Safety in Kinderloop: Benefits, Cost Structure, Key Resources and Partners, Feasibility
Verified
Added on 2023/06/11
|12
|913
|67
AI Summary
This presentation discusses the benefits, cost structure, key resources and partners, and feasibility of implementing safety measures in Kinderloop for children aged 3-10 years.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
SAFETY IN KINDERLOOP
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Introduction In the recent business operations, it is important for the organizations to adopt the innovations so that the business can be sustainable in nature. The failure of the organization in adopting the new ideas will not enable them to survive in the longer run
Reason of the innovation In Australia, it can be seen that the development of the children is an important aspect that helps the country to grow further (Schonert- Reichl et al., 2015). The use of right educational functions will help the children in understanding the values that are present within the country. The advantages of developing the children in a proper manner will help them as follows: Emotional development Skill development Increasing the learning capacity Developing the knowledge and understanding (Marotz, 2014)
Benefits of the idea Help in securing the safety of the children within the organization Will monitor the activities of the children in a proper manner so that the development can be documented properly Proper feedback regarding the security system can be provided to the organization (Khwaja et al., 2014)
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Cost structure The initial cost for the safety measures needs to be borne by the clients Premium security services will be given at an amount of $100 The clients can opt for normal services where the children will not be monitored
Revenue Streams The fees that will be taken up from the clients The advertisements that will be provided The B2B model that will help in promoting the facility in other organizations (Boyd et al., 2013)
Key Resources and Key Partners The technology for the safety measures will be high end so that the safety measures can be installed properly The partners will be the safety companies that will help in installing the applications within the organization.
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Customer Relationships andCustomer Segments The company will cater to clients of various age groups. Most importantly, the children who are aged between 3-10 years will be admitted in to the organization so that proper development can be ensured. The interaction with the clients can be done in a direct manner, as they will provide a nominal fee for the first 3 months after the safety measures have been installed
Success factors Monitoring development Researching the market Technology usage Risk control
Feasibility
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Conclusion The above analysis shows that the installation of the safety measures will be profitable for Kinderloop, as the success factors of the organization depends on meeting the requirements. The idea feasibility is positive and it depends on the demands in the market along with the benefits. Thus it can be stated that the use of the safety measures will help the organization to be sustainable.
References Boyd, A., Golding, J., Macleod, J., Lawlor, D. A., Fraser, A., Henderson, J., ... & Davey Smith, G. (2013). Cohort profile: the ‘children of the 90s’—the index offspring of the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children. International journal of epidemiology, 42(1), 111-127. Crittenden, P. M. (2013). Raising parents: Attachment, parenting and child safety. Routledge. Gordon, R. A., Fujimoto, K., Kaestner, R., Korenman, S., & Abner, K. (2013). An assessment of the validity of the ECERS-R with implications for measures of child care quality and relations to child development. Developmental psychology, 49(1), 146. Jones, L. M., Mitchell, K. J., & Finkelhor, D. (2013). Online harassment in context: Trends from three youth internet safety surveys (2000, 2005, 2010). Psychology of violence, 3(1), 53. Khwaja, O. S., Ho, E., Barnes, K. V., O’Leary, H. M., Pereira, L. M., Finkelstein, Y., ... & Khatwa, U. (2014). Safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary assessment of efficacy of mecasermin (recombinant human IGF-1) for the treatment of Rett syndrome. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(12), 4596-4601. Marotz, L. R. (2014). Health, safety, and nutrition for the young child. Nelson Education. Schonert-Reichl, K. A., Oberle, E., Lawlor, M. S., Abbott, D., Thomson, K., Oberlander, T. F., & Diamond, A. (2015). Enhancing cognitive and social–emotional development through a simple-to-administer mindfulness-based school program for elementary school children: A randomized controlled trial. Developmental psychology, 51(1), 52. Singh, A., Park, A., & Dercon, S. (2013). School meals as a safety net: an evaluation of the midday meal scheme in India. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 62(2), 275-306.