L1 Transfer vs L2 Development Error Analysis

Verified

Added on  2021/04/17

|10
|3486
|68
AI Summary
This assignment requires a detailed analysis of a language error made by an ELL student. The student's sentence 'Put in one side of the equation the number and in the other one the variables' is examined for semantic meaning, with the conclusion that it is ambiguous and offers incomplete information. The error is then attributed to L2 development due to McLaughlin's Attention-Processing Model, which suggests that learners may make errors due to not fully processing linguistic rules for a new language. The student's choice of words and arrangement are noted as being inappropriate, leading to a sentence with no semantic sense. Two references, Frisk (2014) and Radford (1999), are used to support this analysis.

Contribute Materials

Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your documents today.
Document Page
Surname 1
Assignment B – Written Language Analysis Project
Student Name
Lecturer’s Name
Course Name and Number
Date Submitted
Name:
Native Language of Student: Spanish (not Thai as stated in the video!)
Type up OR copy and paste the transcript of your sample below:
Today in math class we did many graph of equations in the coordinate plane, the class was very good because
the teacher knows how to explain the math problems for the students can understand about the steps to do the
problems.
the steps to do or resolving the graphs of equation are the following:
1. Assign values of your choice to the incognite “x”,
2. Put in one side of the equation the number and in the other one the variables.
3. After of did the second step, Do same with the Next.
Morphology Part A
In the numbered rows below, list five different examples from your excerpt that show the child’s correct
usage of morphology (the accomplishments). For each example, write 2-3 sentences describing why this
example shows correct usage. Remember to use all of the appropriate terminology in your description.
Example of Accomplishments Description of Accomplishments

Secure Best Marks with AI Grader

Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Document Page
Surname 1
1. did Correct of the root word ‘do’ has been used in the sentence, ‘Today in math
class we did many graph of equations’.
The inflectional morpheme –ed has been added to the root word do to show
past tense.
2. following Correct present continuous tense of the morpheme ‘follow’
The inflectional morpheme –ing has been added to the root word follow to
show the progressive form.
3. choice Correct form of the root verb choose. The derivational morpheme –ice has
been added to the root verb, transforming it into a noun.
4. Understand Correct formation of the compound morpheme understand derived from the
two morphemes under and stand.
5. following Correct present continuous tense of the root verb follow. The inflectional
morpheme –ing has been added to the root verb to show a progressive state.
In the numbered rows below, list three examples from your excerpt that show the child’s incorrect usage of
morphology (the challenges). Write 2-3 sentences describing why this example shows incorrect usage.
Remember to use all of the appropriate terminology in your description. Choose and highlight one of the
examples to use in the next section.
Example of Challenges Description of Challenges
1. resolving The inflectional morpheme –ing has been added to the root verb resolve yet
it has been used in the sentence in the simple present tense.
2. Graph The letter -s has been added to the morpheme graph in a sentence that
illustrates the plural form. Thus when corrected the sentence, ‘we did many
graph of equations’ reads as, ‘we did many graphs of equations’.
3. did Incorrect derivational morpheme of the root do used in the phrase After of
did the second step.
Morphology Part B
In the following section, provide a detailed analysis of the challenge that you highlighted above. Type your
answers in the space below each question.
What is the standard U.S. English language rule that is violated in the error? (List the website address where
you got your information)
First, identify the grammar feature that the student has gotten wrong (for example: past perfect tense,
adjective-noun order, negation, or pluralization). Then, search google for the English language rule
associated with this grammar feature. Make sure that the website you use is reliable. List the website
Document Page
Surname 1
address where you got your information.
Singularization was identified as wrongly used in the words ‘graph’ and ‘equation’. The plural forms of the
words should be used instead since they are referring to more than one graph and equation (dictionary).
Is this error due to L1 (first language) transfer or L2 (second language) development? Check one.
Remember that L1 transfer means that the student is using grammar rules from their first language and
applying it to English, causing an error. To figure this out, learn more about how this particular grammar
feature works in the student’s native language. You can search google for more information about the
language.
L2 development should only be selected if the error is not L2 transfer, meaning that the student has made
an error due to the natural second language learning process and independent of the way grammar works
in their first language.
L1 Transfer × L2 Development
Explain why you selected L1 transfer or L2 development. You must be able to justify why the error is a result
of one and not the other.
If you have chosen L1 transfer, show with explicit examples why– remember that you can always use
Google translate to find examples that you can discuss below.
If you have chosen L2 development, use the examples from Google translate to show how this was not a
grammar transfer from the first language and how this was a normal second language learning error.
The student has applied the literacy skills of the parent language and applied them in the learned language.
This is evidenced in the formation of the words graph and did.
Which theory/theorist supports your opinion? Remember to read up on these under the information for
Assignment B in Canvas. Check or highlight one of the following:
If you have selected “L1 transfer” above, make sure you choose a theory from the “L1 Transfer” list for
theories on the left below.
If you have written “L2 development” above, make sure you choose one theory from the “L2
Development” list of theories on the right below.
L1 Transfer Theories/Theorists L2 Development Theories/Theorists
Selinker’s Interlanguage theory □ McLaughlin’s Attention-Processing Model
□ Overgeneralization □ Bialystok’s Analysis/Automaticity Model
Document Page
Surname 1
□ Natural Translation □ Swain’s Output Hypothesis
Codeswitching □ U-Shaped Learning/ Backsliding
× Cummins’ Common Underlying proficiency
Selecting two references connected to the theorist/theory you selected above, read these and use the
information to describe in your own words why this theory/theorist is relevant to explain the language error
that your ELL student made:
Cummins’ Common Underlying proficiency occurs when one uses the grammar rules and literacy skills from
the parent language to the second language. This is evident where the student uses the singular forms of the
words ‘graph’ and ‘equation’ instead of their plural forms, a literacy rule carried from the native language.
Please list the two references here that you used above:
Chan, Julie. Khan Academy. Monday, 03 February 2016. website. 10th March 2018.
<http://www.khanacademy.org/test-prep/sat/approach-sentence-and-paragraph-sequence-questions.>.
dictionary, merriam webster. merriam webster dictionary online. 02 January 2018. website. 11th March 2018.
<https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/singularize.>.
Syntax Part A
In the numbered rows below, list five different examples from your excerpt that show the child’s correct
usage of syntax (the accomplishments). For each example, write 2-3 sentences describing why this example
shows correct usage. Remember to use all of the appropriate terminology in your description.
Example of Accomplishments Description of Accomplishments
1. Assign values of your choice to the incognite
“x”
The subject in the sentence is the noun phrase ‘assign
values of your choice’ has been correctly placed as the
subject in the sentence.
2. Today in math class we did many graph of
equations in the coordinate plane
The sentence follows proper syntax sequence SVO
(subject, verb and object). The subject is we, the verb is
did and the object is graph of equations in the

Secure Best Marks with AI Grader

Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Document Page
Surname 1
coordinate plane.
3. Put in one side of the equation the number Correct arrangement and formation of the preposition
phrase in the sentence ‘Put in one side of the equation
the number and in the other one the variables.’
4. Today in math class Correct formation of the noun phrase in the sentence,
Today in math class we did many graph of equations
in the coordinate plane.’
5. resolving the graphs of equation are the
following
Correct plurality in the noun phrase graphs of equation.
Single marking of plurals rule has well executed by
using the plural form of the word graph.
In the numbered rows below, list three examples in your excerpt that show the child’s incorrect usage of
syntax (the challenges). Write 2-3 sentences describing why this example shows incorrect usage. Remember
to use all of the appropriate terminology in your description. Choose and highlight one of the examples to use
in the next section.
Example of Challenges Description of Challenges
1. After of did the second step Incorrect arrangement of elements in the preposition
phrase ‘after of did the second step’.
The conjunction of should be omitted from the phrase
and the correct form of the root word do used.
2. for the students can understand about the steps
to do the problems.
Inappropriate word order: improper addition of the
preposition about in the verb phrase ‘can understand
about.’
3. Do same with the Next. Missing element from the noun phrase that forms the
object of the sentence ‘After of did the second step, Do
same with the Next.’
Addition of the noun equation completes the noun
phrase.
Syntax Part B
In the following section, provide a detailed analysis of the challenge that you highlighted above. Type your
answers in the space below each question.
What is the standard U.S. English language rule that is violated in the error? (List the website address where
you got your information)
First, identify the grammar feature that the student has gotten wrong (for example: past perfect tense,
Document Page
Surname 1
adjective-noun order, negation, or pluralization). Then, search google for the English language rule
associated with this grammar feature. Make sure that the website you use is reliable. List the website
address where you got your information.
Improper word order was identified in the various challenges listed above. In English, the typical word order
followed is adjective-noun, nouns in noun phrases and conjunctions to join two components of a sentence.
Is this error due to L1 (first language) transfer or L2 (second language) development? Check one.
Remember that L1 transfer means that the student is using grammar rules from their first language and
applying it to English, causing an error. To figure this out, learn more about how this particular grammar
feature works in the student’s native language. You can search google for more information about the
language.
L2 development should only be selected if the error is not L2 transfer, meaning that the student has made
an error due to the natural second language learning process and independent of the way grammar works
in their first language.
L1 Transfer L2 Development ×
Explain why you selected L1 transfer or L2 development. You must be able to justify why the error is a result
of one and not the other.
If you have chosen L1 transfer, show with explicit examples why– remember that you can always use
Google translate to find examples that you can discuss below.
If you have chosen L2 development, use the examples from Google translate to show how this was not a
grammar transfer from the first language and how this was a normal second language learning error.
McLaughin’s Attention Processing model states that learners may make errors due to L2 development since
they may not have fully processed all the linguistic rules for L2. This is evidenced by inappropriate word
order and incorrect phrasing of the preposition phrase as illustrated in the table above.
Which theory/theorist supports your opinion? Remember to read up on these under the information for
Assignment B in Canvas. Check or highlight one of the following:
If you have selected “L1 transfer” above, make sure you choose a theory from the “L1 Transfer” list for
theories on the left below.
If you have written “L2 development” above, make sure you choose one theory from the “L2
Development” list of theories on the right below.
L1 Transfer Theories/Theorists L2 Development Theories/Theorists
Selinker’s Interlanguage theory × McLaughlin’s Attention-Processing Model
□ Overgeneralization □ Bialystok’s Analysis/Automaticity Model
Document Page
Surname 1
□ Natural Translation □ Swain’s Output Hypothesis
□ Codeswitching □ U-Shaped Learning/ Backsliding
□ Cummins’ Common Underlying proficiency
Selecting two references connected to the theory you selected above, read these and use the information to
describe in your own words why this theory/theorist is relevant to explain the language error that your ELL
student made:
McLaughin’s Attention Processing model illustrates that the semantic errors committed by the student are due
to development of a new language, one that he may have not fully grasped the grammatical rules. The student
has made errors of omission or commission due to failing to fully grasp the grammar rules.
Please list the two references here that you used above:
Frisk, Chad. Direct Translation Impossible: Tales from the rising sun. Vol. Second. New York: Lioncrest
Publishing, 2014. Document.
Radford, Andrew. LInguistics: An introduction. London: Cambridge University Press, 1999. Document.
Semantics Part A
In the numbered rows below, list five different examples from your excerpt that show the child’s correct
usage of semantics (the accomplishments). For each example, write 2-3 sentences describing why this
example shows correct usage. Remember to use all of the appropriate terminology in your description.
Example of Accomplishments Description of Accomplishments
1. Today in math class we did many graph
of equations
The sentence has semantic meaning: the student is explaining
the activities he accrued out in the math class.
2. the teacher knows how to explain the
math problems for the students can
understand about the steps to do the
problems.
The sentences makes semantic sense; it correlates the phrases
‘the teacher knows how to explain the math problems’ and
‘the students can understand about the steps to do the
problems.
3. Assign values of your choice to the
incognite “x”,
The sentence has semantic sense: it describes the precise
action to be taken to the math values.

Paraphrase This Document

Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Document Page
Surname 1
4. the steps to do or resolving the graphs of
equation are the following:
The use of the noun phrase steps to do offers semantic
meaning to the sentence ‘the steps to do or resolving the
graphs of equation are the following:’
5. the class was very good because the
teacher knows how to explain the math
problems
The use of the noun phrase the class was very good produces
semantic sense since it correlates to the subsequent
descriptive phrase because the teacher knows how to explain
the math problem.
In the numbered rows below, list three examples in your excerpt that show the child’s incorrect usage of
semantics (the challenges). Write 2-3 sentences describing why this example shows incorrect usage.
Remember to use all of the appropriate terminology in your description. Choose and highlight one of the
examples to use in the next section.
Example of Challenges Description of Challenges
1. Today in math class we did many graph
of equations in the coordinate plane
Addition of the phrase ‘in the coordinate plane’ in the
sentence does not make any semantic meaning, instead
producing conflicting meanings.
2. Put in one side of the equation the
number and in the other one the
variables.
The sentence is ambiguous; it offers no precise meaning on
which equation or variable it is referring to.
3. After of did the second step, Do same
with the Next.
The sentence offers incomplete information thus produces no
semantic meaning: it is ambiguous on the following step to be
taken.
Semantics Part B
In the following section, provide a detailed analysis of the challenge that you highlighted above. Type your
answers in the space below each question.
Is this error due to L1 (first language) transfer or L2 (second language) development? Check one.
Remember that L1 transfer means that the student is using grammar rules from their first language and
applying it to English, causing an error. To figure this out, learn more about how this particular grammar
feature works in the student’s native language. You can search google for more information about the
language.
L2 development should only be selected if the error is not L2 transfer, meaning that the student has made
Document Page
Surname 1
an error due to the natural second language learning process and independent of the way grammar works
in their first language.
L1 Transfer L2 Development x
Explain why you selected L1 transfer or L2 development. You must be able to justify why the error is a result
of one and not the other.
If you have chosen L1 transfer, show with explicit examples why– remember that you can always use
Google translate to find examples that you can discuss below.
If you have chosen L2 development, use the examples from Google translate to show how this was not a
grammar transfer from the first language and how this was a normal second language learning error.
McLaughin’s Attention Processing model states that learners may make errors due to L2 development
since they may not have fully processed all the linguistic rules for L2. This is illustrated by the choice of
words that the student has chosen to use in the excerpt.
However, the student may use or arrange the words inappropriately thus the resultant sentence makes no
semantic sense.
Which theory/theorist supports your opinion? Remember to read up on these under the information for
Assignment B in Canvas. Check or highlight one of the following:
If you have selected “L1 transfer” above, make sure you choose a theory from the “L1 Transfer” list for
theories on the left below.
If you have written “L2 development” above, make sure you choose one theory from the “L2
Development” list of theories on the right below.
L1 Transfer Theories/Theorists L2 Development Theories/Theorists
Selinker’s Interlanguage theory □x McLaughlin’s Attention-Processing Model
□ Overgeneralization □ Bialystok’s Analysis/Automaticity Model
□ Natural Translation □ Swain’s Output Hypothesis
□ Codeswitching □ U-Shaped Learning/ Backsliding
□ Cummins’ Common Underlying proficiency
Selecting two references connected to the theorist/theory you selected above, read these and use the
information to describe in your own words why this theory/theorist is relevant to explain the language error
that your ELL student made:
McLaughin’s Attention Processing model illustrates that the semantic errors committed by the student are due
to development of a new language, one that he may have not fully grasped the grammatical rules.
This can be seen in the sentence ‘Put in one side of the equation the number and in the other one the
Document Page
Surname 1
variables’ where the student is using the correct words that will offer semantic sense but has jumbled the
words up.
Please list the two references here that you used above:
Frisk, Chad. Direct Translation Impossible: Tales from the rising sun. Vol. Second. New York: Lioncrest
Publishing, 2014. Document.
Radford, Andrew. LInguistics: An introduction. London: Cambridge University Press, 1999. Document.
1 out of 10
circle_padding
hide_on_mobile
zoom_out_icon
[object Object]

Your All-in-One AI-Powered Toolkit for Academic Success.

Available 24*7 on WhatsApp / Email

[object Object]