Ratio Analysis for Tesco and Sainsbury: A Financial Performance Comparison

This report analyzes the financial performance of Tesco and Sainsbury through ratio analysis. It examines liquidity ratios, profitability ratios, gearing ratios, and more. Recommendations for improving financial performance are also provided.

Finance

INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................................3
PORTFOLIO 1............................................................................................................................................3
Ratio analysis..........................................................................................................................................3
PORTFOLIO 2..........................................................................................................................................14
Investment appraisal techniques............................................................................................................14
CONCLUSION.........................................................................................................................................18

INTRODUCTION
Money is the foundation of each business and to decide valid and reasonable situation of
budgetary circumstance of each business is as fundamental as bread for an individual. In this
unique circumstance (Enyi, 2019), there are different devices and strategies those can be utilized
as a method of deciding the budgetary situation of a business. This activity is vital so that in the
wake of examining into budgetary situation of that firm, productive key arranging should be
possible for future game-plan. This report is isolated into two portfolios. Initial segment is
focusing on examination of budgetary situation of Tesco plc and Sainsbury's plc through device
of proportion investigation. Abundance reliance of money related proportions is likewise not a
decent technique in since quite a while ago run and it is additionally clarified in this report.
Moreover, second portfolio is discussing significance of venture evaluation procedures which are
utilized to decide and recognize right and proper speculation choice for an organization.
PORTFOLIO 1
Ratio analysis
Tesco plc
Name of ratio Calculation Result
2018 2019
Current ratio Current assets/ current
liabilities
13,726 / 19,238
= 0.713484
12668/2
0680
=
0.61257
3
Quick ratio Quick assets/ current
liabilities
4379/ 19238
= 0.227622
3373/ 20680
= 0.163104

Net profit margin Net profit/ total sales (1206/57491)*100
=2.097%
(1322/63911)*100
= 2.068%
Gross profit margin Gross profit/ total sales (3350/57491)*100
= 5.827%
(4144/63911)*100
= 6.484%
Gearing ratio
(Debt to Equity Ratio)
Total debt/ total equity 44862/10480
= 4.280%
49047 / 14858
= 3.301%
P/E ratio Market value per share/
Earnings per share
229/ 9.35
=24.49
213.6/13.65
= 16.97
Earnings per share Income available/ total
number of shares
outstanding
9.35 13.65
Return on capital
employed
Operating profit/ capital
employed
5.13 6.86
Average inventories
turnover period
Net sales/ average
inventory
57491/2282.5
= 25.91 days
63911/2240.5
= 28.52 days.
Dividend pay-out ratio Dividend paid/ net
income
82/1206
= 0.68.
357/1322
= 0.27
Sainsbury plc
Name of ratio Calculation Result
2018 2019
Current ratio Current assets/ current
liabilities
7857/10302
=0.73
7550/11849
=0.63
Quick ratio Quick assets/ current
liabilities
1933/10302
=0.19
1283/11849
=0.19
Net profit margin Net profit/ total sales 309/28456
=0.11%
186/29007
=0.006%
Gross profit margin Gross profit/ total sales 518/28456 601/29007

=0.018% =0.02%
Gearing ratio
(Debt to Equity Ratio)
Total debt/ total equity 34.44 97.75
P/E ratio Market value per share/
Earnings per share
238.80/0.22
=10.85
213.40/46
=4.64
Earnings per share Income available/ total
number of shares
outstanding
22 46
Return on capital
employed
Operating profit/ capital
employed
4.65 3.84
Average inventories
turnover period
Net sales/ average
inventory
28456/1792.5
=15.87 days.
29007/1869.5
=15.51 days.
Dividend pay-out ratio Dividend paid/ net
income
235/309
=0.76
247/186
=1.33
1. Current proportion: It is a proportion that characterizes the liquidity position of the
organization and it speaks to the limit of firm to take care of its present liabilities with the
assistance of current resources (Ergun and et.al., 2019. This implies that organization will have
the option to take care of those liabilities which are expected in coming 1 year or so with
practically fluid resources, for example, money, inventories, borrowers, and so forth Ideal
proportion as per different speculations and models is 2:1. In the given instance of Tesco and
Sainsbury, investigation is done over a time of 2 years, previous has a proportion of 0.71 and
0.61 in 2018 and 2019, separately. If there should arise an occurrence of sainsbury, 0.73 and 0.63
separately in two range periods. Condition is practically same in both the organizations in both
the time-frame. In this manner, it tends to be reasoned that the two of them are similarly acting in
their working capital. Proportion isn't according to the ideal imprint and as per results, it is low
and current resources are insufficient to pay out current liabilities

2. Quick proportion: it is a kind of proportion that essentially goes about as a genuine
introduction of liquidity position of firm, as it just takes real fluid or fast resources into thought.
At the end of the day, it tends to be clarified as that esteem which speaks to the capacity of firm
to take care of its present liabilities from fast resources or money and money counterparts. As
indicated by basic hypotheses and models, 1:1 is the ideal benchmark for the proportion. In the
given instance of tesco and sainsbury, their optimal proportions are not sufficient. The
circumstance is better in tesco when contrasted with the other organization. However, both the
organizations are performing exceptionally low when contrasted with the ideal benchmark (Kim
and Im, 2017)

.
3. Net overall revenue: it is essentially a pointer of organization's exhibition as far as the
measure of benefit that it produced in a particular timeframe. This edge is made dependent on the
measure of deals (Echimova and Yurasova, 2018) Higher the overall revenue, higher is the
benefit of the firm. This benefit measure is endless supply of elements, for example, backhanded
costs, tax collection sum, and so forth in the given instance of tesco and sainsbury, productivity
isn't experiencing any critical increment more than 2018 and 2019. Rather, the diagram is easing
back down. In correlation, tesco is performing better when contrasted with other organization.

4. Gross net revenue: it is the introduction of gross productivity of the firm. As such, it very
well may be clarified as the marker of execution of organization prior to bringing about
backhanded costs. As the name recommends, it speaks to net productivity of the organization and
its root execution. The primary factor that impacts this degree of benefit is deals volume and
direct costs in the firm. In given instance of genuine organizations, execution of the two
organizations is declining, however in examination it tends to be expressed that Tesco is
performing in a way that is better than Sainsbury (Robinson, 2020).
.
5. Gearing proportions: The outfitting proportion is a budgetary proportion that looks at
some type of proprietor's value (or money) to obligation, or assets obtained by the organization.
Equipping is an estimation of the element's budgetary influence, which shows how much a
company's exercises are supported by investors' assets versus leaser's assets. The equipping
proportion is a proportion of monetary influence that shows how much an association's activities
are supported by value capital versus obligation financing (Нугуманова, 2016). In the given
instance of Tesco and Sainsbury, tesco is having less weight of obligation and then again,

sainsbury is having an exceptionally weighty weight of obligation. Tesco has diminished the
weight more than two years and sainsbury has nearly multiplied it up
6. Price to Earning ratio: it is also known as price multiple or earnings multiple. This is basically
an indicator of comparison of current market price of share and per share earnings. This is a
ratio that is useful for investors and analysts and they use this ratios to evaluate various
investment options that are available for them. If one option is having higher returns on relatively
low market rate, than that option is considered to be more profitable. In given situation of Tesco
and Sainsbury, price to earnings ratio is decreasing over the year. In comparison, it is very clear
that former is performing better that the latter (Li and Trutnevyte, 2017).

7. Earnings per share: It is essentially the pointer of productivity that is gotten by the
investor. It is determined by partitioning complete organization's benefit by all out number of
exceptional offers on the lookout. It is a typical thought, that higher the EPS, higher will be the
productivity proportion of the organization. In given circumstance, the circumstance is similarly
better in Sainsbury, as the EPS is higher in this organization in correlation with Tesco. The two
organizations are experiencing a development is EPS bar and along these lines, it tends to be
expressed that the two organizations are performing great as far as benefit (Elmassri, Harris and
Carter, 2016).

8. Return on capital utilized: It is fundamentally a budgetary proportion that is utilized to
reflect benefit and position of proficiency of utilization of capital in the organization. In
straightforward words, it very well may be clarified as the marker of the measuring stick that
presents the organization's presentation in creating benefits from its capital speculation. It is
valuable device for budgetary administrators, partners and furthermore likely financial specialists
and they utilize this proportion as an apparatus for investigating conceivable productivity in the
wake of making interest into organization. In given circumstance, this condition is better in
Tesco, instead of the other organization. Additionally tesco is picturing development in the
proportion. Then again, Sainsbury is defying decay.

9. Inventory turnover normal period: this proportion is a marker of the time span that
normal stock takes to auction totally. This implies it is the time span, which the organization is
taking to auction a bunch of stock and bringing the upgraded one. More limited this period,
implies the organization is having a high deals volume. In the given case, sainsbury is taking
more limited time span, in this way, it very well may be expressed that last has higher deals
volume.
10. Dividend payout proportion: it is the examination between aggregate sum of profit paid
to investors and the overall gain of the organization. It speaks to the level of profit paid to
investors regarding profit out of net gain of organization. The sum that isn't paid to investors is
held by the organization to take care of obligation or to reinvest in center tasks. It is now and
again essentially alluded to as the 'payout proportion.' In the given instance of examination
among Tesco and Sainsbury, the circumstance is better in last as it is countering development in
the chart and furthermore previous is envisioning decrease in the proportion

Proposals
 From the about report it has been suggested that organization should screen and access
stock level if it is overseen successfully. This will help in improving Quick proportion.
 For improving liquidity proportion, organization should run advancements and offer
limits on their items to diminish stock and produce benefit.
 Company should direct an examination for the interest of the items and distinguish what
components are liable for spurring low interest. This improves interest inclusion
proportion (Kent, 2017). This additionally incorporates purchasing conduct of clients,
contenders investigation, and organizations showcasing methodologies and so on
 To improve productivity proportion in account at that point organization needs to
diminish its working costs and work towards boosting net revenue. There can likewise be
a natty gritty examination of cost and evaluating structure. This will help the organization
in gazing incredible.
 If organization turns excessively high, at that point it isn't likely that organization couldn't
convey enough stock to satisfy its clients’ needs. So for that, organization should screen
its stock and consistently saves right equilibrium for their stock.

 A low Assets turnover proportion demonstrates that organization isn't working at its full
limit and not using its resources appropriately. So for this , organization ought to
investigate its resources appropriately
Restriction of ratio analysis
Like some other procedure of monetary investigation method, proportion examination is
likewise having certain constraints and they are as per the following:
 Historical data: The fundamental test with this device of investigation is that it is
determined based on part results. Examinations are finished to increase an
information which can help money related directors to get ready for future course of
activities. Thusly, it very well may be expressed that proportion investigation doesn't
give an away from of future money related execution of organization (Duklewski,
Holdai and Wainwright, 2018).
 Inflationary impacts: Ratio investigation is done dependent on the information and
data outfitted by fiscal summaries of the organization and these assertions are
delivered on fixed periodical premise. In this way, estimation part of proportion
investigation additionally experiences delay between two explicit delivery dates of
fiscal reports. In the event that monetary state of nation stands up to some
circumstance of expansion or emptying, than it might influence the numbers in fiscal
summary also. This effect is reflected further in proportions and subsequently, makes
them unique. In long haul period, if proportions are exceptional of two money related
year, than it might present test before vital arranging measure
 Changes in bookkeeping strategies: If the organization has changed its bookkeeping
approaches and methods, this may essentially influence budgetary detailing. For this
situation, the key budgetary measurements used in proportion investigation are
modified and the monetary outcomes recorded after the change are not tantamount to
the outcomes recorded preceding the change. It is dependent upon the investigator to
be fully informed regarding changes to bookkeeping arrangements. Changes made are
commonly found in the notes to the fiscal summaries area (Kengatharan, 2016).
.

 Projects can't be estimated in real money terms: There are a few ventures which can't
be determined as far as money. Social, Political, Military undertakings are a few
activities which can't be estimated in real money terms. Undertakings like foundation
subsidizing for needy individuals to have feast or building new trip for military
reason fall under this classification. Net present worth model isn't reasonable for these
sorts of tasks. A few activities contains money and non-money both. These ventures
might be affirm with negative NPV gave they have some extra non-money benefits
decided to be adequate acceptable incentive for money to more than have up effect.
PORTFOLIO 2
Investment appraisal techniques
In the given situation, most suitable tool of evaluating available alternative is Net
Present Value method and accordingly, calculations are made as follows:
Project A
NET
PROFITS
DICOUNTING
RATE
PRESENT
VALUE
45000 0.862 38790
45000 0.743 33435
45000 0.641 28845
35000 0.552 19320
35000 0.476 16660
25000 0.41 10250
147300
Less: Initial investment 110000

Net present value 37300
Project B
NET
PROFITS
DICOUNTING
RATE
PRESENT
VALUE
10000 0.862 8620
15000 0.743 11145
25000 0.641 16025
55000 0.552 30360
65000 0.476 30940
58000 0.41 23780
120870
Less: Initial investment 110000
Net present value 10870
Interpretation: According to above counts, net present worth is the sum that is compute in the
wake of deciding all current worth mulling over limiting rate and deducting beginning money
surge. As per this idea, the task having higher net present worth is viewed as more productive.
As per this head, venture An is more productive for the organization and it is suggested for
determination.
Limitations of utilizing investment appraisal techniques:
There are a few venture examination methods those can be utilized to assess speculation
choices accessible with the board of a firm. To show, compensation period, inside pace of return,

net present worth technique, and so forth In the given circumstance, reasonable technique is net
present worth strategy. It likewise has certain impediments as clarified beneath:
 Selection of reasonable limiting rate: In this strategy, the main test is through ascertaining
limiting rate. Limiting rate is fundamentally that transformation rate which is utilized to
decide the current estimation of some future incomes. This rate is endless supply of
elements, for example, hazard related with the alternative, arithmetical precision, and so
forth These all elements if not considered precisely, than may prompt ID of an off-base
rate. This progression may prompt total disappointment of cycle and a colossal budgetary
misfortune for the organization.
 Determining cost of capital and incomes: The expense of capital is the pace of return
necessitated that makes a speculation beneficial. It decides if the profit for a venture
merits the danger. At the point when an organization chooses whether to make a
speculation, it needs to set a fitting expense of capital. On the off chance that it points too
high, at that point it might decide a venture does not merit the hazard and have a botched
chance. On the other hand, if the expense of capital is excessively low, it could be settling
on speculation choices that are not beneficial. At the point when a venture doesn't have an
ensured return it very well may be hard to decide the incomes from that speculation. This
can at times be the situation for organizations that put resources into new hardware or
choices dependent on business extension. An organization can gauge the sort of incomes
these speculation choices may have, yet there is an opportunity they could be off by a
critical rate (Honesty, Honesty and Pebriyani, 2020).
 Investment size: it is a typical thought that a higher NPV speaks to alternative that is
better venture. However, this is anything but a confirmed certainty, as though there are
two speculation choices that are accessible for settling on decision with the
administration of an organization and one choice is having a bigger cost or scale, than it
will clearly report a higher NPV, then again a little expense choice may have better
yields. Along these lines, this procedure is end up being a dubious idea for assessment of
undertakings having inconsistent size. To increase an exact image of productivity of a
speculation choice, it is important to focus on figuring of profits, rather that current
estimation of incomes.

 Additional cost: NPV is a smaller idea as it incorporates just the incomes that are
acquired during this task life cycle. This strategy neglects to perceive those costs which
can be significant for the benefit of a venture. To show, opportunity costs are one sort of
costs that might be a significant thought in picking a speculation elective, however net
present worth technique doesn't take these kind of cost in thought.
 Expressed in total terms: Result of net present worth strategy is communicated in
supreme terms and henceforth, it gets hard to contrast this outcome and some other
criterion of size of speculation. On the off chance that administration needs to assess
more than one choices of speculation, than most significant component is to look at
future productivity of every one of these alternatives. On the off chance that the outcome
is in supreme terms, than correlation is preposterous. This is one of the main restrictions
of net present worth technique.
 Manipulation of budget summary: proportion examination depends on the investigation
which is recorded in fiscal report of the organization. This investigation might be
controlled by the organization to record it better outcomes then its genuine execution in
the budget summary. Subsequently, proportion investigation didn't reflect genuine
execution of the business. As there may be deception or misstep in any data on the
grounds that these errors are not recognized in basic investigation. It is a lot of significant
that the expert ought to identify these errors and must mindful about conceivable control
and make end appropriately
 No regular principles: this is the another restriction as it is hard to ascertain a typical
norm of correlation since circumstances contrast from worry to concern and nature of
each organization is unique in relation to another. For instance a business having
proportion 3:2 probably won't be in that condition to pay its liabilities on time on account
of a negative dissemination of survey. In like manner, on opposite side another
organization having proportion 3:2 may not confront any issue to pay its obligation on
time as a result of its great appropriation of current resources
CONCLUSION
From the above report, it very well may be explained that simple investigating money
related position isn't significant, to break down and ascertain about various venture choices

accessible with the administration is likewise fundamental. As money is most significant piece of
each organization, along these lines, it is fundamental that organization is dealing with their
assets at each progression and guaranteeing they are being used in ideal way.

REFERENCES
Books and Journals
Enyi, E.P., 2019. Relational Trend Analysis: A Simple and Effective Way To Detect Financial
Statements Fraud. Enyi, E. P,(2019). Relational Trend Analysis: A simple and effective
way to detect financial statements fraud, International Journal of Scientific and Research
Publications. 9(2). pp.538-546.
Ergun, Ü. and et.al., 2019. Analysis of Article Methodologies on Financial Statements’
Transparency. Ethics and Sustainability in Accounting and Finance. 1. p.213.
Kim, J.H. and Im, C.C., 2017. Reported Profits And Effective Tax Rate Following Accounting
Standards Changes Analysis Of Consolidated Financial Statements And Separate
Financial Statements. Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR). 33(6). pp.1171-
1186.
Echimova, A. and Yurasova, I.O., 2018. Fraud in Financial statements. Современные научные
исследования и разработки. (12). pp.33-35.
Robinson, T.R., 2020. International financial statement analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
Нугуманова, Г.А., 2016. COMPARISON OF INVESTMENT APPRAISAL TECHNIQUES.
In НАЧАЛО В НАУКЕ (pp. 134-137).
Li, F.G. and Trutnevyte, E., 2017. Investment appraisal of cost-optimal and near-optimal
pathways for the UK electricity sector transition to 2050. Applied energy. 189. pp.89-109.
Elmassri, M.M., Harris, E.P. and Carter, D.B., 2016. Accounting for strategic investment
decision-making under extreme uncertainty. The British Accounting Review. 48(2).
pp.151-168.
Kent, R., 2017. Cost Management in Plastics Processing: Strategies, Targets, Techniques, and
Tools. Elsevier.
Duklewski, B., Holdai, V. and Wainwright, B., 2018. Some Limitations of Financial
Models. UMAP Journal. 39(1).
Kengatharan, L., 2016. Capital budgeting theory and practice: a review and agenda for future
research. Applied Economics and Finance. 3(2). pp.15-38.
Honesty, F.F., Honesty, H.N. and Pebriyani, D., 2020, March. The Analysis of Accounting
Students Perception to the Financial Statements Reporting. In 4th Padang International
Conference on Education, Economics, Business and Accounting (PICEEBA-2 2019) (pp.
86-93). Atlantis Press.