Strategic Planning and Policy

Running head: STRATEGIC PLANNING AND POLICY
Strategic planning and Policy
Name of the Student:
Name of the University:
Authors Note:

1STRATEGIC PLANNING AND POLICY
Table of Contents
Introduction:...............................................................................................................................2
Discussion:.................................................................................................................................2
Recommendation:......................................................................................................................4
Conclusion..................................................................................................................................6
Reference....................................................................................................................................7

2STRATEGIC PLANNING AND POLICY
Introduction:
In the modern era of our world, most developed countries take a high ground when it
comes to international dispute matters because they have the economic and political strength
as compared to other underdeveloped and developing countries. Third world countries always
face a disadvantage when they are up against developed countries. The government is strong,
economy is huge and most importantly the legal system that shape the way countries treat
other countries. In case of disputes, between a developed country and a third world country,
the latter gets the lower ground (Bryson 2018). But if we look at what is justified, we can
consider that a third world should get the higher ground as they lack the power to fight for
such dispute in the international court. The International Court of Justice, as the essential
legal organ of the United Nations, is the main genuinely general legal body. It is available to
all States of the worldwide network. It appreciates a complete topic locale grasping all parts
of open global law, yet its compelling purview stays consensual and obliged. The ICJ is
frequently thought of as the essential means for the goals of debate among States, and in truth
the Court is very much perceived for its critical commitment to the improvement of universal
law. Be that as it may, the Court has not worked at full limit. Just four or five cases are
alluded to the Court for legal settlement consistently (Tikhomirov and Frenkel 2017).
Discussion:
From the given facts, it can be perceived that, the US Company was given a
judgement in their favour by the international court that disrupted the company of third world
country. As discussed earlier, that, third world countries usually stand at low ground and
suffers for any decision that is given against them and this causes grave injustice towards the
company of third world country. In the present case, the third world country company was
supposed to pay $ 1 billion, this is considered as a huge blow for the poor company thus the
payment of such amount was put on hold and the US Company for their wrongdoings should