Controversy of Seralini Affair: Impact of GM Corn on Food and Chemical Toxicology
Verified
Added on  2023/06/15
|8
|2482
|302
AI Summary
This essay discusses the controversy of Seralini affair and its impact on food and chemical toxicology. It includes a short literature review, analysis of case presentation, retraction and republication. The subject is food toxicology and the course code is not mentioned.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Individual Assessment
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Table of Contents INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................3 MAIN BODY...................................................................................................................................3 CONCLUSION................................................................................................................................7 REFERENCES................................................................................................................................8
INTRODUCTION Scienceisdevelopingandtherearemanymodificationswithinfoodthroughusing chemicals and other modification which can include genetics can lead to create high impact on the crop development. This may include various modification and variation that can allow to get better and effective response for the higher productivity and includes different variation that includes modification in the crop quality that can have high impact on the individual who consume that product. In this, there is discussion about the controversy of Seralini affair that includes difficulty in dealing with the food and chemical toxicology. In this, there is also discussion about the controversial publication in food and chemical toxicology. There is also some discussion about the issues and arguments through the short literature review. This also includes the analysis of various ways through which case was presented within public about this and communicated within he public against the scientific communication which was published thoroughoutthepeerreviewedliterature.Thisessayalsoincludestheretractionand republication of the controversy review(Nepovimova, (2018)). MAIN BODY Food toxicology refers to an important consideration which may include the food chain which may become more multination within origin. It may also include the contamination or toxic manifestation which can lead to cause an adverse health impact and wide spread in nature. While getting use of chemical to modified the crop for getting better and effective nutritional food can lead to create the risk of getting food and chemical toxicology which can have harmful impact on the individual that can lead to create and health related issues which includes tumours or risk of cancer within the controversial article. Here, it is necessary to focus on the chemical agents of the pesticides which are used and also ensure about safe genetic modification within the crop. This may have high impact on the mechanism of action within living organism. There is a Seralini affair which was one of the controversy within the publication, republicationandretraction.Here,firstpublicationwasabouttheFoodandChemical Toxicology in September 2012. This was the article that present the two year feeding study regarding rat which were reported to increase in the tumours within rats who were fed genetically modified corn along with the herbicide Roundup. There was the controversy which includes that there are many rats who were getting health related issues and facing tumours
within them due to use of the genetically modified maize or corn. There are very few number of rats were included that were associated with the experiments. Due to this article, there was the controversy which includes the criticism(Lee & et. al., (2018)). This was associated with the controversy where Seralini needed journalists to influence them to sign an unusual agreement regarding the confidentially which was regarding exchanging the advance access to the articles and prohibiting them from getting communicated with other scientists before press conference should be held regarding the announcing publication related with the articles. In this, there is the experiment that how rats are getting tumours due to consumption of genetically modified corn which composed using pesticides that may include various chemicals which care scientifically harmful for the body and have risk of forming cancer within body. This is associated with creating health related issues which should be taken in care that suing of pesticide which includes some certain chemicals are harmful in long term and may have risk of developing tumours or cancer within them. In this, there is the ethical issues that may include health of individual who consumes the genetically modified corn and lead to cause of cancer within them (Carvalho, (2020)). Here, ethical issues may arise that this should be shared with the public due to topic of public interest and should be delivered it within the appropriate proof which can have scientific data that can help in gathering better and effective evidence to support the information. Here, using the technology can also be effective and arising the issues like gathering of data that can be modified or manipulated through the collection of data. This may also include the issue which are associate3d with development in the science and technology which can lead to create an impact on the dealt with by scientists along with laypersons. As per the view of John Fagan, researches over the food and toxicology generally retracted a very controversial study with having for the public, animal as well as ecosystem well-being againstthedesiresofthepeople(Abbas,(2018)).Thestudygenerallypresentsaclear information regarding the toxicity of the round-up herbicides. The study of the toxicity generally generates the data depicting that the genetically modified maize, the events NK603 specifically tested in the three unique doses that may be implicated in the liver and kidney toxicity in the Sprague-Dawley rats. It can present the information’s from the longer term toxicity studies that confirmed the prior findings. The study can also report that the round-up formulation of herbicides that are tested among the very three unique doses can cause the toxicity of liver as well as kidney at the levels which are below the regulatory threshold set for the glyphosate alone.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
As per this, the genetically modified maize NK603, Round-up as well as the two in combination are generally also reported to enhance the mortality as well as incidence of tumour. Moreover, this whole study is specifically designed as a toxicology study but not as a carcinogenesis study. Therefore the incidence of the tumour as well as the outcomes of the mortality were reported and according to the guidelines of the OECD for the chronic toxicity, in this, the secondary observations are needed to follow-up using this study design that is specifically intended to the systematically assess the carcinogenesis (The Seralini affair: degeneration of Science to Re- Science?, 2015). As per the view of Ulrich E. Loening, there is an ongoing international debate that is a s to important length of the mammalian toxicitystudies consisting the metabolic analysis, in association with to the consumption of the genetically modified plants(Schrager & et. al., (2018)). As per the article, no regulatory authorities are generally needed mandatory the chronic animal feeding studies to be performed for the edible genetically modified organisms or the precise studies with the blood analysis for the full commercial formulations of the pesticides as sold and used but it is not only for the declared active principles alone. Moreover, the various 90- day rat feeding trails have been conducted by the agricultural biotechnology industry. These such investigations are mainly concerned with the genetically modified soy and maize as well which are mainly engineered either to be herbicide-tolerant or to produce the modified BT toxin insecticide or can be both. In results, these such genetically modified crops consist the new pesticides residues for which the increased residue levels have been founded in few countries (Steede & et. al., (2018)). The pesticides and herbicides that are sprayed in the crops generally impact the most among rats and as a result it can cause various health related issues in rats such as alterations in weights, the elevation in triglyceride levels among females, alterations in the composition of urine among males, the decreased function or the organ damage in the kidney, liver, heart and so on (Republished study: long-term toxicity of a Round-up herbicide and a Round up-tolerant genetically modified maize, 2014). In this, if it is harmful for the rats and causing various illnesses among them then, it can also impact the humans as well. In this, the European food safety authority can involve that all the blood chemistry as well as the weights of the organs generally fell among the normal range for the control of animals. In this, there are some of the major ethical problems while conducting a particular study such as the informed consent, Beneficence as do not harm, the respect for the anonymity and confidentiality as well as
respect for the privacy. These such are the main ethical problems that can be occurred while conducting a study(Schiemann & et. al., (2019)). In this, it is critically evaluated that the particular topic has become a point of interest among public as through the cancer among the rats, or the organ failures which are caused among the rats by the toxic corns, it has become a topic of interest among the public to know the reason behind this. It is because, from the rats, it is now affecting the humans as well and to stop this, various research has been conducted on this. The study has been released in which the scientists generally promoted the cancer results as a major findings of the study. In this, the scientist's approach was generally criticized and called it a public relations offensive. Furthermore, through the social media platform, the research has now become an interesting topic among public to know the cause or roots of the cancer causing among the rats(Shaw, (2020)). There are various experiments which have been conducted by the researchers to illustrate the toxic effects in the rats as well as in the farm animals. In addition to this, many months of the consumption of an R- tolerant soy, the pancreas as well as the liver of the mice were greatly affected that is as highlighted by the disturbances in the sub nuclear structures. Moreover, it is generally a toxic impact which was mainly produced by the application of the R-Herbicide more directly towards the hepatocytes in the culture. There is an ethical concern to deliver quality products to the public which should not have any health related risk. Here, through the controversy of Seralini affair, it can be analysing that there is high impact of identifying about the cancer within rats which is due to consumption of Genetic Modified corn which are also consumed by the large number of population. this includes the health related concern that can have high impact on the delivery of getting higher risk within public health. This may also include the effective of consuming those corn where scientific has identified the health related issues and cerate the evidence based research that should have been delivered to the public through using the press conference, case study, retraction and replication. This was effective and have high public interest which needed to be investigate with higher impact. In this, there is need to identification of higher relativity of the grade which can provide appropriate information related with the controversy. In this, every individual should use the ethical and professional way to get and collect the information which should be related with the Seralini controversy regarding using the GM corn(Chen, (2020)).
CONCLUSION From the above discussion, it has concluded that there is high impact of food and chemical toxicology on the health. There can be risk of getting higher impact of GM corn on rats which develop cancer tumours and have high negative health impact on long term. There is high controversy of getting cancer tumours due to using of GM corn can create high negative health impact on the rats and can also have impact on humans. This can have negative impacting health and are major public concern. There are various ways through this, controversy has been communicated to the public which includes the republication, retraction, case study and press conference. There were effective and effectively share criticism through the article which includes the information about the risk of cancer tumours within rats after the experiment on rats.
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
REFERENCES Books and journals Abbas, (2018). Genetically engineered (modified) crops (Bacillus thuringiensis crops) and the world controversy on their safety.Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control,28(1), 1- 12. Carvalho, (2020). Glyphosate, the herbicide that become a nightmare and the Precautionary Principle.International Journal of Environmental Studies,77(6), 1012-1023. Chen, (2020). Female responses to genetically modified foods: Effects of the menstrual cycle and food risk concerns.Journal of Business Research,120, 608-618. Lee & et. al., (2018). Genipin inhibits the invasion and migration of colon cancer cells by the suppressionofHIF-1αaccumulationandVEGFexpression.FoodandChemical Toxicology,116, 70-76. Nepovimova, (2018). Chemical warfare agent NOVICHOK-mini-review of available data.Food and chemical toxicology,121, 343-350. Schiemann & et. al., (2019). Risk assessment and regulation of plants modified by modern biotechniques: current status and future challenges.Annual Review of Plant Biology,70, 699-726. Schrager & et. al., (2018). Seeds of accumulation: Molecular breeding and the seed corn industry in Hawai ‘i.Journal of agrarian change,18(2), 370-384. Shaw, (2020). Weaponizing the peer review system.International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research,1(1), 11-26. Steede & et. al., (2018). Genetic Modification, Factory Farms, and ALF: A Focus Group Study of the Netflix Original Film Okja.Journal of Applied Communications,102(4), 1G-1G. Online Republished study: long-term toxicity of a Roundup herbicide and a Roundup-tolerantgenetically modifiedmaize,2014[Online]Available through:<https://enveurope.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s12302-014-0014-5> The Seralini affair: degeneration of Science to Re-Science?, 2015[Online] Available through: <https://enveurope.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s12302-015-0049-2>