This document provides an analysis of SPSS results, a discussion on the relationship between congruence and incongruence theory, references, and an appendix.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
SPSS 1
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Table of Contents RESULTS........................................................................................................................................3 DISCUSSION..................................................................................................................................5 REFERENCES................................................................................................................................8 APPENDIX......................................................................................................................................9 2
RESULTS Descriptive statistics Statistics congruenttrailsincongruenttrails NValid1818 Missing00 Mean868.55561011.7778 Median873.0000941.0000 Mode550.00a651.00a Std. Deviation163.17267215.38244 Range635.00784.00 a. Multiple modes exist. The smallest value is shown Interpretation– it is analysed from table that the mean of congruent trails is 868.55 and of incongruent is 1011.77. besides that, median of congruent is 873 and of other is 941. Moreover, the mode is 550 and 651 respectively. in addition, the SD of congruent is 163 that means group variable differ from mean value. likewise, in incongruent one SD is 215 so here the difference is high between group variables. at last range are 635 and 784 respectively. T test One-Sample Statistics NMeanStd. DeviationStd. Error Mean congruenttrails18868.5556163.1726738.46017 incongruenttrails181011.7778215.3824450.76613 One-Sample Test Test Value = 0 tdfSig. (2-tailed)Mean Difference95% Confidence Interval of the Difference Lower congruenttrails22.58317.000868.55556787.4117 incongruenttrails19.93017.0001011.77778904.6706 3
One-Sample Test Test Value = 0 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference Upper congruenttrails949.6994 incongruenttrails1118.8849 FREQUENCIES VARIABLES=congruenttrails incongruenttrails /STATISTICS=STDDEV RANGE MEAN MEDIAN MODE /ORDER=ANALYSIS. Interpretation– From above table it is found that the significant value obtained is P= .000 which is less than P= 0.05. it means that null hypothesis is rejected. so, there is no relationship betweencongruentandincongruenttrailsingame.thismeanstheoryofcongruentand incongruent is not related to one another. Correlation Descriptive Statistics MeanStd. DeviationN congruenttrails868.5556163.1726718 incongruenttrails1011.7778215.3824418 Correlations congruenttrailsincongruenttrails congruenttrails Pearson Correlation1.816** Sig. (2-tailed).000 N1818 incongruenttrails Pearson Correlation.816**1 Sig. (2-tailed).000 N1818 **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). 4
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Interpretation- By analysing above table it is stated that there is strong relation between two variables that are congruent and incongruent trials. this is because the significant value obtained is P= .816 that is more than P= 0.05. so, there is high correlation between them. it means that congruent trials are dependent on incongruent one. besides, any change in congruent one will affect on incongruent trail. DISCUSSION It has been analysed from the test results that there is no relationship between congruence and incongruence theory. The congruence in psychology can be used to describe a state in which a person's ideal self and actual experience are consistent or very similar. However, the researcher felt that it was rare for a complete state of congruence to exist and that all people experience a certain amount of incongruence. The test has helped in knowing that human brain took certain seconds to identify the colour in which font was been written. It has also been analysed that there appears to be a relation between intelligence and other variable. The results were being predicted by the theory which has been used to derive the results. It has also been analysed that congruence can be taken as the experience which has been felt by the human during the time of analysing some results related to the test. On the other hand, the incongruence theory in psychology can suggest and provide information that human brain can go through unpleasant feeling when experiencing something. In this theory the perceived self can be defined as that how an individual seeks himself and how they desire to seek. It is based on how the view of others can affect their decision making (Humberg et.al., (2019). Both of these theories has explained the psychology pattern of human behaviour really firmly. Incongruence basically means that they have a feeling of something lacking which needs to be filled up. In this theory the human behaviour is not aligned with the actions. The correlation theory is also being used in the present test. In this the correlation provides the information about the inter connecters of the variables. In the incongruence theory the human is unaware of the patterns which are been followed by them while on the other hand in congruence theory the human is all aware about the decisions and patterns that has been followed by them. This will help the human in self-actualising (Carlson Jr, Nelson & Schultz, (2018). The test has also provided the information that the participants in the test was interested. It has also been analysed 5
that there were various issues in the presentation of stimuli which needs to be solved out in further testing as it can provide inappropriate results. It has also been analysed that there was no Ext ravenous variable which were been taken during the time of testing. These are not the independent variable and can also affect the result of the variable. These variables can have the effect on the independent variable and can provide miss-appropriate results. These variables can also do the manipulation of the independent variable so there were no these type of variable which were taken during the time of test was been done. They were not being taken and also they were not being used in the test. thus, it is discussed from above that significant value obtained is P= .000 that is less than P= 0.05. so,null hypothesis is rejected and there is no relationship between congruent and incongruent trails. but on other hand, there is strong correlation between both variables as P value is P= .816. thus, there has need to analyse how test outcomes and theory is related to each other and what changes is required in it. there are other ways in which congruent and incongruent trail are done and there exist correlation between variables. the further research can be done by considering some more elements of theory. It can include experimental study as well. it will help in generating better outcomes and analysing data in effective way. 6
REFERENCES Books and journals Atzil-Slonim, D. & Rafaeli, E. (2018). Emotional congruence between clients and therapists and its effect on treatment outcome.Journal of Counseling Psychology,65(1), 51. Carlson Jr, J. D., Nelson, C., & Schultz, D. (2018). Values and Behavior Congruence in the NFL. Humberg, S., Nestler, S., & Back, M. D. (2019). Response surface analysis in personality and socialpsychology:Checklistandclarificationsforthecaseofcongruence hypotheses.Social Psychological and Personality Science,10(3), 409-419. Rubel, J. A. & Lutz, W. (2018). Congruence of therapeutic bond perceptions and its relation to treatmentoutcome:Within-andbetween-dyadeffects.JournalofConsultingandClinical Psychology,86(4), 341 7
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.