Shallow Foundations: Comparative Analysis of Design Methods using GEO 5
Verified
Added on  2022/12/26
|6
|1642
|31
AI Summary
This report discusses shallow foundations and the use of GEO 5 software in construction. It explores the design methods for shallow foundations using Terzaghi, Meyerhof, Hansen, Vesic, and Eurocode 7 methods. The report also includes hand calculations, simulations, and a discussion of the final year project.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Shallow Foundations: Comparative analysis of the design methods using GEO 5
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Table of Contents INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................3 MAIN BODY...................................................................................................................................3 CONCLUSION................................................................................................................................5
INTRODUCTION Construction projects are a series of related tasks that are carried out in correct manner. This helps to manage the completion of project. In this report, there is discussion about shallow foundation and GEO 5 software that is used in construction. Shallow foundation is also known as footings which are suitable under the lowest part of structure. Shallow foundation is basically used as the most economical foundation system. This is relatively easy for managing the construction work. there is a careful investigation of foundation site as well as detailed information related to the subsurface stratum. This is used for designing the foundation and avoiding any kind of degradation of the building. There is also explanation regarding basic requirements within construction. MAIN BODY Shallow foundation is widely used in construction of buildings where the depth of a foundation is low and width of foundation is wide. In shallow foundation root of the constructed building covers maximum width and small area of depth. Shallow foundation is mainly used in residential buildings which provides more stability to the buildings. To calculate the area under which the building is to be constructed is the primary function of a civil engineer and to put an idea about the shallow foundation under which the engineer checks whether the soil quality is appropriate or not is the secondary function of a construction engineer. It also provides more strength to buildings as root system of the buildings covers a wide width area. It is most widely practised technique in the field of construction, which requires systematic involvement of functions. With the help of shallow foundation, basement can be also constructed in a residential building. Most widely used types of shallow foundation with their explanation are mentioned below: Individual footing-Individual footing is used in small size residential building; it basically uses a single column for construction. The size under individual footing is based on load which is coming on the column as well as the load bearing capacity of the soil. Individual footing does not require heavy engineering, it requires normal level of construction activities and also less number of labourers. Raft foundations-This type of shallow foundation is used in construction of heavy building mainly malls and large capacity residential building. In this, foundation is spread over a large area to minimise the load on columns. The resistance capacity of raft foundations is very high
and requires heavy engineers to perform the construction of this type of foundation. Raft foundations also require bulky construction materials and professional construction level in a building in order to achieve maximum safety from the construction of a building. Construction engineering is defined as professional discipline which involves different aspects such as design, plan, construction as well as management. It is associated with the field of project. This is necessary for accomplishing the concentration of different project and design work. GEO 5 is most preferable software that used by the construction company which deliver maximum solution in respect of geotechnical activities. It consists set of programs that individual use with similar interface to bring coordination and communication in the activitie4sof construction. These set of programs aids in designing particular type of structure. Here are some solutions that is deliver by this software GEO 5 such as stability analysis, Excavation design, walls and Gabions, shallow foundations, deep foundations, settlement analysis, tunnels and shafts, geological survey, field tests. The stability analysis examine stability, rock stability. Excavation design is mainly focus on redesigning and verification of structure, pile walls and designing. Walls and gabions involves reducing complexities in the constructions retain9ing walls and gravity. Shallowfoundations leverage the capacity settlement of operations of construction process. Deep foundation leverage only capacity, settlement of piles activities. Settlement analysis involves combining of foundation soil. The tunnel and shafts consist of examine underground tunnels and complex construction design. Geological survey combine4s of modelling and geological surveys in respect of terrain and subsoil. At last field test examine framework of testing like SPT, CPT5,PMT etc. These test consist of field test. The software of GEO5 provide unique solutions on geotechnical, traditional and analytical, finite component problem method. Here is some key solution or features that is provided by this software. It delivers unique solution in respect of geotechnical activities. Main purpose of designing this software that it solves most complicated activities of geotechnical activities. These deliver from the easy one to specific prioritize programs. This software solves complexities in the framework of construction that company can easily deliver and satisfy the need of customer. The software delivers most consumer friendly interface. This consist of various set of individual programs, it delivers very efficient to handle and use. Software do not need any type of productive training while operationsof construction activities. For bringing up gradation or advancementin
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
designing of the survey of Geological. It is most preferable comprehensive software which facilitate data and modelling of the geological framework. It combines of useful methodology of FEM and analytical software. It aids in restructuring design to deliver effective solution of verification of the activities. This helps in the establishment of linkage programmes that ensure appropriate data transfer from one level to another. It delivers lots of solution while construction and support the BIM programs. Determine bearing resistance of the foundation for width B = 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 m at a depth of 1.5 m using Terzaghi (1943), Meyerhof (1963), Hansen (1970), Vesic (1973) and Eurocode 7 (1996) methods. Carryout hand calculations. Determine bearing resistance of the foundation for width B = 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 m at a depth of 1.5 m for a load inclination of 15 degrees using Terzaghi (1943), Meyerhof (1963), Hansen (1970), Vesic (1973) and Eurocode 7 (1996)methods. Carryout hand calculations. Use H/V ratio as ½. You are required to verify your hand calculations and perform simulations for the above cases using GEO 5 Software. When you complete all of the above then start writing your final year project and describe your results and findings in context of other past studies. It would be really good if you discuss/describe your results in comparison of the lab or field measurements carried out by other people. CONCLUSION
REFERENCES Books and Journals Alves,T.D.C.andShah,N.,2018.Analysisofconstructioncontracts:searchingfor collaboration. In Construction Research Congress 2018 (pp. 148-157). Burke, R.D., Parrish, K. and El Asmar, M., 2018. Environmental product declarations: Use in the architectural and engineering design process to support sustainable construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(5), p.04018026. Fayek, A.R. and Lourenzutti, R., 2018. Introduction to fuzzy logic in construction engineering andmanagement.InFuzzyHybridComputinginConstructionEngineeringand Management. Emerald Publishing Limited. Guevremont, M. and Hammad, A., 2019. Defining levels of development for 4D simulation of major capital construction projects. In Advances in informatics and computing in civil and construction engineering (pp. 77-83). Springer, Cham. Kapelko, M. and Abbott, M., 2017. Productivity growth and business cycles: Case study of the Spanish construction industry. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(5), p.05016026. Kereri, J.O. and Harper, C.M., 2019. Social networks and construction teams: Literature review. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 145(4), p.03119001. Loosemore, M. and Lim, B.T.H., 2018. Mapping corporate social responsibility strategies in the construction and engineering industry. Construction management and economics, 36(2), pp.67-82. Mahpour, A. and Mortaheb, M.M., 2018. Financial-based incentive plan to reduce construction waste. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(5), p.04018029. Nnaji, C., Lee, H.W., Karakhan, A. and Gambatese, J., 2018. Developing a decision-making framework to select safety technologies for highway construction. Journal of construction engineering and management, 144(4), p.04018016. Pan, Y. and Zhang, L., 2021. Roles of artificial intelligence in construction engineering and management: A critical review and future trends. Automation in Construction, 122, p.103517. Siraj, N.B. and Fayek, A.R., 2019. Risk identification and common risks in construction: Literaturereviewandcontentanalysis.JournalofConstructionEngineeringand Management, 145(9), p.03119004. Zhang, R., Ashuri, B., Shyr, Y. and Deng, Y., 2018. Forecasting Construction Cost Index based on visibility graph: A network approach. Physica A: Statistical Mechanicsand Its Applications, 493, pp.239-252.