Quality of Operations and Systems of Coca-Cola and PepsiCo
Verified
Added on 2022/11/13
|10
|2408
|454
AI Summary
This paper discusses the quality of operations and systems of the Coca-Cola and PepsiCo companies, including the role of organizational values, PESTEL and 5 Forces analyses, and stakeholder analysis. It also explores possible improvements for both companies.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head: Strategic Management Strategic Management Name of the Student Name of the University Author Note
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Strategic Management1 Table of Contents Introduction:...............................................................................................................................2 Quality of system and operations:..............................................................................................2 The role of organisational values:..............................................................................................3 PESTEL and 5 Forces analyses:................................................................................................5 Stakeholder analysis:..................................................................................................................7 Conclusion:................................................................................................................................7 References:.................................................................................................................................9
2Strategic Management Introduction: The purpose of this paper is to discuss the quality of operations and systems of the Coca-Cola company and the Pepsico, as well as to find possible improvements. Both of the companies provide similar types of product. The Quality of product of both the companies are almost same. The paper will also discuss the role of the organisational values such as vision, mission, competencies and the goals in the strategic formulation. This paper will be do the PESTLE analysis and the five forces analysis of the Coca-Cola and PepsiCo company. Quality of system and operations: This is so much important that the quality of the products that is produced by the Coca-Cola Company as well as PepsiCo is of high quality standard for ensuring that each of the products is exactly similar. It is also important if the company wants to meet the expectation and the requirement of the customer (Cadle, Paul and Turner 2014). The organisation uses inspection in each of the production procedure, especially in the testing phase of the formula of Coca-Cola for ensuring that each of the products are meeting their specific requirement. Normally, the inspection referred to the samples of the product after the manufacturing the product. The company uses both Quality Assurance (QA) and Quality Control (QC) throughout the production process of it (Dockalikova and Klozikova 2014). The focus of QC is mainly is on the entire operation procedures of it as well as the functions that are related. In QA and QC, the state of the computers to check all of the aspects of the procedure of production, maintaining quality and consistency through checking the creation of the bottles, consistency of the formula, filling the level of each of the bottles, labelling of each of the bottle (Hendricks et al. 2015). It can ensure that the demand of the products is met. Each of the bottles is checked also that this is at the actual fill level as well as the correct label. The company Coca-Cola also uses TQM (Total Quality Management) that is involving
3Strategic Management the quality management at each of the levels of the organisation that also includes production, suppliers, consumers etc (Irefin and Mechanic 2014). It allows the company to regain or retain the competitiveness for achieving the satisfaction of the consumers that are increasing. The company is using this method for improving the quality of the products of them continuously. For that teamwork is having so much importance as well as both the PepsiCo and the Coca-Cola company ensures that each of the staffs are involved in the procedure of production. The meaning is that each of the employees understand what is the role or job of them (Karnani 2014). The role of organisational values: It is most important that each and every product of the PepsiCo and the Coca-Cola Company provides the product having the high quality (Kauškale and Geipele 2017). It is very important of the company that wants to meet with the requirements and also the expectations of the customer. Coca-Cola is brand in world-wide. It is very important that these can be checked consistently in the continuous basis. The standard bottles of the Coca- Cola need to be checked on the production line for making sure that the high amount of the quality will be met (Ladas et al. 2013). The most common checks are the ingredients, packaging and also the distribution. It is the duty of the employees to verify the quality of the drinks of the company (LEYVA et al. 2018). Coca-Cola uses the testing in the entire testing processes for ensuring that each product is meeting some specific requirements. This testing is normally refers to the sampling of the product after the product. PepsiCo makes this mandatory in their organizational culture. This company has the ability to eliminate the mistakes and it is used to maintain the high quality of the products (Powell and Gard 2015). It is very easy to apply and is also very cost effective.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
4Strategic Management The mission of the Coca-Cola and PepsiCo company includes: Refreshing the world in mind, body and also the sprit Inspiring the moments of the optimistic and also the happiness by using the brands and also the actions. By creating the value and makes it different from others. For achieving the vision of this company, the company sets different goals which will work together for making our products better. People:The Company offers the brand of the portfolio of the drinks that can satisfy the desire of the people and their needs. Partners:The Company should nature the winning of the partners of the network and also used build the loyalty which is mutual in nature. Planet:Being the responsible person of this earth, makes the difference by means of the help of the building and also for the support for the sustainable communities. Profit:TheCompanywantstoincreasethelongtermreturnforthe shareholders. It is being very kind hearted of the total responsibilities. Productivity:It is the very lean and the first moving company with respect to the efficiency. The value of the Coca-Cola &PepsiCocompany incudes: Leadership:The Company has the courage for shaping the excellent future of the company. Collaboration:TheCompanyworkscollectivelyforthegrowthofthe business. Integrity:The company is very real and the professional in their business.
5Strategic Management Passion:The employees of the company are passionate so that the company can achieve the highest business excellence. Quality:The Company is trying its level best to increase the quality of the product. PESTEL and 5 Forces analyses: The PESTEL analysis is the strategic tool for analysing the environmental of the organization (Serôdio, McKee and Stuckler 2018). PESTEL stands for- Political, Economic, Social, Technological Environmental and also the legal factors.Political factors play a very vital role for the determination of the factors that can impact the business. The long run profit of this company is to increase the business in the certain company or the certain market. This company conducts the business of the beverages (Sohel, Rahman and Uddin 2014). The soft drinks of this company have the different kinds of the risks related to the politics of that particular country (Song, Sun and Jin 2017). The market of the soft drinks is to classify the risks of the politics. The political environment affects the business which includes: Political stability and also the increase in the importance of beverages can affect the business of the soft drinks sector in that particular country. Risk of the military attack. There will be different levels of the corruption can affect the business of the Coca-Cola andPepsiCo. For the enforcement of the contractual employees some legal framework is present. The protection of the different kinds of the intellectual property. Regulations of the trade and also tariffs of the Consumer Goods have to be implemented.
6Strategic Management The partners of this company are very friendly and also very much favoured. Anti-trust laws have to implement which is mostly related to the Soft drinks. Regulation of the pricing of the goods is implemented especially for the soft drinks. The tax rates and also the incentives are very much favourable in nature. The company is providing the essential benefits of the employee. There is the safety regulation for the industry in the Customer Goods. Soft drinks and other requirements in the Beverages are labelled properly. The macro environments factors are used to determine the demand of the aggregation and also the aggregation related to the economy (Song, Sun and Jin 2017). The Coca-Cola Company can use the economic factor of the country. This includes thee growth rate, inflation and economic indicators of the company. The economic factor includes: The type of the economy system and also the stability of that economy. Intervention of the government in the market and the associated Goods of the customers. Rate of the exchanges and also the currency of the stability of the host country. Efficiency of the markets related to the finance sector. Quality of the infrastructure of the Beverages including the soft drinks. Level of the education in the sector of the economy of the country. Cycle stage related tom the business. For example, prosperity, recession, recovery. The growth rate of the economic sector of Rate of the unemployment in the country. Rate of the inflation
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
7Strategic Management Rate of the interest of the banking sector in the entire country. Stakeholder analysis: The culture of the society and also the impact in the culture of that organization in the environment (Powell and Gard 2015). Company should analyse the PESTEL analysis are: Skills and also the demographics of the population of the country. Class, hierarchy and the power structure in the society Education level of the country can affect the business level of the coca cola company. Technology factor of the PESTEL analysis related to: Current development of the technology Impact of the technology in the offering of the product Effect of the value chain structure of the customer. Conclusion: Thus,it can be concluded from the above report that the Coca-Cola &PepsiCo company can improve their business by using the PESTEL analysis. As discussed above the pestel analysis can improve the business. Coca-Cola is an international brand. So for improving the business Coca-Cola should look the customer feedback very carefully. This report can be concluded that thePepsiCo andCoca-Cola can improve the business only by focusing on the feedback of the customers.
8Strategic Management References: Allen, F., 2015.Secret Formula: The Inside Story of How Coca-Cola Became the Best- Known Brand in the World. Open Road Media. Boyjoo, Y., Cheng, Y., Zhong, H., Tian, H., Pan, J., Pareek, V.K., Jiang, S.P., Lamonier, J.F., Jaroniec, M. and Liu, J., 2017. From waste Coca Cola® to activated carbons with impressive capabilities for CO2 adsorption and supercapacitors.Carbon,116, pp.490-499. Cadle, J., Paul, D. and Turner, P., 2014.Business analysis techniques. Chartered Institute for IT. Dockalikova,I.andKlozikova,J.,2014,November.MCDMMethodsinPractice: Determining the Significance of PESTEL Analysis Criteria. InEuropean Conference on Management,Leadership&Governance(p.418).AcademicConferencesInternational Limited. Hendricks, S., O’connor, S., Lambert, M., Brown, J., Burger, N., Mc Fie, S., Readhead, C. and Viljoen, W., 2015. Contact technique and concussions in the South African under-18 Coca-Cola craven week rugby tournament.European journal of sport science,15(6), pp.557- 564. Irefin, P. and Mechanic, M.A., 2014. Effect of employee commitment on organizational performance in Coca Cola Nigeria Limited Maiduguri, Borno state.Journal of Humanities and Social Science,19(3), pp.33-41. Karnani, A., 2014. Corporate social responsibility does not avert the tragedy of the commons. Case study: Coca-Cola India.Economics, Management, and Financial Markets,9(3), pp.11- 23.
9Strategic Management Kauškale, L. and Geipele, I., 2017. Integrated approach of real estate market analysis in sustainable development context for decision making.Procedia Engineering,172, pp.505- 512. Ladas,S.D.,Kamberoglou,D.,Karamanolis,G.,Vlachogiannakos,J.andZouboulis‐ Vafiadis,I.,2013.Systematicreview:Coca‐Colacaneffectivelydissolvegastric phytobezoars as a first‐line treatment.Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics,37(2), LEYVA, M., HECHAVARRIA, J., BATISTA, N., ALARCON, J.A. and GOMEZ, O., 2018. A framework for PEST analysis based on fuzzy decision maps.Revista ESPACIOS,39(16). Powell, D. and Gard, M., 2015. The governmentality of childhood obesity: Coca-Cola, public health and primary schools.Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education,36(6), pp.854-867. pp.169-173. Serôdio, P.M., McKee, M. and Stuckler, D., 2018. Coca-Cola–a model of transparency in researchpartnerships?AnetworkanalysisofCoca-Cola’sresearchfunding(2008– 2016).Public health nutrition,21(9), pp.1594-1607. Sohel, S.M., Rahman, A.M.A. and Uddin, M.A., 2014. COMPETITIVE PROFILE MATRIX (CPM)ASACOMPETITORS’ANALYSISTOOL:ATHEORETICAL PERSPECTIVE.International Journal of Human Potential Development,3(1), pp.40-47. Song, J., Sun, Y. and Jin, L., 2017. PESTEL analysis of the development of the waste-to- energy incineration industry in China.Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,80, pp.276-289. \