Safety Critical Review: Workplace Hazards and Safety Breach

This paper has briefly elaborated on the case of Canberra Construction Company who is liquidised and penalised for breaching workplace health and safety laws. It has shed light on the incident of the death of one of the workers of the company because of poor safety management planning prevailing in the organisation. Furthermore, it has also assessed the different hazards that were associated with the work sites and how the different managerial department showed their negligence to the same. This report is concluded with providing some recommendation for the part of the different authority bodies of the company which, if would have followed, could have stopped the incident from taking place.

Running head: SAFETY CRTICAL REVIEW
Safety Critical Review
Name of the Student:
Name of the University:
Author note:

1SAFETY CRITICAL REVIEW
Executive Summary
This paper has briefly elaborated on the case of Canberra Construction Company who
is liquidised and penalised for breaching workplace health and safety laws. It has shed light
on the incident of the death of one of the workers of the company because of poor safety
management planning prevailing in the organisation. Furthermore, it has also assessed the
different hazards that were associated with the work sites and how the different managerial
department showed their negligence to the same. This report is concluded with providing
some recommendation for the part of the different authority bodies of the company which, if
would have followed, could have stopped the incident from taking place.

2SAFETY CRITICAL REVIEW
Table of Contents
Introduction................................................................................................................................3
Background................................................................................................................................3
The Workplace.......................................................................................................................3
The hazards............................................................................................................................4
How the safety breach could have been avoided?.................................................................4
What actually had happened?.................................................................................................5
How did SAFEWORK resolve the issue?..............................................................................6
What could have been done differently and how would you address the issue if you worked
in the workplace?...................................................................................................................6
Conclusion..................................................................................................................................7
References..................................................................................................................................8

3SAFETY CRITICAL REVIEW
Introduction
Safety has always been the primary concern of any organisation present all around the
globe. This is the reason behind why the Australian federal government is so vocal regarding
the various different safety related incidents happening within the country. The chosen
company for this report is the Canberra construction company of Australia. This paper shall
focus upon the case of the death of truck driver and the penalties that have been imposed by
the Australian government on the Canberra Construction company. This paper will shed light
on describing workplace and hazards. Along with this it shall also describe how the safety
breach could have been avoided in the workplace. Furthermore, it would also describe the
situation in the company that has led to the emergence of hazards there and the way in which
the SAFEWORK have resolved the issue. Moreover, this paper would provide some
significant suggestions on what could have been done differently in order to resolve the issue
and how it would have been addressed if I would have been working in the workplace.
Background
The Workplace
After the very accident of the truck driver, several investigations were made by the
Australian government on the different policies and procedures in regards to the risk and
safety management within Canberra Construction Company. It has been identified that there
were loop holes present within the management but it is to note that the firm showed no
repentance for the very case. They were not sorry for the death of a human which actually
happed because of their own negligence. The name of driver was Michel Booth (Abc.net.au,
2018). Although the firm showed no trace of tension, the Australian government took this
incident very seriously. The condition of the family of the driver was pathetic and this was
taken into consideration by the Australian Industrial Magistrate, Lorraine Walker. He had

4SAFETY CRITICAL REVIEW
accused Kenoss encouraging and allowing poor internal corporate culture within the firm.
With the same, one of the significant factor behind the incident was that the internal
management decisions were not made in proper way in Canberra Construction Company and
it was on the verge of this mishap from a long period of time (Corrs.com.au, 2017). It was
also identified that the safety officer of the firm, who was the son of the general manger had
no clue regarding the safety operations that are been carried out within the company and this
was because of his lack of adequate qualification, knowledge, and idea about how to carry
out the work in effective manner (Friend & Kohn, 2018).
The hazards
Furthermore, it is to state that as per Friend and Kohn (2018), the safety breaches are
necessary to be maintained in every organisations belonging from any industry. Kenoss tried
its best to stop the procedure of investigation and they used several strategies to do so. Many
of the safety policies and procedures have been violated. The management of the working site
was poorly maintained. Along with this, there was absence of safety flags and signs which
would help the workers in identifying that they were already in danger and must hold
whatever work they are doing. Also, there was a smaller storage compound but it was kept
unlocked. There was a great need to keep the place being locked to protect the property inside
it (Xiang et al., 2014). It is also to note that the biggest issue in the power lines is the fact that
the electricity have not been turned off at the time of working at the site. This in turn had
increased the chances of electrocution accidents in greater level. Moreover, it is also to
mention that there was no usage of spotters in the site of work where the worker was
working. This again have increased the risk level by increasing the chances of danger for the
workers working there (Yoon et al., 2013).

5SAFETY CRITICAL REVIEW
How the safety breach could have been avoided?
Kenoss contractors had breached most of the safety rules. It is to state that the incident
could have been avoided if the proper actions could have been taken in the best ways. The
alternatives or alteration of the record of attendance of the worker, Mr Booth could be
conveyed as a sheer breach of the workplace safety rules. Also, the deaths within the
workplace could also be avoided if the policies, rules, regulations and practices were in the
best interest of the workers (Vivoda & Fulcher, 2017).
What actually had happened?
As per the Australian Industrial magistrate, the workplace was completely neglected
in the Canberra Construction Company and that have brought in the unfortunate and
unwanted death of Mr Michael Booth. She has also mentioned electrocution has the reason
behind this event. The electrical wires were been kept in a manner that they were not visible
to the naked eyes as because of the presence of vegetation in that surrounding case (Guiso,
Sapienza & Zingales, 2015). With the same, it is also to mention that she have declared that
the power lines were also not visible and completely clear to the normal people who used to
go there.
The incident could have been avoided if some simple safety precautions from the
parts of the company management department were taken in proper way (Vivoda & Fulcher,
2017). The charge against the project manager named Munir al Hasani came out. It was
identified by the industrial magistrate that the project manager did not try to inform the
visitors about the risks associated with the workplace or the sites. He did not warned any one
of them from visiting the site without proper measures. This failure of his has been identified.
Also, it is said that the project manager did not even make any arrangements for the risk
management operations, although the primary role of a project manager is to manage the
risks within the organization and the site. Hence, he has a great contribution in the entire

6SAFETY CRITICAL REVIEW
mishap. Finally, the industrial magistrate declared the verdict of making the firm go into
liquidation and with the same, have also suggested that the firm shall be given sentence at the
next date. Hence, Kenoss failed to secure the health and safety of his employees and it is an
unforgivable breach of the rules and regulations of workplace (Roper & Fill, 2012).
How did SAFEWORK resolve the issue?
The SAFEWORK Australia gave their ideas and opinions in relation to the incident
about hhow to resolve the issue in best possible way. The National Safety Council of
Australia (NSCA) had also come for investigation upon the same. They investigated the spot
and concluded saying that the firm had completely breached the workplace safety rules and
regulations (Pouliakas & Theodossiou, 2013). It was a very serious offence as they were not
capable of taking care of the health and safety of their workers and employees. An event as
such (death of an individual solely because of organisational negligence) had been
condemned highly across the nation. After the hearing in the Industrial Court of Australia, the
firm was fined an amount of 1.1 billion dollars (Canberratimes.com.au, 2018). It is also to
mention that the SAFEWORK Australia had started to carry out risk assessment procedure
and was highly effective. It has also identified that the authority was wholly unaware of the
fact that health and safety of the employees was at a high risk. They also did not do proper
health monitoring of the workers (Pouliakas & Theodossiou, 2013). The risk assessment
procedures were also not carried out effectively and the reduction procedures of the risk were
not applied to any extent. With the same there was absence of accurate infrastructure as
suggested as per the model codes of practice for the SAFEWORK Australia.
What could have been done differently and how would you address the issue if you worked
in the workplace?
Firstly, the management department of the company should have restricted these sites for the
workers to work as they were lot of risks presents in that area and the contractors were aware of this.

7SAFETY CRITICAL REVIEW
Secondly, proper risk assessment should have been carried out in the workplace in proper manner
before delivering the work. Thirdly, all the employees working in the organisation should have been
warned by the management authority regarding the risks in the working sites and they were to be
provided with certain effective guidelines in order to access those sites if required. This main reason
behind doing this is that there were potential risks in those sites and therefore, the line of accessing
those points for the workers should be restricted. They could have built a fence like structure all
around the work site and the place where the electrical wires were kept with big banners of the sign of
“danger” so that anyone, trying to pass that area gets aware of the risk associated with it (Zanko &
Dawson, 2012). Fourthly, the supply of the electricity should have been turned off by the
electrical department head or any other body who was aware of the risk if the delivery is
scheduled in the working site. Fifthly, the workers could have been provided with spotters so
that they could have taken them with themselves to deliver the goods. Sixthly, the flags
should have be placed at the lines so the truck drivers would be able to see them from far.
Seventhly, each of the users who were using the work site should be made aware of the risks
that are associated with using this site. Lastly, a site induction should be conducted by the
project manager of the company to ensure absence of risk and loss of lives in the workplace
due to working in those sites (Robson et al., 2012).
Conclusion
From the above discussion it is clear that incident in Canberra Construction Company
at Kennoss was a very unfortunate incident for the family of the workers. The lack of safety
and risk management in the workplace has resulted in such a pathetic situation and due to
this, the firm has been liquidated by the Australian government and also many penalties
including the penalty of 1.1 million dollars have been imposed on it
(Enhancesolutions.com.au, 2018). If the organisation is still maintained in the same manner
like it was till date, then no would is potential enough to stop it from getting shattered. It is to

8SAFETY CRITICAL REVIEW
note that the maintenance of proper safety working cultures within an organisation is very
important and the lack of safety has resulted in this incident in Canberra Construction
Company. It has not followed most of the workplace safety measures during its business
operation. This is one of the best example for all the organisations for why workplace health,
safety and risk measures and policies are necessary to be followed.
References
Abc.net.au. (2018). Canberra construction company fined $1.1m over death of truck driver.
Retrieved from http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-08-19/construction-company-fined-
1-million-over-workplace-death/6708032
Canberratimes.com.au (2018). Kenoss Contractors fined $ 1.1 million for workplace death.
Retrieved from https://www.canberratimes.com.au/national/act/kenoss-contractors-
fined-11-million-for-workplace-death-20150819-gj2fra.
Corrs.com.au (2017). Who is an officer under the model work health and safety act?
Retrieved from http://www.corrs.com.au/publications/corrs-in-brief/who-is-an-
officer-under-the-model-work-health-and-safety-act/
Enhancesolutions.com.au (2018). Poor Safety Culture and Lack of Systems Lead to Fatality.
Retrieved from http://www.enhancesolutions.com.au/blog/poor-safety-culture-and-
lack-of-systems-lead-to-fatality
Friend, M. A., & Kohn, J. P. (2018). Fundamentals of occupational safety and health.
Rowman & Littlefield.
Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2015). The value of corporate culture. Journal of
Financial Economics, 117(1), 60-76.

9SAFETY CRITICAL REVIEW
Pouliakas, K., & Theodossiou, I. (2013). The economics of health and safety at work: an
interdiciplinary review of the theory and policy. Journal of Economic Surveys, 27(1),
167-208.
Robson, L. S., Stephenson, C. M., Schulte, P. A., Amick III, B. C., Irvin, E. L., Eggerth, D.
E., ... & Peters, R. H. (2012). A systematic review of the effectiveness of occupational
health and safety training. Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health, 193-
208.
Roper, S., & Fill, C. (2012). Corporate reputation: brand and communication. Harlow:
Pearson.
Vivoda, V., & Fulcher, J. (2017). Occupational Health and Safety (No. Mining Legislation
Reform Initiative, Working Paper No. 6, pp. 1-8). Mining Legislation Reform
Initiative, AUA Center for Responsible Mining.
Xiang, J., Bi, P., Pisaniello, D., & Hansen, A. (2014). Health impacts of workplace heat
exposure: an epidemiological review. Industrial health, 52(2), 91-101.
Yoon, S. J., Lin, H. K., Chen, G., Yi, S., Choi, J., & Rui, Z. (2013). Effect of occupational
health and safety management system on work-related accident rate and differences of
occupational health and safety management system awareness between managers in
South Korea's construction industry. Safety and health at work, 4(4), 201-209.
Zanko, M., & Dawson, P. (2012). Occupational health and safety management in
organizations: A review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 14(3), 328-
344.