Skeleton Argument & Bundle of Authority

Running head: SKELETON ARGUMENT & BUNDLE OF AUTHORITY
Skeleton Argument & Bundle of Authority
Name of the Student
Name of the University
Author Note

SKELETON ARGUMENT & BUNDLE OF AUTHORITY1
IN THE COURT OF APEEAL (CIVIL DIVISION)
BETWEEN:
DANIEL
Appellant
AND
JONATHAN
Respondent
SKELETON ARGUMENT ON BEHALF OF THE APPELLANT
GROUND 1:
Ground of appeal:
1. The Court of First Instance erred in applying the principles established in the case of
Edwards v Skyways Ltd [1964] 1 WLR 349 and concluding that the parties to the
contract never had the intention to create a valid contract and being bound by the
terms of the same.
Submissions:
2. The principles established in the case of Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Company
[1892] EWCA Civ 1 states that any offer that has been made to public is considered to
be a unilateral offer. This kind of offer can be accepted by the another person by
fulfilling the conditions.
3. It has been established in the case of Smith v Hughes (1871) LR 6 QB 597 that the
terms of the offer needs to be clear, unambiguous and definite to achieve the status of
a valid offer and create a contract on being accepted.