Limited-time offer! Save up to 50% Off | Solutions starting at $6 each  

Statutory Interpretation: Assignment

Added on - 16 Mar 2020

Trusted by 2+ million users,
1000+ happy students everyday
Showing pages 1 to 3 of 7 pages
Running head: STATUTORY INTERPRETATIONStatutory InterpretationName of the student:Name of the university:Author note
1STATUTORY INTERPRETATIONTable of ContentsIntroduction:...............................................................................................................................2Discussion:.................................................................................................................................2Issues:.....................................................................................................................................2Statutory interpretation:..........................................................................................................3Penal provision:......................................................................................................................3Remedies or defences:............................................................................................................4Conclusion:................................................................................................................................5Reference:..................................................................................................................................6
2STATUTORY INTERPRETATIONIntroduction:The subject of the case is attracting the provision of Commonwealth Games Act andnecessary provision has been made regarding the computer hacking system. It has been heldthat the integrity of the games will be affected if proper steps have not been taken to befollowed1. Relevant provisions are made in this respect so that the interest of the same can beprotected and piracy can be restricted. Provision regarding section 20A and 20B has beenmade in this respect.The subject matter of the case is evolved with George who was alleged to violate theprovision of the Commonwealth games act and uploaded certain videos that are going againstthe interest of the games2.The provision of the case has to be discussed from certain interpretation chapters andthe self-incriminatory nature of the common law should have to be discussed in this case. Anattempt has been made to understand the presumptions of the statutory interpretation in thisreport.Discussion:Issues:The main issues of the case are whether George has violated the provision of theCommonwealth Games Act or not and whether he has any defence to secure his interest ornot. It has been observed here that George is a member of anti gaming authority and had1Katz, Leslie. "The Introduction of Jury Sentencing in the Commonwealth of Virginia." (2016).2Golding, Gabrielle. "High court rules out mutual trust and confidence in Australian employment contracts:Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Barker [2014] HCA 32." (2014).
desklib-logo
You’re reading a preview
Preview Documents

To View Complete Document

Click the button to download
Subscribe to our plans

Download This Document