logo

Statutory Interpretation: Assignment

7 Pages1018 Words302 Views
   

Added on  2020-03-16

Statutory Interpretation: Assignment

   Added on 2020-03-16

ShareRelated Documents
Running head: STATUTORY INTERPRETATIONStatutory InterpretationName of the student:Name of the university:Author note
Statutory Interpretation: Assignment_1
1STATUTORY INTERPRETATIONTable of ContentsIntroduction:...............................................................................................................................2Discussion:.................................................................................................................................2Issues:.....................................................................................................................................2Statutory interpretation:..........................................................................................................3Penal provision:......................................................................................................................3Remedies or defences:............................................................................................................4Conclusion:................................................................................................................................5Reference:..................................................................................................................................6
Statutory Interpretation: Assignment_2
2STATUTORY INTERPRETATIONIntroduction:The subject of the case is attracting the provision of Commonwealth Games Act andnecessary provision has been made regarding the computer hacking system. It has been heldthat the integrity of the games will be affected if proper steps have not been taken to befollowed1. Relevant provisions are made in this respect so that the interest of the same can beprotected and piracy can be restricted. Provision regarding section 20A and 20B has beenmade in this respect. The subject matter of the case is evolved with George who was alleged to violate theprovision of the Commonwealth games act and uploaded certain videos that are going againstthe interest of the games2.The provision of the case has to be discussed from certain interpretation chapters andthe self-incriminatory nature of the common law should have to be discussed in this case. Anattempt has been made to understand the presumptions of the statutory interpretation in thisreport. Discussion:Issues:The main issues of the case are whether George has violated the provision of theCommonwealth Games Act or not and whether he has any defence to secure his interest ornot. It has been observed here that George is a member of anti gaming authority and had1Katz, Leslie. "The Introduction of Jury Sentencing in the Commonwealth of Virginia." (2016).2Golding, Gabrielle. "High court rules out mutual trust and confidence in Australian employment contracts:Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Barker [2014] HCA 32." (2014).
Statutory Interpretation: Assignment_3

End of preview

Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.

Related Documents
Christmas Island crabs flock to the sea once again
|6
|984
|34

Principles of Business Governance Question 2022
|8
|1814
|64

Media Law: Breach of Privacy, Defamation, and Sub-judice Contempt
|9
|1807
|188

ASIC v Rich: Establishing the Principle of Business Judgment Rule
|9
|2165
|83

Criminal Law and Procedures in the UK: Arrest, Trial, and Sentencing
|8
|2428
|478

Interpretation of Statutes - PDF
|8
|3160
|302