(PDF) Air Quality Monitoring
20 Pages2528 Words200 Views
Added on 2020-01-06
(PDF) Air Quality Monitoring
Added on 2020-01-06
ShareRelated Documents
SPSS
TABLE OF CONTENTINTRODUCTION/ Literature review..........................................................................................................3Graphical representation of data..............................................................................................................5Discussion.................................................................................................................................................14Conclusion.................................................................................................................................................15REFERENCES..........................................................................................................................................16Figure 1 Graphical representation of different areas PM 10 values.............................................................5
INTRODUCTION/ Literature reviewPM 10 helps in measuring air pollution in the specific geographic area.In UK level of PH10 is high and it reflects that in UK level of pollution is high. The main source of Air pollution islarge number of vehicles in the UK. With passage of time number of cars and bikes get increase in the mentioned nation. Due to this reason heavy amount of pollutants are emanated from vehicles. These pollutants are polluting surrounding environment and due to this reason number of deaths are also increasing in the UK. A new report was published under which research was carried out on the data that was related to 2008-2013. This research study or report was reflecting the cities of the UK that cross the level that was determined by the WHO as its standard in respect to PM 10. As per WHO level of air pollution must not cross the standard value 20 micrograms per cubic meter. The report clearly state that London which is capital of England have worst air quality followed by Eastbourne, Nottingham, Oxford, Southampton and York etc (From Glasgow to Eastbourne: the 10 UK towns and cities breaching WHO air quality limits, 2016.). This report states that there is not any big difference in level of degradation of air quality. Means that there is a difference between the value of PM 10 among these cities but thereis not huge gap in the values of this parameter in case of these locations. It can be said that these cities are in danger.According to Seinfeld and Pandis, (2016)the number of deaths due to air pollution in London and other cities of the UK are increasing rapidly which is matter of concern. However, inthis regard every effort is made by the nation government but still now level of pollution is high. It is well known fact that many giant automobile manufacturers of the world are using technology that measure the pollutants released by their cars. Such kind of efforts proves insufficient in current time period. Hence, air pollution is increasing at rapid pace in the UK.As per views of Hajat and et all.,,(2015)population density is different in different locations or cities. Consequently, level of pollution must also be different in these cities. But this does not happened and it is find out that there is not a big difference in the PM 10 value in different cities. This is one of the big contrasting facts and it can be said that due to higher level of mobility of people among different cities level of pollution is almost similar in some specific cities. It can be observed that PM 10 value is York and London Melbourne road.
Moisseeva and et.al.,(2016)claims that there is serious need to make sure that air pollution remain in control.In this regard some of the specific steps can be taken by the government. General public itself can play an important role in controlling air pollution. If they increasingly will make use of cycles to visit short distant place then air pollution can be easily controlled by the nation to some extent. Apart from this, people can travel from trains to visit specific place. By doing so pollution can be controlled to great extent and PM 10 level can be improved to great extent. It is clear from the fact that unless UK government will not receive support from the general public nothing can be happen and air pollution level cannot be controlled.Lelieveldand et all.,(2015)states that in Japan large number of people makes use of cyclesto visit specific place and due to this reason pollution is in control in the mentioned nation. People of the nation understand there social responsibility and are taking active part in conserving there natural environment from the population. UK government needs to run a campaign under which general public will be considered as one of the most important and valuable stakeholder in controlling air pollution. Under this campaign awareness will be created among the people about air pollution and steps that they can take to prevent further elevation in PM 10 levels in different cities of the UK. Such kind of steps will greatly help UK in reducing level of pollution from its land.Research questionWhat is the extent to which level of PM 10 is different among various cities of the UK?Ho: There is no significant difference between values of PM 10 in different areas.H1: There is significant difference between values of PM 10 in different areas.
End of preview
Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.
Related Documents
Environmental Management Assignmentlg...
|17
|4300
|57
Effects of Contaminated Air Research 2022lg...
|7
|1482
|11
Physics - CADR | Question and Answerlg...
|6
|823
|34
Impact of Ultra Low Emission Zone on London Private Hirer Driverslg...
|13
|3277
|52
Air Pollution as a Global Health Policy Issuelg...
|11
|3938
|342
Nox Pollution prevention and control in UKlg...
|14
|1027
|14