SAP103 INTRODUCTION TO WELFARE LAW2 AUSTRALIIAN WELFARE SYSTEM INTRODUCTION In Australia, children are protected by the statutory child protection which is the responsibility of the territorial government and the state. One out of thirty three children in Australia need protection offered by the state from violence and harm, with emotional abuse being the most common problem that requires intervention Most of the cases that child services handle end up being repeat cases. The government has set in place departments that help provide child protection and help vulnerable children who have been harmed, abused, neglected or fail to receive adequate care and protection from their parents. One such department is the children’s court of Victoria. THE CHILDREN'S COURT OF VICTORIA The children’s court of Victoria is located in Victoria, Australia and is a statutory court that handles cases related to criminal offenses committed by children between the ages of ten and seventeen, as well as other proceedings that relate to the care and protection of minors below the age of seventeen. The court is headed by the president of the court, who is usually a county court judge, and also comprises of a registrar and a magistrate. Most of the proceedings are led by the president, but the registrar or magistrate can sit as the court in certain proceedings. The court comprises of four divisions i.e. the family division, the criminal division, the koori court and the neighborhood justice division. The family division is in charge of care of minors and handles cases related to determination of guardianship or handing out orders when the defendant is seventeen years or below. Such orders may be interventions or therapeutic treatment orders.
SAP103 INTRODUCTION TO WELFARE LAW3 The criminal division handles most criminal offences that have been committed by children under the age of eighteen years. They handle all criminal offences except those that involved loss of life such as attempted murder or murder, manslaughter and arson or motor vehicle accidents that resulted in a death. Such cases are handled in the county court of Victoria or the supreme court of Victoria. However, children below the age of nine are not usually charged with criminal offences. The koori court is part of the criminal division but handles criminal offenses committed by children with aboriginal backgrounds. Such cases use little formality and technicality. The court however does not handle cases related to sexual offenses and hears cases where the child pleads guilty to an offense or has already been found guilty. The neighborhood justice division handles criminal offenses committed by homeless children with the aim of restoration. In some instances it also handles cases concerning aboriginal children who have a close connection in that particular division (Home, 2019) COURT CASE The court that was visited was Parramatta children's court of New South Wales. The case in court was a custody hearing case. It involved a single parent who was the mother of a five year old boy, and his paternal father. The parents of the child were not married and had had the child after a short relationship. The man had his own family and believed the child would grow up in a better environment if he was in his custody. He was filing for sole custody and claimed that he had tried on several occasions to meet with the mother and the son but the lady had refused to have anything to do with him. He had sent money before to help support his son but the money had always been returned to him unused. The child’s mother had been a single parent ever since
SAP103 INTRODUCTION TO WELFARE LAW4 the boy was born and had been his sole provider for his entire life. She was not as financially stable as the man but believed that she could provide the needs of her son as she had done for the past five years. She claimed that she had sought after the man before and asked him to assist in providing for their son but the man had refused several times. AUSTRALIAN CUSTODY LAW The Australian child custody law came into effect in 2006 and places its main focus on ensuring that the child has a meaningful relationship with both parents and is protected from harm from either of the parent or community within which the parent resides. Responsibility is meant to be shared by both of the parents after separation. This law takes the best interest of the child at heart to ensure that the child grows up knowing both their parents and does not feel the burden of growing up without one of them if it can be avoided. Unless the court makes an order that changes the statutory conferral of joint parental responsibility, the law states under section 61C (1) that until the child turns eighteen both parents have a responsibility to care for the child. This includes all duties, authority and power that the parents have related to the child. A parent can have joint custody even though the child is living with the other parent. The law presumes that it is in the best interest of the child to have both parents share responsibility equally. The presumption is applied unless there is a reason to believe that the child is going to face any form of abuse or violence while living with either parent. Once the presumption is applied, the court then considers making an order that serves the best interest of the child which is reasonable and as practical as possible to ensure that the child spends equal
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
SAP103 INTRODUCTION TO WELFARE LAW5 time with both parents. If this is not practically possible then the court makes an order to ensure that the child spends significant time with each parent (Brank, 2019). The Act provides guidance to the meaning of significant time. The time includes weekends, holidays and weekdays. This time should give the parents an opportunity to be involved in the child’s daily routine, events and occasions that have a particular significance to the child (ACCL, 2016) When it comes to family disputes, it is more favorable to solve them amicably so that the child is not affected as much (Walker, 2018). The child’s interest is always put at the forefront when it comes to custody hearing processes and it is important to ensure that the proceedings have the least possible negative impact on the child. It is advised to settle such conflicts using alternative methods before taking the matter to court. An agreement can be reached by both parents on where the child spends their time. An interim hearing can be done where the court gives temporary orders before the final decision is made. The final custody hearing is concluded by re- examining the applicant’s witnesses, re- examining the respondent’s witnesses, presentation of evidence by the independent children’s lawyer to cross- examine the witnesses, preparation of the expert report and giving of the final comments that support the case (Loader, 2014) In some cases one of the parents may have to relocate to a new home that is closer to the other parent to ensure that the child can spend equal time with both parents. Such situations are considered when one of the parents has a flexible job or is in a position to relocate without having to make too many life adjustments (Stahil, 2013). CONCLUSION
SAP103 INTRODUCTION TO WELFARE LAW6 After all the evidence in the case was presented and both arguments were considered, the judge concluded that there was no reason to believe that the child would face any kind of harm while residing with either parent. Both parents lived within the same region hence there was no need for either of them to relocate. The child already had an advantage since he could attend the same school and participate in the same activities while residing with either of his parents and would not need to make a major life adjustment. The child hadbeen living with his motherand it was important for him to get acquainted with his fatheras well as his other family. As a result the court ruled that the child was to spend the first four days of the week at his father’s place and the last three days of the week at his mother’s place. They were both obligated to participate in any occasions and events that were significant in the boy’s life such as holidays. They were also to ensure that responsibility of taking care of the boy was shared equally between the two of them, and the man was to provide adequate support when it came to taking care of the boy.
SAP103 INTRODUCTION TO WELFARE LAW7 REFERENCES Australia Child Custody Law. (2016). Retrieved from https://www.international-divorce.com/australia_child_custody.htm Brank, E. M. (2019). Child Custody, Visitation, and Support. The Psychology of Family Law, 122-138. doi:10.18574/nyu/9781479865413.003.0008 Child Custody Laws in Australia - Aussie Divorce. (2019). Retrieved from https://www.aussiedivorce.com.au/family-law/child-custody/ Home (2019). Retrieved from https://www.childrenscourt.vic.gov.au/about-us Loader, D. (2014). Custody services. Clearing, Settlement and Custody, 97-124. doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-098333-2.00006-2 Stahil, P. M., & Drozd, L. M. (2013). Relocation Issues in Child Custody Cases. London, England: Routledge. Walker, L. (2018). 6. Child Support. Family Law. doi:10.1093/he/9780198749653.003.0006