Strategic Financial Management: Investment Appraisal Techniques, Analysis, and Evaluation

This report discusses the calculation of investment appraisal techniques, analysis and evaluation of investment projects, and two sources of financing in strategic financial management. It provides insights into determining the best investment option and the funding sources used by AYR Co.

Strategic financial
management

Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................3
TASK...............................................................................................................................................3
Calculation of investment appraisal techniques..........................................................................3
Analysis and evaluation of Investment projects..........................................................................6
Two sources of financing.............................................................................................................8
CONCLUSION..............................................................................................................................11
REFERENCES..............................................................................................................................12

INTRODUCTION
Strategic financial management entails not just to controlling a business earnings, but doing so
with the aim of achieving the business's mission and vision and also increasing shareholder
equity over period (Bouzon, Govindan and Rodriguez, 2018). It aids in the establishment of
business goals, it also provides a framework for developing and implementing strategies to
address problems that arise during the process. It also entails setting out a plan to help the
company achieve its goals. In this report, calculation of different investment appraisal techniques
is shown which help company to determine the best suitable option for investments. In addition,
report also discuss the analysis and evaluation of most important investment method and the
source of funding which is implemented by company to meet the requirement of investment.
TASK
Calculation of investment appraisal techniques
Investment evaluation is a process through which a company evaluates the feasibility of potential
acquisitions or schemes depending on the results of various working capital as well as funding
techniques. This is a type of fundamental research for investors and it can assist in identifying
long-term patterns and also a corporation's potential profitability. These methods have excellent
answers to this issue. Each approach looks at the design from with a particular perspective and
offers a unique perspective. The most command methods which are used in the context of AYR
Co. to calculate the profitability of both project which is more beneficial are discussed below
with detail calculation (Chow, Greatbatch and Bracci, 2019).
Payback period: The payback time is amongst the most basic investment valuation strategies.
The payback strategy describes how long it takes for a venture to produce enough working
capital to offset its initial costs. The payback period seems to be the interval between when you
make an expenditure and when you break even on the transaction Take the expense of the project
and split it by the revealing how much profit to determine the payback date. Short repayment
times are preferable since it requires less time for such an individual to recoup their investment
resources.
Internal rate of return: The undervaluing rate, or internal rate of return, takes discounted
profitability to the same level as the original investment. To put it another way, it's really the
undervaluing pace during which the business won't lose money or earn a profit. This is achieved

by the process of trial and error. They may also define IRR as the level during which the
program's net present value (NPV) becomes zero (Dekker, 2016).
Net present value: The discrepancy between the actual values towards capital employed as well
as the estimated price of operating expenses for a set predefined timeframe net present value
(NPV). NPV is indeed a capital market money management that allows for both the period level
of resources and has been used to measure a project's projected profitability. The financial
leverage theorem states that currency is worth as much now as this would be in the potential it
has had more order to grab interest. Revenues and expenses are calculated using the opportunity
cost of capital principle, which takes into account current valuations (Kar, Chakravorty and
Gupta, 2018). Mostly as consequence, NPV decides whether investing in a venture or accepting
a lower return somewhere compared to expected potential returns is much more fiscally feasible.
Subtract the present amount of invested capital again from present value of projected cash flows
to arrive only at NPV. If another NPV is optimistic, it means that the expected sales or income of
a program are higher than the expected costs. If the net present value (NPV) is low, the
organisation will decide not to support the process or investment.
Aspire
Cash
inflows
Variable
cost
Cash
Inflows
Discount
@ 10%
Present
value Scrap NPV
Year 0
650000.
0 27000.0 -2250000
Year 1
650000.
0 27000.0 623000.0
0.9090909
09 566363.6
-
1683636.4
Year 2
695500.
0 28822.5 666677.5
0.8264462
81 550973.1
-
1132663.2
Year 3
747662.
5 30768.0 716894.5
0.7513148
01 538613.4 -594049.8
Year 4
803737.
2 32844.9 770892.3
0.6830134
55 526529.8 -67520.0
Year 5
864017.
5 35061.9 828955.6
0.6209213
23 514716.2
37500
0
822,196.2
4
Wol
f
Cash
inflows
Variable
cost
Expen
ses
Cash
Inflows
Discount
@ 10%
Present
value
Scra
p NPV

Year
0 955000.0 14400.0
18000.
0 -2250000
Year
1 955000.0 14400.0
18000.
0 922600.0
0.909090
909 838727.3
-
1411272.7
Year
2 955000.0 15480.0
16650.
0 922870.0
0.826446
281 762702.5 -648570.2
Year
3 955000.0 16641.0
15401.
3 922957.8
0.751314
801 693431.8 44861.6
Year
4 955000.0 17889.1
14246.
2 922864.8
0.683013
455 630329.1 675190.6
Year
5 955000.0 19230.8
13177.
7 922591.5
0.620921
323 572856.8
3750
00
1,623,047.
39
Payback
period
Aspire
Payback = 4
year
Cash Inflows
Year 0 -2250000
Year 1 623,000.0 (1,627,000.0)
Year 2 666,677.5 (960,322.5)
Year 3 716,894.5 (243,428.0)
Year 4 770,892.3 527,464.3
Year 5 828,955.6 1,356,419.9
Payback
period
Wolf
Payback = 3
year
Cash Inflows
Year 0 -2250000
Year 1 922,600.00 (1,327,400.00)
Year 2 922,870.00 (404,530.00)
Year 3 922,957.75 518,427.75

Year 4 922,864.77 1,441,292.52
Year 5 922,591.55 2,363,884.07
Analysis and evaluation of Investment projects
Recommendation for project
From the above calculation, it is determined that AYR Co. must adopt the project Wolf in the
future as it’s requires less payback time to recover the amount invested. It's critical for investors
since it's a type of fundamental research that can tell them how well a commodity or enterprise
has long-term prospects depending mostly on feasibility of its new endeavours and
accomplishments. The payback date form is identical to the original. The main distinction is that
in the undervaluing payback system, the payback time is measured using estimated investment
returns, whereas in the accounting ratios, the net income is measured using projected cash flows.
Company would sometimes assign a criterion standard or evaluation test before beginning a
project. For example, can stipulate that only initiatives with a three-year payback period can be
pursued. Only Project B will be suitable in this situation. They increasing, nevertheless, set a 5-
year payback date, where in case all ventures meet the investment criteria. Then you have to
choose between two options.
On a business level, Project B is definitely the better option because it pays off faster. Other
considerations, like non-financial or valuation concerns, can now be regarded. It's possible that
the company's cash flow is tight, so choosing the plan that returns out the most quickly is critical
whether other considerations indicate that it isn't the right option for the future.
Justification for Investment appraisal techniques used in above calculation
NPV
The disparity between the current value of currency outflows and inflows throughout a span of
time is defined as net present value (NPV). The net present value (NPV) is a calculation used
during financial analysis and financial management to determine the feasibility of a proposed
project or investment (Lana, Velez and Vlahogianni, 2018). A positive NPV means that an
original project or equity investment expected profits (in monetary terms) outweigh its estimated
costs (mostly in present dollars). It is expected that a higher Npv expenditure would be
beneficial, while a negative NPV expenditure will end in a significant deficit. The NPV Rule,
which states that certain transactions with such a positive current value can be made, is generally

considered acceptable. The NPV Rule, which states that certain securities with positive Net
present values returns can be accepted, is based on this principle. Adjusted for inflation as well
as earnings through new profits generated during the interim, cash throughout the current is
worth as much as the identical significant value. In other terms, a dollar generated by the
investment would be equal to the present value earned currently.
Advantages of using NPV.
Time value of money: This approach is a technique for determining the project viability. It took
a long time worth of capital into account. The valuation of potential cash flows would be lower
than the amount of modern cash flows. As a result, the greater the cash balance, the lower the
valuation. It really is a critical factor that should be taken into account when using the NPV
form. When a Project A with such a life of three years have higher revenue throughout the early
incident as well as a Project B with such a lifespan of three years have higher revenues during
the latter time, so using NPV, the company would be capable of picking Project A wisely
because inflows now are more valuable than inflows further on (Lu and Xiao-qiang, 2017).
The investment's valued: The Net Present Value equation not only determines not whether a
project can be viable, it also determines the gross benefit value. After undervaluing the
investment returns, the project would benefit $1,623,047.39, as seen in the example above. The
tool calculates the profit or loss on an investment.
Payback period
The payback approach aids in determining an investment portfolio payback time. The payback
period (PBP) seems to be the duration of information (in years) it requires again for retained
earnings from some kind of proposal's profits to offset the original investment. Once given the
option, a CFO will choose the plan with both the shorter payback time. Since it is simple to
measure and comprehend, the repayment way to measure capital spending programs is quite
common. That being said, it has several flaws and overlooks certain critical considerations that
really should be weighed when assessing the commercial feasibility of programs. The benefits of
the repayment method have made it a common option among executives. However, the
drawbacks of the repayment cycle, like those of any other system, prohibit managers about
relying entirely on it to make decisions. Throughout this post, we'll go through the benefits and
drawbacks including its repayment method in order to assist you form an opinion about this
capital budgeting technique.

Advantages of Payback period
Simple to Manage and Comprehend: This is one of the most important benefits including its
payback era. The approach has a small number of inputs and is simpler to quantify than most
financial analysis. To measure the payback time, all they need are the preliminary project
expense and estimated cash flows. Other strategies were using the same inputs too though, but
they require more conclusions. For example, the quantity of investment, which is used by most
approaches, necessitates managers making some judgments (McLeod, Payne and Evert, 2016).
Quick Mitigate: Managers can easily measure the payback time of programmes because it is
easier to compute and has less inputs. This enables management to make swift decisions, which
is critical in businesses with scarce capital.
Liquidity is preferred: Almost no capital budgeting approach shows the payback date, which is
critical detail. A proposal with a smaller payback time is usually less risky. For small enterprises
with scarce funding, such knowledge is critical. Small companies must rapidly recoup their costs
in order to expand in new ventures. In markets where there is uncertainty or rapid technical
development, the payback approach is very useful. Since of this volatility, forecasting projected
annual cash inflows is challenging. As a result, doing that and completing tasks with fast PBP
decreases the potential of a failure due to fragmentation. The payback technique's most important
benefit has been its flexibility. It was a simple method of comparing many proposals just choose
the one with the quickest payback period. The payback, on the other hand, has a number of
realistic and conceptual disadvantages.
Two sources of financing
Equity, also known as investors' equity (or investors' equitable throughout the context of
privately owned companies), is the sum of capital that would be returning to a minority
employees because all of the corporation's properties are repossessed but all of the liabilities was
paying off during the event of an insolvency. That is the amount of the business sale without any
authority given by the firm that were not exchanged with the transaction throughout the terms of
payment. Furthermore, shareholder equity may be used to reflect a business's market valuation
(Passetti and Tenucci, 2016). Equity should be used as a method of money. It also reflects a
corporation's pro-rata holding of its shares. Among the most popular types of capital is equity
that can be placed on a firm's balance sheet. It is consider to be most popular pieces of evidence
used by investors to measure a corporate accounting stability, so it is seen on the accounting

records. The "assets-minus-liabilities" share price formula creates a straightforward image of a
company's wealth, and thus can be widely accessed by financial analysts, by contrasting specific
figures representing what the corporation controls and what it holds. The funds earned by a firm
is known as equity, but is used to buy properties, invest in ventures, and finance operations. A
company may make investments by raising debt (throughout the form of grants or securities) or
equity (throughout the securities of the company) (by selling stock). Equity investments become
preferred by investors because they allow them to participate more fully in a company's earnings
and progress. The company is focused on Angle investors for case of equity financing which
normally call businesses with negative stock value to be expensive or dangerous investments.
Market value is also not a reliable measure of a corporate accounting stability on its own; but,
when combined with other resources and indicators, an individual can correctly assess a firm's
performance. It's significant because it reflects the worth of an investor's interest in a firm, as
measured by another ownership of the preferred equity. Stockholders who own shares in a
company will benefit from both capital gains income. Shareholders who own stock will be able
to vote on company decisions as well as operations of a company appointments. These stock
ownership advantages encourage shareholders to remain committed to the organization. The
value of a company's stockholders may be rational or irrational. If the result is satisfactory, the
total profitability are sufficient to support its liabilities. When the capital structure is
unfavourable, the corporation's liabilities outweigh its funds; this is known as financial statement
bankruptcy (Quattrone, 2016).
A debt would be a chunk of cash lent by another person. Many companies and individuals
employ debt to finance major transactions that they would not be able to make under normal
conditions. A loan agreement allows the investing party to make payments mostly on assumption
that this be repaid at a future stage, normally with interest. Loans, such as deposits and vehicle
loans, as well as unsecured loans as well as consumer debt, seem to be the most prevalent types
of debt. The creditor is expected to repay the total debt before a certain date, usually several
months in the future, according to the borrower to the lender. The amount of inflation that even
the creditor will pay is also specified throughout the loan agreements. In order to make the
investment AYR co. is planning to take a bank loan for a certified bank on reliable interest rate
including the time period which is not a burden over company. The rate of interest which the
applicant must pay monthly, calculated as a proportion including its amount borrowed, also is

specified throughout the existing loans. Interest has been used to reimburse the investor for
carrying on the burden of the debt and also allowing the applicant to pay back the loan rapidly in
attempt to lessen his net interest cost. Firms that really need funding have other lending solutions
than loans as well as consumer debt. Individuals cannot make investments or corporate bonds,
which are popular forms of commercial paper. Securities are a form of debt product that helps a
business to raise money by offering shareholders the guarantee of redemption (Sledgianowski,
Gomaa and Tan, 2017).
Impact on average cost of capital
As a company receives money from debt borrowing, the financing portion of the income
statement shows a favourable item, and also a rise in current liabilities. Principal, that must be
lent to lenders and shareholders, and interest are all part of debt servicing. Interest payments on
loans lower net profits and cash flow, even though debt doesn't really magnify ownership. This
decrease in net profit also results in a tax advantage since the gross income is smaller. Liquidity
ratios like debt-to-equity as well as debt-to-total capital increase as debt levels rise. Covenants
are also attached to loan funding, requiring a company to fulfil some term debt as well as debt-
level conditions. Debt creditors have priority over shareholders throughout the case of a
company's insolvency.
While equity funding has little effect on a company's earnings, it will dilute current shareholders'
investments when the firm's total income is distributed over a greater amount of securities. As a
business raises money from equity funding, the capital structure from financing operations
column shows a favourable item, as well as a rise in common shares at par net realizable value.
Impact of bank loan on shareholder and lenders
Certain contract terms, known as agreements, will apply to higher payments, including the
availability of budget allocations details. Loans aren't really versatile, and you might end up
spending interest on money they don't need. If your clients don't reimburse them on time, they
might have difficulty making mortgage repayments, triggering cash flow issues. In certain
situations, loans are backed by the business's properties or your personal belongings, such as
your house. Lending institutions can have cheaper rates that unsecured loans, however if they
can't afford the mortgage, the savings or property could be at threat. If they wish to repay the
money until the expiry of the agreement, they will have to pay a small fee (Zyoud and Fuchs-
Hanusch, 2017). If they wish to pay back the loan even before expiry of the agreement, you will

have to pay a fee, especially if the interest’s rate is set. Refinance for recurring costs is not a
smart option and it will be impossible to keep up with repayments. Rather, ongoing costs can be
supported through cash from purchases, likely with an outstanding balance as a buffer. If you are
unable to secure a loan or any form of financing from the bank, people have other financing
opportunities. See Business Lending Options - An Outline for more detail. Prepare the company
for bank lending if they think a line of credit is a feasible choice for the company.
CONCLUSION
In the last of report, it is founded that the funding is moderately risky, falling in between
low-risk debt and high-risk financing decision. The borrower creates a mortgage, but if all looks
perfectly, the corporation repays the loan on agreed-upon terms. The "best" sum of debt differs
from one company to the next. Various criteria are being used to decide whether the amount of
debt, or interest, that a business uses to finance activities is within a proper range while
determining its financial status.

REFERENCES
Books and Journals
Bouzon, M., Govindan, K. and Rodriguez, C .M. T., 2018. Evaluating barriers for reverse
logistics implementation under a multiple stakeholders’ perspective analysis using grey
decision making approach. Resources, conservation and recycling, 128, pp.315-335.
Chow, D.S., Greatbatch, D. and Bracci, E., 2019. Financial responsibilisation and the role of
accounting in social work: challenges and possibilities. The British Journal of Social
Work, 49(6), pp.1582-1600.
Dekker, H.C., 2016. On the boundaries between intrafirm and interfirm management accounting
research. Management Accounting Research, 31, pp.86-99.
Du, L., Feng, Y., Lu, W., Kong, L. and Yang, Z., 2020. Evolutionary game analysis of
stakeholders' decision-making behaviours in construction and demolition waste
management. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 84, p.106408.
Kar, S., Chakravorty, B., Sinha, S. and Gupta, M. P., 2018. Analysis of stakeholders within IoT
ecosystem. In Digital India (pp. 251-276). Springer, Cham.
Lana, I., Del Ser, J., Velez, M. and Vlahogianni, E.I., 2018. Road traffic forecasting: Recent
advances and new challenges. IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine, 10(2),
pp.93-109.
Lu, D. A. I. and Xiao-qiang, Z .H. I., 2017. How the Westernized Management Accounting
Techniques are Transferred to China's SOEs? A Case Study. Finance Research, (1), p.3.
McLeod, M.S., Payne, G.T. and Evert, R.E., 2016. Organizational ethics research: A systematic
review of methods and analytical techniques. Journal of Business Ethics, 134(3), pp.429-
443.
Passetti, E. and Tenucci, A., 2016. Eco-efficiency measurement and the influence of
organisational factors: evidence from large Italian companies. Journal of Cleaner
production, 122, pp.228-239.
Quattrone, P., 2016. Management accounting goes digital: Will the move make it
wiser?. Management Accounting Research, 31, pp.118-122.
Sledgianowski, D., Gomaa, M. and Tan, C., 2017. Toward integration of Big Data, technology
and information systems competencies into the accounting curriculum. Journal of
Accounting Education, 38, pp.81-93.
Zyoud, S.H. and Fuchs-Hanusch, D., 2017. A bibliometric-based survey on AHP and TOPSIS
techniques. Expert systems with applications, 78, pp.158-181.