Assignment on Speech Pathology
Added on 2021-06-15
11 Pages2520 Words38 Views
Running head: SPEECH PATHOLOGY1Speech pathologyName:Institution:
SPEECH PATHOLOGY2Language and speech evaluation 02/04/2018Clients:Max ReidDate of birth:02/11/2012Parent:Mr. and Mrs. ReidReferral questionsAn inclusive speech and phonological assessment were requested to determine the severity, extent, nature of language, speech damage, and functional limits connected to the speaking and language loss.Explicit referral queries are;Does Max reveal an expressive and receptive language disorder, which influence use of verbal, compressive or written linguistic and enforces function boundaries on his capability to converse?Does Max demonstrate phonological disorders, which influence on spoken fluency and imposes limits on his capability to talk?Does Max exhibit a fluency and voice syndrome, which sways on voice quality and speech eloquence and executing useful limitation on his capability to connect?BackgroundMax was reported by his mother to suffer multiple ear infection during the initial years oflife. It is reported that Max was ‘okay’ but an audiology assessment indicated no further hearing
SPEECH PATHOLOGY3concerns. Max’s father, Reid, reports that he himself was slow to talk when he was a child and had issues with learning to read. Mrs. Reid reports that the kid had no difficulties at school. Max enjoys outdoors and loves listening to nursery rhymes with his parents. Max seemed to babble and coo as a baby; however, he did not use his first word until around17 months of age. The child attended a group pathology programs when he was 3 years and 2 months, which concentrate on teaching his parents on strategies to follow in leading and promoting Max’s language in daily operations. Max’s parents requested a speech pathology review as his preprimary noted that he appeared to not progress as quickly as other students in the class, specifically with his sentence complexity and emerging literacy skills. The current speech pathology review assessment comprised informal play, administering the Sutherland phonological awareness test- Revised (SPAT-R) and CELF- P2 and interacted readily with the speech pathologist (Hoff & Tian, 2005, pp. 276). The pathologist engaged Max in play with a farm set which he appeared to enjoy. He showed sufficient attention during all evaluation tasks and his mother felt that Max’s reactions were representative of his true capabilities.AssessmentFormal and informal evaluation gauge were used in assessment to evaluate speech and languageabilitiesLanguage assessmentsSPAT-R assess both expressive and audience communication from children between birth and years of age (Abe, Bretanha, Bozza, Ferraro & Lopes-Herrera, 2013, pp. 78). The test
SPEECH PATHOLOGY4is planned to evaluate a youngster's level of phonological comprehending and expressive communiqué strength and challenges. The standard score from the acoustic understanding part ofthis specific assessment is below the usual for his age class. The Max is successfully able to complete all the comprehension tasks of his group of 24 to 29 months.The designed standard score for Max’s expressive communication is lower than the average of his age set. Max demonstrate the capability to efficaciously name items within a photograph, appeal assistance and answering yes/ no enquiries all takes within the 24 to 29 months age group for expressive communiqué (Kent & Vorperian, 2013, pp. 180). Max did not exhibit the use of constant-vowel-constant sound communication in an impulsive speech during the clinical verbal action. According to CELF-P2, the expressive language capability falls belowthe language expectations of Max’s age set (Lamônica & Ferreira-Vasques, 2015, pp. 1478).Max’s entire phonological standard score of 100, communication of aural command and expressive statement is below the standard score of his class. Max’s deceptive and expressive language skills are deliberated typical. Through the evaluation, Max produced correctness to a class approximation of the words. The finding is steady with parent report on Max’s expressive vocabulary comprising of more than 36 words.Max’s mean length of utterance in morphemes was designed based on colloquial speech sample got from the reflection of clinician-kid collaboration. The probable MLU from a kid between the ages of two and threes is about 2-5 morphemes per utterances. Therefore, Max shows an MLU in between the score. Informally, Max was assessed on gestures, interaction-attachment, play, language comprehension, pragmatics, and language expression (Bento & Befi-Lopes, 2010, pp. 505). The
End of preview
Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.
Related Documents
Clinical Management Plan and Session Plan for Joe.lg...
|15
|3957
|3
Psychological Assessment for Adoptive Parents - Deskliblg...
|11
|2973
|406