Solving an Ethical Dilemma: Applying ACS Code of Ethics and Legal Principles
Verified
Added on 2023/06/15
|5
|1306
|235
AI Summary
This article discusses how to solve an ethical dilemma by applying ACS Code of Ethics and legal principles. It also provides recommendations for ethical dilemmas.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Assignment Cover Sheet Subject Name:Professional Environments Assignment Name/Number: Date of Submission: Participant Name: ACS Member Number Email Address: Declaration: I declare that the assignment is based on my own work and that all material previously written or published in any source by any other person has been duly acknowledged in the assignment. I have not submitted this work, or a significant part thereof, previously as part of any academic program. In submitting this assignment I give ACS permission to copy for assessment purposes only.
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Australian Computer Society Professional Code of Ethics As an ACS member, you must uphold and advance the honor, dignity and effectiveness of being a professional. This entails, in addition to being a good citizen and acting within the law, your conformance to the following ACS values (ACS Code of Professional Conduct 2014). The Primacy of the Public Interest You will place the interests of the public above those of personal, business or sectional interests. The Enhancement of Quality of Life You will strive to enhance the quality of life of those affected by your work. Honesty You will be honest in your representation of skills, knowledge, services and products. Competence You will work competently and diligently for your stakeholders. Professional Development You will enhance your own professional development, and that of your staff. Professionalism You will enhance the integrity of the ACS and the respect of its members for each other.
It is to be stated according to theSFIAframework that people who are employed in at a high level in an organization will have higher responsibility. According to the SFIA model there are seven levels of responsibility ranging from level one to level seven. Level one responsibility indicates the most junior and level seven indicates the most senior. In this case it can be noted that Hardeep is employed as the IT manager and therefore he has a high level of responsibility. His responsibilities include setting policies for the company, making decisions which are critical for the success of the company. He should also exhibit key leadership and management skills. Thus, it can be stated that it is his duty to make the right decision even in ethical dilemmas; as such decision will be instrumental for the success of the company. The values of ACS code of Ethics that have been identified and complied with in order to solve the ethical dilemma are: Primacy of Public Interest Honesty Enhancement of Quality of Life The clauses of ACS code of professional conduct that have been helpful in solving ethical dilemma are: One will place the interests of the public above those of personal, business or sectional interests. One will enhance his own professional development, and that of your staff. One will enhance the integrity of the ACS and the respect of its members for each other. One will work competently and diligently for his stakeholders. One will be honest in his representation of skills, knowledge, services and products (ACS Code of Professional Conduct 2014). In order to resolve his dilemma he must undertake the following actions: Recognize the moral dilemma faced by him: In this case study the dilemma faced by Hardeep is ethical in nature. It can be said that it is duty to make the right decision which produces the best result for his company. At the same time he has a moral duty of supporting his friend by procuring software from the company B. However, the offer of company A is better than that of company B. Identifying the parties who are involved It can be said that in this given scenario the main stakeholders are the Mandeep, Hardeep, the government department where Hardeep is employed, Company A and Company B. Hardeep shares a personal relationship with his friend where as he shares a fiduciary relationship with the government department where he is employed as the IT manager. Evaluation of the ethical values It is to be stated that trust is the primary value which is involved in this case. Hardeep is trusted by the government department by the virtue of acting as its IT manager to make the
decision which is in the best interest of the department. Thus he should accept Company A’s offer. However he owes a moral duty to his friend and if he is to fulfil such duty he must accept the offer of company B. Further it is to be stated that he must ensure to act fairly. Therefore, he should accept company A’s offer which deserves acceptance. Evaluating the Burdens and Benefits In this case if Hardeep chooses to accept the offer of company A, he will ensure that he acted in best interests of the government department, however he would ruin his friendship with his friend If he chooses to accept company B’s offer his friendship with Mandeep would not be affected however the decision would not be in the best interest of the company. Comparison of the dilemma with instances which are similar in nature Section 182 and 183 of the Corporation Act 2001 state that it is the duty of the directors to act in the best interest of the company. It is to be further stated that officers and directors are prohibited from misusing their powers in order to act in their own interest or the interest of the third party. Having a discussion about the dilemma with others Hardeep must discuss the dilemma faced by him with other people of the department who are relevant Analysing the decision in accordance with legal principles Hardeep in this case must accept company A’s offer. If he does not do so he would not be considered to have acted in the best interest of the company as governed by section 182 and 183 of the Corporations Act 2001. Choosing Company B’s offer would result in violation of the provisions of ACS code of ethics and Corporations Act. Assessment of Comfort level of the decision In this case Hardeep is expected to feel that he acted in righteous and fair way if he chooses too accept the offer of Company A. Recommendations for Ethical Dilemma ThusitcanbestatedthatinthiscaseHardeepmustplacetheinterestofthe government department before his personal interest of helping his friend. He must choose the offer of company A in order to ensure that he acts in accordance with the ACS code of conduct.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Bibliography: ACS Code of Professional Conduct Professional Standards Board Australian Computer Society. (2014). 1st ed. Australian Computer Society Professional Code of Ethics Legislation.gov.au.(2018).CorporationsAct2001.[online]Availableat: https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2018C00031 [Accessed 12 Feb. 2018]. Shapiro, J.P. and Stefkovich, J.A., 2016.Ethical leadership and decision making in education: Applying theoretical perspectives to complex dilemmas. Routledge. von Konsky, B.R., Jones, A. and Miller, C., 2014, January. Visualising career progression for ICTprofessionalsandtheimplicationsforICTcurriculumdesigninhighereducation. InProceedingsoftheSixteenthAustralasianComputingEducationConference-Volume 148(pp. 13-20). Australian Computer Society, Inc..