Your All-in-One AI-Powered Toolkit for Academic Success.

+13062052269

info@desklib.com

Available 24*7 on WhatsApp / Email

Company

Tools

Support

Emotional Congruence Scale Analysis

Verified

Added on 2020/05/28

AI Summary

This assignment analyzes a video's effectiveness in eliciting specific emotions as measured by an emotional congruence scale. It reports on the frequency distribution of responses for different emotion categories (Disgust, Disgust & Contemptuous, Happy) across three randomized control trials. The analysis utilizes statistical methods like MANOVA to assess the equality of means for various emotional levels and examines the satisfaction level based on pre-defined thresholds.

Contribute Materials

Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your documents today.

Running head: SPSS STATISTICS PSYCHOLOGY
SPSS Statistics Psychology
Name of the Student:
Name of the University:
Author’s note:

Secure Best Marks with AI Grader

Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.

1SPSS STATISTICS PSYCHOLOGY
Table of Contents
Introduction:................................................................................................................................................................................................2
Data Analysis:..............................................................................................................................................................................................2
50% Threshold.........................................................................................................................................................................................2
25% Threshold:........................................................................................................................................................................................7
10% Threshold:......................................................................................................................................................................................12
Frequency distribution of demographics:..............................................................................................................................................16
Frequency Distribution of Disgust People:............................................................................................................................................17
Frequency Distribution of Contemptuous People:................................................................................................................................21
Frequency Distribution of Happy People:.............................................................................................................................................24
Conclusion:................................................................................................................................................................................................27
Annotated Bibliography:...........................................................................................................................................................................28

2SPSS STATISTICS PSYCHOLOGY
Introduction:
A screening survey was utilised via “SurveyMonkey” for determining whether participants met the inclusion criteria. SPSS
statistics generates many various tables in the one-way MANOVA (Multivariate analysis of variance) analysis. In this section, we
indicate the main tables needed for understanding the outcomes from one-way MANOVA and Tukey post-hoc tests. For, a complete
explanation, we discuss MANOVA assumptions for having a valid result.
The Disgust, Joy, Surprise, Fear and Contempt are the dependent variables that define the emotional situations after watching
the video. Affective and Cognitive empathy can be conceptualized by the outcomes of MANOVA. The elicitation of self-conscious
includes expanded cognitive methods that have self-hearted notion. Collectivist self and Inner-Focused individualistic self are
described by analysed data.
To test the extent of emotions received from the video, we developed the measures of emotions. The aspects of measures that
are used to define psychology are-
1. Anger, Disgust and Sadness (Disgust)
2. Fear, Contemptuous and Attention (Disgust and Contemptuous)
3. Joy, Surprise and Engagement (Happy)
The Likert scale measures are used here. The scores used here, are “iMotions” scores describes empathetic accuracy scale. The
emotions after watching the videos are characterised by Cultural groups. The research aims to verify the equality of means of the
multiple variable average levels of emotions.
We have taken into account 11 Anglo and 10 Lebanese people in each sample. The assigned video reactions are stored for 1)
Disgust, 2) Disgust & Contemptuous and 3) Happy reactions. This way, for all 3 “Facial Mimicries”, we collected total 63 samples
with collaboration. With the all three types of facial mimicries, we are eager to calculate the behavioural factors regarding empathetic
accuracy and emotional congruence. The calculation of MANOVA is executed into three types of thresholds that are 50%, 25% and
10% as provided in the SPSS dataset.
Data Analysis:
Cultural group vs. facial mimicries for measuring different empathic accuracy and emotional congruence behaviours:
50% Threshold
(Cases excluded if attention < 75%)
Between-Subjects Factors
Value Label N
Culture 1.00 Lebanese 30
2.00 Anglo 33
Descriptive Statistics
Culture Mean Std. Deviation N
Duration_50
Lebanese 6355.2000 2384.42131 30
Anglo 6686.1818 2113.96172 33
Total 6528.5714 2234.63449 63
frames_total_50
Lebanese 202.3667 64.38113 30
Anglo 203.0303 63.71150 33
Total 202.7143 63.51313 63
Anger_frames_50 Lebanese .0000 .00000 30

3SPSS STATISTICS PSYCHOLOGY
Anglo .0000 .00000 33
Total .0000 .00000 63
Anger_percent_50
Lebanese .0000 .00000 30
Anglo .0000 .00000 33
Total .0000 .00000 63
Sadness_frames_50
Lebanese .0000 .00000 30
Anglo .0000 .00000 33
Total .0000 .00000 63
Sadness_percent_50
Lebanese .0000 .00000 30
Anglo .0000 .00000 33
Total .0000 .00000 63
Disgust_frames_50
Lebanese .0000 .00000 30
Anglo .2424 1.39262 33
Total .1270 1.00791 63
Disgust_percent_50
Lebanese .0000 .00000 30
Anglo .1332 .76525 33
Total .0698 .55384 63
Joy_frames_50
Lebanese 31.8667 54.04196 30
Anglo 39.1818 60.81758 33
Total 35.6984 57.34689 63
Joy_percent_50
Lebanese 13.6307 21.07689 30
Anglo 17.8776 27.62259 33
Total 15.8553 24.62050 63
Surprise_frames_50
Lebanese .7000 2.81805 30
Anglo .0000 .00000 33
Total .3333 1.95926 63
Surprise_percent_50
Lebanese .2887 1.10555 30
Anglo .0000 .00000 33
Total .1375 .76995 63
Fear_frames_50
Lebanese .0000 .00000 30
Anglo .4242 1.96898 33
Total .2222 1.43059 63
Fear_percent_50
Lebanese .0000 .00000 30
Anglo .2731 1.39375 33
Total .1431 1.01069 63
Contempt_frames_50
Lebanese 2.0000 10.95445 30
Anglo .5758 3.30748 33
Total 1.2540 7.89236 63
Contempt_percent_50
Lebanese .6993 3.83022 30
Anglo .1999 1.14839 33
Total .4377 2.75789 63
Engagement_frames_50
Lebanese 38.2333 57.13124 30
Anglo 41.3333 62.58178 33
Total 39.8571 59.58644 63
Engagement_percent_50
Lebanese 16.6142 22.45838 30
Anglo 18.8772 28.73940 33
Total 17.7996 25.75879 63
Attention_frames_50
Lebanese 194.2000 65.83490 30
Anglo 183.1212 83.36057 33
Total 188.3968 75.13312 63
Attention_percent_50
Lebanese 96.1102 11.35888 30
Anglo 90.2709 27.36894 33
Total 93.0515 21.34487 63
The 50% threshold of mean of duration, frames_total, anger_frames, sadness_frames, disgust_frames, Joy_frames,
Fear_frames, Comtempt_frames are Sadness_frames are found to be greater in case of Anglo people rather than Lebanese people.
Surprise_frames and Engagement_frames show Lebanese people has greater mean than Anglo peoples do.
Multivariate Testsa
Effect Value F Hypothesis df Error df Sig. Partial Eta
Squared
Noncent.
Parameter
Observed
Powerc
Intercept Pillai's Trace .996 941.737b 14.000 48.000 .000 .996 13184.323 1.000
Wilks' Lambda .004 941.737b 14.000 48.000 .000 .996 13184.323 1.000
Hotelling's Trace 274.673 941.737b 14.000 48.000 .000 .996 13184.323 1.000

Secure Best Marks with AI Grader

Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.

4SPSS STATISTICS PSYCHOLOGY
Roy's Largest Root 274.673 941.737b 14.000 48.000 .000 .996 13184.323 1.000
Culture
Pillai's Trace .258 1.190b 14.000 48.000 .314 .258 16.654 .624
Wilks' Lambda .742 1.190b 14.000 48.000 .314 .258 16.654 .624
Hotelling's Trace .347 1.190b 14.000 48.000 .314 .258 16.654 .624
Roy's Largest Root .347 1.190b 14.000 48.000 .314 .258 16.654 .624
a. Design: Intercept + Culture
b. Exact statistic
c. Computed using alpha = .05
The value of partial Eta-squared is 0.258. The significant p-value of “Wilks’ Lambda” of Culture is found to be 0.314. It is
greater than 0.05. Therefore, we accept the null hypothesis. Hence, we can conclude that the measures regarding facial mimicry,
empathic accuracy and emotional congruence are independent of Cultural groups at 50% threshold.
Levene's Test of Equality of Error Variancesa
F df1 df2 Sig.
Duration_frames_25 .001 1 61 .978
Frames_total_25 .011 1 61 .915
Anger_frames_25 . 1 61 .
Anger_percent_25 . 1 61 .
Sadness_frames_25 4.728 1 61 .034
Sadness_percent_25 4.728 1 61 .034
Disgust_frames_25 4.182 1 61 .045
Disgust_percent_25 4.187 1 61 .045
Joy_frames_25 2.586 1 61 .113
Joy_percent_25 4.922 1 61 .030
Surprise_frames_25 8.620 1 61 .005
Surprise_percent_25 10.108 1 61 .002
Fear_frames_25 4.825 1 61 .032
Fear_percent_25 4.183 1 61 .045
Contempt_frames_25 1.903 1 61 .173
Contempt_percent_25 1.919 1 61 .171
Engagement_frames_25 .461 1 61 .500
Engagement_percent_25 1.684 1 61 .199
Attn_frames_25 .338 1 61 .563
Attn_percent_25 4.713 1 61 .034
Tests the null hypothesis that the error variance of the dependent variable is equal across groups.
a. Design: Intercept + Culture
The Levene’s test for equality of error variance indicate that Duration of frames, Frames total, Joy frames, Contempt
frames, Engagement frames are Attention frames are homogeneous in nature. Sadness frames, Surprise frames and Fear frames are not
homogeneous in nature.
Tests of Between-Subjects Effects
Source Dependent Variable Type III Sum of
Squares
df Mean Square F Sig. Partial Eta
Squared
Noncent.
Parameter
Observed
Powerr
Corrected
Model
Duration_50 1721483.719a 1 1721483.719 .341 .561 .006 .341 .089
frames_total_50 6.921b 1 6.921 .002 .967 .000 .002 .050
Anger_frames_50 .000c 1 .000 . . . . .
Anger_percent_50 .000c 1 .000 . . . . .

5SPSS STATISTICS PSYCHOLOGY
Sadness_frames_50 .000c 1 .000 . . . . .
Sadness_percent_50 .000c 1 .000 . . . . .
Disgust_frames_50 .924d 1 .924 .908 .344 .015 .908 .155
Disgust_percent_50 .279e 1 .279 .908 .344 .015 .908 .155
Joy_frames_50 840.894f 1 840.894 .253 .617 .004 .253 .078
Joy_percent_50 283.422g 1 283.422 .464 .499 .008 .464 .103
Surprise_frames_50 7.700h 1 7.700 2.040 .158 .032 2.040 .290
Surprise_percent_50 1.310i 1 1.310 2.255 .138 .036 2.255 .315
Fear_frames_50 2.828j 1 2.828 1.391 .243 .022 1.391 .213
Fear_percent_50 1.172k 1 1.172 1.150 .288 .019 1.150 .184
Contempt_frames_50 31.876l 1 31.876 .508 .479 .008 .508 .108
Contempt_percent_50 3.919m 1 3.919 .511 .477 .008 .511 .108
Engagement_frames_50 151.014n 1 151.014 .042 .839 .001 .042 .055
Engagement_percent_50 80.476o 1 80.476 .120 .731 .002 .120 .063
Attention_frames_50 1928.764p 1 1928.764 .338 .563 .006 .338 .088
Attention_percent_50 535.821q 1 535.821 1.179 .282 .019 1.179 .188
Intercept
Duration_50 2672648624.291 1 2672648624.291 529.528 .000 .897 529.528 1.000
frames_total_50 2582591.048 1 2582591.048 629.910 .000 .912 629.910 1.000
Anger_frames_50 .000 1 .000 . . . . .
Anger_percent_50 .000 1 .000 . . . . .
Sadness_frames_50 .000 1 .000 . . . . .
Sadness_percent_50 .000 1 .000 . . . . .
Disgust_frames_50 .924 1 .924 .908 .344 .015 .908 .155
Disgust_percent_50 .279 1 .279 .908 .344 .015 .908 .155
Joy_frames_50 79323.942 1 79323.942 23.830 .000 .281 23.830 .998
Joy_percent_50 15600.694 1 15600.694 25.514 .000 .295 25.514 .999
Surprise_frames_50 7.700 1 7.700 2.040 .158 .032 2.040 .290
Surprise_percent_50 1.310 1 1.310 2.255 .138 .036 2.255 .315
Fear_frames_50 2.828 1 2.828 1.391 .243 .022 1.391 .213
Fear_percent_50 1.172 1 1.172 1.150 .288 .019 1.150 .184
Contempt_frames_50 104.257 1 104.257 1.660 .202 .026 1.660 .245
Contempt_percent_50 12.706 1 12.706 1.657 .203 .026 1.657 .245
Engagement_frames_50 99484.856 1 99484.856 27.587 .000 .311 27.587 .999
Engagement_percent_50 19794.419 1 19794.419 29.409 .000 .325 29.409 1.000
Attention_frames_50 2237263.240 1 2237263.240 392.096 .000 .865 392.096 1.000
Attention_percent_50 545881.761 1 545881.761 1201.620 .000 .952 1201.620 1.000
Culture
Duration_50 1721483.719 1 1721483.719 .341 .561 .006 .341 .089
frames_total_50 6.921 1 6.921 .002 .967 .000 .002 .050
Anger_frames_50 .000 1 .000 . . . . .
Anger_percent_50 .000 1 .000 . . . . .
Sadness_frames_50 .000 1 .000 . . . . .
Sadness_percent_50 .000 1 .000 . . . . .
Disgust_frames_50 .924 1 .924 .908 .344 .015 .908 .155
Disgust_percent_50 .279 1 .279 .908 .344 .015 .908 .155
Joy_frames_50 840.894 1 840.894 .253 .617 .004 .253 .078
Joy_percent_50 283.422 1 283.422 .464 .499 .008 .464 .103
Surprise_frames_50 7.700 1 7.700 2.040 .158 .032 2.040 .290
Surprise_percent_50 1.310 1 1.310 2.255 .138 .036 2.255 .315
Fear_frames_50 2.828 1 2.828 1.391 .243 .022 1.391 .213
Fear_percent_50 1.172 1 1.172 1.150 .288 .019 1.150 .184
Contempt_frames_50 31.876 1 31.876 .508 .479 .008 .508 .108
Contempt_percent_50 3.919 1 3.919 .511 .477 .008 .511 .108
Engagement_frames_50 151.014 1 151.014 .042 .839 .001 .042 .055
Engagement_percent_50 80.476 1 80.476 .120 .731 .002 .120 .063
Attention_frames_50 1928.764 1 1928.764 .338 .563 .006 .338 .088
Attention_percent_50 535.821 1 535.821 1.179 .282 .019 1.179 .188
Error Duration_50 307881177.709 61 5047232.421
frames_total_50 250095.936 61 4099.933
Anger_frames_50 .000 61 .000
Anger_percent_50 .000 61 .000
Sadness_frames_50 .000 61 .000
Sadness_percent_50 .000 61 .000
Disgust_frames_50 62.061 61 1.017
Disgust_percent_50 18.739 61 .307
Joy_frames_50 203056.376 61 3328.793

6SPSS STATISTICS PSYCHOLOGY
Joy_percent_50 37299.055 61 611.460
Surprise_frames_50 230.300 61 3.775
Surprise_percent_50 35.445 61 .581
Fear_frames_50 124.061 61 2.034
Fear_percent_50 62.161 61 1.019
Contempt_frames_50 3830.061 61 62.788
Contempt_percent_50 467.649 61 7.666
Engagement_frames_50 219982.700 61 3606.274
Engagement_percent_50 41057.474 61 673.073
Attention_frames_50 348060.315 61 5705.907
Attention_percent_50 27711.583 61 454.288
Total
Duration_50 2994804090.000 63
frames_total_50 2838967.000 63
Anger_frames_50 .000 63
Anger_percent_50 .000 63
Sadness_frames_50 .000 63
Sadness_percent_50 .000 63
Disgust_frames_50 64.000 63
Disgust_percent_50 19.325 63
Joy_frames_50 284183.000 63
Joy_percent_50 53419.989 63
Surprise_frames_50 245.000 63
Surprise_percent_50 37.946 63
Fear_frames_50 130.000 63
Fear_percent_50 64.623 63
Contempt_frames_50 3961.000 63
Contempt_percent_50 483.639 63
Engagement_frames_50 320215.000 63
Engagement_percent_50 61098.016 63
Attention_frames_50 2586071.000 63
Attention_percent_50 573738.514 63
Corrected Total
Duration_50 309602661.429 62
frames_total_50 250102.857 62
Anger_frames_50 .000 62
Anger_percent_50 .000 62
Sadness_frames_50 .000 62
Sadness_percent_50 .000 62
Disgust_frames_50 62.984 62
Disgust_percent_50 19.018 62
Joy_frames_50 203897.270 62
Joy_percent_50 37582.477 62
Surprise_frames_50 238.000 62
Surprise_percent_50 36.755 62
Fear_frames_50 126.889 62
Fear_percent_50 63.333 62
Contempt_frames_50 3861.937 62
Contempt_percent_50 471.568 62
Engagement_frames_50 220133.714 62
Engagement_percent_50 41137.950 62
Attention_frames_50 349989.079 62
Attention_percent_50 28247.404 62
a. R Squared = .006 (Adjusted R Squared = -.011)
b. R Squared = .000 (Adjusted R Squared = -.016)
c. R Squared = . (Adjusted R Squared = .)
d. R Squared = .015 (Adjusted R Squared = -.001)
e. R Squared = .015 (Adjusted R Squared = -.001)
f. R Squared = .004 (Adjusted R Squared = -.012)
g. R Squared = .008 (Adjusted R Squared = -.009)
h. R Squared = .032 (Adjusted R Squared = .016)
i. R Squared = .036 (Adjusted R Squared = .020)
j. R Squared = .022 (Adjusted R Squared = .006)
k. R Squared = .019 (Adjusted R Squared = .002)
l. R Squared = .008 (Adjusted R Squared = -.008)
m. R Squared = .008 (Adjusted R Squared = -.008)
n. R Squared = .001 (Adjusted R Squared = -.016)

Paraphrase This Document

Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser

7SPSS STATISTICS PSYCHOLOGY
o. R Squared = .002 (Adjusted R Squared = -.014)
p. R Squared = .006 (Adjusted R Squared = -.011)
q. R Squared = .019 (Adjusted R Squared = .003)
r. Computed using alpha = .05
We can observe from this table that the Cultural effect has a statistically insignificant effect on the respective score below:
frames_total (p-value =0.967, partial Eta-squared = 0.0),
Disgust_frames (p-value=0.344, partial Eta-squared =0.015),
Joy_frames (p-value=0.617, partial Eta-squared=0.004),
Surprise_frames (p-values=0.158, partial Eta-squared = 0.032),
Fear_frames (p-values= 0.243, partial Eta-squared= 0.022),
Contempt_frames (p-values= 0.479, partial Eta-squared =0.008),
Engagement_frames (p-values = 0.839, partial Eta-squared=0.001),
Attention_frames (p-values=0.563, partial Eta-squared= 0.019).
Cultural group vs. facial mimicries for measuring different empathic accuracy and emotional congruence behaviours:
25% Threshold:
(Cases excluded if attention < 75%)
Between-Subjects Factors
Value Label N
Culture 1.00 Lebanese 30
2.00 Anglo 33
Descriptive Statistics
Culture Mean Std. Deviation N
Duration_frames_25
Lebanese 6355.2000 2384.42131 30
Anglo 6686.1818 2113.96172 33
Total 6528.5714 2234.63449 63
Frames_total_25
Lebanese 202.3667 64.38113 30
Anglo 203.0303 63.71150 33
Total 202.7143 63.51313 63
Anger_frames_25
Lebanese .0000 .00000 30
Anglo .0000 .00000 33
Total .0000 .00000 63
Anger_percent_25
Lebanese .0000 .00000 30
Anglo .0000 .00000 33
Total .0000 .00000 63
Sadness_frames_25
Lebanese .1667 .91287 30
Anglo .0000 .00000 33
Total .0794 .62994 63
Sadness_percent_25
Lebanese .1208 .66147 30
Anglo .0000 .00000 33
Total .0575 .45646 63
Disgust_frames_25
Lebanese 4.9333 26.09258 30
Anglo .2727 1.56670 33
Total 2.4921 18.03390 63
Disgust_percent_25
Lebanese 2.7064 14.49693 30
Anglo .1498 .86081 33
Total 1.3673 10.01699 63
Joy_frames_25 Lebanese 33.0667 55.02284 30
Anglo 40.0000 61.70798 33

8SPSS STATISTICS PSYCHOLOGY
Total 36.6984 58.25490 63
Joy_percent_25
Lebanese 14.2260 21.62949 30
Anglo 18.2706 28.20166 33
Total 16.3446 25.16877 63
Surprise_frames_25
Lebanese 1.0000 4.11892 30
Anglo .0000 .00000 33
Total .4762 2.86163 63
Surprise_percent_25
Lebanese .4055 1.57035 30
Anglo .0000 .00000 33
Total .1931 1.09321 63
Fear_frames_25
Lebanese .0000 .00000 30
Anglo 1.4545 7.35311 33
Total .7619 5.33314 63
Fear_percent_25
Lebanese .0000 .00000 30
Anglo .9854 5.29913 33
Total .5162 3.83919 63
Contempt_frames_25
Lebanese 3.2667 17.89227 30
Anglo 1.0606 6.09272 33
Total 2.1111 13.04349 63
Contempt_percent_25
Lebanese 1.1422 6.25609 30
Anglo .3683 2.11557 33
Total .7368 4.55726 63
Engagement_frames_25
Lebanese 44.9667 65.89201 30
Anglo 42.1818 63.11074 33
Total 43.5079 63.94147 63
Engagement_percent_25
Lebanese 19.4087 25.40261 30
Anglo 19.2708 29.00292 33
Total 19.3364 27.12909 63
Attn_frames_25
Lebanese 194.3000 65.73151 30
Anglo 183.1212 83.36057 33
Total 188.4444 75.09452 63
Attn_percent_25
Lebanese 96.1581 11.16617 30
Anglo 90.2709 27.36894 33
Total 93.0743 21.30059 63
The 25% threshold of mean of duration, frames_total, anger_frames, disgust_frames, Fear_frames, are Sadness_frames are
found to be greater in case of Anglo people rather than Lebanese people. Attention_percent, Surprise_frames, Comtempt_frames,
Joy_frames, sadness_frames and Engagement_frames show Lebanese people has greater mean than Anglo peoples do.
Multivariate Testsa
Effect Value F Hypothesis df Error df Sig. Partial Eta
Squared
Noncent.
Parameter
Observed
Powerc
Intercept
Pillai's Trace .996 796.413b 16.000 46.000 .000 .996 12742.607 1.000
Wilks' Lambda .004 796.413b 16.000 46.000 .000 .996 12742.607 1.000
Hotelling's Trace 277.013 796.413b 16.000 46.000 .000 .996 12742.607 1.000
Roy's Largest Root 277.013 796.413b 16.000 46.000 .000 .996 12742.607 1.000
Culture
Pillai's Trace .291 1.177b 16.000 46.000 .321 .291 18.838 .647
Wilks' Lambda .709 1.177b 16.000 46.000 .321 .291 18.838 .647
Hotelling's Trace .410 1.177b 16.000 46.000 .321 .291 18.838 .647
Roy's Largest Root .410 1.177b 16.000 46.000 .321 .291 18.838 .647
a. Design: Intercept + Culture
b. Exact statistic
c. Computed using alpha = .05
The value of partial Eta-squared is 0.291. The significant p-value of “Wilks’ Lambda” of Culture is found to be 0.321. It is
greater than 0.05. Therefore, we accept the null hypothesis. Hence, we can conclude that the measures regarding facial mimicry,
empathic accuracy and emotional congruence are independent of Cultural groups at 52% threshold.

9SPSS STATISTICS PSYCHOLOGY
Levene's Test of Equality of Error Variancesa
F df1 df2 Sig.
Duration_frames_25 .001 1 61 .978
Frames_total_25 .011 1 61 .915
Anger_frames_25 . 1 61 .
Anger_percent_25 . 1 61 .
Sadness_frames_25 4.728 1 61 .034
Sadness_percent_25 4.728 1 61 .034
Disgust_frames_25 4.182 1 61 .045
Disgust_percent_25 4.187 1 61 .045
Joy_frames_25 2.586 1 61 .113
Joy_percent_25 4.922 1 61 .030
Surprise_frames_25 8.620 1 61 .005
Surprise_percent_25 10.108 1 61 .002
Fear_frames_25 4.825 1 61 .032
Fear_percent_25 4.183 1 61 .045
Contempt_frames_25 1.903 1 61 .173
Contempt_percent_25 1.919 1 61 .171
Engagement_frames_25 .461 1 61 .500
Engagement_percent_25 1.684 1 61 .199
Attn_frames_25 .338 1 61 .563
Attn_percent_25 4.713 1 61 .034
Tests the null hypothesis that the error variance of the dependent variable is equal across groups.
a. Design: Intercept + Culture
The Levene’s test for equality of error variance indicate that Duration of frames, Frames total, Joy frames, Contempt frames,
Engagement frames are Attention frames are homogeneous in nature. Sadness frames, Disgust frames, Surprise frames and Fear
frames are not homogeneous in nature.
Tests of Between-Subjects Effects
Source Dependent Variable Type III Sum of
Squares
df Mean Square F Sig. Partial Eta
Squared
Noncent.
Parameter
Observed
Powert
Corrected
Model
Duration_frames_25 1721483.719a 1 1721483.719 .341 .561 .006 .341 .089
Frames_total_25 6.921b 1 6.921 .002 .967 .000 .002 .050
Anger_frames_25 .000c 1 .000 . . . . .
Anger_percent_25 .000c 1 .000 . . . . .
Sadness_frames_25 .437d 1 .437 1.102 .298 .018 1.102 .178
Sadness_percent_25 .229e 1 .229 1.102 .298 .018 1.102 .178
Disgust_frames_25 341.334f 1 341.334 1.050 .309 .017 1.050 .172
Disgust_percent_25 102.708g 1 102.708 1.024 .316 .017 1.024 .169
Joy_frames_25 755.403h 1 755.403 .220 .641 .004 .220 .075
Joy_percent_25 257.067i 1 257.067 .402 .528 .007 .402 .096
Surprise_frames_25 15.714j 1 15.714 1.948 .168 .031 1.948 .279
Surprise_percent_25 2.583k 1 2.583 2.204 .143 .035 2.204 .309
Fear_frames_25 33.247l 1 33.247 1.172 .283 .019 1.172 .187
Fear_percent_25 15.259m 1 15.259 1.036 .313 .017 1.036 .171
Contempt_frames_25 76.477n 1 76.477 .445 .507 .007 .445 .101
Contempt_percent_25 9.412o 1 9.412 .449 .505 .007 .449 .101
Engagement_frames_25 121.870p 1 121.870 .029 .865 .000 .029 .053
Engagement_percent_25 .299q 1 .299 .000 .984 .000 .000 .050
Attn_frames_25 1963.740r 1 1963.740 .345 .559 .006 .345 .089
Attn_percent_25 544.648s 1 544.648 1.204 .277 .019 1.204 .191
Intercept Duration_frames_25 2672648624.291 1 2672648624.291 529.528 .000 .897 529.528 1.000
Frames_total_25 2582591.048 1 2582591.048 629.910 .000 .912 629.910 1.000
Anger_frames_25 .000 1 .000 . . . . .
Anger_percent_25 .000 1 .000 . . . . .
Sadness_frames_25 .437 1 .437 1.102 .298 .018 1.102 .178
Sadness_percent_25 .229 1 .229 1.102 .298 .018 1.102 .178
Disgust_frames_25 425.905 1 425.905 1.311 .257 .021 1.311 .203
Disgust_percent_25 128.200 1 128.200 1.278 .263 .021 1.278 .200
Joy_frames_25 83894.451 1 83894.451 24.410 .000 .286 24.410 .998

Secure Best Marks with AI Grader

Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.

10SPSS STATISTICS PSYCHOLOGY
Joy_percent_25 16594.748 1 16594.748 25.944 .000 .298 25.944 .999
Surprise_frames_25 15.714 1 15.714 1.948 .168 .031 1.948 .279
Surprise_percent_25 2.583 1 2.583 2.204 .143 .035 2.204 .309
Fear_frames_25 33.247 1 33.247 1.172 .283 .019 1.172 .187
Fear_percent_25 15.259 1 15.259 1.036 .313 .017 1.036 .171
Contempt_frames_25 294.255 1 294.255 1.714 .195 .027 1.714 .252
Contempt_percent_25 35.853 1 35.853 1.711 .196 .027 1.711 .251
Engagement_frames_25 119347.775 1 119347.775 28.734 .000 .320 28.734 1.000
Engagement_percent_25 23510.150 1 23510.150 31.429 .000 .340 31.429 1.000
Attn_frames_25 2238449.264 1 2238449.264 392.749 .000 .866 392.749 1.000
Attn_percent_25 546162.381 1 546162.381 1207.724 .000 .952 1207.724 1.000
Culture
Duration_frames_25 1721483.719 1 1721483.719 .341 .561 .006 .341 .089
Frames_total_25 6.921 1 6.921 .002 .967 .000 .002 .050
Anger_frames_25 .000 1 .000 . . . . .
Anger_percent_25 .000 1 .000 . . . . .
Sadness_frames_25 .437 1 .437 1.102 .298 .018 1.102 .178
Sadness_percent_25 .229 1 .229 1.102 .298 .018 1.102 .178
Disgust_frames_25 341.334 1 341.334 1.050 .309 .017 1.050 .172
Disgust_percent_25 102.708 1 102.708 1.024 .316 .017 1.024 .169
Joy_frames_25 755.403 1 755.403 .220 .641 .004 .220 .075
Joy_percent_25 257.067 1 257.067 .402 .528 .007 .402 .096
Surprise_frames_25 15.714 1 15.714 1.948 .168 .031 1.948 .279
Surprise_percent_25 2.583 1 2.583 2.204 .143 .035 2.204 .309
Fear_frames_25 33.247 1 33.247 1.172 .283 .019 1.172 .187
Fear_percent_25 15.259 1 15.259 1.036 .313 .017 1.036 .171
Contempt_frames_25 76.477 1 76.477 .445 .507 .007 .445 .101
Contempt_percent_25 9.412 1 9.412 .449 .505 .007 .449 .101
Engagement_frames_25 121.870 1 121.870 .029 .865 .000 .029 .053
Engagement_percent_25 .299 1 .299 .000 .984 .000 .000 .050
Attn_frames_25 1963.740 1 1963.740 .345 .559 .006 .345 .089
Attn_percent_25 544.648 1 544.648 1.204 .277 .019 1.204 .191
Error
Duration_frames_25 307881177.709 61 5047232.421
Frames_total_25 250095.936 61 4099.933
Anger_frames_25 .000 61 .000
Anger_percent_25 .000 61 .000
Sadness_frames_25 24.167 61 .396
Sadness_percent_25 12.689 61 .208
Disgust_frames_25 19822.412 61 324.958
Disgust_percent_25 6118.379 61 100.301
Joy_frames_25 209649.867 61 3436.883
Joy_percent_25 39017.883 61 639.637
Surprise_frames_25 492.000 61 8.066
Surprise_percent_25 71.514 61 1.172
Fear_frames_25 1730.182 61 28.364
Fear_percent_25 898.585 61 14.731
Contempt_frames_25 10471.745 61 171.668
Contempt_percent_25 1278.240 61 20.955
Engagement_frames_25 253365.876 61 4153.539
Engagement_percent_25 45630.912 61 748.048
Attn_frames_25 347665.815 61 5699.440
Attn_percent_25 27585.699 61 452.225
Total Duration_frames_25 2994804090.000 63
Frames_total_25 2838967.000 63
Anger_frames_25 .000 63
Anger_percent_25 .000 63
Sadness_frames_25 25.000 63
Sadness_percent_25 13.126 63
Disgust_frames_25 20555.000 63
Disgust_percent_25 6338.858 63
Joy_frames_25 295252.000 63
Joy_percent_25 56105.152 63
Surprise_frames_25 522.000 63
Surprise_percent_25 76.446 63
Fear_frames_25 1800.000 63
Fear_percent_25 930.628 63
Contempt_frames_25 10829.000 63
Contempt_percent_25 1321.854 63

11SPSS STATISTICS PSYCHOLOGY
Engagement_frames_25 372743.000 63
Engagement_percent_25 69186.790 63
Attn_frames_25 2586842.000 63
Attn_percent_25 573888.919 63
Corrected Total
Duration_frames_25 309602661.429 62
Frames_total_25 250102.857 62
Anger_frames_25 .000 62
Anger_percent_25 .000 62
Sadness_frames_25 24.603 62
Sadness_percent_25 12.918 62
Disgust_frames_25 20163.746 62
Disgust_percent_25 6221.087 62
Joy_frames_25 210405.270 62
Joy_percent_25 39274.951 62
Surprise_frames_25 507.714 62
Surprise_percent_25 74.097 62
Fear_frames_25 1763.429 62
Fear_percent_25 913.844 62
Contempt_frames_25 10548.222 62
Contempt_percent_25 1287.652 62
Engagement_frames_25 253487.746 62
Engagement_percent_25 45631.211 62
Attn_frames_25 349629.556 62
Attn_percent_25 28130.347 62
a. R Squared = .006 (Adjusted R Squared = -.011)
b. R Squared = .000 (Adjusted R Squared = -.016)
c. R Squared = . (Adjusted R Squared = .)
d. R Squared = .018 (Adjusted R Squared = .002)
e. R Squared = .018 (Adjusted R Squared = .002)
f. R Squared = .017 (Adjusted R Squared = .001)
g. R Squared = .017 (Adjusted R Squared = .000)
h. R Squared = .004 (Adjusted R Squared = -.013)
i. R Squared = .007 (Adjusted R Squared = -.010)
j. R Squared = .031 (Adjusted R Squared = .015)
k. R Squared = .035 (Adjusted R Squared = .019)
l. R Squared = .019 (Adjusted R Squared = .003)
m. R Squared = .017 (Adjusted R Squared = .001)
n. R Squared = .007 (Adjusted R Squared = -.009)
o. R Squared = .007 (Adjusted R Squared = -.009)
p. R Squared = .000 (Adjusted R Squared = -.016)
q. R Squared = .000 (Adjusted R Squared = -.016)
r. R Squared = .006 (Adjusted R Squared = -.011)
s. R Squared = .019 (Adjusted R Squared = .003)
t. Computed using alpha = .05
We can observe from this table that the Cultural effect has a statistically insignificant effect on the respective score below:
Duration_total (p-value=0.561, partial Eta-squared =0.006),
Sadness_frames (p-value=0.298, partial Eta-squared=0.018),
frames_total (p-value =0.967, partial Eta-squared = 0.0),
Disgust_frames (p-value=0.309, partial Eta-squared =0.017),
Joy_frames (p-value=0.641, partial Eta-squared=0.004),
Surprise_frames (p-values=0.168, partial Eta-squared = 0.031),
Fear_frames (p-values= 0.283, partial Eta-squared= 0.019),

12SPSS STATISTICS PSYCHOLOGY
Contempt_frames (p-values= 0.507, partial Eta-squared =0.007),
Engagement_frames (p-values = 0.865, partial Eta-squared=0.000),
Attention_frames (p-values=0.559, partial Eta-squared= 0.006).
Cultural group vs. facial mimicries for measuring different empathic accuracy and emotional congruence behaviours:
10% Threshold:
(Cases excluded if attention < 75%)
Between-Subjects Factors
Value Label N
Culture 1.00 Lebanese 30
2.00 Anglo 33
Descriptive Statistics
Culture Mean Std. Deviation N
Duration_10
Lebanese 6355.2000 2384.42131 30
Anglo 6686.1818 2113.96172 33
Total 6528.5714 2234.63449 63
Frames_total_10
Lebanese 202.3667 64.38113 30
Anglo 203.0303 63.71150 33
Total 202.7143 63.51313 63
Anger_frames_10
Lebanese .0000 .00000 30
Anglo .0000 .00000 33
Total .0000 .00000 63
Anger_percent_10
Lebanese .0000 .00000 30
Anglo .0000 .00000 33
Total .0000 .00000 63
Sadness_frames_10
Lebanese .2000 1.09545 30
Anglo .0303 .17408 33
Total .1111 .76435 63
Sadness_percent_10
Lebanese .1449 .79383 30
Anglo .0105 .06023 33
Total .0745 .54883 63
Disgust_frames_10
Lebanese 6.1667 32.84455 30
Anglo .3030 1.74078 33
Total 3.0952 22.69057 63
Disgust_percent_10
Lebanese 3.3916 18.24920 30
Anglo .1665 .95656 33
Total 1.7023 12.60485 63
Joy_frames_10
Lebanese 34.1000 55.51039 30
Anglo 40.6667 62.42579 33
Total 37.5397 58.85215 63
Joy_percent_10
Lebanese 14.7309 21.98919 30
Anglo 18.5799 28.63847 33
Total 16.7470 25.55835 63
Surprise_frames_10
Lebanese 1.6333 5.23571 30
Anglo .1515 .71244 33
Total .8571 3.69331 63
Surprise_percent_10
Lebanese .6400 1.98443 30
Anglo .0816 .38324 33
Total .3475 1.41307 63
Fear_frames_10
Lebanese .0667 .36515 30
Anglo 2.4545 12.12717 33
Total 1.3175 8.79851 63
Fear_percent_10
Lebanese .0228 .12506 30
Anglo 1.6414 8.71144 33
Total .8707 6.31189 63
Contempt_frames_10
Lebanese 3.8333 20.99603 30
Anglo 1.9394 11.14097 33
Total 2.8413 16.46718 63
Contempt_percent_10 Lebanese 1.3403 7.34131 30

Paraphrase This Document

Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser

13SPSS STATISTICS PSYCHOLOGY
Anglo .6734 3.86835 33
Total .9910 5.74848 63
Engagement_frames_10
Lebanese 49.6333 66.92996 30
Anglo 44.4242 63.66810 33
Total 46.9048 64.76402 63
Engagement_percent_10
Lebanese 21.7011 26.24592 30
Anglo 20.3210 29.39522 33
Total 20.9782 27.72476 63
Attn_frames_10
Lebanese 194.4667 65.51532 30
Anglo 183.1212 83.36057 33
Total 188.5238 75.01244 63
Attn_percent_10
Lebanese 96.2422 10.80179 30
Anglo 90.2709 27.36894 33
Total 93.1144 21.21848 63
The 10% threshold of mean of duration frames_total, anger_frames, Fear_frames, are found to be greater in case of Anglo
people rather than Lebanese people. Sadness_frames, Attention_percent, Surprise_frames, Comtempt_frames, Joy_frames,
sadness_frames, disgust_frames and Engagement_frames show Lebanese people has greater mean than Anglo peoples do.
Multivariate Testsa
Effect Value F Hypothesis df Error df Sig. Partial Eta
Squared
Noncent.
Parameter
Observed
Powerc
Intercept
Pillai's Trace .996 738.870b 17.000 45.000 .000 .996 12560.791 1.000
Wilks' Lambda .004 738.870b 17.000 45.000 .000 .996 12560.791 1.000
Hotelling's Trace 279.129 738.870b 17.000 45.000 .000 .996 12560.791 1.000
Roy's Largest Root 279.129 738.870b 17.000 45.000 .000 .996 12560.791 1.000
Culture
Pillai's Trace .276 1.011b 17.000 45.000 .465 .276 17.184 .573
Wilks' Lambda .724 1.011b 17.000 45.000 .465 .276 17.184 .573
Hotelling's Trace .382 1.011b 17.000 45.000 .465 .276 17.184 .573
Roy's Largest Root .382 1.011b 17.000 45.000 .465 .276 17.184 .573
a. Design: Intercept + Culture
b. Exact statistic
c. Computed using alpha = .05
The value of partial Eta-squared is 0.276. The significant p-value of “Wilks’ Lambda” of Culture is found to be 0.465. It is
greater than 0.05. Therefore, we accept the null hypothesis. Hence, we can conclude that the measures regarding facial mimicry,
empathic accuracy and emotional congruence are independent of Cultural groups at 10% threshold.
Levene's Test of Equality of Error Variancesa
F df1 df2 Sig.
Duration_10 .001 1 61 .978
Frames_total_10 .011 1 61 .915
Anger_frames_10 . 1 61 .
Anger_percent_10 . 1 61 .
Sadness_frames_10 3.306 1 61 .074
Sadness_percent_10 4.040 1 61 .049
Disgust_frames_10 4.243 1 61 .044
Disgust_percent_10 4.251 1 61 .043
Joy_frames_10 2.554 1 61 .115
Joy_percent_10 4.671 1 61 .035
Surprise_frames_10 12.306 1 61 .001
Surprise_percent_10 12.207 1 61 .001
Fear_frames_10 4.806 1 61 .032
Fear_percent_10 4.188 1 61 .045
Contempt_frames_10 .872 1 61 .354
Contempt_percent_10 .888 1 61 .350
Engagement_frames_10 .311 1 61 .579
Engagement_percent_10 1.183 1 61 .281
Attn_frames_10 .344 1 61 .560

14SPSS STATISTICS PSYCHOLOGY
Attn_percent_10 4.905 1 61 .031
Tests the null hypothesis that the error variance of the dependent variable is equal across groups.
a. Design: Intercept + Culture
The Levene’s test for equality of error variance indicate that Duration of frames, Frames total, Sadness frames, Joy frames,
Contempt frames, Engagement frames are Attention frames are homogeneous in nature. Disgust frames, Surprise frames and Fear
frames are not homogeneous in nature.
Tests of Between-Subjects Effects
Source Dependent Variable Type III Sum of
Squares
df Mean Square F Sig. Partial Eta
Squared
Noncent.
Parameter
Observed
Powert
Corrected
Model
Duration_10 1721483.719a 1 1721483.719 .341 .561 .006 .341 .089
Frames_total_10 6.921b 1 6.921 .002 .967 .000 .002 .050
Anger_frames_10 .000c 1 .000 . . . . .
Anger_percent_10 .000c 1 .000 . . . . .
Sadness_frames_10 .453d 1 .453 .772 .383 .012 .772 .139
Sadness_percent_10 .284e 1 .284 .942 .336 .015 .942 .159
Disgust_frames_10 540.292f 1 540.292 1.050 .309 .017 1.050 .172
Disgust_percent_10 163.447g 1 163.447 1.029 .314 .017 1.029 .170
Joy_frames_10 677.617h 1 677.617 .193 .662 .003 .193 .072
Joy_percent_10 232.813i 1 232.813 .353 .555 .006 .353 .090
Surprise_frames_10 34.505j 1 34.505 2.595 .112 .041 2.595 .354
Surprise_percent_10 4.900k 1 4.900 2.514 .118 .040 2.514 .345
Fear_frames_10 89.602l 1 89.602 1.160 .286 .019 1.160 .185
Fear_percent_10 41.169m 1 41.169 1.034 .313 .017 1.034 .170
Contempt_frames_10 56.367n 1 56.367 .205 .652 .003 .205 .073
Contempt_percent_10 6.990o 1 6.990 .209 .649 .003 .209 .073
Engagement_frames_10 426.401p 1 426.401 .100 .753 .002 .100 .061
Engagement_percent_10 29.930q 1 29.930 .038 .845 .001 .038 .054
Attn_frames_10 2022.732r 1 2022.732 .356 .553 .006 .356 .090
Attn_percent_10 560.320s 1 560.320 1.250 .268 .020 1.250 .196
Intercept
Duration_10 2672648624.291 1 2672648624.291 529.528 .000 .897 529.528 1.000
Frames_total_10 2582591.048 1 2582591.048 629.910 .000 .912 629.910 1.000
Anger_frames_10 .000 1 .000 . . . . .
Anger_percent_10 .000 1 .000 . . . . .
Sadness_frames_10 .833 1 .833 1.421 .238 .023 1.421 .217
Sadness_percent_10 .380 1 .380 1.259 .266 .020 1.259 .197
Disgust_frames_10 657.753 1 657.753 1.279 .263 .021 1.279 .200
Disgust_percent_10 198.946 1 198.946 1.253 .267 .020 1.253 .196
Joy_frames_10 87843.713 1 87843.713 25.032 .000 .291 25.032 .998
Joy_percent_10 17436.725 1 17436.725 26.414 .000 .302 26.414 .999
Surprise_frames_10 50.061 1 50.061 3.764 .057 .058 3.764 .480
Surprise_percent_10 8.181 1 8.181 4.197 .045 .064 4.197 .523
Fear_frames_10 99.888 1 99.888 1.294 .260 .021 1.294 .201
Fear_percent_10 43.525 1 43.525 1.093 .300 .018 1.093 .177
Contempt_frames_10 523.669 1 523.669 1.906 .172 .030 1.906 .274
Contempt_percent_10 63.723 1 63.723 1.904 .173 .030 1.904 .274
Engagement_frames_10 139021.576 1 139021.576 32.664 .000 .349 32.664 1.000
Engagement_percent_10 27749.096 1 27749.096 35.541 .000 .368 35.541 1.000
Attn_frames_10 2240426.669 1 2240426.669 394.029 .000 .866 394.029 1.000
Attn_percent_10 546655.250 1 546655.250 1219.072 .000 .952 1219.072 1.000
Culture Duration_10 1721483.719 1 1721483.719 .341 .561 .006 .341 .089
Frames_total_10 6.921 1 6.921 .002 .967 .000 .002 .050
Anger_frames_10 .000 1 .000 . . . . .
Anger_percent_10 .000 1 .000 . . . . .
Sadness_frames_10 .453 1 .453 .772 .383 .012 .772 .139
Sadness_percent_10 .284 1 .284 .942 .336 .015 .942 .159
Disgust_frames_10 540.292 1 540.292 1.050 .309 .017 1.050 .172
Disgust_percent_10 163.447 1 163.447 1.029 .314 .017 1.029 .170
Joy_frames_10 677.617 1 677.617 .193 .662 .003 .193 .072
Joy_percent_10 232.813 1 232.813 .353 .555 .006 .353 .090

15SPSS STATISTICS PSYCHOLOGY
Surprise_frames_10 34.505 1 34.505 2.595 .112 .041 2.595 .354
Surprise_percent_10 4.900 1 4.900 2.514 .118 .040 2.514 .345
Fear_frames_10 89.602 1 89.602 1.160 .286 .019 1.160 .185
Fear_percent_10 41.169 1 41.169 1.034 .313 .017 1.034 .170
Contempt_frames_10 56.367 1 56.367 .205 .652 .003 .205 .073
Contempt_percent_10 6.990 1 6.990 .209 .649 .003 .209 .073
Engagement_frames_10 426.401 1 426.401 .100 .753 .002 .100 .061
Engagement_percent_10 29.930 1 29.930 .038 .845 .001 .038 .054
Attn_frames_10 2022.732 1 2022.732 .356 .553 .006 .356 .090
Attn_percent_10 560.320 1 560.320 1.250 .268 .020 1.250 .196
Error
Duration_10 307881177.709 61 5047232.421
Frames_total_10 250095.936 61 4099.933
Anger_frames_10 .000 61 .000
Anger_percent_10 .000 61 .000
Sadness_frames_10 35.770 61 .586
Sadness_percent_10 18.391 61 .301
Disgust_frames_10 31381.136 61 514.445
Disgust_percent_10 9687.247 61 158.807
Joy_frames_10 214064.033 61 3509.246
Joy_percent_10 40267.397 61 660.121
Surprise_frames_10 811.209 61 13.299
Surprise_percent_10 118.900 61 1.949
Fear_frames_10 4710.048 61 77.214
Fear_percent_10 2428.906 61 39.818
Contempt_frames_10 16756.045 61 274.689
Contempt_percent_10 2041.802 61 33.472
Engagement_frames_10 259625.027 61 4256.148
Engagement_percent_10 47627.127 61 780.773
Attn_frames_10 346842.982 61 5685.951
Attn_percent_10 27353.559 61 448.419
Total
Duration_10 2994804090.000 63
Frames_total_10 2838967.000 63
Anger_frames_10 .000 63
Anger_percent_10 .000 63
Sadness_frames_10 37.000 63
Sadness_percent_10 19.025 63
Disgust_frames_10 32525.000 63
Disgust_percent_10 10033.251 63
Joy_frames_10 303523.000 63
Joy_percent_10 58169.417 63
Surprise_frames_10 892.000 63
Surprise_percent_10 131.407 63
Fear_frames_10 4909.000 63
Fear_percent_10 2517.833 63
Contempt_frames_10 17321.000 63
Contempt_percent_10 2110.661 63
Engagement_frames_10 398655.000 63
Engagement_percent_10 75382.295 63
Attn_frames_10 2587963.000 63
Attn_percent_10 574142.205 63
Corrected Total Duration_10 309602661.429 62
Frames_total_10 250102.857 62
Anger_frames_10 .000 62
Anger_percent_10 .000 62
Sadness_frames_10 36.222 62
Sadness_percent_10 18.675 62
Disgust_frames_10 31921.429 62
Disgust_percent_10 9850.694 62
Joy_frames_10 214741.651 62
Joy_percent_10 40500.210 62
Surprise_frames_10 845.714 62
Surprise_percent_10 123.800 62
Fear_frames_10 4799.651 62
Fear_percent_10 2470.075 62
Contempt_frames_10 16812.413 62

Secure Best Marks with AI Grader

Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.

16SPSS STATISTICS PSYCHOLOGY
Contempt_percent_10 2048.792 62
Engagement_frames_10 260051.429 62
Engagement_percent_10 47657.057 62
Attn_frames_10 348865.714 62
Attn_percent_10 27913.878 62
a. R Squared = .006 (Adjusted R Squared = -.011)
b. R Squared = .000 (Adjusted R Squared = -.016)
c. R Squared = . (Adjusted R Squared = .)
d. R Squared = .012 (Adjusted R Squared = -.004)
e. R Squared = .015 (Adjusted R Squared = -.001)
f. R Squared = .017 (Adjusted R Squared = .001)
g. R Squared = .017 (Adjusted R Squared = .000)
h. R Squared = .003 (Adjusted R Squared = -.013)
i. R Squared = .006 (Adjusted R Squared = -.011)
j. R Squared = .041 (Adjusted R Squared = .025)
k. R Squared = .040 (Adjusted R Squared = .024)
l. R Squared = .019 (Adjusted R Squared = .003)
m. R Squared = .017 (Adjusted R Squared = .001)
n. R Squared = .003 (Adjusted R Squared = -.013)
o. R Squared = .003 (Adjusted R Squared = -.013)
p. R Squared = .002 (Adjusted R Squared = -.015)
q. R Squared = .001 (Adjusted R Squared = -.016)
r. R Squared = .006 (Adjusted R Squared = -.011)
s. R Squared = .020 (Adjusted R Squared = .004)
t. Computed using alpha = .05
We can observe from this table that the Cultural effect has a statistically insignificant effect on the respective score below:
Duration_total (p-value=0.561, partial Eta-squared =0.006),
Sadness_frames (p-value=0.383, partial Eta-squared=0.012),
frames_total (p-value =0.967, partial Eta-squared = 0.0),
Disgust_frames (p-value=0.309, partial Eta-squared =0.017),
Joy_frames (p-value=0.662, partial Eta-squared=0.003),
Surprise_frames (p-values=0.112, partial Eta-squared = 0.041),
Fear_frames (p-values= 0.286, partial Eta-squared= 0.019),
Contempt_frames (p-values= 0.652, partial Eta-squared =0.003),
Engagement_frames (p-values = 0.753, partial Eta-squared=0.002),
Attention_frames (p-values=0.553, partial Eta-squared= 0.006).
Frequency distribution of demographics:
Sex
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
Female 48 76.2 76.2 76.2
Male 15 23.8 23.8 100.0
Total 63 100.0 100.0
Among (63/3=21) samples, (48/3=16) people (76.2%) are female and (15/3=5) people (23.8%) are male.

17SPSS STATISTICS PSYCHOLOGY
Age_Groups
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
Young_adult 51 81.0 81.0 81.0
Middle_adult 12 19.0 19.0 100.0
Total 63 100.0 100.0
A significant number of (51/3=17) (81%) people are Young_adult, whereas (12/3=4) (19%) people are Middle_adult. Hence,
most of the people are Young_adult.
Culture
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid Lebanese 30 47.6 47.6 47.6
Anglo 33 52.4 52.4 100.0
Total 63 100.0 100.0
The frequency table refers that among (63/3=21) people, (30/3=10) (47.6%) people are Lebanese and (3/3=11) (52.4%) people
are Anglo according to the Culture.
Frequency Distribution of Disgust People:
Statistics
Plea
sed
Exci
ted
Chee
rful
Depre
ssed
Sorro
wful
Worr
ied
Fea
rful
An
gry
Hos
tile
Contemp
tuous
Pleas
edA
Excit
edA
Cheer
fulA
Depres
sedA
Sorrow
fulA
Worri
edA
Fearf
ulA
Angr
yA
Hosti
leA
Contempt
uousA
N
Vali
d 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20
Miss
ing 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Pleased
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
0 20 90.9 95.2 95.2
2 1 4.5 4.8 100.0
Total 21 95.5 100.0
Missing System 1 4.5
Total 22 100.0
Excited
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid 0 21 95.5 100.0 100.0
Missing System 1 4.5
Total 22 100.0
Cheerful
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
0 19 86.4 90.5 90.5
1 2 9.1 9.5 100.0
Total 21 95.5 100.0
Missing System 1 4.5
Total 22 100.0

18SPSS STATISTICS PSYCHOLOGY
Depressed
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
0 13 59.1 61.9 61.9
1 6 27.3 28.6 90.5
2 1 4.5 4.8 95.2
4 1 4.5 4.8 100.0
Total 21 95.5 100.0
Missing System 1 4.5
Total 22 100.0
Sorrowful
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
0 10 45.5 47.6 47.6
1 5 22.7 23.8 71.4
2 3 13.6 14.3 85.7
3 2 9.1 9.5 95.2
5 1 4.5 4.8 100.0
Total 21 95.5 100.0
Missing System 1 4.5
Total 22 100.0
Worried
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
0 5 22.7 23.8 23.8
1 7 31.8 33.3 57.1
2 2 9.1 9.5 66.7
3 5 22.7 23.8 90.5
4 2 9.1 9.5 100.0
Total 21 95.5 100.0
Missing System 1 4.5
Total 22 100.0
Fearful
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
0 9 40.9 42.9 42.9
1 8 36.4 38.1 81.0
2 3 13.6 14.3 95.2
3 1 4.5 4.8 100.0
Total 21 95.5 100.0
Missing System 1 4.5
Total 22 100.0
Angry
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
0 9 40.9 42.9 42.9
1 7 31.8 33.3 76.2
2 4 18.2 19.0 95.2
4 1 4.5 4.8 100.0
Total 21 95.5 100.0
Missing System 1 4.5
Total 22 100.0

Paraphrase This Document

Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser

19SPSS STATISTICS PSYCHOLOGY
Hostile
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
0 10 45.5 47.6 47.6
1 5 22.7 23.8 71.4
2 3 13.6 14.3 85.7
3 2 9.1 9.5 95.2
4 1 4.5 4.8 100.0
Total 21 95.5 100.0
Missing System 1 4.5
Total 22 100.0
Contemptuous
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
0 5 22.7 23.8 23.8
1 7 31.8 33.3 57.1
2 6 27.3 28.6 85.7
3 2 9.1 9.5 95.2
5 1 4.5 4.8 100.0
Total 21 95.5 100.0
Missing System 1 4.5
Total 22 100.0
PleasedA
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
0 18 81.8 90.0 90.0
1 2 9.1 10.0 100.0
Total 20 90.9 100.0
Missing System 2 9.1
Total 22 100.0
ExcitedA
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
0 19 86.4 95.0 95.0
1 1 4.5 5.0 100.0
Total 20 90.9 100.0
Missing System 2 9.1
Total 22 100.0
CheerfulA
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
0 18 81.8 90.0 90.0
1 2 9.1 10.0 100.0
Total 20 90.9 100.0
Missing System 2 9.1
Total 22 100.0
DepressedA
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid 0 19 86.4 95.0 95.0
1 1 4.5 5.0 100.0

20SPSS STATISTICS PSYCHOLOGY
Total 20 90.9 100.0
Missing System 2 9.1
Total 22 100.0
SorrowfulA
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
0 16 72.7 80.0 80.0
1 3 13.6 15.0 95.0
2 1 4.5 5.0 100.0
Total 20 90.9 100.0
Missing System 2 9.1
Total 22 100.0
WorriedA
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
0 10 45.5 50.0 50.0
1 5 22.7 25.0 75.0
2 4 18.2 20.0 95.0
4 1 4.5 5.0 100.0
Total 20 90.9 100.0
Missing System 2 9.1
Total 22 100.0
FearfulA
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
0 19 86.4 95.0 95.0
3 1 4.5 5.0 100.0
Total 20 90.9 100.0
Missing System 2 9.1
Total 22 100.0
AngryA
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
0 19 86.4 95.0 95.0
1 1 4.5 5.0 100.0
Total 20 90.9 100.0
Missing System 2 9.1
Total 22 100.0
HostileA
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
0 18 81.8 90.0 90.0
1 1 4.5 5.0 95.0
4 1 4.5 5.0 100.0
Total 20 90.9 100.0
Missing System 2 9.1
Total 22 100.0
ContemptuousA
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent

21SPSS STATISTICS PSYCHOLOGY
Valid
0 15 68.2 75.0 75.0
1 3 13.6 15.0 90.0
2 1 4.5 5.0 95.0
4 1 4.5 5.0 100.0
Total 20 90.9 100.0
Missing System 2 9.1
Total 22 100.0
Frequency Distribution of Contemptuous People:
Statistics
Plea
sed
Exci
ted
Chee
rful
Depre
ssed
Sorro
wful
Worr
ied
Fea
rful
An
gry
Hos
tile
Contemp
tuous
Pleas
edA
Excit
edA
Cheer
fulA
Depres
sedA
Sorrow
fulA
Worri
edA
Fearf
ulA
Angr
yA
Hosti
leA
Contempt
uousA
N
Vali
d 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21
Miss
ing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pleased
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
0 20 95.2 95.2 95.2
1 1 4.8 4.8 100.0
Total 21 100.0 100.0
Excited
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid 0 21 100.0 100.0 100.0
Cheerful
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
0 20 95.2 95.2 95.2
1 1 4.8 4.8 100.0
Total 21 100.0 100.0
Depressed
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
0 15 71.4 71.4 71.4
1 5 23.8 23.8 95.2
2 1 4.8 4.8 100.0
Total 21 100.0 100.0
Sorrowful
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
0 10 47.6 47.6 47.6
1 6 28.6 28.6 76.2
2 5 23.8 23.8 100.0
Total 21 100.0 100.0
Worried

Secure Best Marks with AI Grader

Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.

22SPSS STATISTICS PSYCHOLOGY
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
0 2 9.5 9.5 9.5
1 4 19.0 19.0 28.6
2 6 28.6 28.6 57.1
3 5 23.8 23.8 81.0
4 4 19.0 19.0 100.0
Total 21 100.0 100.0
Fearful
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
0 9 42.9 42.9 42.9
1 9 42.9 42.9 85.7
2 3 14.3 14.3 100.0
Total 21 100.0 100.0
Angry
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
0 11 52.4 52.4 52.4
1 3 14.3 14.3 66.7
2 5 23.8 23.8 90.5
3 1 4.8 4.8 95.2
4 1 4.8 4.8 100.0
Total 21 100.0 100.0
Hostile
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
0 9 42.9 42.9 42.9
1 5 23.8 23.8 66.7
2 4 19.0 19.0 85.7
3 1 4.8 4.8 90.5
4 1 4.8 4.8 95.2
5 1 4.8 4.8 100.0
Total 21 100.0 100.0
Contemptuous
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
0 11 52.4 52.4 52.4
1 7 33.3 33.3 85.7
2 2 9.5 9.5 95.2
4 1 4.8 4.8 100.0
Total 21 100.0 100.0
PleasedA
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid 0 21 100.0 100.0 100.0
ExcitedA
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent

23SPSS STATISTICS PSYCHOLOGY
Valid 0 21 100.0 100.0 100.0
CheerfulA
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
0 20 95.2 95.2 95.2
1 1 4.8 4.8 100.0
Total 21 100.0 100.0
DepressedA
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid 0 21 100.0 100.0 100.0
SorrowfulA
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
0 16 76.2 76.2 76.2
1 4 19.0 19.0 95.2
2 1 4.8 4.8 100.0
Total 21 100.0 100.0
WorriedA
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
0 10 47.6 47.6 47.6
1 7 33.3 33.3 81.0
2 4 19.0 19.0 100.0
Total 21 100.0 100.0
FearfulA
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
0 20 95.2 95.2 95.2
2 1 4.8 4.8 100.0
Total 21 100.0 100.0
AngryA
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
0 20 95.2 95.2 95.2
1 1 4.8 4.8 100.0
Total 21 100.0 100.0
HostileA
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
0 15 71.4 71.4 71.4
1 3 14.3 14.3 85.7
2 3 14.3 14.3 100.0
Total 21 100.0 100.0
ContemptuousA

24SPSS STATISTICS PSYCHOLOGY
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
0 17 81.0 81.0 81.0
1 3 14.3 14.3 95.2
2 1 4.8 4.8 100.0
Total 21 100.0 100.0
Frequency Distribution of Happy People:
Statistics
Plea
sed
Exci
ted
Chee
rful
Depre
ssed
Sorro
wful
Worr
ied
Fea
rful
An
gry
Hos
tile
Contemp
tuous
Pleas
edA
Excit
edA
Cheer
fulA
Depres
sedA
Sorrow
fulA
Worri
edA
Fearf
ulA
Angr
yA
Hosti
leA
Contempt
uousA
N
Vali
d 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21
Miss
ing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pleased
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
0 1 4.8 4.8 4.8
2 5 23.8 23.8 28.6
3 5 23.8 23.8 52.4
4 9 42.9 42.9 95.2
5 1 4.8 4.8 100.0
Total 21 100.0 100.0
Excited
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
0 3 14.3 14.3 14.3
1 6 28.6 28.6 42.9
2 6 28.6 28.6 71.4
3 4 19.0 19.0 90.5
4 2 9.5 9.5 100.0
Total 21 100.0 100.0
Cheerful
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
0 2 9.5 9.5 9.5
2 4 19.0 19.0 28.6
3 6 28.6 28.6 57.1
4 3 14.3 14.3 71.4
5 6 28.6 28.6 100.0
Total 21 100.0 100.0
Depressed
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
0 20 95.2 95.2 95.2
1 1 4.8 4.8 100.0
Total 21 100.0 100.0

Paraphrase This Document

Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser

25SPSS STATISTICS PSYCHOLOGY
Sorrowful
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
0 19 90.5 90.5 90.5
1 2 9.5 9.5 100.0
Total 21 100.0 100.0
Worried
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
0 17 81.0 81.0 81.0
1 3 14.3 14.3 95.2
3 1 4.8 4.8 100.0
Total 21 100.0 100.0
Fearful
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
0 20 95.2 95.2 95.2
1 1 4.8 4.8 100.0
Total 21 100.0 100.0
Angry
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
0 20 95.2 95.2 95.2
2 1 4.8 4.8 100.0
Total 21 100.0 100.0
Hostile
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
0 20 95.2 95.2 95.2
2 1 4.8 4.8 100.0
Total 21 100.0 100.0
Contemptuous
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
0 18 85.7 85.7 85.7
2 2 9.5 9.5 95.2
3 1 4.8 4.8 100.0
Total 21 100.0 100.0
PleasedA
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
0 3 14.3 14.3 14.3
1 6 28.6 28.6 42.9
2 3 14.3 14.3 57.1
3 5 23.8 23.8 81.0
4 3 14.3 14.3 95.2
5 1 4.8 4.8 100.0
Total 21 100.0 100.0

26SPSS STATISTICS PSYCHOLOGY
ExcitedA
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
0 10 47.6 47.6 47.6
1 6 28.6 28.6 76.2
2 5 23.8 23.8 100.0
Total 21 100.0 100.0
CheerfulA
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
0 4 19.0 19.0 19.0
1 4 19.0 19.0 38.1
2 7 33.3 33.3 71.4
3 3 14.3 14.3 85.7
4 3 14.3 14.3 100.0
Total 21 100.0 100.0
DepressedA
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid 0 21 100.0 100.0 100.0
SorrowfulA
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
0 19 90.5 90.5 90.5
1 1 4.8 4.8 95.2
2 1 4.8 4.8 100.0
Total 21 100.0 100.0
WorriedA
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
0 17 81.0 81.0 81.0
1 2 9.5 9.5 90.5
2 2 9.5 9.5 100.0
Total 21 100.0 100.0
AngryA
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid 0 21 100.0 100.0 100.0
HostileA
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid 0 21 100.0 100.0 100.0
ContemptuousA
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent

27SPSS STATISTICS PSYCHOLOGY
Valid
0 18 85.7 85.7 85.7
1 1 4.8 4.8 90.5
2 2 9.5 9.5 100.0
Total 21 100.0 100.0
Conclusion:
The video is stimulus for measuring emotional congruence scale. Among the three sets of randomized control, video displayed
two negative emotions and other displayed positive emotion among 21 samples. According to the multi-group analytic scale, the three
types of emotions (Disgust, Disgust & Contemptuous, Happy) are found to be equally distributed in three trials. The satisfaction level
is found to be significant when calculated by 10% threshold. The anger and dissatisfaction was found in case of 50% threshold. The
sample of 21 people indicates by MANOVA analysis that equality of means of levels of emotions is not satisfied.

Secure Best Marks with AI Grader

Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.

28SPSS STATISTICS PSYCHOLOGY
Annotated Bibliography:
Cronk, B. C. (2017). How to use SPSS®: A step-by-step guide to analysis and interpretation. Routledge.
Levine, G. (2013). A guide to SPSS for analysis of variance. Psychology Press.
Meyers, L. S., Gamst, G. C., & Guarino, A. J. (2013). Performing data analysis using IBM SPSS. John Wiley & Sons.
Singer, T., & Klimecki, O. M. (2014). Empathy and compassion. Current Biology, 24(18), R875-R878.
Stueber, K. R. (2013). Empathy. In Encyclopedia of Sciences and Religions (pp. 723-727). Springer Netherlands.
Warne, R. T. (2014). A Primer on Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA) for Behavioral Scientists. Practical Assessment,
Research & Evaluation, 19.
Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA's statement on p-values: context, process, and purpose.
Zaki, J. (2014). Empathy: A motivated account. Psychological bulletin, 140(6), 1608.

1 out of 29