Doctrine of Separation of Powers in Australia: An Analysis

This essay discusses the doctrine of separation of powers in Australia, its origins, and its application at the federal level. It covers the roles and obligations of the legislative, executive, and judiciary branches, and how they work together to safeguard citizens' rights.

Separation of
Power

Table of Contents
Introduction.......................................................................................................................................2
Main Body.........................................................................................................................................2
Conclusion ........................................................................................................................................6
References ........................................................................................................................................7
Introduction
The doctrine separation of power was evolved and originated while tracing down history
of Ancient Greece. This principle became common and widely known to people through French
thinker Charles Montesquieu interpreted its thoughts in the book Spirit of laws in year 1748
stating about state independence reliance on three major forces for governing society in
general(Crandell,2020). These powers were legislative, executive and judiciary where each had
distinct identity from one another. The idea of this philosopher has been diversely used by various
nations. The constitution of Australia mainly sets regulations through which country operates
under which initial three sections of establishment talks about the main division of categories
governing country which are Legislature,Execution and judicial forces. They mainly played
various function in administering Australian citizens welfare. Further making and managing
legislation which are bound to follow strictly under this criteria which is termed as separation of
powers. Thus, the cognition to administer is divided among Parliament,Executives, Judiciary for
avoiding any category having all the authority. Every segment of group must perform within their
territory or jurisdiction of particular field carrying responsibilities for checking actions of others.
This essay mainly covers extension of doctrine implemented in Australia in centre and state.
Moreover, elaborating about separation of power in depth.
Main Body
The principal of separation of power regulated by Westminster method which in usual
circumstances is regarded as one of the basic dogma of parliamentarian democratic system. This
doctrine is divided into numerous divisions of government delegating authority to its branches
namely Parliamentary, executive and judiciary. The legislative commonly introduces and creates
law, execution of such legislation is administered by executive and adjudication of laws in
tribunals is interpreted by judicial officers or magistrates. The roles and obligation of each is
different from each other where such forces separately carries their task without intervening one
another. But in reality these institution are inter dependent on each other as not even single force
is ale to carry its functions absolutely without relying on rest of the agencies. The segregation of
authorities must avoid completion of authority solely as this can arise issues related to corruption
resulting in monarchical rule which shall not be encouraged arisen from chances which
ungoverned cognition proposes. This principal can be widened for enabling these categories of

government for acting as check and balance on one another(Fernando, et.al ,2018). All branches
being free and having liberty to carry its conduct helped to keep an eye on other division whether
they are exceeding their powers or not. Therefore ensure to safeguard rules established by law and
safeguarding every citizens rights. The Westminster system regulation is a democratic system of
governing Australia which adopted from English legal system. Where existence of such doctrine
does not separates entirely these branches functioning and principal is not represented in the
establishment of laws in states of Australia. Moreover,these divisions of Australia prescribes
legislature in Parliamentarian form, execution in administration and operation of laws in
governmental agencies and ministers cabin holding responsibility judicial enforcement of laws in
tribunals and courts by magistrate. However, executive department being obligated to legislatures
who makes laws stating connection between both institutions and their performance where
separation of power in judicial branch is diverse from other divisions working independently for
welfare of people. The objective of such doctrine is development of mechanism avoiding
authorities powers being excessively concentrating on one branch respectively of government.
The practices carried out by Australia methods of governance avoids excess focus on authorities
existence in many aspects by constitutional provisions and treaties, bicameral method , numerous
governmental parties, election conducted, the publication of news through agencies like radio, TV
and other medium of communication, tribunals and court, Federal regime, actively participating in
recent acts by people of nation(Krishna, et.al, 2019).
The thinkers like Montesquieu and Locke found the applicable aspect during American
insurrection modified this doctrine in the year 1780s impelled by choice for making infeasible
misuse of authoritative position which originated from nations like England and George III. The
implementers or executor of fundamental law enlarged this principal. It further provided aid
ensuring protection of autonomy, these divisions of government authority were segregated and
promotes equivalence. They workers solely performed their task wherein conducting abstracted
election of bodies like Parliament members and administrators in executive department. These
branches of government had special powers particularly having certain form of veto over another,
confirmation of recruitment, allegation of wrongs committed, judicial inquest of laws by apex
court and strengthen the doctrine separation of power conception, inevitable involvement of each
category in functions of other and extension of actually delegating powers to another division.
The upper limit in organizational of person sole independence on behalf of this principal
separating powers and one rooted in rulings of Supreme Court but due to constraints, inefficiency
and political unfairness stated by current accusation attempted on Clinton or legislative assembly
delaying programme made it complex for authorities. It is partially the intent. Certain democratic
nations subsequently have entirely favoured approach of American philosophers. This conception

diversely aims to take distinct forms in between the complexity of ideologies interpreted,
preference and desire, organizational practical politics which are segment of all governmental
forces(Lee, et.al,2019).
The Westminster system of law operating doctrine in Federal governance of Australian laws
where the constitution provides separate sections of all three forces as legislation, executive and
judiciary in general. It themselves does not comprises separation of powers. The administrative
branch at minimum level allocates monarchical ruler or individual representing nation as
Governor General while allocation in practice to executive which required the representative to
act in accordance of direction given by authorities assisting such subject matter. This model of
Westminster and its dependence on treaties has equal effect as referred to terms of law making
establishment. It particularly requires Ministerial authority of state to be present in legislature
institution transparently establishing link between Administrator and Legislative agency
effectively avoided by American mode of detached executive department(Manoj,2021). The
circumstances in judiciary branch was contrast from other two where under Chapter 3 of
Constitutional provision section 71 particularly stated usage of tribunals for establishing
compulsive doctrine separation of power for national courts from executive and legislature field.
In the case of New South Wales v. Commonwealth, the appellate tribunal stated in their ruling that
Constitution embodies the principal of separating judicial authority . Its application can be seen in
courts and committee established by federal institutions parallel to other tantamount nations. They
can only suggest outcome where itself national authorities making laws in certain aspects has used
as prerogative to act in certain situations. It majorly took advantage in cases related to issues
where third person not being part of Parliament acted in disdain of institution.
Although the constitution of Australia has nominally discussed by political leaders significance
where influence of parties relating to powers of executive and Parliament discusses about the
presence varying characters of freedom to express its thought essentials interprets independent
egalitarian system and factor of competition among them controls overly capacity of certain party
impact by such individual. It involves other consequences where treaties dominating subordinate
house formed the government then execution exerted authoritative power its lower division. Th
extraordinary benefit of Australian group leaders subject field ensured that Houses of Parliament
within its members of numerous big parties had supported administrators and their position on
varied concerns. Even after discussing and endeavour of opposing and democratic groups the
impossible losses was effectively inquired by minister by law makers(Roshanravan, et.al, 2020).
The doctrine separation of power in Commonwealth of Australia as per system of Westminster
separates their constitutional provision for individual forces namely legislature, executives and

judiciary shall not comprise principal on its own. The administrators allocates minimum authority
allocated to their representatives or monarchical ruler under section 61. During allocation of
powers to executives on the assistance of government. In this method of administration reliance
over treaties was equivalent to words of constitutional provisions establishing their link amidst
ministers and legislatures and effectively avoiding American form of detached administration
agency. The establishment shall not provide sole aspect for physically separating powers of
executives from Parliament where section 44 concerned incompetency application to union of
legislature excluding governmental workers of Parliament including individuals bound under
contract arrangement within Commonwealth. This section intents for abstracting impact of
ministers from law makers agency. Such necessity is not applied in Federal
appointments(Shawawreh & Faisal, 2020).

Conclusion
This essay mainly infers detail analysis of separation of power in accordance to Australian
legal system in general. This further elaborates about their functioning and role of three branches
being dependent or interdependent from one another. Moreover, it talks about extension of forces
influencing the federal and Commonwealth constitutional provisions. This discusses about
political parties influence in relation to this doctrine origination expressed by various thinkers
from distinct part of world.

References
Crandell, M. (2020). 'Emilliah': The'utopian'suffragist settlement scheme proposed for
Denmark, Western Australia. Studies in Western Australian History, 33, 155-171.
Fernando, et.al (2018). Photocatalysis with Pt–Au–ZnO and Au–ZnO hybrids: effect of
charge accumulation and discharge properties of metal nanoparticles. Langmuir, 34(25),
7334-7345.
Krishna, et.al, (2019). Quantitative assessment of cerebellar ataxia, through automated
limb functional tests. Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 16(1), 1-15.
Lee, et.al, (2019, January). Performing earth observation missions using micro and small
satellites. In APISAT 2019: Asia Pacific International Symposium on Aerospace
Technology (pp. 520-529). Gold Coast, Australia: Engineers Australia.
Manoj, S. (2021). Drivers and Barriers in the Deployment of Lignocellulose waste-
derived liquid fuel in Australia.
Roshanravan, et.al, (2020). Modelling gold potential in the Granites-Tanami Orogen, NT,
Australia: a comparative study using continuous and data-driven techniques. Ore
Geology Reviews, 125, 103661.
Shawawreh, A., & Faisal, W. (2020). An evaluation study in mediation: a comparative
study between Australia and Jordan (Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern
Queensland).