Effect of Employee Job Satisfaction on Organization Performance in Hotel Industry
Verified
Added on 2023/04/06
|5
|771
|237
AI Summary
This research examines the effect of employee job satisfaction on the performance of an organization in the hotel industry. Statistical analysis methods include ANOVA, Chi-square test, and t-test.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head: Statistics1 Statistics by Course: Tutor: University: Department: Date:
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Statistics2 Part A The research by Deshpande, Arekar, Sharma, and Somaiya (2012) was aimed at examining the effect of employee job satisfaction on the performance of an organization with a specific focus on the hotel industry. The statistical analysis approaches used include ANOVA (F-test), Chi-square test, and t-test. The three statistical analysis methods were chosen because of the multiple differences in the variables under study. For instance, a Chi-square test was to be undertaken in instances where the data types of both variables were nominal. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was to be used in situations where only a single data set was nominal and the other one is of a ratio in nature i.e. more than two categories exist. Moreover, an independent t-test was to be carried out if one data set was ratio or interval (on condition that only two categories exist) in nature and the other one nominal. Additionally, the overall satisfaction levels were measured using the mean and median values. The Bartlett’s test of sphericity was used to ascertain the strength of the association between the study variables by making use of an approximate Chi-square value. More specifically, the approach was used to test the null hypothesis that there was no correlation in the study variables. The analysis of variance was used to test the difference in the means of the six computed variables for job satisfaction which includes role clarity, financial benefits, work stress, work environment, workers relations and welfare. An F-test was used to compare equality of two different variances. The decision to reject or accept the null hypothesis was based on the computed and statistic value of F. If the computed F value was larger than the F statistic, then the null hypothesis was rejected and vice versa. More specifically, ANOVA was used to test the association between experience, salary, and department with job satisfaction.
Statistics3 An independent sample t-test was conducted to ascertain the overall satisfaction of employees based on gender. The t-test was to test whether there was a significant variation between the mean responses of the male and female. Part B The Z test could be used to test the hypothesis that overall employee satisfaction was based on gender. This is because the Z test is more suitable where the sample size is large (n is greater than 30), the population variance is computable or provided, and the population and sample variance is assumed to be equal. In this instance, the sample population was 72 and the standard variation can be calculated. The Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test can also be used as an alternative to the two-sample t-test especially when there is doubt as to whether the study variables are normally distributed in the two groups. The Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test takes all the observations from the two groups understudy and arranges them on the basis of their size (without adhering to group membership) and the sums them up. An ad hoc test such as the least significant difference test can also be conducted in addition to one way ANOVA. The study has used one way ANOVA to compare two means from two independent and unrelated groups (such as job satisfaction and salary, job satisfaction and work experience, and job satisfaction and department). An F distribution has been used to test whether the two means are equal, and the test returned a significant f-statistic. This however only shows the difference in the means but does not tell which specific group had a difference in means. Thus, an ad hoc test such as the least significant difference test can further be carried out to find out exactly which group had a difference in means. Alternatively, Levene’s test could be used instead of Bartlett’s test in F-statistic. Levene’s test also tests whether the variances in the group(s) are equal, and also examines the
Statistics4 assumption of equality of the variances of the populations from which the samples are obtained (Corder & Foreman, 2014). Other descriptive statistical analysis methods such as mean and standard deviation can be used to show the participants responses on each variable. This would provide insight into the general view of the participants as pertains to the research variables.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Statistics5 References Corder, G. W., & Foreman, D. I. (2014).Nonparametric statistics: A step-by-step approach (2nded.). New Jersey, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. Deshpande, B., Arekar, K., Sharma, R., & Somaiya, S. (2012, January). Effect of employee satisfaction on organization performance: An empirical study in hotel industry. InNinth AIMS International Conference on Management held at Pune, India,9(1), 671-623.