This paper reflects upon the two most popular and widely accepted theories in social work: Task-Centred Theory and Strength-Narrative and Solution based Theory. It discusses the concepts and advantages/disadvantages of each theory and suggests that both approaches can be used conjointly for better results.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head: SOCIAL WORK THEORY Social Work Theory Name of the University: Name of the Student: Author Note:
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
1Social Work Theory Social Work refers to the profession that works for the service of the nation. It is a system of practices and values and also some theories. Being a volunteer of the charity body of the school, in this paper, I wish to reflect upon the two most popular and widely accepted theories and further evaluate them from a critical perspective. The two theories that I wish to talk about are the Task –Centred Theory and Strength- Narrative and Solution based Theory. First I wish to discuss the Strength and Narrative based Approaches. Strength-based approaches to social work refer to the skills and capability of individuals. Self-centred theories are viewed as tools to identify and resolve their own problems and come up with solutions by oneself. Therefore, it is more integrative by nature and improves a person’s abilities, thus providing a sense of empowerment (Connolly, 2007). The Narrative approach refers to the process of finding solutions, on the basis of the narration that is gathered from the individuals. I believe that both of these theories can be used conjointly to get better outputs. Next, I will move to the concept and meaning of the Task- Centred Theory. This practice requires to deal with specific issues with an approach to manage and resolve issues through specific steps where a client is appointed to a social worker who helps the former to resolve the problems. Firstly, the problem, or the target problem, as it is named, of the client, is identified by the social worker. Secondly, certain steps and measures are formulated o address those problems, thirdly the measures are implemented and fourthly, the worker and the client work towards achieving the set goals (Maidment & Egan, 2016). This particular practice focuses more on client requirements. However, while analysing and practising both these theories, I have come across certain advantages and disadvantages for both these theories. First, I will talk about the Strength – Narrative approach where the counsellor work to help the communities to resolve
2Social Work Theory their own problems. There are many evidences where it is observed that the clients are not happy with the practitioners or the worker is not objective towards all the members of the team. Moreover, it often seems that the resources provided to the individual for resolving their issues are not rightly used("Strengths-based approaches for working with individuals", 2019). Also, sometimes when working in remote areas, it is found that the workers are reluctant to work with the clients (Morgan, 2014). Similarly, while working, I have realised that there are certain issues with Task-centred problems as well. The essential problem that I have mostly come about is that often the clients are unable to identify the problems correctly and therefore, accepts the issues that are distinguished by the trainer (Payne, 2014). This often leads to addressing a different issue and not resolving the correct problem which means the actual problem keep on persisting. Further, since this is session based practice, hence, often it is seen that the issues are not resolved within the allocated time. Although, while working with a particular community, I usually prefer the Strength- based approach, however, I believe that there are specific changes that are needed to be addressed and while practising on a personal level I have often used both the approaches conjointly and have received better results.
3Social Work Theory References: Connolly, M. (2007). Practice frameworks: Conceptual maps to guide interventions in child welfare.British Journal of Social Work,37(5), 825-837. Maidment, J., & Egan, R. (2016).Practice skills in social work and welfare: More than just common sense. Allen &Unwin. Morgan, S. (2014).Working with strengths: Putting personalization and recovery into practice. East Sussex: Pavilion Publishing & Media Limited. Payne, M. (2014).Modern Social Work Theory.(4rded.) UK: Palgrave MacMillan Strengths-based approaches for working with individuals. (2019). Retrieved from https://www.iriss.org.uk/resources/insights/strengths-based-approaches-working- individuals