Impact of State Initiative in Curriculum

This study focuses on the results that have come up as a result of the government’s initiative in the curriculum. The government has been actively taking part in the curriculum development of the education system so as to equip the future job market with the relevant skills. The study discusses various initiatives taken by the government to improve the education system, including the introduction of ICT equipment, training of teachers, introduction of whiteboards, grammar tests, and more. The study also highlights the negative impacts of government involvement in the curriculum, such as too many exams and less focus on co-curricular activities.

Running head: IMPACT OF STATE INITIATIVE IN CURRICULUM 1
Impact of State Initiative in Curriculum
Name of Student
Institution Affiliation
Date

IMPACT OF STATE INITIATIVE IN CURRICULUM 2
Impact of State Initiative in Curriculum
In the current age, a person without qualified education is considered to be not ready for
the society since he/she lacks the required skills that will fit him well in the current competitive
job market (DeJarnette, 2012). Due to the ever increasing advancement in technological
innovation, the old skills which were normally taught can no longer be used in our current
context. As a result, the government has been actively taking part in the curriculum development
of the education system so as to equip the future job market with the relevant skills.
The governments of different states have been working hard by using every resource at
their disposal, especially in the technological department to ensure that the future job market is
ready when the time comes. As a result of this hard work, there have obviously been results that
have been achieved (Aiken, Cheung, & Olds, 2009). This study will focus on the results that
have come up as a result of the government’s initiative in the curriculum. This study is based on
well researched works that have been governed by various sources.
One of the main methods the government has used in quality learning is the ‘National
Grid for learning. This is a method by which the government has deployed many educational
institutions with adequate amounts of learning equipment such as ICT equipment. This increases
the skills of the learners in such a way that they are able to become competent computer literates
(Bethell, Newacheck, Hawes, & Halfon, 2014). This then enables them to be fit for the future job
market as it will be mostly based on technological innovation. However, there is still inadequate
use of ICT equipment in some school courses across the curriculum. The other method that has
been used by the state is through training of teachers of various school subjects hence enabling
them to be computer literates. The impact brought about by this initiative is that as teachers

IMPACT OF STATE INITIATIVE IN CURRICULUM 3
become more competent in the ICT sector, they are able to impart the skills acquired to their
students, which is the first step in ensuring that the school curriculum is improved (Keengwe,
Schnellert, & Mills, 2012).
The government has also enhanced the curriculum by the introduction of whiteboards to
the schools. The white boards have increased the learner's eagerness to learn. They also improve
on the quality of teaching hence improving on the quality of the curriculum.
Apart from the ICT sector, the government has introduced and initiative where grammar
tests are taken frequently. These tests will lead to enhancement of the language skills of the
students. To enhance more on the system, schools were given the freedom to carry out their own
assessment tests against the national curriculum tests (Lucas, 2010). This enables the school to
identify the areas which affect each student and come up with solutions to improve on the
students’ weak areas.
The government also came up with an initiative to make the school leavers better in their
skills by reforming the system and coming up with strong foundations for further academic and
professional studies. Students over 16 years to specialize in science and math related subjects.
This will lead to an increase in technological innovation (Voogt, & Roblin, 2012).
In Finland, the government was desperate to improve on the education quality of its
schools. As a result, the country came up with a system that catered to both the bright students
and the challenged ones. One of the main initiative that the government of Finland did was to
involve the brightest of the high school graduates and convince them to be a teacher through
incentives such as adequate pay and better working conditions. This motivated many talented
citizens aspire to take part in the development of the country (Roehrig, Kruse, & Kern, 2009). As
a result, the country’s education improved greatly. The country is known to be the best country

IMPACT OF STATE INITIATIVE IN CURRICULUM 4
globally in terms of science and math related subjects. In each and every class, there are a
minimal of two teachers in the class; one teaching and the other helping the weak students in
understanding the new concept. As a result, the government’s efforts have paid off as the country
has a 2% high school dropout compared to the United States with a 25% high school dropout
rate. The country is also the 8th best in education affairs overall in the world (Gude, 2009).
The government may also take part in the curriculum development by the provision of
student loans. Some of the students lack enough funds to support their educational needs most
especially those in universities. The students can then pay the loans later when they are
financially stable. As a result of the provision of the student's loans initiative, most of the needy
students are able to pay their fees and support their daily needs (Whitehead, Jensen, & Boschee,
2013). This increases the number of graduates in a country. Another impact would be that some
of the business minded students can begin small businesses which will provide a steady income
to them and may become potential big businesses that may play a big role in the economy
development of the country.
Good education without moral character will be of no good use, hence the government
may impact the curriculum by providing moral and civic education to the students. The impact of
this would be increased discipline in the schools. This would also equip the students to become
morally fit people for the society. The greatest impact of this would be that the crime rates of a
given country reduce to a minimal level and hence improve on the country’s economy
(Glatthorn, Jailall, & Jailall, 2016).
The government could also introduce learning of general skills to the students. As silly as
it would seem, it may play a big role. Students could be taught skills such as carpentry, metal
work, artwork, building and construction and basic computer skills. The impact of this would be

IMPACT OF STATE INITIATIVE IN CURRICULUM 5
that the students are able to become creative in various ways and open up their way of thinking.
Such basic skills could also be of help to students who may not qualify for the undergraduate
level studies in universities (Porter, McMaken, Hwang, & Yang, 2011).
The government could also impact the curriculum by the restructuring of the school
subjects and make them more technical and practical. The impact would be that not only will it
increase the student's thinking capacity, but also enable them to be craftier. When these two
skills are combined, they lead to problem solving of major issues and innovation of more
technology that will continue to serve mankind (Blumenthal, 2011).
The school curriculum would be impacted further when the students are given more time
to work on their own rather than always being supervised by teachers. This enables the students
to understand each other and work with each other which is basically the most important value
one can have at the workplace. This also enables the students to become more responsible and
innovative (Wilson, 2013). Examples of group works that became big giants globally are
Microsoft, Apple, and Facebook among many others. Bill Gates could have created Microsoft
without the help of Paul Allen neither would have Steve Wozniak come up with the Apple
Company without the help of Steve Jobs. Hence it is important that the students are given time to
work on their own.
Another important initiative would the restructuring and shortening of the curriculum.
This reduces the heavy burden of studies that a student has to worry about. There are some
unnecessary topics which the students are taught and are of no importance. The students should
also be allowed to specialize in their areas of interests. This gives students an early exposure to
their career of choice (Doolittle, Sudeck, & Rattigan, 2009). When they get the early exposure,

IMPACT OF STATE INITIATIVE IN CURRICULUM 6
they become competent professionals who are able to improve the industry state rather than just
continue with the current state.
The government would also impact the education system through the restructuring of the
leadership of schools from one that is more student-friendly. This allows the students to access
help whenever they need any aid (Polly, Mims, Shepherd, & Inan, 2010). The administration
could also be made more efficient through the implementation of the open office policy which
allows students to access assistance easily.
Introduction of the campaign against drugs would play a huge role in impacting the
curriculum. This would be of a huge impact most especially in countries such as the US that are
hit badly by deaths caused by drug addiction. In the US, it is reported that close to 600,000
people die daily due to the abuse of narcotics (Mathis, 2010). The students become aware of the
consequences of drug addiction and hence they become more responsible people in the society
hence reducing the number of deaths related to drug abuse.
One of the main aims of the government is to ensure that there is equality across the
education system regardless of one’s background or physical ability. Before the government
could take part in the development of the physically challenged beings, they used to remain non-
useful beings in the society and at some point, this would also hinder their full potential. This
also made them feel like they were not a part of the society (Darling-Hammond et al. 2009).
Once the government stepped in and improved the curriculum by including the physically
challenged in the development of the society, this has overturned all the negative stuff about
them and has enhanced their capabilities and self-esteem. To some levels, they are have filled
some of the gaps which the physically able couldn’t. The government has taken part in the

IMPACT OF STATE INITIATIVE IN CURRICULUM 7
development of their physically challenged through the introduction of braille systems, advanced
sign language education and many other types of equipment.
The government could also take part in the curriculum development by the provision of
breakfast and lunch in schools. It is said that in the US that over forty million people do not have
sufficient food. Of the total number, 13 million are children (Darling-Hammond et al. 2009).This
would mean that there are students who go to school on a hungry stomach. Introduction of free
food would improve the living standards of some of the students and hence increase their
efficiency and learning capabilities. This will generally improve the education system as it will
lead to improved performance of the students struck by hunger.
Apart from all the positive impacts that have been brought about by government
involvement in the curriculum, there are also some negative reports regarding the issue. Firstly,
the government is not giving enough room for the teachers to take part in the curriculum
development (Glatthorn, Jailall, & Jailall, 2016). The government only allows the teachers to
participate only when they follow the set of guidelines provided to them by the authorities in the
curriculum. This makes the teachers take part in the curriculum development passively and hence
new ideas on how to enhance the curriculum are not that frequent hence slowing the rate of
positive education reforms. The teachers also tend to feel less important and this reduces their
morale and esteem.
One of the greatest challenges faced in the modern day parenting is the
inadequacy of time for parents to take part in the development of their children. A huge
percentage of the workers have school going kids who need parental care (DeJarnette, 2012).
The government could take part in ensuring enhancement of child care by increasing the number
of off hours to workers with schools going kids. This makes the kids feel loved and cared for and

IMPACT OF STATE INITIATIVE IN CURRICULUM 8
hence this provides them with a perfect environment for them to succeed at school. This also
ensures that children grow to become morally upright people in the society
The other negative effect that would come up as a result of increased government
initiatives in the curriculum is too many frustrating exams which sometimes lead to frustrations
among students. Too many exams may slow down student’s productivity as they are always
focusing on studying for their exams (Desimone, 2009). The students may also develop a bad
attitude towards education and hence delaying the main reason of education which is to impart
the knowledge required for the development of the future job market in a fun way. When
students lose interest in education, they learn little or nothing. Hence, the government should
consider such factors as it takes part in curriculum development.
The authorities may also tend to focus too much on academic matters and give less focus
on co-curricular activities which mainly lead to character developments of most students. This
may also hinder the development of talents among students (Parkay, Stanford, & Gougeon,
2010). Some of these talents need to be nature as they sometimes become a career to some of the
students. If Cristiano’s talent was not natured, then he could not have been among the greatest
soccer players globally alongside Lionel Messi. The solution to such would be for the
government to organize a curriculum that is all round. These can be organized by the
introduction of academic and co-curricular activities competitions among schools. This would
also allow positive interaction between students of different schools which would lead to more
exposure as they exchange ideas.
Thirdly, the government is drained into providing quality education for the students such
that they forget the introduction of services as guidance and counseling which ensure that a
student is mentally stable. The reason such services are needed is as before children attain

IMPACT OF STATE INITIATIVE IN CURRICULUM 9
adulthood, they tend to go through difficult experiences such as bullying, home issues such as
parents’ divorce or loss of a parent or a close relative (Davis, Preston, & Sahin, 2009). One in
four children under 18 years faces mental illness caused by traumatic experiences. So as to aid
for the students who may need to recover from such experiences, the government should ensure
that each school has facilities to cater for such kind of cases so as to ensure the dropout rate is
minimal. Such services would also ensure that the students are able to bring out the best of their
capabilities and Maximize their productivity on school based activities.
Another limitation that is caused by the government involvement in the curriculum is
inadequate facilities in schools. This is caused by delays brought about by the government in
supplying of the various equipment required. Government involvement causes schools to entirely
depend on the government for resources. Sometimes the government does not provide the exact
equipment requested by the schools that depend on it (Breakspear, 2012). As a result, this leads
to ineffective learning as students have to use what is provided. This causes inefficiency and
inaccuracy and hence leading to inefficiency. The paraphernalia supplied may also be inadequate
and hence leading to sharing a limited number of resources among a large number of students.
The students are then not well exposed leading to little or no understanding of the concept being
taught.
The government initiative has a lot of implications on educational leaders
such as teachers. Combined the government initiatives have increased the teacher's competency
in their skill. This increases the learning capability of the students hence equipping them further
for the job the job market. The initiative to increase the usage of ICT equipment in class has also
enhanced students’ understanding by through enhanced well elaborated diagrams rather than
poorly drawn diagrams which were used initially by the educators (Stromquist, & Monkman,

IMPACT OF STATE INITIATIVE IN CURRICULUM 10
2014). An example is that instead of the teacher drawing irrelevant diagrams of a certain
landscape; he/she is now able to elaborate using well captured photographs. The teachers are also
able to use precise videos to elaborate on scenarios which they would like to explain to their
students. In return, the students are able to actively participate in class and try to comprehend
what they have just learnt. The student's questions also become more focused, logic and
intelligent. For the rest of the lesson, the students remain glued to the lesson.
The initiative has also improved the teacher's motivation to teach. This then improves
their way of teaching and this enables different as the students to remain glued to the teacher for
the whole of the lesson (Darling-Hammond et al. 2009). When some pupils are asked about
learning with the new technology, they described that the words on the whiteboard seem clearer,
makes learning a lot more fun than it used to be, it is easier and not confusing, presentations are
easily shared on the screen and the teacher can easily go back to previously taught work.
Teachers who are also the most important in this initiative after the students are not given
equal rights as the rest of the professionals. An example is that teachers are paid below the
average pay for a professional. In the United States, teachers are paid an average of 36,000
annually compared to other professionals in the market who get an average of 50,000 dollars
annually (Aiken, Cheung, & Olds, 2009). The average pay for well experienced teachers ranges
at around 50,000 dollars. This makes the teachers lose morale and hate their occupation. This
then bears bad results as the teachers extend their frustrations in classrooms leading to reduced
efficiency and hence slowed academic progress.
One of the main policies that would make teachers happy would be the reduction of
government activities in schools most especially public schools. This initiative is not meant to
exclude the government from the curriculum but rather to allow schools to operate on their own

IMPACT OF STATE INITIATIVE IN CURRICULUM 11
(Doolittle, Sudeck, & Rattigan, 2009). This allows teachers to actively take part in the
development of the students intellectually and also character-wise among many other important
values rather than just follow a set of guides and rules implemented by the government. This
increases teacher efficiency, experience and they also tend to develop a great passion for their
job.
From the analysis, it is clear that the methods the government has used in quality learning
include the ‘National Grid for learning’ enhanced the curriculum by the introduction of
whiteboards to the schools and training of teachers of various school subjects hence enabling
them to be computer literates. Combined, the government initiatives have increased the teacher's
competency in their skill. This increases the learning capability of the students hence equipping
them with necessary skills the job market. The main policy that would make teachers happy
would be the reduction of government activities in schools most especially public schools. This
initiative is not meant to exclude the government from the curriculum but rather to allow schools
to operate on their own. The government could also take part in the curriculum development by
the provision of breakfast and lunch in schools. Apart from all the positive impacts that have
been brought about by government involvement in the curriculum, there are also some negative
reports regarding the issue. Firstly, the government is not giving enough room for the teachers to
take part in the curriculum development. Teachers who are also the most important in this
initiative after the students are not given equal rights as the rest of the professionals. One of the
greatest challenges faced in the modern day parenting is the inadequacy of time for parents to
take part in the development of their children.
The other negative effect that would come up as a result of increased government
initiatives in the curriculum is too many frustrating exams which sometimes lead to frustrations

IMPACT OF STATE INITIATIVE IN CURRICULUM 12
among students. The authorities may also tend to focus too much on academic matters and give
less focus on co-curricular activities which mainly lead to character developments of most
students. The government is drained into providing quality education for the students such that
they forget the introduction of services as guidance and counseling which ensure that a student is
mentally stable.
.

IMPACT OF STATE INITIATIVE IN CURRICULUM 13
References
Aiken, L. H., Cheung, R. B., & Olds, D. M. (2009). Education policy initiatives to address the
nurse shortage in the United States. Health Affairs, 28(4), w646-w656.
Bethell, C. D., Newacheck, P., Hawes, E., & Halfon, N. (2014). Adverse childhood experiences:
assessing the impact on health and school engagement and the mitigating role of
resilience. Health Affairs, 33(12), 2106-2115.
Blumenthal, D. (2011). Implementation of the federal health information technology
initiative. New England Journal of Medicine, 365(25), 2426-2431.
Breakspear, S. (2012). The policy impact of PISA.
Darling-Hammond, L., Wei, R. C., Andree, A., Richardson, N., & Orphanos, S. (2009). State of
the profession. The Learning Professional, 30(2), 42.
Darling-Hammond, L., Wei, R. C., Andree, A., Richardson, N., & Orphanos, S. (2009).
Professional learning in the learning profession. Washington, DC: National Staff
Development Council, 12.
Davis, N., Preston, C., & Sahin, I. (2009). Training teachers to use new technologies impacts
multiple ecologies: Evidence from a national initiative. British journal of educational
technology, 40(5), 861-878.
DeJarnette, N. (2012). America's children: Providing early exposure to STEM (science,
technology, engineering and math) initiatives. Education, 133(1), 77-84.
Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development:
Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational researcher, 38(3), 181-199.
Doolittle, G., Sudeck, M., & Rattigan, P. (2009). Creating professional learning communities:
The work of professional development schools. Theory Into Practice, 47(4), 303-310.

IMPACT OF STATE INITIATIVE IN CURRICULUM 14
Glatthorn, A. A., Jailall, J. M., & Jailall, J. K. (2016). The principal as curriculum leader:
Shaping what is taught and tested. Corwin Press.
Gude, O. (2009). Principles of possibility: Considerations for a 21st-century art & culture
curriculum.
Hiebert, E. H., & Mesmer, H. A. E. (2013). Upping the ante of text complexity in the Common
Core State Standards: Examining its potential impact on young readers. Educational
Researcher, 42(1), 44-51.
Keengwe, J., Schnellert, G., & Mills, C. (2012). Laptop initiative: Impact on instructional
technology integration and student learning. Education and Information
Technologies, 17(2), 137-146.
Klenowski, V., & Wyatt-Smith, C. (2012). The impact of high stakes testing: The Australian
story. Assessment in education: Principles, policy & practice, 19(1), 65-79.
Loveless, T. (2013). The common core initiative: What are the chances of success. Educational
Leadership, 70(4), 60-63.
Lucas, T. (Ed.). (2010). Teacher preparation for linguistically diverse classrooms: A resource
for teacher educators. Routledge.
Mathis, W. J. (2010). The “Common Core” standards initiative: An effective reform
tool. Boulder and Tempe: Education and the Public Interest Center & Education Policy
Research Unit. Retrieved July, 29, 2010.
National Research Council. (2009). Engineering in K-12 education: Understanding the status
and improving the prospects. National Academies Press.
Parkay, F. W., Stanford, B. H., & Gougeon, T. D. (2010). Becoming a teacher (pp. 432-462).
Pearson/Merrill.

IMPACT OF STATE INITIATIVE IN CURRICULUM 15
Pinar, W. F. (2013). International handbook of curriculum research. Routledge.
Polly, D., Mims, C., Shepherd, C. E., & Inan, F. (2010). Evidence of impact: Transforming
teacher education with preparing tomorrow's teachers to teach with technology (PT3)
grants. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(4), 863-870.
Porter, A., McMaken, J., Hwang, J., & Yang, R. (2011). Common core standards: The new US
intended curriculum. Educational Researcher, 40(3), 103-116.
Roehrig, G. H., Kruse, R. A., & Kern, A. (2009). Teacher and school characteristics and their
influence on curriculum implementation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The
Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 44(7),
883-907.
Stromquist, N. P., & Monkman, K. (Eds.). (2014). Globalization and education: Integration and
contestation across cultures. R&L Education.
Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st
century competences: Implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of
curriculum studies, 44(3), 299-321.
Whitehead, B. M., Jensen, D. F., & Boschee, F. (2013). Planning for technology: A guide for
school administrators, technology coordinators, and curriculum leaders. Corwin Press.
Wilson, S. M. (2013). Professional development for science teachers. Science, 340(6130), 310-
313.
Wiseman, D. L. (2012). The intersection of policy, reform, and teacher education.