Sharon Griggs Case Study

Sharon Griggs Case study 1
Sharon Griggs Case Study
By (Name)
The Name of the Class
Professor
The Name of the School
The City and State
The Date

Sharon Griggs Case Study 2
1. Patients are often complicated. Describe 3 of the major factors identified in this case
which will determine the success of this patient's outcome? This could include medical
diagnoses or nursing diagnoses.
There are various factors which determine the success of a patient’s outcome that is being
offered non-invasive ventilation support. In relation to Sharon Griggs case, the success will be
determined by the respiratory rate, severe acidosis and the premorbid condition is poor. During
the assessment, it was noted that Sharon condition was deteriorating; she could not move both
her hands and arms and could not drink water. After arterial blood examination, the results
showed that she had severe acidosis. In addition, Sharon had increased breath rates of 32 breaths
per minute which is also a predictor of the patient success. Nicolini et al (2014) indicated that the
tolerance of non-invasive ventilation support by patients predicts the outcome of the patient.
2. Given the interventions designed by your group, do you feel every decision was
underpinned by logical clinical sense? Was there anything you think should have been
designed differently? Was there anything brought up by students in other groups in your
room or who you have spoken to since your PBL session which you missed and would
have contributed to your group discussion?
I believe every decision was underpinned in relation to Sharon’s clinical presentations.
After assessing the general condition of Sharon, it was recommended that it was necessary for
her to undergo non-invasive ventilation. Everything was done accordingly and I don’t think there
is anything which could have been designed differently. In addition, there was nothing which
was brought by other groups which we had missed during our discussion.
3. Given the interventions designed by your group, do you feel every decision was
underpinned by logical clinical sense? Was there anything you think should have been

Sharon Griggs Case Study 3
designed differently? Was there anything brought up by students in other groups in your
room or who you have spoken to since your PBL session which you missed and would
have contributed to your group discussion?
The collaboration of multidisciplinary team was very vital for Sharon’s current condition.
There are various things which could have been addressed at the staff level. A nutritionist should
have been consulted because Sharon is having aspiration pneumonia, which means that she is
prone to aspirating when she is being fed. Percutaneous gastrectomy has been found to be
effective for nutrition intake more than nasogastric tubes. In addition, it is more comfortable
compared to the nasogastric tube. However, it is the commonest cause of death to those patients
who have aspiration pneumonia. Oral hygiene has been shown to help in the prevention of
aspiration pneumonia, the dentist could have instructed Sharon and George on various ways in
which they can maintain oral care which maximizes the risk of developing aspiration pneumonia.
This is because poor oral hygiene and infected teeth increase the risk of developing pneumonia
when a patient aspirates contents infected oral secretions. In addition, missing teeth or dentures
also interferes with chewing and swallowing which puts the patient at the risk of developing
aspiration pneumonia. The nurse could have elevated Sharon’s bed to 30o when she is being fed
continuously or during intermittent feeding and for a period of one hour after feeding is vital; this
was the reason why she was coughing after she drank water. Educating George on how to be
feeding her slowly to avoid aspirating was also important. In addition, the nurse could have
considered the insertion of a nasogastric tube.
4. Three topics were considered in skills for these two weeks: Primary & Secondary Survey,
Education & Consent for NIV & Care of the patient. State one learning point from each
topic. How will this learning contribute to quality patient care?