Strategic Management Accounting: Wattle Jet Case Study on Stakeholders
Verified
Added on  2023/06/10
|4
|971
|88
AI Summary
This article discusses the stakeholders of Wattle Jet Case Study, their value and requirements, strategic objectives, strategies to achieve them, project implementation, payback period, sensitivity analysis, earned value variances, and budgeting. It also includes a bibliography for further reading.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Assignment Strategic Management Accounting Wattle Jet Case Study Focus on stakeholders 1.0Identify significant stakeholders. The term stakeholder encompasses any person/ entity that can affect or be affected by the actions of the entity. The key stakeholders identified in business include:(Jonathan Kletzel, 2016) ï‚·Customers of the company; ï‚·Employees of the organisation ; ï‚·Suppliers of the company; ï‚·Shareholders of the company; ï‚·Government rules and regulations 2.0Thevalueeachstakeholderbringsto,andrequiresfrom,the company The value each stake holders bring is defined here-in-below: Sl NoParticularsValue broughtValue required 1Customers Business, loyalty and future potential Quality, customer care and ethical requirements. 2Employees Business growth, innovation, problem solving and value driver. Safe working condition, payroll,job guarantee, recognition 3Suppliers Raw material supply and credit facility Equal business opportunities 4Shareholders Funds, seed capital, expertise and vision Return on capital , safe management of funds, growth 5GovernmentWorking environment, safety and Taxation, true and fair reporting, 1
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
competitive industrycompliance (Wikipedia, 2018) 3.0Strategic objectives related to providing stakeholder value The strategic objective includes: ï‚·Advantage over competitors and Market Leader; ï‚·Survival; ï‚·Efficiency in operations; ï‚·Profitability; ï‚·Wealth Maximisation; ï‚·Reducing litigation and other disputes 4.0Strategies to achieve the strategic objectives. Some of the strategies to achieve the strategic objective include: ï‚·Making B-Plan with a defined time plan and structural format; ï‚·Enhance customer experience; ï‚·To increase non-passenger revenue; ï‚·Target to work at 80% occupancy rate; ï‚·To enhance operation and reach wider networks; ï‚·To identify new business opportunities and synergy; ï‚·Establishing Strategic Business Units (SBU); ï‚·Reduce fuel consumption and increase fleet utilisation etc. Project Implementation 5.0Use the weighted average savings calculated in Table 2 and other cash flow information to calculate the project's payback time. Theprojectpaybackstime2.49yearsonthebasisofbudgeted dataprovidedinthecasestudy.Further,pleasefindenclosed herewith the detailed working of the payback as Project Implementation Projected Cash Flows OutflowAUD Year 0' 2350 00 2
Year 1 7500 0 Total 3100 00 Inflow Weighted AverageAUD Cumulativ e Year 1 7979 079790 Year 2 1425 40222330 Year 3 1795 90401920 Projected Pay back period Budgeted2.49Years 6.0Commentonyourresults:howdoestheprojectpaybackinform your views on the risk of the project? To begin with Project payback period is the simple selection method of analysing the feasibility of project. It is defined as the required to realise the cash employed in the project. It generally showcases the time horizon for realisation of original investment. The shorter the time period, the better the investment. Further, in the proposed case since the payback period is 2.49 years, the project is taking a better part of the time to realise the investmentasitoccupies83.33%ofthetimehorizonoftheproject. (Project Selection Methods for Project Management Professionals) On the basis of time required, the project is risky as the major benefit is on a later part of the project. 7.0Wattle Jet has forecast a new WACC of 13% over the project life. What is the sensitivity of NPV to this 1% decline in discount rate? Express the sensitivity of NPV as a percentage of total investment in the ADS-B system ($310,000) The sensitivity of 1% decline in WACC on project NPV as percentage of total investment is 1.93%. Further, the project would not have been feasible at 13% WACC. The calculation assumes that AUD 75000 has been expensed at year zero since it has been considered as part of total investment otherwise the same would have been deducted from the year 1 cash flow. Senstivity computation 3
Sl noCashflowsDiscounting@13% (A)Discounting@12% (B) 1797907061171241 2142540111630113632 3179590124465127829 Total (1+2+3)306705312702 Difference (C=B-A)5996 Percentage of investment (C/$310000)%1.93% Assumption:AUD75000isassumedtobeinvestedatthebeginning otherwise the said computation shall change and AUD 75000 shall be deducted from year 1 cash flow 8.0Calculate Wattle Jet's earned value variances and comment on the results. Is the project ahead of, or behind schedule? Is it over or under budget? Earned Value = percentage of work completed * Budgeted cost = 60%*310000 =186000.(AUD) Earned value variance =200000-186000=14000AUD The project is behind schedule as 60% of the work has been completed in 12 months instead of 75%. The project is under budgeted as the actual cost exceeded the budgeted cost at 60% completion by 14000 AUD. Bibliography Jonathan Kletzel, A. S. (2016).U.S. carriers need to reward their stakeholders. Retrieved july 7, 2018, from www.strategyand.pwc.com: https://www.strategyand.pwc.com/media/file/2016-Commercial-Aviation- Industry-Trends.pdf Project Selection Methods for Project Management Professionals. (n.d.). Retrieved july 7, 2018, from www.simplilearn.com: https://www.simplilearn.com/project-selection-methods-article Stakeholder (corporate). (2018, may 18). Retrieved july 5, 2018, from en.wikipedia.org: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stakeholder_(corporate) 4