The Role of Philip in Alexander the Great's Achievements

This essay explores the contribution of Philip towards the fame, fortune, and achievements of Alexander the Great. It discusses the role of Philip in shaping Alexander's success and argues that without Philip, there would be no Alexander the Great.

Running head: SOCIOLOGY
SOCIOLOGY
Name of the student
Name of the university
Author note

SOCIOLOGY 1
Introduction
Alexander the Great is famous till the current decade for the military power he owed and
has been one of renowned figure in the history. With the courage of the tiger and with the
ferocity of the lion, Alexander is often called to be a descendant of the god. He was the genius in
the military due to his exceptional skills in the battles through the Asia against the king of empire
of Persia who brought him the fortune, the fame and the eternal glory as the greatest king in the
history of all the times (Worthington 2014). Alexander was brilliant, patient and often devious
regarding his careful strategies of planning. But behind the glory and the fame of Alexander lies
the query regarding the role and the implication of Philip towards some of the greatest
achievement of Alexander. The essay initiates to elaborate over the question “'Without Philip, no
Alexander the Great': true or false, do you think?”. The essay highlights some of the major
factors and the contribution of Philip towards the fame, fortune and the eternal glory of
Alexander explaining the answer to the question. It is true that without Philips, there is no
alexander the great.
Discussion
The lives and the Alexander and Philip have been intertwined in several of the ways.
Philip centralized the ancient Macedonia. Philips furthermore built the army regarding the
unprecedented resilience and ability conquering the Greek peninsula with the preparation of the
conquest of the Persian Empire that amalgamated towards the Macedonia army.
Philip's and Alexander the Great's existences were interlinked in several respects. Ancient
Macedonia were centrally controlled by Philip (Trundle 2004). Philip furthermore created an
army for unparalleled capacity and strength that colonized the peninsula of Greece as well as

2SOCIOLOGY
compelled for the colonization of the Persian Empire incorporated with such an military of
Greco-Macedonia. In fact, when he invaded the brilliant Persian Empire, Alexander spurred its
allied forces (Alexandris et al. 2017). After which Alexander did take his military to
contemporary India's boundaries. That is where Alexander developed the parliamentary
democracy and kingdom which, notwithstanding the its disintegration, influenced the Greek and
roman era's economic religious and cultural universe. Alexander was riding his family's engine.
Unless Alexander would not have accomplished too, the accomplishments of Philips would have
been quickly forgotten as much of Macedonia's colonial masters. Macedon's Alexander III was
known worldwide as Alexander the Great (Heckel and Yardley 2004). He was known to
humanity of his renowned character and major accomplishments. It really is important to note
that Alexander excelled in having conquered the whole world in 13 years. Alexander shaped its
history's biggest Greek kingdom. Notwithstanding all of the significant achievements of
Alexander, Alexander nevertheless followed in the footsteps of his father. Alexander might has
little or no place on the world stage due to the extreme vigilant readiness and bold behavior of
Philip from Macedon.
Macedonia was indeed an impoverished land. The humans lived with everybody around
each other in constant conflict. While having great political profundity and nuance, Philip did
take responsibility for his own actions (Roisman and Worthington 2010). Philip did these by
setting up a successful military, strengthening militarized city external borders. Philip
accomplished just that by extorting his opponents with currency and ruthlessness. Philip
transformed into some kind of lucrative business of silver and gold drilling. There have also been
highways and tunnels constructed by Philip.

3SOCIOLOGY
From the historical context it was evident that the studies and the training of Alexander
was instructed by Aristotle who gave some of the most valuable lesson of his life (Murison
2006). This helped the king to become of the most successful, challenging and ancient champion
in Macedonia in the 4th century. Furthermore it has been evident from the research study of
various of the authors that Philips the king passed many of his knowledge and skills to his son
which he gathered by the observation and the power of the individual will and his consistent
exposition.
It will be important to note that it had been Philip who was the developer of the first
property nation in history (Heckel and Tritle 2011). One of the most commanding
accomplishment of Philip was Corinthian reconciliation in which Philip eventually reunified
every one of his longtime opponents, not ignoring Athens in and out of one corporation. The
major gift or the contributions which spurred in Alexander's subsequent significant achievements
have been training by Aristotle , Philip's military formed such as coinage as well as an
developed residence. Regrettably of Alexander, he thought his dad restrained and just seemed to
reside under the shadow of his , that seemed to terrify him as his accomplishments that were
negligible before the achievement of his father's In several respects, Alexander and Philip
participated "optimization and hostility" as illustrated in Carney and Ogden (2010).
According to the study by Worthington (2014) it has been believed by some of the
scholars that Alexander the great played a role towards the murder and the death of his father
either directly or indirectly for leading the voyage to Asia that his father, Philips has organized
for himself. It has thus been a fascinating portrayal of the connection and the relation among
both father and son. Alexander and Philips were both famous and great in their own era.

4SOCIOLOGY
Thus it can be summarized that the contribution of Philips laid some of the greater
foundations for Alexander for becoming the great man he was. The factors such as the education,
army and the siege warfare that was inherited by the Alexander the great was all the contribution
of Philips towards the successful establishment of the homeland. It can furthermore be stated that
Philips and Alexander both were two of the greatest gems in their own right and within their own
reign. If Philips would not have created or developed the army, Alexander could not have
achieved what he did and what he conquered and is still famous for. The studies furthermore
states that Philips could not achieved what Alexander did in his reign.
Conclusion
Thus, it can be concluded from above essay that Alexander was the genius in the military
due to his exceptional skills in the battles through the Asia against the king of empire of Persia
who brought him the fortune, the fame and the eternal glory as the greatest king in the history of
all the times. Alexander was brilliant, patient and often devious regarding his careful strategies of
planning. But behind the glory and the fame of Alexander lies the query regarding the role and
the implication of Philip towards some of the greatest achievement of Alexander. The essay
highlights and discusses with the positive note that “'Without Philip, no Alexander the Great';
being a true statement. The contribution of Philips laid some of the greater foundations for
Alexander for becoming the great man he was. Philips and Alexander both were two of the
greatest gems in their own right and within their own reign. Philips the king passed many of his
knowledge and skills to his son which he gathered by the observation and the power of the
individual will and his consistent exposition which eventually helped Alexander to conquer the
expeditions and become the greatest king of the entire world in the history.

5SOCIOLOGY

6SOCIOLOGY
References
Alexandris, K., Theodorakis, N., Kaplanidou, K. and Papadimitriou, D., 2017. Event quality and
loyalty among runners with different running involvement levels: The case of “The Alexander
the Great” International Marathon. International Journal of Event and Festival
Management, 8(3), pp.292-307.
Carney, E. and Ogden, D. eds., 2010. Philip II and Alexander the Great: Father and Son, Lives
and Afterlives. Oxford University Press.
Heckel, W. and Tritle, L.A. eds., 2011. Alexander the Great: a new history. John Wiley & Sons.
Heckel, W. and Yardley, J., 2004. Alexander the Great: historical texts in translation. Wiley-
Blackwell.
Murison, C.L., 2006. J. Roisman, ed., Brill's Companion to Alexander the Great; Claude Mosse,
Alexander: Destiny and Myth. MOUSEION-CALGARY-, 6(1), p.46.
Roisman, J. and Worthington, I. eds., 2010. A Companion to Ancient Macedonia. Wiley-
Blackwell.
Trundle, M., 2004. Greek mercenaries: From the late archaic period to Alexander. Routledge.
Worthington, I., 2014. Alexander the Great: Man and God. Routledge.
Worthington, I., 2014. By the Spear: Philip II, Alexander the Great, and the Rise and Fall of the
Macedonian Empire. Ancient Warfare and Civilizati.