Analysis of Service Times at Gourmet Delight Restaurant

This presentation analyzes the service times at Gourmet Delight restaurant in Melbourne, including before and after a training program, and 6 months after the program. The results show a significant improvement after the training, but a concerning increase 6 months later.

Quantitative
Methods
Name of the Student
Name of the University
Student ID

Introduction
 Gourmet Delight is a Fictitious 5-star restaurant in the Central District
of Melbourne.
 The sitting capacity at the restaurant is around 100 people at a time
 Restaurant Timings: 12 pm – 3 pm for lunch and 6 pm – 11 pm for
dinner.
 Restaurant open all 7 days in a week.
 The clients of the restaurant started to decrease in the past 6
months.
 The owner assumes this is because of number of staffs leaving the
Restaurant.
 It has to be determined, whether this is a concern to the owner.

Descriptive Summary of Serving
Times
The Table shows clearly that the serving times before training was quite high,
which was reduced significantly after the training.
Serving Times prior to training
(minutes) Serving Times after Training (minutes)
Mean 40.53 20
Standard Error 1.75 1.21
Median 39.5 19
Mode 35 18
Standard Deviation 9.59 6.65
Sample Variance 92.05 44.28
Kurtosis 0.53 -0.86
Skewness 0.70 0.25
Range 40 24
Minimum 25 10
Maximum 65 34
Sum 1216 600
Count 30 30

Summary of Service Times
15 25 35 45 55 65
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Frequency of Service Times After Training
Service Times
Frequency
After the training, service times
reduced and no customers had to
wait for more than 40 minutes, which
was not the case before the training
was conducted.
15 25 35 45 55 65
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Frequency of Service Times Before Training
Service Times
Frequency
Serving Times prior to
training (minutes)
Serving Times after
Training (minutes)
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
35.00
40.00
45.00
50.00
Boxplot Comparing the service times before and after
Training
Service Times

Service Times 6 Months After
Training
Serving Times after Training (minutes) Serving Time (6 months Late
Mean 20 22.5
Standard Error 1.21 1.175
Median 19 23
Mode 18 20
Standard Deviation 6.65 5.257
Sample Variance 44.28 27.632
Kurtosis -0.86 -1.145
Skewness 0.25 -0.104
Range 24 17
Minimum 10 14
Maximum 34 31
Sum 600 450
Count 30 20
The service times have increased again, after 6 months of
conduction of the training program. This is a matter of concern
for the owner again.

Comparison of service times after
training and 6 months after training
Serving Times after Training
(minutes)
Serving Time (6 months Late
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
Comparison of Serving times After Training and 6 Months
after Training
Serving Times
After 6 months, service time has
increased a little, as can be seen
from the boxplot.

Thank You