Life is about increasing utility to achieve the pleasure principle. This response discusses the role of Gabriella in sweatshops and the arguments for and against them.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running Head: SECOND STUDENT RESPONSE1 Second Student response Student Name University
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
SECOND STUDENT RESPONSE2 Second Student response Life is about increasing utility to achieve the pleasure principle, this means that everything that people engage in is based on increasing the benefits that the world presents to them and how to ensure that they are able to meet their personal needs. Thus this job offers Gabriella an opportunity to further her career and achieve the aspirations of her life. Thus the fact that the organization has given her an opportunity to be in charge of the position means Gabriella should focus on the needs of the organization and ensuring that the business objective is achieved. Thus the priorities that she has in the sweatshops is the agenda of the organization that has sent her there. The role that she plays should fall within the terms of reference for the job that has been assigned to her and how the objectives will be achieved. Proponents of sweatshops look at the value of the shops and the reasons why the people who work there decide to take the jobs.Gabriella needs to tell Natasha that she supports her idea of independence and the economic benefits that they bring to people from such countries like the women in Bangladesh. From choice theory, human beings are rational beings who weigh the options that are presented to them and the opportunity cost of taking the job or leaving it (Kates, 2015). Thus the women who work in sweatshops do so because they have weighed the opportunity costs of taking the job. This implies that the women value the economic benefits that they derive from the shops and how these shops are playing a relevance in their life. Economically, the women are better off receiving whatever they get from the shops as compared to the shops being closed because they have failed to meet the required condition. This also presents the concept of autonomy where the women have the right to make their own choices. According to Bailey (2010) Kant argues that individuals have the capacity to self- determination and the desire for freedom in areas of their life. By choosing to work in the
SECOND STUDENT RESPONSE3 sweatshops the women are exercising personal autonomy through pursuing a course of action regardless of the moral content that it holds. Thus since the women have individually decided to work in the shops, their autonomy should be respected by ensuring that the sweatshops are operational for them to keep working there. This means that Gabriella should be concerned more about the operations of the organization to ensure that the women can still enjoy the benefits of the sweatshop being operational. This means that interference of any form like closing the sweatshops to review the working conditions will lead to lost benefits and the interference with the autonomy of the women. On the other hand, the utilitarianism approach of sweatshops can be understood from the concept of the invincible hand where organizations pursue their interests which in turn creates utility for other people (Snyder, 2012). Thus by having sweatshops in Bangladesh, the women can work there, earn and thus increasing their utility and attaining the pleasure principle. This means that despite the fact that Nathan is trying to convince her differently, Gabriella needs to understand that in a free and unrestrained market system individuals have the freedom to pursue their interests as long as they achieve the pleasure principle. Thus despite the conditions, the women seem to be benefiting more from the sweatshops as compared to sitting at home. Gabriella needs to tell Nathan that the argument on social injustice that exists in these sweatshops is not admissible since there is a need to look at the benefits that women derive from the shops. Injustices can only be justified if the economic cost of working in the shops is not realistic. I thus support the idea that the country is undergoing a stage of development that is required in modernity theory before development can be achieved(Goodstein, 2011). This justifies why the women have not complained about the sweatshops but rather they look at the brighter side of working in the shops.
SECOND STUDENT RESPONSE4 The role of Gabriella should, therefore, focus on ensuring that the women have work and are able to meet their utility needs. Since their choice is based on autonomy, choice, and utility, the women need to be understood in the context of their situation and ensure that they have stable employment.Thus Gabriella needs to take up the job and ensure that the sweatshops are operational for the women to be engaged. Changing the operational principles will reduce the profits that the organization seeks to benefit and compromise the economic reasons for establishing sweatshops.What the women need now from Gabriella is to ensure that the sweatshops are operational allowing the women to work and ignore the concerns of Nathan since they are not ethically admissible in the case of sweatshops and the state of the women without the sweatshop job.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
SECOND STUDENT RESPONSE5 References Bailey, T. (2010). Analysing the Good Will: Kant's Argument in the First Section of the Groundwork.British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 18(4), 635–662. Goodstein, E. (2011).Chapter 2: Ethics and Economics". Economics and the Environment. Wiley: New Jersey. Kates, M. (2015). The Ethics of Sweatshops Limits of Choice.Business Ethics Quarterly, 25(2), 191-211. Snyder, J. (2012). Exploitation and Sweatshop Labor: Perspectives and Issues.Business Ethics Quarterly, 20(2), 187-213.