Strategic Financial Managment Analysis Report

Strategic financial
managment

Contents
Introduction...........................................................................................................................................3
Interpretation and evaluation.................................................................................................................3
Ratio Analysis.......................................................................................................................................3
Profitability ratios..............................................................................................................................4
Capital structure ratios.......................................................................................................................7
Vertical analysis....................................................................................................................................8
Market performance and KPIs.........................................................................................................10
Risks and opportunities.......................................................................................................................13
Conclusion...........................................................................................................................................16
References...........................................................................................................................................17

Introduction
The report brings out a discussion on financial analysis of company registered in Malta Stock
Exchange. Financial analysis is conducted with the help of ratio analysis and commonsize
horizontal analysis with the data of 2017 and 2018. For non-financial analysis, KPIs and
market performance has been examined of Bank of Valletta and APS bank. Ratio analysis is
to examine several aspects of the organisation’s operation and performance. It can improve
the understanding of financial statements and reports. There are several risks and
opportunities in the banking industry.
Bank of Valletta is a Maltese banking service organisation, which is headquartered in Santa
Venera. This bank is one of the oldest and established service provider in the nation. The
organisation has 44 branches, a head office, wealth management, and regional business
centres located near Maltese islands (Bank of Valletta, 2018). The bank was founded in 1974,
which is headquartered in BOV centre, Santa Venera, and Triq il kanun. Products offered
include commercial and retail banking with number of employees (1843). APS is a private
bank, which is founded in 1910 and it was incorporated in 1970 (Bank of Valletta, 2018). It
includes and employs 300 staff members across Gozo and Malta. The products offered
include commercial banking, asset management, and private banking. Number of employees
include 300. The subsidiaries include APS Funds Sicav plc (Bank of Valletta, 2018).
Interpretation and evaluation
Ratio Analysis
Ratio analysis is to examine different aspects of the organisation’s financial situations. While
analysing the bank`s performance, it is seen that measurement indicates capital, assets, and
liabilities with the help of organisation`s balance sheet (Srinivasan, & Thevaranjan, 2016).

These ratios will ensure the financial stability of banks through profitability ratios, and capital
structural ratios. Financial reporting in banking sector, which is different from other
industries. The main objective of banking organisation is to attract funds at acceptable cost
and finally invest to earn higher returns. For profitability analysis, return on capital
employed, return on equity, return on total assets, and operating income to the total assets.
For capital structure ratios, interest coverage ratio, loan to assets ratio and capital adequacy
ratio (APS bank, 2018).
Profitability ratios
While deriving the profitability, investors and analysts use ratios to examine the current profit
margin.
Operating income to total assets
This ratio determines how effectively the company generates income by employing total
assets.
1 2
0%
1%
2%
3%
2%
3%
2%
3%
Bank of Valletta
APS
operating income to total assets
Axis Title
(Source: Excel, 2020)

From the above graphical representation, it is seen that the performance of both the banks are
same in relation to operating income ratio (Bank of Valletta, 2017). In 2018, bank of Valletta
generates 2 percent on total assets, and APS generates 3 percent in 2017. In 2018, bank of
Valletta generates 2 percent on total assets in 2018 and APS generates 3 percent in 2017
(APS bank, 2018). According to the overall performance of banking industry, it is reported
that as the banks are highly leveraged where 1 to 2 percent of operating income to total assets
ratio has been considered profitable. When evaluating through banks, APS and Bank of
Valletta has been performing well as being leveraged from two to three percent.
2018 2017
0.00%
0.20%
0.40%
0.60%
0.80%
1.00%
1.20%
0.42%
1.01%
1%
1%
Return on total assets
Bank of Valletta
APS
Axis Title
Axis Title
1 2
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
Non-performing loan/Total Gross loans
Bank of Valletta
APS

According the banking industry of Malta, standard non-performing loan to total gross loan is
estimated at 4.099 percent in 2017 and 5 percent in 2018. Reduced non-performing loan ratio
means more secure loans to customers. APS Bank`s has 3.8 and 4.2 percent, which indicates
that it performs well in regards to the industry. Bank of Valletta is able to maintain much
lower ratio, which is a good indication of recovery the loans.
Increasing net interest income ratio is quite helpful. Bank of Valletta generates 7 percent in
2017, and 8 percent interest income in 2018. There is a need to improve interest income ratio
by enhancing and increasing net operating income, decreasing operating expense, pay off
existing debt, and decreasing the borrowing amount. Expense to income ratio has been one of
the important criteria through which banks can evaluate how much expense it has occurred to
have operating income. Bank of Valletta generates 43 percent in 2017 and 55 percent in
2018. On the other hand, decreasing expense to income ratio indicates that the company has
been incurring less and generating more, which signifies that resources are being used in an
efficient way.
Return on equity
2018 2017
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
5%
12%
9% 10%
Return on equity
Bank of Valletta
APS

This indicates the response of net profit in relation to equity. APS is consistent for both the
years 2017 and 2018. On the other hand, Bank of Valletta earns 5 percent in 2017 and 12
percent in 2018.
Return on total assets
2018 2017
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
7%
8%
9%
3%
8%
1% 1%
Bank of Valletta
APS
This ratio depicts profitability of the company, which indicates per dollar profit that the
company earns on total assets. This ratio is seen as important profitability ratio, which
indicates per unit profit dollar that organisation earns on assets. Most importantly, banks are
highly leveraged then low ROA of 1 to 2 percent will indicate substantial revenues and
profits (APS bank, 2018). Bank of Valletta generates 8 percent in 2017 and in 2018; it
generates 3 percent of net profits. On the other hand, APS generates 1 percent of return in
2017 and it has 1 percent in 2018.

Capital structure ratios
2018 2017
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
4.50
5.00
4.49
3.94
3.68
4.46
Interest Coverage
Bank of Valletta
APS
This ratio depicts the efficiency/times of the company to pay off interest on loans in a year. In
2017, bank of Valletta has 3.94 times and APS has 4.46 times. In 2018, bank of Valetta has
4.49 times to pay off interests whereas; APS has 3.68 times of paying interests (Noor, &
Rosyid, 2018). Low ICR indicates that the company has lower profits to meet interest
expense on debt. Both the companies are able to pay off their interest expense on time such as
from 2017. APS and BOV improves the ICR times.
2018 2017
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
21% 19%
14% 16%
Capital adequacy ratio

CAR is the ratio of the bank`s capital to the risks. This ensures how one absorbs reasonable
amount of losses. This ratio determines the capability to accomplish liabilities and other more
risks such as operational risks and credit risks (Bank of Valletta, 2017). Higher capital
adequacy ratio has been considered as safe. Moreover, banks are less likely to become
insolvents when unexpected losses being occurred. According to the industry, it is mandatory
to maintain 8 to 12 percent of the CAR to maintain proportion of assets and liabilities. Both
the companies have been maintaining considerable CAR in relation to the industry.
1 2
61.00
62.00
63.00
64.00
65.00
66.00
67.00
68.00
69.00
70.00
65.93
64.24
68.96 68.94
Total loan/Total assets
Bank of Valletta
APS
Loan to Assets ratio derive more income from loan. Banks with the lower level of loan-to-
assets derive larger portion of total income from asset management, and non-interest earning
source. The industrial data reveals that ratio of 40 percent is considered as good debt ratio
and 60 percent is considered as poor. It is seen that bank of Valletta and APS are more
leveraged, which is not a good sign.
Vertical analysis
Vertical analysis is a popular tool of financial analysis, which shows that every element in
statement is the percentage of base figure. For analysing vertical analysis of income
statement, figure (sales) is used as base. Other element of the income statement such as

income tax, gross profit, and cost of goods sold and net income shown as percentage of sales
(Srinivasan, & Thevaranjan, 2016). To analyse the balance sheet, total asset is used as base
figure. All current assets, fixed assets and current liabilities, total liabilities, stockholder`s
equity, and long term debt are shown as percentage of total assets.
Particulars 2018 2017 %Difference
€ '000 € '000
Operating Profit/(Loss) 257766.0 300473.0 -0.142132571
Net interest income 1,56,546 1,82,947 -0.144309554
operating expense 1,41,048 1,30,600 -0.08
Finance cost 57350.0 76247.0 -0.247839259
Net profit 51410.0 119498 -0.569783595
Loans and advances to banks 3644933 3431393 0.062231286
Loans and advances to customers 4362983 4162032 0.048281945
Total Assets 12146988.0 1,18,20,630 0.027609188
Average assets 6073494.0 18057303 -0.663654423
Amount owned to Banks 146021 192196 -0.240249537
Amount owned to customers 10414908 10100625 0.031115203
Gross loan 460000 446200 -0.030927835
Non-performing loan 10800 15,600 0.307692308
Asset earning assets 1892570.5 2072811.75 0.086954954
Total risk weighted assets 4673540.0 4802010.0 -0.02675338
Total capital 986405.0 9,31,485 0.058959618
Shareholders' Equity 994133.0 962087 -0.033308838
Bank of Valletta
This segment shed reasonable light on vertical analysis of Bank of Valletta. It is seen that the
operating profit has reduced by 14 percent from 2017 to 2018. It is reasonable that the
company has reduced its interest liability. The company has reduced its net profit, which was
119498 in 2017 and 51410 in 2018. Most important transactions of banks cover from loan,
and loan advances to customers, which has increased by 4 to 6 percent by 2018. The capital
proportions has increased by 5 percent in 2018 (APS bank, 2017).
Particulars 2018 2017 %Difference
€ '000 € '000
Operating Profit/(Loss) 44719.0 42750.0 0.04605848
Finance cost 12149.0 9592.0 0.266576314
Net profit 12584.0 13,108 -0.039975587
Total capital 127659.0 121571.0 0.050077732
Loans and advances to banks 50384.0 33246.0 0.515490585
Loans and advances to customers 1253883.0 998377.0 0.25592136
Average assets 945615.0 1693837.5 -0.441732161
Total assets 1891230.0 1496445.0 0.263815242
Amount owned to Customers 1650308.0 12,25,576 0.346557047
Amount owned to Banks 74473.0 1,11,132 -0.329868985
Total risk weighted assets 939074.0 760207.0 0.235287231
Shareholders' Equity 142244.0 136403 0.042821639
APS

Operating profit has increased by 4 percent in 2018. Finance cost has increased by 26 percent
in 2018. Total capital has increased by 5 percent in 2018. The important element and
transaction include loans and advances to banks and customers by 51 percent and 25 percent.
Total asset has increased by 26 percent in 2018. Net profit has been decreased by 3 percent
by 2018. Total risk weighted assets has increased by 26 percent in 2018 (Srinivasan, &
Thevaranjan, 2016).
Market performance and KPIs
KPIs
Customer retention
Certain KPIs listed for the banking industry include asset quality, customer penetration,
assets under management, and customer retention. Bank of Valletta pertains to perform the
esteemed customers coming over the last few months by updating the documentation by
ensuring all customer data is complete and up to date (Blanchard et al., 2018). Bank has been
requesting the customer for kind cooperation in respect to deadlines and provisions of
complete data, which they have received from banks. Bank will understand certain
inconvenience and striving in making the procedure simple and concise (APS bank, 2017).
As far as employee retention is concerned, APS has been working on small scale while
comparing it to the bank of Valletta.

With total of employee count, it is seen that employees have decreased by 0.8 percent.
Further, in the first year, it has increased by 6.9 percent and then it has increased 16.9 percent
in last two years. Opening of new branch of APS is marked new standard in local retail
banking. Branch has traditional retail point, which connects with customers. New
technologies include “bricks and mortar” is under the pressure from the digital technologies.
Real estate has been expensive with cost of technology, which has been decreasing. Rate of
adoption and new technologies by the customers leading the banks to look at tow
segmentation strategies. Convention branch remain vital for the business in helping customer
retention.
Customer penetration
The bank is able to attract shareholders, which has approached 1 billion Euros in 2017. While
handling and delegating BOV complaints, it is seen that bank strives to create long-term
relationship with customers by supporting and feeling special. Banks avail professional,
caring and customer experience. Complimenting customers and encouraging for being honest
and genuine and submitting their documents on time.
Market performance
Bank of Valletta has been providing financial, investment and banking services in Malta.
Currently, the company has been trading 59.4 percent below fair value. The earnings have
been growing by 25.1 percent for the last few years (Aidoo, & Mensah, 2018). Bank of
Valletta has forecasted annual growth of 7.6 percent in 1 to 3 years where projection is based
on consensus estimations of professional analysts helping the investors to understand the
organisational ability to generate profits. There have been criteria for risk checks-

Revenue and earnings forecasted to grow
(over past 5 years)
-.39
Shareholders have been diluted over past
years
Fail
Forecasting to achieve profitability Pass (in three months)
Whether the dividend sustainable Did not pay consistent dividend
Liquidity of share price and its stability Stable over three months
Higher quality earnings Pass
Profit margins improved over the past years BOV has become profitable
Sufficient financial data Availability of 3 years of financial data
Current market performance of APS bank announces strong operating performance of 2018
with activation and reaching all round record level (Blanchard et al., 2018). Group`s
operating income has expanded through 4.6 percent and also pre-tax profits have been
increased by 1.5 percent. Deposit raising and activity related to lending grew through strong
34.7 percent (1.65 billion dollars). Result has been achieved on backs of the continuous
growth in the business momentum in people, network transformation, process reorganisation,
functional, and investment in people. Transformation of APS bank has turned it into strong
market players, which has enriched customer proposition, risks control, which has improved
quality of income statement. This group allocates appropriate capital for the operational risks
(Blanchard et al., 2018).
Risks and opportunities
It is seen that there is increased operational and operational risks for the banking sector. Poor
transparency is another feature for bank. Risk score has been seen as six out of ten rating.
European banking Authority indicates where Malta`s has failed to impose several effective

sanctions. It has been reported that central bank of Malta is profitable, sound, and resilient
with non-performing loans at the historic lows (Bank of Valletta, 2018).
Risk
category
Stakeholder
affected
Likelihood
rating
Consequenc
e rating
Risk control
Credit risk Customers
and other
banks
B 4 Checking new
customer`s
credit score
and creating
humble
relationship
with customers
(Pratiwi, &
Handayani,
2018).
The
organisation
can establish
credit limits
and political
risk insurance
(Lindman,
Tuunainen, &
Rossi, 2017).
Operational
risk
Employees
and owners
C 3 Distribution of
tasks among

the right
people for right
job. Examining
it in regular
intervals
(Aaron,
Rivadeneyra,
& Shoal,
2017).
Reputational
risk
Customers
and
shareholders
D 5 Understanding
actions, which
will affect
public
perception
Focusing on
the positive
image and
communicating
with the
customers.
Liquidity
risk
Investors E 2 Eliminate the
useless assets,
controlling the
overhead
expenses and

switching from
short term to
long-term debt.
Negotiating to
have long
payment cycles
(Ahmad, &
Zabri, 2016).
Likelihood rating of A is considered excellent, B is very good, C is good, D is average, and E
is bad. Consequence rating has been considered as the level of risks/ business situations
affecting APS and bank of Valletta (Ahmad, & Zabri, 2016).
Non-financial analysis
CSR activities include sustainability among leaders integrating it into environmental and
social issues in the business model. APS undertakes to conduct innovations so that it can
become sustainable (Roberts, Neumann, & Cauvin, 2017).
Bank of Valletta undertakes to come up with toolkit for several SMEs in Malta. CSR practise
on the board are tapping local best practises one they are tested. Number of workshops
include representatives from local company. CSR initiative by the Maltese companies can
promote concept of obliged entrepreneurship in the business community when maximising
the advantages of business operations (Roberts, Neumann, & Cauvin, 2017).
Conclusion
From the above discussion, it is seen that APS has been working on smaller scale whereas,
BOV (bank of Valletta) has been offering products and services at much larger scale. Certain

risks identified are credit risks, operational risk, reputational risk, and liquidity risks. It is
seen that Malta banking industry has been suffering from several risks, which affects
different group of stakeholders. Furthermore, the profitability of both the companies say that
both are performing well at their own level. The capital adequacy ratio tier says market
positioning of Central bank “BOV” retains more customers and employment of people is
much higher than APS. BOV (Bank of Valletta) has attracted the shareholders of $1 billion in
2017, which has been increasing with time. APS suffers from various risks at higher level due
to increasing sufferings of whole industry.

References
Aaron, M., Rivadeneyra, F., & Sohal, S. (2017). Fintech: Is This Time Different?: A
Framework for Assessing Risks and Opportunities for Central Banks. Bank of
Canada.
Ahmad, K., & Zabri, S. M. (2016). The application of non-financial performance
measurement in Malaysian manufacturing firms. Procedia Economics and
Finance, 35, 476-484.
Aidoo, M., & Mensah, F. S. (2018). Development of financial performance assessment
indices for bank performance rating in Ghana. Global Journal of Management And
Business Research.
APS bank, (2017). ANNUAL REPORT & FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2017. Retrieved
from: file:///C:/Users/System04099/Downloads/APS%20Annual%20Report
%202017%20(1).pdf
APS bank, (2018). ANNUAL REPORT & FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2018. Retrieved
from: file:///C:/Users/System04099/Downloads/APS%20Bank%20Annual%20Report
%202018%20(2).pdf
Bank of Valletta, (2017). Annual reports, 2017. Retrieved from:
file:///C:/Users/System04099/Downloads/BOV_Annual_Report_2017%20(1).pdf
Bank of Valletta, (2018). Annual reports, 2018. Retrieved from:
file:///C:/Users/System04099/Downloads/2._Annual_Report_web_version_final_08.0
4.19%20(1).pdf

Blanchard, O., Collins, C. G., Jahan-Parvar, M. R., Pellet, T., & Wilson, B. A. (2018). A year
of rising dangerously? The US stock market performance in the aftermath of the
presidential election. Journal of Policy Modeling, 40(3), 489-502.
Ferris, E., & Aris, B. (2018). Economic Risks and Opportunities for Putin's Fourth
Term. Russian Analytical Digest (RAD), 224.
Lindman, J., Tuunainen, V. K., & Rossi, M. (2017). Opportunities and risks of Blockchain
Technologies–a research agenda.
Noor, M. I., & Rosyid, P. I. (2018). Effect of Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR), Loan to
Deposit Ratio (LDR) and Return on Equity (ROE) on Share Price PT Bank Danamon
Indonesia, TBK. International Journal of Business and Applied Social Science
(IJBASS) Vol, 4.
Pratiwi, S., & Handayani, S. R. (2018). ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE
INDONESIA SHARIA BANKS (Empirical Study on Muamalat Bank, BRI Sharia,
BNI Sharia, and Bank Sharia Mandiri). Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis, 63(1), 140-147.
Roberts, M. L., Neumann, B. R., & Cauvin, E. (2017). Individual Performance Measures:
Effects of Experience on Preference for Financial or Non-Financial Measures.
In Advances in Management Accounting (pp. 191-221). Emerald Publishing Limited.
Srinivasan, D., & Thevaranjan, A. (2016). The role of non-financial measures in controlling
myopic activities: the case of hard selling. International Journal of Accounting,
Auditing and Performance Evaluation, 12(2), 103-130.

Bank of Valletta
Particulars 2018 2017 %Differe
nce
€ '000 € '000
Operating Profit/(Loss) 257766.0
300473.
0
-
0.1421325
71
Net interest income 1,56,546 1,82,947
-
0.1443095
54
operating expense 1,41,048 1,30,600 -0.08
Finance cost 57350.0 76247.0
-
0.2478392
59
Net profit 51410.0 119498
-
0.5697835
95
Loans and advances to
banks 3644933 3431393
0.0622312
86
Loans and advances to
customers 4362983 4162032
0.0482819
45
Total Assets 12146988.0
1,18,20,
630
0.0276091
88
Average assets 6073494.0
1805730
3
-
0.6636544
23
Amount owned to Banks 146021 192196
-
0.2402495
37
Amount owned to
customers 10414908
1010062
5
0.0311152
03
Gross loan 46000 44620
-
0.0309278
35
Non-performing loan 10800 15,600
0.3076923
08
Asset earning assets 1892570.5
2072811
.75
0.0869549
54
Total risk weighted assets 4673540.0
4802010
.0
-
0.0267533
8
Total capital 986405.0 9,31,485
0.0589596
18
Shareholders' Equity 994133.0 962087
-
0.0333088
38
Computation of ratio analysis

Profitability Ratios 2018 2017
Operating income to total
assets Operating income/ Total assets 2% 3%
Return on Capital
Employed net profit/capital emplyed 5% 13%
Return on Equity net profit/ equity 5% 12%
Expense to income ratio operating expense/Operating income 55% 43%
Net interest income
margin
interest income/average earnings
assets 8% 9%
non performing loan non-performing loan/Gross loan 23% 35%
Return on Total assets net profit/total assets 0.42% 1.01%
Solvency Ratios
Capital structure ratio 2018 2017
Interest coverage ratio EBIT/Interest 4.49 3.94
Liquidity ratio 2018 2017
Total loan/Total assets 0.66 0.64
Capital adequacy ratio
Tier 1 capital+Tier II capital/Risk
weighted assets 21% 19%
APS
Particulars 2018 2017 %Differe
nce
€ '000 € '000
Operating Profit/(Loss) 44719.0 42750.0
0.0460584
8
Finance cost 12149.0 9592.0
0.2665763
14
Net profit 12584.0 13,108
-
0.0399755
87
Total capital 127659.0
121571.
0
0.0500777
32
Loans and advances to
banks 50384.0 33246.0
0.5154905
85
Loans and advances to
customers 1253883.0
998377.
0
0.2559213
6
Average assets 945615.0
169383
7.5
-
0.4417321
61
Total assets 1891230.0
149644
5.0
0.2638152
42
Amount owned to
Customers 1650308.0
12,25,5
76
0.3465570
47
Amount owned to Banks 74473.0
1,11,13
2
-
0.3298689
85

Total risk weighted assets 939074.0
760207.
0
0.2352872
31
Shareholders' Equity 142244.0 136403
0.0428216
39
Computation of ratio analysis
Profitability Ratios 2018 2017
Operating income to total
assets Operating income/ Total assets 2% 3%
Return on Capital
Employed net profit/capital employed 10% 11%
Return on Equity net profit/ equity 9% 10%
Return on Total assets net profit/total assets 1% 1%
Solvency Ratios
Capital structure ratio 2018 2017
Interest coverage ratio EBIT/Interest 3.68 4.46
Liquidity ratio 2018 2017
Total loan/Total assets 0.69 0.69
Capital adequacy ratio
Tier 1 capital +Tier II capital/Risk
weighted assets 14% 16%

Here are the screenshots of bank of Valletta financial report-
(Source: Annualreports, 2018)
(Source: Annualreports, 2018)
(Source: APS, 2018)

(Source: APS, 2018)
Here are the financial statements for APS bank-
(Source: APS, 2018)

(Source: APS, 2018)
(Source: APS, 2018)
(Source: bank of Valletta, 2018)

(Source: bank of Valletta, 2018)
(Source: APS, 2018)