Accessibility of London Underground for People with Learning Disabilities
Verified
Added on 2023/01/16
|13
|3059
|89
AI Summary
This article discusses the accessibility of the London Underground for people with learning disabilities, including facilities, barriers, and implications. It also provides recommendations for improving accessibility.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Sociology Name Institution Professor Course Date
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Introduction Over the years,London has become one of the most accessible cities in boththe UK and the entire contemporary world. Most of the available tube stations are usually accessed through the sitting steps and escalators. The undergrounds stations have various facilities which are best suited for disabled clients. All the existing train carriages also have clearly marked seats that are well created for those specific clients who have learning disabilities (Bovy and Stern, 2012,p.89). They are well visible and identified by key notices thus kept free for the customers with learning disabilities and other disabled people. Apart from the Metropolitan line, all the underground trains have audio announcementswhich state clearly the train destination, interchangeable routes, and next terminus in order to make it easier to be accessed by the people with learning disabilities. Also, it has well-trained staff who have greater skills in offering instructions and extra help to people with learning disabilities in case of an issue. Various TFLs London underground services have got accessible facilities that are well designed for passengers with learning disabilities like audiovisual information, wide access rails that can be grabbed without necessarily having to view (Brown et al, p.19). Accessibility guidance for the disabled is also available.\ Background London underground and trains Evidence and action on disability rights
There exist tremendous concerns about how the department for transport and accessibility plan is monitoring the issues of people with learning disabilities. It includes plan made by the UK government authority regarding the changes needed o data set of the number of people with disabilities and number of journeys that they should make (Buhalis, Darcy, and Ambrose, 2012). In spite of London being quite an accessible city, people with learning disabilities still face various issues. Underground Accessibility of open toilets increasing more prominent consideration and could be the next enormous issue • Continued calls for expanding step-free access over the system. • Some issues, especially for visually impaired and individuals with learning disabilities – lighting, floor surfaces, materials utilized on steps – which can cause bewilderment or make way finding challenges. • Lifts/wide passageway doors areas – regularly wheelchair clients need to trim crosswise over different clients. • Way finding around stations Analysis: Issues Commuters with learning disabilities notice a significant number of the key hindrances which have developed in past research, for example, issues moving inside stations, especially those without free step access; absence of fitting data arrangement at stations; and issues with getting a seat on both London Underground and transports (Ceccato 2013, p.56). Be that as it may, these obstructions are exacerbated when driving amid peak times as a result of expanded traveler numbers, which frequently prompts packing in stations, at transport stops, and on transports and prepares.
For instance, trouble with travelling through stations is uplifted amid peak time travel as a result of the volume of different travelers moving at speed through the station like when changing routes in case there is any interruption. Other commuters are usually highly inconsiderate towards people with learning disabilities especially in the stations (De Domenico, Solé-Ribalta, Gómez, and Arenas, 2014.p.55). There are likewise some particular issues amid the morning peak time when there are younger students traveling, as people with learning disabilities state that they are especially reluctant to surrender their seats and can be boisterous and problematic. This blend of challenges amid existing peak time travel can prompt physical distress and strain, which people with learning disabilities state that these constraints influence their capacity to travel comfortably. It thus causes enthusiastic pain and worries about physical wellbeing and the threat of falling. The barriers experienced by disabled workers affect their movement decisions, especially travel courses and transport modes. A few members stated that they plan their adventures early enough so as to limit the physical strain of driving, regardless of whether this implies taking a more extended route or expanding the general travel time (Ferrari, Berlingerio, Calabrese, and Reades, 2014,p.28). This is additionally connected to a modular decision, with many workers with disabilities wanting to utilize the transport regularly. Congestion Overcrowding on the different methods of transport and at stations makes explicit issues for workers with disabilities going at the most peak time frames. These are challenges with the route; failure to change courses if there are transport service interruptions; and issues brought about by the conduct of different clients.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
This is a specific issue for those with portability disabilities. The route challenges and dread of being pushed or bumped are distinguished as being specific worries in stations where there is no progression-free access and the travelers are compelled to utilize the stairs. Just as causing physical uneasiness, impaired workers likewise feel restless about conceivably holding up different travelers. Failure to change routes Due to an absence of physical versatility, handicapped travelers with learning disabilities can think that it's hard to make changes to their course if there are deferrals or cancellation to travel services. This is underlined amid peak hours when the climate is progressively harsh because of the number of individuals utilizing open transport (Graves et al, p.471). They may likewise think that it's increasingly hard to discover an individual from staff to help exhort them on suitable travel changes to make. On the off chance that individuals with learning incapacities are making new adventures and are moving freely, they will in general plan their travel ahead of time. This may include making the adventure with a companion first or requesting that someone compose basic, clear guidelines on a piece of paper clearly outlining their plans. Since the adventure has been deliberately arranged, disturbances can be at first become quite disorientating (Guo 2011, p.625). Notwithstanding, the failure to change travel routes effectively is anything but a major worry for the general population addressed with learning inabilities. Those with serious learning inabilities will frequently go with other individuals who will enable them to locate another travel route. Individuals with milder learning handicaps will typically proceed to discover an individual from
staff for assistance, particularly the individuals who think that it's hard to peruse. Some of the time they will take as much time as necessary to work out another course themselves. Impolite conduct from different travelers is seen as a key issue to people travelers with learning disabilities. Disabled commuters states that different travelers don't mull over their requirements when on Tube and train stages. People with disabilities need to hold up longer to board the transport or train amid peak hours when the underground services, stations, and stops are occupied.Thiscanpromptphysicalinconvenienceandfurthermoresentimentsof disappointment (Jones, Goodman, Roberts, Steinbach, and Green, 2013, p.202). According to research A few clients with learning disabilities feel that TfL staff can neglect to comprehend when their freedom passes are not working. They feel that on the grounds that their inability is more subtle than movement debilitations, staff rush to challenge them and contend that they can't travel. Some have likewise experienced staff being harsh or quite unhelpful to them in these conditions. Security concerns Security can be a worry for crippled individuals at night and during the evening. This is felt most unequivocally particularly on the Underground when there is less obvious staff. The general population addressed by the research involving those with learning handicaps don not generally travel much at night thus maintaining their wellbeing is a major concern. Fewer announcements and visible staff Some individuals with learning disabilities feel that there are fewer travel announcements from audio tools and noticeable staff, so they are less ready to acquire the information needed to make their travel simpler.
Implications Impact of barriers on disabled commuters' travel plans and modal choices Travelers with learning disabilities state that they regularly alter their movement conduct in light of the different troubles they find when utilizing transport in London. They will, in general, adjust their movement conduct by either changing the movement course and/or method of transport, or now and again abstaining from going amid pinnacle hours totally (Lathia, Smith, Froehlich, and Capra 2013, p.643). Changing travel courses and methods of transport Given the exertion required to utilize open transport, handicapped suburbanites more often than not prepare of time so as to recognize travel courses that are the least physically strenuous and tedious. This implies recognizing and utilizing underground and over ground stations with free step access, and transport courses and terminals that are available. The decision to travel at peak hours Solutions Passengers who experience issues reading signs depend on data passed on over amplifiers, or counsel from different travelers and TfL staff. One of the benefits of going amid pinnacle hours is that there are adequate declarations, contrasted with off-peak times when declarations are less continuous, which can leave impaired workers feeling stranded and inadequately educated. More staff at stations The expanded number of staff at cylinder and train stations amid pinnacle times is recognized as a positive viewpoint for impaired suburbanites as they can offer help and direct traveler stream.
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
This is especially significant in light of the issues experienced amid pinnacle times due to congestion (Miciukiewicz, and Vigar, 2012, p.1941). For the most part, handicapped clients feel that Underground stations present the best physical difficulties. Accordingly, steps free access get to is fundamental in ensuring debilitated travelers are unreservedly ready to get to transport offices with certainty. A few travelers feel that TfL staff need more "diversity" preparing, as they ought to be explicitly prepared to manage travelers with various sorts of inability. They comprehend that some have the understanding and preparing at this, however, they feel that the irregularities in the administration they get from staff could be limited with more prominent preparing. Clients with learning disabilities find that LU staff communicate quickly while offering key directions and giving counsel on elective routes. On these events, they don't generally feel great requesting that they back off or to rehash what they have said Staffing and preparing • the underground accessibility is seeing more prominent calls and pressures for Disability Equality Training – for ranking directors, organizers, and originators to likewise better comprehend the requirements of more seasoned and impaired individuals. • Greater help required for staff to finish EqIAs. • Improve the institutionalization of preparing and staff systems overall vehicle administrators – clients are progressively baffled by accepting various encounters. This likewise incorporates stations served by various administrators' staff – Euston, Wimbledon, Harrow, and Wealdstone. • Improving staff training programs so staff can help the wide range of clients being served, while additionally being increasingly open to staff havingbetterlearningofexplicitclient'sneeds.•Potentialforbetterutilizingimpaired individuals to prepare staff, as at Tower Transit (Prager, Beeler Asay, and Lee, and von Winterfeldt, 2011, p.773).
Recommendations According to this paper, it sees six key everyday issues and finds that individuals with learning disabilities in the UK are encountering detriments in every one of them. In any case, their lives are not lived in slick and unmistakable classes, and it is important that policymakers overall divisions perceive how the issues recognized collaborate and gather all through incapacitated individuals'lifeventures.Forinstance,beingunfittoaccessopentransportinfluences individuals' capacity to access and profit from school instruction or work (Quak 2011, p.38). Models that approach the UK Governments to put another national spotlight on inability balance, so the privileges of debilitated individuals are completely acknowledged, and to convey upgrades in handicapped individuals' involvement and results should be done. It recommended that the UK and local governments make a coordinated move to 1. Decrease instructive accomplishment and business employment holes for handicapped individuals. 2. Guarantee that basic services are available, for example, housing wellbeing, transport, and equity, meet the specific needs of impaired individuals and bolster their freedom and prosperity. 3. Advance the consideration inclusion and cooperation of handicapped individuals in metro and political life. 4. Fortify individuals' decision, self-sufficiency and command over choices and services (Ramachandran 2011, p.202). Improve existing enactment, strategies, structures and activity to readily ensure and advance the privileges of people with learning disabilities in the stations. 6. Improve the proof base on the encounters and results of impaired individuals and the capacity to survey how reasonable UK is for every single debilitated individual (Steinbach, Green, Datta, and Edwards,2011,p.33). To help the execution of these recommendations, it is significant to work with governments and key influencers to bring issues to the awareness of the underground train stations system.
Conclusion London underground transport system should be well designed in order incorporated all the people especially those with disabilities in order to ensure easy access to all UK Networks (Wentz, Jaeger, and Lazar, 2011, p.3). The transport system in the UK should thus be well established.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
References Bovy, P.H. and Stern, E., 2012.Route Choice: Wayfinding in Transport Networks: Wayfinding in Transport Networks(Vol. 9). Springer Science & Business Media.PP,.65-78 Brown, D.J., McHugh, D., Standen, P., Evett, L., Shopland, N. and Battersby, S., 2011. Designing location-based learning experiences for people with intellectual disabilities and additional sensory impairments.Computers & Education,56(1), pp.11-20. Buhalis, D., Darcy, S. and Ambrose, I. eds., 2012.Best practice in accessible tourism: Inclusion, disability, ageing population and tourism. Channel View Publications,PP.78-143 Ceccato, V., 2013.Moving safely: crime and perceived safety in Stockholm's subway stations. Lexington books. DeDomenico,M.,Solé-Ribalta,A.,Gómez,S.andArenas,A.,2014.Navigabilityof interconnectednetworksunderrandomfailures.ProceedingsoftheNationalAcademyof Sciences,111(23), pp.8351-8356. Ferrari, L., Berlingerio, M., Calabrese, F. and Reades, J., 2014. Improving the accessibility of urban transportation networks for people with disabilities.Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies,45, pp.27-40. Graves, A., Wayne, G., Reynolds, M., Harley, T., Danihelka, I., Grabska-Barwińska, A., Colmenarejo, S.G., Grefenstette, E., Ramalho, T., Agapiou, J. and Badia, A.P., 2016. Hybrid computing using a neural network with dynamic external memory.Nature,538(7626), p.471.
Guo,Z.,2011.Mindthemap!Theimpactoftransitmapsonpathchoiceinpublic transit.Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice,45(7), pp.625-639. Jones, A., Goodman, A., Roberts, H., Steinbach, R. and Green, J., 2013. Entitlement to concessionary public transport and wellbeing: a qualitative study of young people and older citizens in London, UK.Social Science & Medicine,91, pp.202-209. Lathia, N., Smith, C., Froehlich, J. and Capra, L., 2013. Individuals among commuters: Building personalised transport information services from fare collection systems.Pervasive and Mobile Computing,9(5), pp.643-664. Miciukiewicz, K. and Vigar, G., 2012. Mobility and social cohesion in the splintered city: challenging technocentric transport research and policy-making practices.Urban Studies,49(9), pp.1941-1957. Prager, F., Beeler Asay, G.R., Lee, B. and von Winterfeldt, D., 2011. Exploring reductions in London underground passenger journeys following the July 2005 bombings.Risk Analysis: An International Journal,31(5), pp.773-786. Quak, H., 2011. Urban freight transport: the challenge of sustainability.City distribution and urban freight transport: multiple perspectives, pp.37-55. Ramachandran,N.T.,2011.Enhancinginternationalstudents’experiences:Animperative agenda for universities in the UK.Journal of Research in International Education,10(2), pp.201-220.
Steinbach, R., Green, J., Datta, J. and Edwards, P., 2011. Cycling and the city: a case study of how gendered, ethnic and class identities can shape healthy transport choices.Social science & medicine,72(7), pp.1123-1130. Wentz, B., Jaeger, P.T. and Lazar, J., 2011. Retrofitting accessibility: The legal inequality of after-the-factonlineaccessforpersonswithdisabilitiesintheUnitedStates.First Monday,16(11).pp.77-90