Safety and Risk Management in Construction Company in Canberra

This study highlights on the risks and security management in Construction Company in Canberra that has been fined $1.1 million due to the death of a truck driver. It focuses on description of workplace, description of hazards and ways safety breach could have been avoided. Serious safety breaches and no signs of warning on the live power lines have been the cause of accident. The guidelines of Occupational Health and Safety act 2004 and Work health and Safety Act 2011 have been analyzed in this context.

Running head: Safety And Risk Management
SAFETY AND RISK MANAGEMENT

2
Safety And Risk Management
Executive summary
This study highlights on the risks and security management in Construction Company in
Canberra that has been fined $1.1 million due to the death of a truck driver. It focuses on
description of workplace, description of hazards and ways safety breach could have been
avoided. Serious safety breaches and no signs of warning on the live power lines have been the
cause of accident. The guidelines of Occupational Health and Safety act 2004 and Work health
and Safety Act 2011 have been analyzed in this context. In addition, actual happenings, ways
SAFEWORK could have resolved the issue along with ways by which accident could have been
prevented have been analyzed. Recommendations of implementing adequate health and safety
policies and risk management have been given.

3
Safety And Risk Management
Table of Contents
Introduction......................................................................................................................................3
Findings and Analysis......................................................................................................................3
Description of workplace.............................................................................................................3
Description of hazards.................................................................................................................3
Ways safety breach could have been avoided..............................................................................4
Actual happenings........................................................................................................................4
Ways SAFEWORK could have resolved the issue......................................................................5
Ways by which accident could have been prevented...................................................................6
Reflection regarding safety systems in the workplace.................................................................6
Recommendations and Conclusion..................................................................................................7
References........................................................................................................................................9

4
Safety And Risk Management
Introduction
Risk and safety management is considered to be the most important aspect for
organizations as it helps in ensuring safety practices and adhering to governmental norms. This
study focuses on a construction company in Canberra that has been fined $1.1 million due to the
death of a truck driver. It highlights workplace hazards and ways it could have been prevented.
In addition, it focuses on actual happenings and ways SAFEWORK could have resolved the
issue. Ways by which this accident could have been prevented has been analyzed. Reflection has
also been provided regarding the ways safety systems in the workplace can be implemented.
Findings and Analysis
Description of workplace
Kenosis contractors Pty Ltd is a construction company in Canberra that is involved in
street and highways construction. According to Taylor (2015), the company has not been able to
adhere to safety norms which have resulted in electrocution of the driver. It has poor working
culture as the son of general manager has been appointed as safety officer in spite of having no
qualification for the job. Wok site of the contractors is under power lines and no safety measures
have been implemented which has resulted in this accident. Apathetic and negligence attitude of
employees have led to electrocution. The company lacks coordination and cooperation with its
employees and its poor corporate culture has made employees dissatisfied (2cc.net.au, 2018).
Description of hazards
According to Inman (2015), the construction has been fined $1.1 million due to its failure
in its safety measures with respect to the death of a truck driver. Booth's truck has come in

5
Safety And Risk Management
contact with Low slung power lines which have resulted in electrocution. Sadgrove (2016) is of
the view that accidents in construction companies can result from working under or near power
lines, handling of chemicals and dealing with faulty types of equipment. In this case, the
company has not taken proper steps in warning these workers regarding the hazards and has
failed to cooperate with the authorities in time of investigation (Taylor, 2015). The incident has
happened on the working site of Canberra Company Kenoss Contractors.
Ways safety breach could have been avoided
Safety breach could have been appointed if the company has issued a safety warning to
its employees and abolition of work site under power lines. The company should have
implemented the guidelines of Occupational Health and Safety act 2004 and Workhealth and
Safety Act 2011 for preventing these types of accidents (content.safetyculture.com.au, 2015).
Moreover, the abolition of work site under power lines could have prevented this accident. As
per the Occupational Health and Safety act 2004, it is important for the companies to implement
adequate health and safety measures for preventing workplace accidents (worksafe.qld.gov.au,
2016). In addition, adequate compensation should be provided to workers who have died or
suffered injuries due to an accident in the workplace. On the other hand, the Work Health and
Safety Act 2011 states of a framework which are required to be followed by companies for
protecting the safety, welfare, and health of workers (worksafe.qld.gov.au, 2016).
Actual happenings
Mr. Booth of Gunning has been delivering a load consisting of gravel type materials to a
road resurfacing project which has been run by Kenosis Contractors. He has taken the load to a
small fenced off compound in the worksite where piping and other piles of material has been

6
Safety And Risk Management
lying. The truck of Mr. Booth either has been connected or came close to the power lines,
resulting in an electrical arc which is strong enough for deflating the tires and leaving burn marks
on the road (whitecardonlineexpress.com.au, 2015). At that moment, Booth has jumped out of
the truck and collapsed which has resulted in death. The prosecution has alleged that serious
safety breaches have resulted in a fatality.
There have been no signs of warning on the live power lines, the compound has not been
locked and it has appeared to be a dumping ground. Nothing has been done to turn off the power
lines during working hours, no visual warnings have been attached to make it more visible and
worksite has been poorly managed (nsca.org.au, 2015). Moreover, the company has not obliged
by guidelines of Corporate law as the security officer has no enough influence or control in
operations. It has been found that the maximum penalty which the court can impose for safety
breaches is $1.5 million (cgw.com.au, 2016). Moreover, the risks have been known to the
company and affordable and simple methods could have helped in avoiding death.
Ways SAFEWORK could have resolved the issue
Model WHS regulations state that the person who is commissioned with construction
work need to consult with the designer for safety matters and safety measures which can prevent
accidents. Under this model of the WHS Act, the person in control or management of a
workplace needs to ensure that activities in the workplace do not lead to risks for any individuals
(safework.nsw.gov.au, 2016). In this case, SAFEWORK could have helped the company to
implement adequate safety measures and issues warnings to workers. It could have helped the
driver of the company to know areas of risks and reduce working under power lines. As per the
duties of work health and safety, specific duties which are applicable to contractors include
giving required knowledge about safety procedures to workers. The duty of the workers is to

7
Safety And Risk Management
inform, keep, review and prepare others regarding WHS management plan in the construction
area. The above-mentioned procedures could have helped the company to prevent the accident
and give $1.1 million due to safety breaches.
Ways by which accident could have been prevented
The construction company could have prevented this accident by following appropriate
work health and safety duties and issue warnings to its workers. The work site should not be
under power lines and flags or safety warnings should have given regarding live power lines.
According to Gurcanli, Bilir & Sevim (2015), the work site should have properly managed and it
should not have an appearance like that of a dumping ground.
During the working hours, the power lines should have been cut and the systematic
approach should have been implemented for reducing the accidents. This could have prevented
the aforementioned accident. However, this heavy fine has given a strong warning to the
companies regarding safety procedures and processes to be adopted. As per the view of Tappura,
Sievänen, Heikkilä, Jussila, & Nenonen (2015), a Strong message is required to be given to
employees for addressing the risks of working near or under overhead power lines. However, the
minister of Workplace Safety and Industrial Relations is of the view that this would be sent a
strong message to the construction industry regarding the importance of safety in the workplace
and well-known risks which are associated with working under or near active power lines.
Reflection regarding safety systems in the workplace
If I have been responsible for the safety systems in the workplace, then I would have
given flags or warning systems in the site near power lines which could have prevented the
accident. As a safety officer, it is my responsibility to monitor and control the internal operations

8
Safety And Risk Management
so that the workers remain protected from accidents. I would have ensured that adequate
workplace safety and health duty is implemented so that the health of the driver would not have
jeopardized. In the words of Wu, Liu, Zhang, Skibniewski & Wang (2015), adequate corporate
culture and effective communication is required so that employees are aware of safety rules and
regulations. A strong safety approach would have been implemented so that workers would not
have faced any safety problems while doing their duties.
I would have implemented a proper safety and health framework which could have
helped in giving adequate compensation to the electrocuted driver. Power lines would have been
cut during working hours and adequate safety mechanisms would have been put in place so that
it could have given a signal when the truck has entered in power lines. In addition to this,
effective communication and coordination would have been implemented for ensuring that the
needs and interests of the employees have been paid heed. Implementation of regular monitoring
and reviewing system would have helped in getting regular updates of the company.
Recommendations and Conclusion
It can be recommended that the construction company should have implemented
adequate health and safety standards which could have prevented this accident. The other
construction companies should take it as the outcomes if they are not able to implement adequate
safety measures and ensure workplace safety. Moreover, the government needs to be stringent
and vigilant for ensuring adequate implementation of safety and health laws. The trail which is
conducted for accidents and work safety issues should be completed in a time bound manner so
that it can create deterrence among employees of other organizations. In addition, the
government should set a special committee which should monitor and review workplace safety
and health standards implemented by companies.

9
Safety And Risk Management
It can be concluded that Canberra construction company Kenosis contractors Pty Ltd has
failed to implement adequate health and safety standards which could have prevented
electrocution of the truck driver. It is the negligence of the company for providing adequate
safety and health procedures for employees. The heavy penalty that has been imposed by the
court should act as a deterrent for those companies who have been unable to implement adequate
safety and risk management. Moreover, the company has tried to falsify records and data of the
driver to hinder the investigation and given no compensation for the death of the driver. It is the
responsibility of the security offered to ensure that the workplace safety and health are
maintained. Moreover, the management should have given more power and authority to the
officer for controlling workplace accidents. A strong safety approach and adequate warning
systems would have helped in preventing the accident and company paying huge millions as a
fine.

10
Safety And Risk Management
References
2cc.net.au. (2018) Canberra construction company fined $1.1 million over workplace death
Retrieved on 11 Jan 2018 from: http://www.2cc.net.au/localnews/3848-canberra-
construction-company-fined-1-1-million-over-workplace-death.html
cgw.com.au. (2016) Contractor fined $1.1 million for truck driver’s electrocution death
Retrieved on 11 Jan 2018 from: https://www.cgw.com.au/publication/contractor-fined-1-
1-million-for-truck-drivers-electrocution-death/
content.safetyculture.com.au. (2015) Canberra construction company fined over workplace
death Retrieved on 11 Jan 2018 from:
http://content.safetyculture.com.au/news/index.php/08/canberra-construction-company-
fined-workplace-death/#.W7HmryQzbIU
Gurcanli, G. E., Bilir, S., & Sevim, M. (2015). Activity based risk assessment and safety cost
estimation for residential building construction projects. Safety science, 80, 1-12.
Inman, M. (2015) Kenoss Contractors fined $1.1 million for workplace death Retrieved on 11
Jan 2018 from: https://www.canberratimes.com.au/national/act/kenoss-contractors-fined-
11-million-for-workplace-death-20150819-gj2fra.html
nsca.org.au. (2015) Company fined $1.1 million Retrieved on 11 Jan 2018 from:
https://nsca.org.au/prosecution-fined/company-fined-1-1-million/
Sadgrove, K. (2016). The complete guide to business risk management. Abingdon: Routledge.
safework.nsw.gov.au. (2016) Safework Retrieved on 11 Jan 2018 from:
http://www.safework.nsw.gov.au/health-and-safety/consultation-@-work/resolving-
issues

11
Safety And Risk Management
Tappura, S., Sievänen, M., Heikkilä, J., Jussila, A., & Nenonen, N. (2015). A management
accounting perspective on safety. Safety science, 71, 151-159.
Taylor, C. (2015) $1.1 million fine for company after ‘very preventable death’ Retrieved on 11
Jan 2018 from: https://www.wcd.net.au/2015/08/20/heavy-fines-for-companys-after-
preventable-deaths/
Taylor, G. (2015) Canberra construction company fined $1.1 million over death of truck driver
Retrieved on 11 Jan 2018 from: http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-08-19/construction-
company-fined-1-million-over-workplace-death/6708032
whitecardonlineexpress.com.au. (2015) Construction Company Fined $1.1 million For
Workplace Fatality Retrieved on 11 Jan 2018 from:
https://www.whitecardonlineexpress.com.au/industry-news/construction-company-fined-
1-1-million-for-workplace-fatality/
worksafe.qld.gov.au. (2016) Guide to the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 Retrieved on 11 Jan
2018 from: https://www.worksafe.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/82545/guide-
to-work-health-and-safety-act-2011.pdf
worksafe.qld.gov.au. (2016) Work Health and Safety Act 2011
https://www.worksafe.qld.gov.au/laws-and-compliance/workplace-health-and-safety-
laws/laws-and-legislation/work-health-and-safety-act-2011
Wu, X., Liu, Q., Zhang, L., Skibniewski, M. J., & Wang, Y. (2015). Prospective safety
performance evaluation on construction sites. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 78, 58-72.