Effect of Exertion on Heart Rate: Scientific Report
Verified
Added on  2023/01/11
|10
|1784
|97
AI Summary
This scientific report examines the effect of exertion on heart rate through a study conducted on university students. The report includes methods, results, discussion, and conclusion.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Scientific report
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Table of Contents INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................3 Methods..............................................................................................................................3 Results...............................................................................................................................3 Discussion...........................................................................................................................8 Conclusion...................................................................................................................................8 REFERENCES............................................................................................................................9 2
INTRODUCTION The report is about a study conducted on students of university to find out effect on exertion on heart rate. It will answer question that whether there is relationship between effect of heart rate or not. (Edelstein and Wang, 2016) Hypothesis - null – there is no significant relationship between effect of exertion on heart rate alternate hypothesis- there is significant relationship between effect of exertion on heart rate Methods Collection of data- it is necessary to gather relevant and precise data so that hypothesis can be tested. If data is not collected properly then it can led to ineffective outcomes. This highly impact on hypothesis testing (Hassamaland Danovitch,2017). Thus, in order to test these hypothesis a sample of 36 students has been taken. Their before and after heart rate will be recorded to find out effect of exertion on heart rate. Furthermore, primary data will be gathered. So, in order to record heart rate medical equipment will be used. The study is ethical as there is no forceful entry of students and also no harm will be caused to them. Besides that, data gathered will not be shared with any third party and is kept secured and protected. In this data of students of Queens building was gathered before and after exertion. (Hatala and Cook, 2017) Results T test One-Sample Statistics NMeanStd. DeviationStd. Error Mean before3676.97228.797681.46628 after36118.333310.328881.72148 3
One-Sample Test Test Value = 0 tdfSig. (2-tailed)Mean Difference95% Confidence Interval of the Difference LowerUpper before52.49535.00076.9722273.995579.9489 after68.73935.000118.33333114.8385121.8281 Interpretation-From table it is analysed that there are significant value obtained in P = .000 which is less than P =0.05 thus alternative hypothesis is accepted. It means that there is effect of exertion on heart rate. There is difference in before and after heart rate of students. (Walston and Ely, 2017) Chi square Case Processing Summary Cases ValidMissingTotal NPercentNPercentNPercent before * after36100.0%00.0%36100.0% before * after Crosstabulation Count after 98.0099.00101.00104.00106.00108.00109.00 before62.000000000 64.000000000 65.001000000 66.000100000 68.000000001 70.000010000 4
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Chi-Square Tests ValuedfAsymp. Sig. (2- sided) Pearson Chi-Square553.000a552.480 Likelihood Ratio191.1045521.000 Linear-by-Linear Association15.6741.000 N of Valid Cases36 a. 600 cells (100.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .03. Symmetric Measures ValueApprox. Sig. Nominal by NominalPhi3.919.480 Cramer's V.817.480 N of Valid Cases36 a. Not assuming the null hypothesis. b.Usingtheasymptoticstandarderrorassumingthenull hypothesis. Interpretation-By interpreting table it is found that P value is .480 that is more than P =0.05. thus, alternative hypothesis is accepted. It means there is effect of exertion on heart rate. It highly impact on heart rate as student can feel difference on it before and after exertion. (Ye and Waddle, 2017) Discussion Therefore, from study it is discussed that before doing any physical exercise student heart rate is normal. However, when they do exercise after that heart rate increases. This is because here energy is consumed. They have to put on effort to do exercise. So, more energy and effort are needed. Due to it, heart rate increases as blood supply increases within body. Therefore, there in effect of exertion on heart rate. 8
Conclusion It is summarised that exertion is doing of exercise. Thus, it directly impact on heart rate as energy is consumed and blood circulation increases. Hence, alternative hypothesis is accepted as there is effect on exertion on heart rate. 9
REFERENCES Books and Journal Edelstein, S.L. and Wang, C.H., 2016. Report of the Eye Bank Association of America medical review subcommittee on adverse reactions reported from 2007 to 2014.Cornea,35(7), pp.917-926. Hassamal, S. and Danovitch, I., 2017. Overcoming barriers to initiating medication-assisted treatment for heroin use disorder in a general medical hospital: a case report and narrative literature review.Journal of psychiatric practice,23(3), pp.221-229. Hatala, R. and Cook, D.A., 2017. Using in-training evaluation report (ITER) qualitative comments to assess medical students and residents: a systematic review.Academic Medicine,92(6), pp.868-879. Oez, M.M., Nuance Communications Inc, 2020.Method and system for generating a medical report and computer program product therefor. U.S. Patent 10,586,018. Walston, J. and Ely, E.W., 2017. Integrating frailty research into the medical specialties— report from a U13 conference.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society,65(10), pp.2134-2139. Ye, F. and Waddle, M.R., 2017. Comparison of patient report and medical records of comorbidities: results from a population-based cohort of patients with prostate cancer.JAMA oncology,3(8), pp.1035-1042. Ziring, D. and Lochnan, H., 2018. Silent witnesses: faculty reluctance to report medical students’ professionalism lapses.Academic Medicine,93(11), pp.1700-1706. 10