Sample Mean and Standard Deviation

Verified

Added on  2023/03/30

|6
|1027
|277
AI Summary
This document discusses the concept of sample mean and standard deviation in research and hypothesis testing. It explains the null and alternative hypotheses and provides a step-by-step analysis of sample data to calculate the sample mean and standard deviation. The document also covers the testing of the hypothesis using t-distribution, justification of the results, and checking for errors. References are included for further reading.

Contribute Materials

Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your documents today.
Document Page
SAMPLE MEAN AND STANDARD DEVIATION 1
Research and Hypothesis Testing
Name
Course
Professor’s Name
University
State
Date
.

Secure Best Marks with AI Grader

Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Document Page
SAMPLE MEAN AND STANDARD DEVIATION 2
Using Sample Mean and Standard deviation
In recent years, there has been a rise in cases of obesity and overweight in many parts of
the world including Australia. Height and weight are important measures that are important in
the computation of the body mass index (BMI) of an individual. This is an important issue since
obesity and overweight are associated with heart diseases, diabetes, high blood pressure, gout
among others. The study sought to find out if there exists a significant difference in the mean
weight of Australians. According to the Australian Bureau of statistics, in the year 2012, an
average Australian woman measured 161.8 cm and 71.1kg in weight while men weighed 85.9
kg. A random sample of 10 female students was taken and their weights measured using a
weighing machine.
Hypothesis tests
A hypothesis is classified as an educated guess that any researcher is interested at finding out.
The null hypothesis is the one the researcher assumes no difference between the test variables
while the alternative hypothesis test the existence of a difference between the two.
Null hypothesis (Ho ):The sample mean weight of female students is not different from the
normal population. (Ho=0)
Alternative hypothesis (HA ): The sample mean weight of female students is different from the
normal population (Ha ≠ 0)
The table of female weights is as shown below.
Table 1: Sample Data set
Student Female Weight (Kgs)
1 80.5
2 60.9
3 73.4
4 75.0
5 70.0
Document Page
SAMPLE MEAN AND STANDARD DEVIATION 3
6 65.0
7 67.8
8 72.1
9 89.0
10 60.2
SUM 713.9
MEAN 71.4
STD DEVIATION 8.83
Considering that Sample Mean formula is = X = X
N = 80.5+60.9++60.2
10 =71.4
Sample standard deviation ( s ¿ formula = ¿ ¿=8.83
The sample statistics is t= Xμ
S / N where X =71.1kg,μ=¿71.4kgs s=8.83 and n=10
Therefore sample statistics t= 71.171.4
8.33/ 10 =-.1039
The considered level of significance is 5 %.We are therefore testing if sample and population are
greater than 95%.
From the t-distribution table, checking the critical value t0.05,9 = 2.262 for the two tailed test
which is our concern.
Since the critical value is 2.262, the value of -.1039 which is less than the critical value. The null
hypothesis is therefore accepted.
Justification
We, therefore, conclude that the sample mean weight of female students is not different
from the normal population. According to the Australian Bureau of statistics report of 1995, the
majority of males with age above 18 years of (56%) while the majority of females (60%) were
2.262
Document Page
SAMPLE MEAN AND STANDARD DEVIATION 4
between 50 and 70 kg. The average weights for females and males were 67 and 82 respectively.
In 2012, an average lady of Australian origin weighed 71.1 kg. Australia's health 2018 report
mentions that between 2014 and 2015, the majority of Australian adults (63%) were found to be
overweight or obese. Studies show that the rates of obesity and being overweight are on the rise.
This is caused by changes in the lifestyle of people. Uptake of junk foods, alcoholic drinks and
lack of exercise among individuals is one of the causes of this. The hypothesis revealed that the
mean weight of female students is not different from the normal population. This is a true
reflection of the current situation in Australia.Most women in Australia weigh between 65 and
80 kgs on average. This is, therefore, the reason why the hypothesis is accepted.The weight of
women is also affected by child birth.Many women will add a significant amount of weight
during pregnancy (Brown,Hockey and Dobson,2010).This is a reason for almost similar average
weight by women.However,many of them are involved in physical exercises and daily
monitoring of diet to ensure their weights remain manageable. A lot of pressure and stigma is
associated with weight gain. The current trend view women with less weight small bodies as
fashionable.(Rothblum, 1992).This is therefore the reason why most strive to ensure that their
weights remain manageable.
Checking Errorss (Type I and Type II)
Type I error is the chance of rejecting the null hypothesis when true (incorrect rejection
of a true null hypothesis) while Type II error is the probability of accepting the null hypothesis
when false (failure to reject a false null hypothesis). Considering that the mean of the sample lies
with the boundary of the population mean type I and type II errors were not committed.The
average weight of women is 71.1 kg hence not significantly different from the population mean.
The sample had relatively similar characteristics with the population, since similar social,

Secure Best Marks with AI Grader

Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Document Page
SAMPLE MEAN AND STANDARD DEVIATION 5
cultural, economic, geographical exists between the population and sample. The difference in
time was not significant.
Document Page
SAMPLE MEAN AND STANDARD DEVIATION 6
References
Australian Bureau of Statistics, 1995. How Australians measure up.
Coulson, F.R., Ypinazar, V.A. and Margolis, S.A., 2006. Awareness of risks of overweight
among rural Australians. Rural Remote Health, 6, p.514.
https://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/lookup/4338.0main+features212011-13
Ng, S.P., Korda, R., Clements, M., Latz, I., Bauman, A., Bambrick, H., Liu, B., Rogers, K.,
Herbert, N. and Banks, E., 2011. Validity of selfreported height and weight and derived
body mass index in middleaged and elderly individuals in Australia. Australian and New
Zealand journal of public health, 35(6), pp.557-563.
Mishra, G. and Byles, J., 2014. Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health.
Gomersall, S.R., Dobson, A.J. and Brown, W.J., 2014. Weight gain, overweight, and obesity:
determinants and health outcomes from the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s
Health. Current obesity reports, 3(1), pp.46-53.
Thorburn, A.W., 2005. Prevalence of obesity in Australia. Obesity Reviews, 6(3), pp.187-189.
Mishra, G.D., Carrigan, G., Brown, W.J., Barnett, A.G. and Dobson, A.J., 2007. Short-term
weight change and the incidence of diabetes in midlife: results from the Australian
Longitudinal Study on Women's Health. Diabetes Care, 30(6), pp.1418-1424.
Rothblum, E.D., 1992. The stigma of women's weight: Social and economic realities. Feminism
& Psychology, 2(1), pp.61-73.
Brown, W.J., Hockey, R. and Dobson, A.J., 2010. Effects of having a baby on weight
gain. American journal of preventive medicine, 38(2), pp.163-170.
1 out of 6
circle_padding
hide_on_mobile
zoom_out_icon
[object Object]

Your All-in-One AI-Powered Toolkit for Academic Success.

Available 24*7 on WhatsApp / Email

[object Object]