Strategic Management of Dick Smith: Analysis and Recommendations
Verified
Added on  2023/03/31
|13
|2303
|123
AI Summary
This report analyzes the strategic management of Dick Smith, a failed Australian retailer, using various tools such as SWOT analysis and value chain analysis. It identifies the key contributing factors to the failure and recommends effective strategies for future success.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head: STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT Strategic management Name of the student Name of the university Author note
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
1STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT Table of Contents Introduction......................................................................................................................................2 Determination of the general environment......................................................................................2 Determination of the industry competitiveness...............................................................................4 Competitive analysis........................................................................................................................5 Internal analysis...............................................................................................................................6 Value chain analysis........................................................................................................................7 SWOT analysis................................................................................................................................9 Strategy analysis of Dick Smith......................................................................................................9 Conclusion.....................................................................................................................................10 Reference.......................................................................................................................................11
2STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT Introduction The current business scenario is much challenging for the business entities than it was a few years ago. This is due to the reason that market trends along with the taste and preferences of the customers are changing at much rapid pace and posing challenges for the business entities in coping up with. There are number of organizations got failed in the current competitive market situations due to not being able to cope up with the changes. One such example is Dick Smith of Australia, which was closed in 2016. Lack of proper and effective strategies in aligning with the current business trends caused the closure of their business. However, in addition, there are number of other external factors that further contributed in the failure of Dick Smith. This report will discuss about the business situations of Dick Smith on the basis of different strategic management tools. In addition, the key contributing factors will be identified. The existing strategies that caused failure of Dick Smith will be discussed and on the basis of these, effective strategies will be discussed. Determination of the general environment Economical factorsThe global recession of 2008 reduced the purchasing power of the customers and thus the demand for electronic appliances got reduced as well as the business viability of Dick Smith. Turbulence in the national economy of Australia also reduced the business viability of Dick Smith (Eaton et al. 2016). Physical factorsDick Smith was having presence only in the Australian market as other foreign business of them got failed. Thus, dependence only on single market caused higher risks for Dick Smith. Moreover, the
3STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT turbulenceintheAustralianmarketforDickSmithcannotget overcame from the business in foreign business. Sociocultural factorsChange in the social factors and trends in Australia are evident due to the high level social globalization in the country. In line to this scenario,thebuyingmediumsandtrendsofthecustomersgot changed such as emergence of online mediums (Scott 2013). In this case, it posed challenges for the traditional retailers in coping up with the change. Global factorsEmergence of new global brands and entry of them in the Australian market posed challenges for the domestic firms. The global firms are more effective and efficient with better technical holds compared to the domestic firms. It increased the challenges for the domestic Australian retailers. Technological factorsTechnologyplayedanimportantroleinchangingthebusiness scenarioin the retailsector. Thecustomerconvenienceprocess drasticallychangedwiththeevolutionoftechnologiessuchas introduction of self checkout system. This caused challenges for a few brands in investing more in developing the technologies (Inman and Nikolova 2017). Political legal factorsAustralia is having favorable political and legal environment but the foreign investments friendly approach of the governments increased the competition in the domestic market, which posed the challenge for the domestic players.
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
4STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT Demographic factorsThe ever increasing average age level of the population in Australia posed challenge for the retailers. This is due to the reason that the older will be the age groups; the lower will be the market demand, which reduced the viability for the retailers (Mitchell and Boustani 2015). Determination of the industry competitiveness Bargaining power of the buyersBargaining power of the buyersis high in the electronic retailing industry due to the reason that there are number of retailers operating in the market. Hence, the pricing decisions arehighlyinfluencedbythemarketfactors.Thiscaused limited profitability of the retailers. In addition, the customers are having lower cost of switching between the retailers, which also posed challenge for the entities in managing the customer loyalty (Lauermann 2013). Bargainingpowerofthe suppliers Bargaining power of the suppliers is high for the electronic retailers due to the reason that they are just reselling the manufactured items. Thus, the pricing of the suppliers or the original equipment manufacturers determine the end pricing of the retailers. This is also concluding the fact that retailers are having low influence in the business decisions. Threat of new entrantsThreat of entrants is moderate due to the fact that countrywide presence is difficultfor the newentrantsbut small scale
5STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT businessishighlyevident.Inaddition,numberofglobal brands entered in the Australian global scenario is having the capabilityofcompetingwiththeexistingplayers(Dobbs 2014). Threat of substitutesThreat of substitute is high as number of retailers is offering same products and services. Emergence of online mediums further intensified the substitutions threat. Due to the lack of point of differences between the retailers, brand loyalty among the customers is low (Porter and Heppelmann 2014). Competitive rivalryCompetitive rivalry is high in the Australian retail scenario due to thepresence of highnumber of competitors.Different retailers are offering discounts and seasonal benefits to attract the customers. Competitive analysis Dick Smith is having number of competitors in its strategic group including Harvey Norman, JB Hi-Fi and Aldi. The rivalry in this strategic group is intense due to the reason that majority of the competitors are following cost based business strategies. However, in the case of Harvey Norman, their major capabilities include high market presence across Australia with having good number of stores across the country. On the other hand, the major competitive advantage of Aldi is high product assortment and varieties. Thus, the major challenge for Dick Smith is to cover the entire Australian region and offering larger varieties to the customers. In addition, ALDI is also gaining from the cost leadership advantages due to their diversified
6STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT product portfolio (Richardson, Taylor and Lanis 2013). Thus, the lower profit margin from the electronic items is getting adjusted from the profitability from other goods. This is not in the case of Dick Smith due to the fact that they offered only the single product line of electronic goods. It can be concluded that almost all the competitors of Dick Smith are having some sorts of competitive advantages over them. This further contributed in the failure of the business of Dick Smith. Internal analysis It is identified that the tangible resources of Dick Smith include their stores across the country and the stock inventory. On the other hand, the intangible resources of Dick Smith include their trademarks, brand identity and value, financial resources and the employees. The intangible resources such as the trademarks and brand value are the major differentiating factors for Dick Smith over their competitors. In terms of identification of capabilities of Dick Smith, one of the major capabilities of Dick Smith is the ability to change the product portfolio according to the change in the market trend and demand. For instance, they offered more of split air conditioners in the recent time over the traditional window air conditioners due to the change in the market trend. On the other hand, it is also identified that Dick Smith is having the capability of extensive market intelligence process. This is due to the reason that the product strategy of Dick Smith is based on the feedback from the customers and it is well evident from their business approaches. ValuableRarityInimitabilityOrganizational capability Product strategyYesNoNoYes
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
7STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT Market intelligence YesNoYesYes From the above analysis of the competency of Dick Smith, it is identified that majority of their capabilities are not competent enough. This is due to the reason that he product strategy and market intelligence process initiated them is not rare as it can be initiated by their competing forces also. This lead to the fact that Dick Smith is having lower points of differences with their major competitors and thus they have not being able to gain the competitive advantages in the market. Value chain analysis Primary activities Inbound logisticsInbound logistics of Dick Smith involves getting the supplies delivered from the OEMs. Thus, they do not have the liabilities or responsibilities for this process. OperationsOperations include of delivering the goods from their warehouse directly to the customers. Outbound logisticsOutbound logistics of Dick Smith include delivering the goods and this process if initiated by them. Thus, the responsibility and risks involve in incurred by Dick Smith. Marketing and salesDick Smith is following extensive process of marketing and sales, which is further helping in gaining the larger market reach. This also helping in staying relevant in the competition and
8STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT increasing the brand recall value among the customers. ServiceDick Smith is having dedicated and effective service process including the after sales services. Customers are provided with the highest level of service standards along with the after sales services after the purchase. Dedicated customer care process is maintained by Dick Smith. Support activities Firm infrastructureInfrastructure of Dick Smith includes stores across the Australian region and warehousesin different strategiclocations.It is helping them in ensuring the lowest and faster transportation process and delivering process to the customers. Humanresource management Human resource management of Dick Smith involves different employee related elements such as workplace diversity. Dick Smith is having their stores across Australia and thus they are having employees from different social backgrounds. Employees are also being provided with proper workplace environment. Technology developmentDick Smith is not the market leader in terms of the usages of latest technologies. This is one of their major gaps in terms of the value chain analysis. However, the existing technologies being used by Dick Smith are effective enough but not at par to some of their competitors. ProcurementProcurement process of Dick Smith involves simpler form due to the fact that they are directly procuring the electronic items from
9STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT the OEMs without the involvement of any intermediaries. SWOT analysis StrengthsOne of the major strengths of Dick Smith is the country wide presence, which is helping in catering to larger target segments. In addition, cost leadership strategy of Dick Smith is also helping in gaining competitive advantages in the market. WeaknessesThe major weakness of Dick Smith is the lower profit margin due to the practice of cost leadership. This is affecting their long term business viability for Dick Smith. Moreover, Dick Smith is also lacking in terms of deeper product assortments and varieties. OpportunitiesOpportunities of Dick Smith include tapping the foreign markets such as the developing countries. These countries are witnessing huge growth and huge market size. Thus, Dick Smith will be able to increase their business revenue and volumes. ThreatsEmergence of global recession is a major threat for Dick Smith along with the increase in competition in the forms of new entrants. Strategy analysis of Dick Smith Dick Smith followed unplanned way of growth strategies as it is stated that they were doing good with 100 stores across the country but they went on to open 300 stores, which caused the downfall. Thus, their business expansion strategy is not got aligned with the market trends
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
10STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT and standards (Hallback and Gabrielsson 2013). In addition, they also faced issues due to initiation of the growth strategy without the development of new products. Thus, it eventually ate up the business of one another of their stores. It is recommended that Dick Smith should initiate differentiated approach in terms of services. This is due to the reason that products are similar across all the retailers while service process can be made different. It is recommended that they should offer certain trendy products such as smartphones and other modern day electronic items especially the music gadgets. This will help them to increase the target segments and larger revenue. Conclusion This report concludes that there are number of gaps identified in terms of the business process of Dick Smith. Different strategic management tools are leveraged in determining the gasp areas of Dick Smith. It is identified that Dick Smith is facing lack of point of differentiation with their competitors. In addition, presence only in the Australian market for further challenge for Dick Smith in managing profitability. Their existing cost leadership strategy is also affecting the profit margin. It is recommended that they should initiate service differentiation strategy to gain competitive advantages in the market.
11STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT Reference E. Dobbs, M., 2014. Guidelines for applying Porter's five forces framework: a set of industry analysis templates.Competitiveness Review,24(1), pp.32-45. Eaton,J.,Kortum,S.,Neiman,B.andRomalis,J.,2016.Tradeandtheglobal recession.American Economic Review,106(11), pp.3401-38. Hallbäck, J. and Gabrielsson, P., 2013. Entrepreneurial marketing strategies during the growth of international new ventures originating in small and open economies.International Business Review,22(6), pp.1008-1020. Inman, J.J. and Nikolova, H., 2017. Shopper-facing retail technology: a retailer adoption decisionframeworkincorporatingshopperattitudesandprivacyconcerns.Journalof Retailing,93(1), pp.7-28. Lauermann, S., 2013. Dynamic matching and bargaining games: A general approach.American Economic Review,103(2), pp.663-89. Mitchell, V.W. and Boustani, P., 2015. The effects of demographic variables on measuring perceived risk. InProceedings of the 1993 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference(pp. 663-669). Springer, Cham. Porter, M.E. and Heppelmann, J.E., 2014. How smart, connected products are transforming competition.Harvard business review,92(11), pp.64-88. Richardson, G., Taylor, G. and Lanis, R., 2013. Determinants of transfer pricing aggressiveness: EmpiricalevidencefromAustralianfirms.JournalofContemporaryAccounting& Economics,9(2), pp.136-150.
12STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT Scott, A., 2013. Introduction—Globalization: Social Process or Political Rhetoric?. InThe limits of globalization(pp. 13-34). Routledge.