ProductsLogo
LogoStudy Documents
LogoAI Grader
LogoAI Answer
LogoAI Code Checker
LogoPlagiarism Checker
LogoAI Paraphraser
LogoAI Quiz
LogoAI Detector
PricingBlogAbout Us
logo

Effect of Running on Pulse Rate

Verified

Added on Β 2023/01/16

|7
|1048
|30
AI Summary
This document discusses the effect of running on pulse rate in terms of location and scale. It provides statistical and graphical evidence to understand the impact. The data shows that the pulse rate decreases with an increase in the frequency of exercise. The distribution of pulse rate is positively skewed, indicating a decrease in pulse rate with running.

Contribute Materials

Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your documents today.
Document Page
Statistics
Student Name:
Instructor Name:
Course Number:
3 April 2019

Secure Best Marks with AI Grader

Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Document Page
QUESTION 1. Working with Minitab
(a) What percentage of
Tabulated statistics: Smokes, Exercise
Rows: Smokes Columns: Exercise
High Medium
Frequency Low Frequency Frequency All
Not 14 32 52 98
Regular 0 5 6 11
All 14 37 58 109
Cell Contents: Count
Pearson Chi-Square = 2.053, DF = 2, P-Value = 0.358
Likelihood Ratio Chi-Square = 3.419, DF = 2, P-Value = 0.181
* NOTE * 2 cells with expected counts less than 5
i. High-frequency exercisers are non-smokers [1 mark]?
Answer
100% of high-frequency exercisers are non-smokers
ii. Smokers are low-frequency exercisers [1 mark]?
Answer
45.45% of smokers are low-frequency exercisers.
iii. Individuals are medium-frequency exercisers and non-smokers [1 mark]?
Answer
47.71% of individuals are medium-frequency exercisers and non-smokers
iv. Individuals are non-smokers [1 mark]?
Answer
89.91% of individuals are non-smokers.
(b) Describe the relationship between 𝑃𝑒𝑙𝑠𝑒1 and 𝐸π‘₯π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘π‘–π‘ π‘’ in terms of:
Descriptive Statistics: Pulse1
Variable Exercise N N* Mean SE Mean StDev Minimum Q1
Pulse1 High Frequency 14 0 68.64 3.39 12.69 49.00 59.00
Low Frequency 37 0 78.35 1.88 11.46 52.00 70.50
Medium Frequency 58 0 75.69 1.85 14.09 47.00 67.50
Variable Exercise Median Q3 Maximum
Pulse1 High Frequency 68.50 76.50 96.00
Low Frequency 78.00 85.00 119.00
Medium Frequency 75.00 80.50 145.00
i. Location [2 marks], citing an appropriate sample statistic [1 mark]?
Document Page
Answer
High frequency exercisers have lower pulse1 rate as compared those who either are low
frequency or medium frequency exercisers. The more the frequency of exercise the
lower the pulse1 rate. The appropriate statistics is the mean.
ii. Scale [2 marks], citing an appropriate sample statistic [1 mark]?
Answer
In terms of scale, we observe that the low frequency exercisers have less widely
distributed data as compared to the medium frequency exercisers and high frequency
exercisers.
(c) Describe the relationship between 𝑃𝑒𝑙𝑠𝑒1 and π΄π‘™π‘π‘œβ„Žπ‘œπ‘™ in terms of:
i. Location [1 mark], citing an appropriate feature of the boxplots [1 mark]?
Answer
Regular alcohol drinkers have higher pulse1 rate as compared to those who don’t drink.
The appropriate feature of the boxplots is the size of the boxplot.
ii. Scale [1 mark], citing an appropriate feature of the boxplots [1 mark]?
Answer
The distribution for the non-drinkers is approximately normal while that of regular
drinkers is slightly skewed. The appropriate feature is the position of the median line in
the boxplot.
Document Page
(d) Citing statistical and graphical evidence, write a paragraph or two describing the effect of
running on the change in pulse rate (𝑃𝑒𝑙𝑠𝑒𝐷𝑖𝑓𝑓 ) in terms of location and scale
Answer
As can be seen from the boxplot presented below, it is clear that the data on PulseDiff is heavily
skewed. The data is positively skewed.
QUESTION 2. Working with SPSS
(a) Decide which best describes the following attributes of the relationship between π‘Šπ‘’π‘–π‘”β„Žπ‘‘ and
π»π‘’π‘–π‘”β„Žπ‘‘:

Paraphrase This Document

Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Document Page
i. Association or correlation: positive, negative or none [1 mark]?
Answer
This is a correlation and it is a positive correlation.
ii. Type: linear, quadratic or cubic [1 mark]?
Answer
It is a linear relationship
iii. Strength: weak, medium, strong or very strong [1 mark]? Provide a reason for your
answer [2 marks].
Answer
The strength is strong. There is a strong relationship because the data points are close
together and not scattered.
(b) Using the histograms (with superimposed normal curve), assess whether the distributions of
π»π‘’π‘–π‘”β„Žπ‘‘ and π‘Šπ‘’π‘–π‘”β„Žπ‘‘:
Document Page
i. Are located near the centre of the normal density curve [1 mark each]
Answer
The distribution of weight is located near the centre of the normal density curve while
that of height is located far away from the centre of the normal density curve.
ii. Are symmetrical like the normal density curve [1 mark each]
Answer
Weight has symmetrical like the normal density curve while height has asymmetrical
shape.
iii. Have too many outliers in comparison to the normal density curve [1 mark each]
Answer
Height has too many outliers in comparison to the normal density curve as compared to
the weight.
iv. And in conclusion look approximately normal [1 mark each].
Answer
In conclusion weight look to be approximately normal while height does not.
(c) Using the histogram, assess whether the distribution of π‘Šπ‘’π‘–π‘”β„Žπ‘‘πΏπ‘œπ‘”20:
i. Is located near the centre of the normal density curve [1 mark]
Answer
Yes the distribution of π‘Šπ‘’π‘–π‘”β„Žπ‘‘πΏπ‘œπ‘”20 is located near the centre of the normal
density curve.
ii. Is symmetrical like the normal density curve [1 mark]
Answer
Yes the distribution of π‘Šπ‘’π‘–π‘”β„Žπ‘‘πΏπ‘œπ‘”20 is symmetrical like the normal density curve.
iii. Has too many outliers in comparison to the normal density curve [1 mark]
Document Page
Answer
There are no too many outliers for this distribution.
iv. And in conclusion looks approximately normal [1 mark].
Answer
In conclusion the distribution of π‘Šπ‘’π‘–π‘”β„Žπ‘‘πΏπ‘œπ‘”20 seem to be approximately normal.
(d) Writing your answer to 3 decimal places, calculate the regression model’s predicted value of
π‘Šπ‘’π‘–π‘”β„Žπ‘‘πΏπ‘œπ‘”20 when π»π‘’π‘–π‘”β„Žπ‘‘ = 183
Answer
WeightLog 20=0.473+ 0.005Γ— Height
WeightLog 20=0.473+ 0.005Γ— 183
WeightLog 20=0.473+ 0.915
WeightLog 20=1.388
(e) Recall the formula
WeightLog 20= loge (Weight )
loge (20)
WeightLog 20=1.388
1.388= loge ( Weight )
loge (20)
loge ( Weight )=1.388βˆ—loge (20)
loge ( Weight ) =4.158076
x=eloge(x)=exp ΒΏ
x=exp ΒΏ
1 out of 7
[object Object]

Your All-in-One AI-Powered Toolkit for Academic Success.

Available 24*7 on WhatsApp / Email

[object Object]