Solution 1. The main stakeholders of the conference coordinator system (CSS) are as follows.1.Author- In this system author is the one of the researchers who writes the research papersand writes their unique research in it and wants the other researchers to review it. To doso the author has to submit their report in the CSS system along with the proper formatand their names.2.Authors- There are a lot of authors who wants to submit their research and want to reviewthem by the experts.3.Expert / Reviewers- Experts are the panel who will review the research papers of theauthors and provide their review whether the report is good or not by the proper formatand the material in the report. Experts are unknown to the authors. They are randomlychosen by the system editor. Three weeks of time are given to the experts to review theresearch and assigned the paper as accepted, accepted subject to revision, and rejected.4.Editor- Editor is the mediator between the authors and the reviewer. The paper submittedby the author in the system will get a random number and then the editor place that paperto their respective experts for review. And it maintains the anonymity among them.Authors and author are the external stakeholders of the CSS system.Expert and Editor are the internal stakeholders of the system.Solution 2.a. Functional requirementsAuthors1.Paper is prepared by the authors. The paper should be in the proper format and the PDFform.2.Author must have to create account in the system3.The author have to submit their paper on their respective account.4.The author is also designated as the corresponding author who will review the email.5.From containing the field of paper title and the abstract information about the paper.6.The author must provide his name, contacts, email, title of the paper, and the institutionname.Editor1.Editor track down the papers of the authors.2.It checks whether the paper is in proper format and in time.3.The editor will assign the paper to the reviewer of particular field for review.4.Edit will check the reviewing time taken by the reviewer and if the period is competed amessage is then sent to the reviewer.5.The editor will show the result of the author on the respective account. The result is in theform of category based on the assessment of the reviewer.6.The editor helps in scheduling the conference by keeping track on each paper.

+13062052269

info@desklib.com

Submission and Review Process

Contribute Materials

Related Documents

Worksheet & Peer Review