Reprogenetics and Social Inequality, Computer Aided Communication Technologies, and Technological Advancement and Social Progress

This article discusses the social issues raised by reprogenetics, the impact of computer aided communication technologies on our social life, and whether technological advancement leads to social progress. It covers topics such as eugenics, social inequality, cyber bullying, and the benefits and drawbacks of technological progress.

Running head: Sociology
Sociology
Name of the Student
Name of the University
Author Note

1Sociology
A.1: Reprogenetics and Social Inequality
Reprogenetics is the discipline that combines genetic and reproductive technologies to
allow modifications to the embryonic genome with the intent of inducing enhancements. It
can also be understood as a technology that allows the development, use, modification and
storage of embryos and gametes. Reprogenetics involves developments in different types of
technologies, such as technologies that interprets the different expressions of DNA,
harvesting embryos, identification and patenting of genes, designing genes and making
clones as well as screening for certain genes (de Melo-Martín and Inmaculada). These
technologies can facilitate modifications of the human genome at the fetal stage, inducing
‘controlled’ changes, and can be even used to eradicate disease genes being transmitted to the
children. However, such technology also draws significant amount of controversy, and debate
on its ethical use. Critics have analyzed the social issues raised by reprogenetics. Knowles,
Lori and Gregory (2007) have pointed out that eugenics is the central concern for
reprogenetics. Even the modification of the human genome to treat disease or to enhance
mental of physical attributes of human is a slippery slope. Many skeptics believe that
adaption through random mutation is a long process of evolution through natural selection,
and incorporating artificial changes in the genome can only disrupt the natural mechanism of
accumulation of changes, and can cause inadvertent results. Similar opinions have been
voiced by most of the opponents of Genetically Modified Organisms or GMOs used as crops
(Klümper et al.). Critics also believe that modifying the genome of the fetus entails an
unacceptable risk of a distorted parent child relation and can exerbate social inequalities.
More importantly, many see the focus of reprogenetics in the enhancement of human
attributes as a form of eugenics itself. Even though scientific technologies of reprogenetics
have allowed new ways of managing human fertility and create families, and also have
helped many to grow their families, such technology can also lead to class and gender

2Sociology
inequality (Jarman). According to Billups (2016), in-vitro fertilization and surrogacy
procedures are rather very expensive and not easily available for everyone across their
socioeconomic backgrounds. Thus, the framing of infertility is done as an individual problem
instead of it being related to the structural constrains or existing socioeconomic inequalities
faced by the individuals, and places stigma on the childless woman. Even though such factors
have led to the subsequent development in the market for assisted reproductive technologies
and the science for freezing and storage of gametes have allowed the development of sperm
banks, the process of recruitment and marketing of their services are different between men
and women, as the women are more likely to be recruited to provide an ‘altruistic service’
donating their eggs to infertile women, and the egg bangs have been known to capitalize on
the social construct of egg donation as a type of gift exchange. Due to this, there has been a
higher participation of women compared to men in such type of service, even though for
males, this technique is far less invasive. These points out towards an inequality in the
services expected from the male and female gender, and underlie a possible patriarchal
undertone (Billups). Similarly, the latest advantages of the technological developments in
cloning, stem cell research and genetic screening are also very expensive, and its services are
only available to the highest bidders. This implies that such technologies will remain out of
access for individuals from socioeconomic disadvantaged positions. Critiques have argued
that such aspects will further shift the focus on science on eugenics. Eugenics has been
considered as a cause of human differentiation and discrimination. As several proponents of
eugenics supports the superiority of one race over the other, the technology of reprogenetics
may actually provide the tools to see such inequalities to fruition. The concept of ‘positive
eugenics’ where individuals who are marked as ‘superior’ will be encouraged to have more
children, while the concept of ‘negative eugenics’ where individuals deemed ‘inferior’ will
be discouraged to do the same. As was exhibited by the atrocious acts of the Nazi Germany

3Sociology
where 350,000 people were sterilized to prevent them from procreating, shows how the
slippery slope of eugenics might lead to gross violations of human rights, and can potentially
perpetuate the social, cultural and economic inequalities, already existing in our societies and
further the gap between the classes (Shalev). The technology of cloning also raises the
question whether, availability of this technology to the public can lead to this being used
more by a particular segment of the public, and cause a particular group or groups to make
clones of themselves and increasing their chances of perpetuation, and allow children to be
born with inborn talents, creating a cohort of ‘super citizens’. In addition of this being
disruptive to the nature-nurture interplay, can greatly increase the socioeconomic divide
based on the access towards these new and expensive technologies (Islam and MdMonirul).
A 3: How computer aided communication technologies have shaped our social life:
With the advent of technology, the ability of humans to send and receive messages
have been greatly enhanced. With the latest phase of the continued revolution in
communication technologies in the form of internet, mobile phones and social media, the
ways we communicate now has been greatly reshaped (Qureshi). However, with such
advances also came few challenges and problems, borne out of the effects of these new
technologies on our society. For example, the free flow of information that forms the basis of
our communication also exposes an inherent risk of the information landing in the wrong
hands, and being misutilised, and raises concerns about the security of the information. Such
concerns are graver still in context to sensitive information like personal data or intellectual
property, and also towards an inequality in the access of the data. These aspects increases the
risks of increasing the divide among people, exposes people to the risks of cyber bullying and
blackmailing and pose a significant challenge in the management, monitoring and filtering of

4Sociology
all the information flowing in these communication media (Hall et al.). The internet was
initially developed as an experimental network by the US Department of Defense’s Advanced
Project Research Agency (DARPA), initially called the ARPANET, which connected a
limited number of computers to allow sharing of information between them (Michael). The
span of the computer network further increased with the advent of communication protocols
such as Transmission Control Program and Internet Protocol. The internet fully developed
with the breakthrough by CERN which allowed computers to access information on the
network through hypertext transfer protocol (http) and the later development of the World
Wide Web (Segal). And internet has seen massive growth since its early beginning, with only
623 website, to the present times having over a billion sites, a number which nearly doubles
every 5 years. This development have far outpaced other forms of communication (like radio
broadcasting), involving billions of people by 2015 (Curran). With the growing popularity of
the internet, platforms like the social media also became popular. As a result of which
companies like Facebook, Linked In, Twitter has millions of subscribers across the globe.
These platforms have allowed individuals to communicate seamlessly with a potentially
unlimited number of people, and use the vast user base of these platforms to broadcast
messages (Perrin). The open access nature of these platforms, and the free flow of
information of the users of the platform have also materialized acts of cyber bullying and
hacking, resulting in the theft of personal information, impersonation and fraud, spamming of
sites and cyber attacks (Olweus). This shows the potential benefits as well as liabilities
imposed by these platforms on the individual users. These platforms (internet and social
media) have allowed individuals to connect on the basis of common interests, work relations
and political agendas, completely bypassing the geographical gap (Perrin). However, this has
also resulted in the person-to-person relationships to be undermined, making it easy for the
digital relationships to take precedence over the physical ones. The technological

5Sociology
development has also made up more dependent on them, due to their ability to give ‘constant
companionship’. This have also instilled in us a belief that out opinions will be constantly
heard (creating an illusion of out centrality), and we have the freedom to invest our attention
wherever we want (creating an illusion of freedom) and that we will never be alone (giving us
an illusion of company). Such aspects have led to online relations slowly replacing the old
face-to-face relations (Rainie et al.). However, the most affected aspects of the new
advancements of communication have resulted in lesser time being spent on physical
activities, sleeping or eating (Cs.stanford.edu). Few critiques have argued that social media
and the internet did not lead to a reduction in our social life, but made them more intense and
much larger. The advancement in mobile technology, with smart phones and GPS, being
connected to the internet and social media has become even the easier. It have helped
individuals to stay in touch with others across geographical and political boundaries, and
maintain family ties and even helped in the providence of medical assistance. In many
countries, mobile phone users are able to use the communication technology breakthroughs to
save money, transfer funds, make payments and manage their finances. One very significant
involvement of the social media and internet in our society is the indolent of these platform
and technologies in various social movements. These tools have been used to promote
stability in a society as well as to undermine existing ones based on strengthening the
relationships between individuals. It has allowed individual grievances to be snowballed into
mass movements, and have allowed the voice of many to be heard across all social, political
and economic boundaries. Incidents like the Arab Springs of 2011 have shown how social
media can also act as a platform for free journalism, overcoming oppressive regimes and sold
out or distorted media, allowing the public voice to be heard (Aouragh). At the same time,
these technologies can be turned against its own users, allowing strategic divides to be

6Sociology
implemented, preventing the free flow of information and bypass ‘net neutrality’ as seen with
the system of ‘great firewall of china’(Shen; Castells).
B 4: Will technological advancement lead to social progress?
Technological progress can lead to social progress is considered as a popular view.
This is particularly prevalent among individuals in the government and those with heavy
investment in technology, however is hardly justified by them (Goldman). However, few
critiques think that such progress mostly benefits only those who promotes these
advancements, such as large corporations who heavily invests in advertising campaigns and
also to encourage the governments to promote this message to the masses. Some governments
can also benefit through the technological advancements, giving them the edge over other
nations, as was in case of the US during the early developmental stages of information
technology (Nolan). The relation of technological advancements with social progress can be
analyzed by first understanding what social progress is. As per Theodore Roszack, ideal
progress is characterized by improvements in the quality of life instead of the quantity of
goods (Roszak). The social progress on account of the technological advancements is mostly
in the forms of an increase in leisure time, possibility of cleaner environment, availability of
better education and healthcare, reduction in unemployment, reduction in crime and more
equal standards of living for everyone in the society (Crowley; Panayotou). However, such
aspects can also be considered to be affected by human effort and political change, rather
than just being the products of technological advancements. In the last two centuries,
technology has played crucial role in the society. From the early invention of the industrial
age, in the form of steam engine to the developments in computing technology in the form of
microprocessor chips technology has travelled a long way (Hakansson). Since then our
societies have also be greatly reshaped, partly due to the new advancements of technology as
well as due to influences which are unrelated to technology. Technology has been implicated

7Sociology
with an increase in the levels of consumption and the growth of wealth in the developed
world by some critiques (Nolan).
On the plus side, advancements in technology have allowed several benefits such as
increasing accessibility to educational and recreational material in the form of printed and
digital media and materials, and technological advances such as the internet and mobile
communication have provided opportunities for individuals to exchange ideas, debate with
each other, share/contradict their viewpoints and even organize around political agendas
(Parasuraman). Moreover, technology have also allowed us to be free of menial duties such
washing clothes or dishes, or reduced the use of shovels or picks through the usage of
machineries (David). At the same time, processes such as storing and preparation of food
have become easier and less time consuming than it used to be before. This have resulted us
being left with more time on our hands, which we can utilize for more constructive purposes.
Automation of processes have aloe allowed risky and difficult tasks to be done with minimal
human involvement, thereby increasing the safety of the workers, as well as increasing the
reliability of the work (done by machines). Immense advances in healthcare was also made
possible by the advances in communication and diagnostic and treatment techniques
(Øvretveit)
The disadvantages of technological show certain darker sides of the progress.
Technological advancements in warfare have resulted in the development of destructive
weapons, with devastating potential. Even the advancements in the automobile industry,
which allowed automobiles to be move at ever faster speeds, have greatly increased the
number of fatalities due to accidents and injuries (Sachs). This highlights the potential burden
of these technological advancements on human lives. Another aspect can be drawn from
advancements in chemistry and chemical manufacturing, which have been used in the

8Sociology
production of synthetic addictive drugs such as Crystal Meth, which ruins millions of lives
globally (Kish).
It is important therefore to handle technological advancements with utmost care, as
the same advancements which can be used to benefit society can be used as a source to inflict
immense harm. Two significant examples of such advancement are the development of the
first dynamite and the first theoretical explanation for the conversion of mass into energy.
The dynamite developed by Sir Alfred Nobel, was intended to help humans move the
immovable objects, allowing the construction of human civilization, but has also been used
extensively as a weapon of destruction (Fant). Similarly, Einstein’s E=MC2 was aimed to
provide a potentially unlimited source of energy to power humankind, but have been used to
develop the nuclear bomb (Bodanis).
However, despite the several potential darker sides that have resulted with the
advancements of technology, it has the potential of changing our society as well as our ways
of live in a significant manner. Increased automation of our jobs have resulted us having
more leisure time, which we have used for other activities. This has significantly contributed
the development of art, as well as further breakthroughs in science, knowledge and
technologies. The potential of technology to shape our society is now higher than ever before,
as we see a continued development in the process of transmission of information which has
allowed us to be connected in a way we never experienced before. Advancements in
computing technologies have given us the power to accurately predict the weather, or
diagnose diseases, thereby improving and increasing human lifespan. Such aspects are bound
to affect the very nature of our social structures at the most fundamental levels.

9Sociology
References:
Aouragh, Miriyam. "Social media, mediation and the Arab revolutions." Marx in the Age of
Digital Capitalism (2016): 482-515.
Billups, Sarah Catherine. "Reproductive Technologies And Social Inequality - There's
Research On That". Thesocietypages.Org, 2016,
https://thesocietypages.org/trot/2016/11/03/reproductive-technologies-and-social-inequality/.
Accessed 15 Apr 2018.
Bodanis, David. E= mc2: A biography of the world's most famous equation. Bloomsbury
Publishing USA, 2005.
Castells, Manuel. Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the Internet age. John
Wiley & Sons, 2015.
Crowley, David, and Paul Heyer. Communication in history: Technology, culture, society.
Routledge, 2015.
Cs.stanford.edu. "Stanford SIQSS Study". Cs.Stanford.Edu, 2018,
https://cs.stanford.edu/people/eroberts/cs201/projects/personal-lives/stanford.html. Accessed
15 Apr 2018.
Curran, James, Natalie Fenton, and Des Freedman. Misunderstanding the internet. Routledge,
2016.
David, H. "Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of workplace
automation." Journal of Economic Perspectives 29.3 (2015): 3-30.
de Melo-Martín, Inmaculada. Rethinking Reprogenetics: Enhancing Ethical Analyses of
Reprogenetic Technologies. Oxford University Press, 2016.

10Sociology
Fant, Kenne. Alfred Nobel: a biography. Arcade Publishing, 2006.
Goldman, Steven L., ed. Science, technology, and social progress. Vol. 2. Lehigh University
Press, 1989.
Hakansson, Hakan, ed. Industrial Technological Development (Routledge Revivals): A
Network Approach. Routledge, 2015.
Hall, Joseph L., and Deven McGraw. "For telehealth to succeed, privacy and security risks
must be identified and addressed." Health Affairs 33.2 (2014): 216-221.
Islam, Md Monirul. "Posthumanism: Through the Postcolonial Lens." Critical Posthumanism
and Planetary Futures. Springer, New Delhi, 2016. 115-129.
Jarman, Michelle. "Relations of abortion: crip approaches to reproductive justice." Feminist
Formations 27.1 (2015): 46-66.
Kish, Stephen J. "Pharmacologic mechanisms of crystal meth." Canadian Medical
Association Journal 178.13 (2008): 1679-1682.
Klümper, Wilhelm, and Matin Qaim. "A meta-analysis of the impacts of genetically modified
crops." PloS one 9.11 (2014): e111629.
Knowles, Lori P., and Gregory E. Kaebnick, eds. Reprogenetics: Law, policy, and ethical
issues. JHU Press, 2007.
Michael, H. "ARPANET—the first Internet." (2015).
Nolan, Laura. "The Belief That Technological Progress Leads To Social
Progress". Scss.Tcd.Ie, 2018,
https://www.scss.tcd.ie/~tangney/ComputersAndSociety/99/StdPapers/P2-Popular/ln.html.
Accessed 15 Apr 2018.

11Sociology
Olweus, Dan. "Cyber Bullying." Aggression and Violence: A Social Psychological
Perspective (2016): 225.
Øvretveit, John, et al. "Improving quality through effective implementation of information
technology in healthcare." International Journal for Quality in Health Care 19.5 (2007): 259-
266.
Panayotou, Theodore. "Economic growth and the environment." The environment in
anthropology (2016): 140-148.
Parasuraman, Raja, Thomas B. Sheridan, and Christopher D. Wickens. "A model for types
and levels of human interaction with automation." IEEE Transactions on systems, man, and
cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans 30.3 (2000): 286-297.
Perrin, Andrew. "Social media usage: 2005-2015." (2015).
Qureshi, Sajda. "Are we making a better world with information and communication
technology for development (ICT4D) research? Findings from the field and theory building."
(2015): 511-522.
Rainie, Lee et al. "What Is The Internet Doing To Relationships?". Pew Research Center:
Internet, Science & Tech, 2018, http://www.pewinternet.org/2006/01/25/what-is-the-internet-
doing-to-relationships/. Accessed 15 Apr 2018.
Roszak, Theodore. Where the wasteland ends: politics and transcendence in post industrial
society. Vol. 903. Doubleday Books, 1973.
Sachs, Wolfgang. For love of the automobile: Looking back into the history of our desires.
Univ of California Press, 1992.
Segal, Ben. "Internet prehistory at CERN." (2014).

12Sociology
Shalev, Carmel. "Reproductive Ethics." Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics (2014): 1-15.
Shen, Fei. "Great firewall of China." Encyclopedia of social media and politics 22 (2014):
599-602.