Strategic and Change Management in Woolworths and Tesla
Verified
Added on 2023/04/24
|11
|2983
|495
AI Summary
This document discusses the strategic and change management approaches of Woolworths and Tesla. It covers topics such as Woolworths' acquisition of David Jones, Lewin's model for change management, formal strategic planning systems, and Tesla's differentiation focus strategy and Master Plan.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head: STRATEGIC AND CHANGE MANAGEMENT STRATEGIC AND CHANGE MANAGEMENT Name of the Student: Name of the University: Author note:
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
1STRATEGIC AND CHANGE MANAGEMENT (1.1)Woolworths with its acquisition of David Jones has initiated its increased margin private label brands in several stores of DJ. The fundamental aim of the company’s grand strategy has been dependent on growing private label in DJ stores from around 5% to 20%. Moreover, food business of Woolworths has intensified at a greater level than its competitors since 2011 (Woolworthsholdings.co.za 2019). Thus, Woolworths by setting up large scale SA headquartered apparel business operations have shifted its products and brands into other thriving markets and further gaining profits from economical costs, fast fashion design capacity. On the other hand, Lovelock and Patterson (2015) have noted that Woolworths with its over 16 years of market retail experience and in-depth knowledge of customer buying choices have been able to increase its growth by over 30%. (1.2)The year 2008 has witnessed an intensified market rivalry between retailers to the significant benefit of customers. It is essential to identify that what has recounted in the past 5 years has been majorly because of intensified nature of competition among retailers. Reports of Xu, Gao and Hammond (2017) have noted that while Woolworths’ Own Brand penetration has been reduced in comparison to the market expansion overseas, retailers have aimed to expand private label in response to shifting customer demands in the Australian market. For example, Woolworths’customerresearchrevealedanunattainedneedinGluten-freeproductsfor customers affected by coeliac disease. As a result, it is highly imperative to recognize that outside of supermarkets, private label is fixed in Australian retail (Woolworthsgroup.com.au 2019). Furthermore,Woolworths SA hasrecentlyacquired David Jones with purpose to ‘transform’ the iconic Australian retailer into approximately 35% private label store. The buying out of David Jones by Woolworths has provided significant competitive advantages which have benefitted both the companies and its clientele. Woolworths has increased scale which has driven
2STRATEGIC AND CHANGE MANAGEMENT substantial productivity and economies through improved global sourcing with the competence to influence shared seasonality and development, improving value for the customer and overall profitability (Mitchell, 2019).Additionally collaboration with David Jones' extremely proficient management team, Woolworths SA has strategized to accelerate David Jones' strategic initiatives to strengthen and develop its competitive position and performance. (1.3)According to reports of Cheng, Green and Ko (2014), shareholders of Woolworths have supportedtheacquisitionofDavidJonesthatestimatedaround$2billion.Woolworths’ significant turnover diversification and extensive diversity in business location have facilitated their extensive range of risks which Woolworths might encounter. Bayne, Schepis and Purchase (2017) have noted that even though Woolworths with the acquisition of David Jones with over1200 stores across 16 nations has expanded greater in comparison to northern hemisphere rivals has entered the department store big league. Woolworths anticipates its Aus $21 billion takeover bid for David Jones will enable the company to develop into one of the 10 largest department store operators in the world. However, the department store noted that entities associated with billionaire Australian business identity Solomon Lew comprise about 13.8% of Country Road in addition to around 10.11% of David Jones. (1.4)David Jones refurbished merchandising strategy of adopting 16 box grid has enabled its consumers to obtain classic supreme, modern, edgy appearance. Such a revisited strategy enabled the brand to acquire midmarket labels. According to reports, investors have been showing inclination towards David Jones (Xu, Gao and Hammond 2017).However, with Myers’ $ 600 million investment in its business Woolworths has assumed to encounter execution risks (Mitchell, 2019). Thus in order to mitigate such risks related to strategic decision Woolworths has initiated implementing its technical proficiency to other segments. Furthermore,
3STRATEGIC AND CHANGE MANAGEMENT by acquiring substantial amount of data and information about David Jones’s clientele and buying decisionsand preferenceswill facilitateWoolworthswith efficientallocationand cataloguing. Additionally, according to the reports Woolworths SA can track around 75 % of its sales through its loyalty card known as ‘W Rewards’. Cheng, Green and Ko (2014) have envisaged the initiation of David Jones loyalty programme will serve as a major game changer whereby 6% of its customers will be able to generate around 25% of sales revenues. On the other hand, Woolworths to reduce the risk of execution can refurbish its service to its stores by recruiting efficient full-time employees and career professionals which will enable the company to target speciality retailers. (1.5)Woolworths for significant period has established standards for quality in SA’s clothing and food retail sectors. Woolworths’ former CEO Ian Moir’s strategic leadership introduced a formidable record and accumulated Woolworths’ severely ailing Australian clothing subsidiary identifiedasCountry Road.Moir’sstrategicleadershipapproachproficientlytackledthe challenge which facilitated Woolworths to sustain its focus on its core market recognized as the upper-income 8-10 LSM (living standard measure) customer base. (Bayne, Schepis and Purchase (2017) have noted that Moir’s strategic leadership approaches believed that Woolworths’ significant competitive advantages have been primarily based on acquiring intensifying affluence of black customers who seek Woolworths brand and recognition more than its existing white clientele. Reports of Methner, Hamann and Nilsson (2015) have revealed that Moir forecasted the living standard measure 8-10 income segment to intensify at the rate of 6% yearly over the next three years and around 93% of the raise will consist of black consumers.Moir’s strategic leadership aided Woolworth’s revenues and earnings. Reports of Cummings and Worley (2014) have revealed that Woolworths’ return on equity (RoE) increased from 38.7% in 2010 to 48.2%
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
4STRATEGIC AND CHANGE MANAGEMENT in 2012. Such an increase had positioned Woolworths at par with revenue earning of Mr. Price estimated around 48.7% and higher than Truworths' 43.1%. Furthermore, Moir’s strategy of reducing lead or response times by two months provided the company with greater degree of flexibility to efficiently respond to customer demand for certain fashion items during particular season (Methner, Hamann and Nilsson 2015). (2)When change strategies have implemented in the organization the employees rapidly respond by showing grievances, engaging in work delay, unstable production. However, proper strategies must be implemented by change management expert in order to overcome the resistance. Managers at this juncture, must emphasize on Lewin’s model by following three steps for successful change management, freeze, unfreeze and refreeze (Cummings, Bridgman and Brown 2016). At the unfreeze stage, Bakari, Hunjra and Niazi (2017) have stated that as human behaviour primarily bases on an equilibrium state set up by motivating and restraining forces; equilibrium state must be destabilized in order to aid the elimination of existing behavioural patterns and views of employees and advancement to proposed change and strategy. However, car manufacturer General Motor’s cultural change approach supported top down approach. Although the primary objective of change management was to intensify decision making process, it disregarded the involvement of the employees. Thus, Lewin’s force field analysis at this stage can be implemented to support the achievement of unfreezing by identifying and evaluating the net impact of all forces which can leverage change process (Asnan, Nordin and Othman 2015). Furthermore,in thechange stageof Lewin’smodel,strategicplan,newmission, understandable vision in addition to change objectives can be formed. Authors have noted that although employees can all be well-informed and persuaded towards change, it is crucial that
5STRATEGIC AND CHANGE MANAGEMENT passable support is offered at this stage. For example, General Motors can offer knowledge development program or courses of actions for enhancing the knowledge base of its employees. Furthermore, leaders should implement strategies whereby proposed objectives along with program actions require to be tactically planned and should be achievable, within organization’s income and ability (Methner, Hamann and Nilsson 2015). However, at the last stage of Lewin’s model that is refreezing, organizations must efficiently assess change process to aid the implementation of this stage and maintain change momentum. Cummings and Worley (2014) have noted that depending on evaluation of proposed change process, counteractive actions must be implemented in order to maintain the strategic flow of change. However, by assessing change management process companies like General Motorsexecutingculturalchangecanstimulateandcontinuouslyprovidesupporttoit employees.Methods such as gratifying newly emerged behavioural patterns, following up training sessions, organized meetings and feedback mechanisms, discussions can be considered as crucial determinants to facilitate the establishment of new practices (Bakari, Hunjra and Niazi 2017). Change leaders must highlight probable achievements of change implementation to motivate employees and reduce their resistance by shedding light on the way successful change implementation has improved level of awareness and responsibility and accountability of employee base thus resulting to improved efficiency and superior productivity. (3)Formalstrategicplanningsystemshavebeenincompetentinsituationsofhigh technology industries with rapid and unpredictable change. As formal systems tend to be highly time-consuming it shows competence in providing solutions during situations with severe time constraints. Furthermore, formal systems primarily depend upon comprehensive estimates and forecasts which have high complexities during chaotic situations (Perkins and Murmann 2018).
6STRATEGIC AND CHANGE MANAGEMENT Regardless of all the complexities, formal systems tend to exhibit certain proficiencies even in thesedemandingenvironments.Forexample,formalsystemsarefrequentlyrelatedto comprehensive and directive strategies but may also be applied in order to practise flexible, unrestricted plans that show high level of suitability for rapidly varying business environments. Furthermore, Bayne, Schepis and Purchase (2017) have noted that performance of formal planning such as gathering data, preparing forecasts, producing as well as taking into account various alternatives have been identified as constructive preparation for making strategic choices and thus could be functional in any type of environment. (4.1)Tesla uses differentiation focus as its generic strategy for competitive advantage Authors have noted that by implementing the differentiation generic strategy, Tesla has shed light on its product uniqueness and further emphasized significantly on early adopters in the high-end market for electric vehicles (Tesla.com 2019). Chen and Perez (2018) have noted that these early adopters have belonged to the economically affluent segment who exhibit high tendency to buy newly launched products.Tesla’s generic competitive strategy due to itsdifferentiation focus has built competitive advantage based on the development of products that distinguish Woolworths fromitscompetitorsinthemarket.Forexample,TeslaInc.’sproductsexhibithigh competitiveness because of their integration with advanced environmentally friendly technology by considering that the vast majority of automobiles in recently use internal combustion engines.The generic strategy of Tesla, Inc. requires appropriate strategic objectives to ensure competitive advantage. For example, one of the strategic objectives of Woolworths relies on the increase of investment in research and development (R&D) to introduce new products which attain market demand for superior renewable energy solutions such as batteries for various purposes (Perkins and Murmann 2018). Furthermore, another strategic objective related to
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
7STRATEGIC AND CHANGE MANAGEMENT Tesla’s generic competitive strategy is to reinforce competitiveness by expanding its market reach to create more sales and sustain brand popularity. Moreover, Chen and Perez (2018) have stated that the differentiation generic strategy enables market development by introducing unique products which attract customers while Tesla shifts into new markets.Bakari, Hunjra and Niazi (2017) have stated that Woolworths can implement the differentiation generic competitive strategy in order to intensify the potential of attaining success in using intensive growth strategy. (4.2)Master Plan introduced by Musk will efficiently integrate renewable energy generation and storage space into residential buildings. Tesla with the execution of Master Plan has acquired Solar City which will permit the company for extensive distribution of its sustainable energy products that includes its solar panels, Power wall in addition to Power pack batteries (Tesla.com 2019). Tesla’s Master Plan has not only acknowledged the advancement Tesla has made with transformed focus on new product development but further has created self-driving vehicles which ensure ten times more safety in comparison to traditional car manufacturers (Asnan, Nordin and Othman2015). Additionally, with self-driving capabilities, Tesla in comparison to conventional cars primarily aims to transform the concept of car-ownership. For example, modified concept of car ownership will enable owners to contract their cars when not in use. On contrary to traditional car manufacturers,MasterPlanexpects the desires and requests of the customer prior to the delivery of finished product by R&D. Such a strategy has encouraged Tesla engineers to develop the essential software at the earliest.
8STRATEGIC AND CHANGE MANAGEMENT References Asnan, R., Nordin, N. and Othman, S.N., 2015. Managing change on lean implementation in service sector.Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,211, pp.313-319. Bakari, H., Hunjra, A.I. and Niazi, G.S.K., 2017. How does authentic leadership influence planned organizational change? The role of employees’ perceptions: Integration of Theory of Planned Behavior and Lewin's three step model.Journal of Change Management,17(2), pp.155- 187. Bayne, L., Schepis, D. and Purchase, S., 2017. A framework for understanding strategic network performance: Exploring efficiency and effectiveness at the network level.Industrial Marketing Management,67, pp.134-147. Chen, Y. and Perez, Y., 2018. Business model design: lessons learned from Tesla Motors. InTowards a Sustainable Economy(pp. 53-69). Springer, Cham. Cheng, M.M., Green, W.J. and Ko, J.C.W., 2014. The impact of strategic relevance and assurance of sustainability indicators on investors' decisions.Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory,34(1), pp.131-162. Cummings, S., Bridgman, T. and Brown, K.G., 2016. Unfreezing change as three steps: Rethinking Kurt Lewin’s legacy for change management.Human relations,69(1), pp.33-60. Cummings, T.G. and Worley, C.G., 2014.Organization development and change. Cengage learning.
9STRATEGIC AND CHANGE MANAGEMENT Laing, R., 2019.Woolworths loses third David Jones CEO. [online] Business Day. Available at: https://www.businesslive.co.za/bd/companies/retail-and-consumer/2019-02-07-woolworths- loses-third-david-jones-ceo/ [Accessed 6 Mar. 2019]. Lovelock, C. and Patterson, P., 2015.Services marketing. Pearson Australia. Methner, N., Hamann, R. and Nilsson, W., 2015. The Evolution of a Sustainability Leader: The Development of Strategic and Boundary Spanning Organizational Innovation Capabilities in Woolworths. InThe Business of Social and Environmental Innovation(pp. 87-104). Springer, Cham. Mitchell, S., 2019.David Jones CEO departure, Woolworths returns source of department store gloom.[online]AustralianFinancialReview.Availableat: https://www.afr.com/business/retail/woolworths-djs-gloom-behind-the-departmentstore- glamour-20190207-h1ayl9 [Accessed 6 Mar. 2019]. Perkins, G. and Murmann, J.P., 2018. What does the success of Tesla mean for the future dynamicsintheglobalautomobilesector?.ManagementandOrganizationReview,14(3), pp.471-480. Tesla.com., 2019.Electric Cars, Solar Panels & Clean Energy Storage | Tesla. [online] Tesla.com. Available at: https://www.tesla.com/ [Accessed 6 Mar. 2019]. Woolworthsgroup.com.au ., 2019.Woolworths Group: Quality Brands and Trusted Retailing. [online]Woolworthsgroup.com.au.Availableat:https://www.woolworthsgroup.com.au/ [Accessed 6 Mar. 2019].
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
10STRATEGIC AND CHANGE MANAGEMENT Woolworthsholdings.co.za.,2019.WoolworthsHoldingsLimited.[online] Woolworthsholdings.co.za. Available at: https://www.woolworthsholdings.co.za/ [Accessed 6 Mar. 2019]. Xu, J., Gao, X. and Hammond, J., 2017. E-tailing in Australia: A preliminary analysis of David Jones.The International Technology Management Review,6(4), pp.149-157.