Strategic Practice: Approaches to Strategic Thinking and Systems Thinking

This article discusses the importance of strategic thinking and systems thinking in strategic practice. It explores the different approaches to strategic thinking and how they can be applied in organizations. The article also delves into the complexity perspective and new ways of thinking about strategy.

Running head: STRATEGIC PRACTICE
Strategic practice
Name of student
Name of University
Author note

1STRATEGIC PRACTICE
Table of Contents
Approaches to Strategic Thinking...................................................................................................4
Systems Thinking............................................................................................................................6
Complexity Perspective: New Ways of Thinking about Strategy?.................................................9
Complex Adaptive Systems: Modeling Complexity.....................................................................11
The Practice Perspective................................................................................................................12
References......................................................................................................................................14

2STRATEGIC PRACTICE
Systems thinking essentially seeks to understand phenomena as a whole formed by the
interaction of parts
The systems thinking means transforming the reader or making them evolve through
systems thinking knowledge and skills to develop systematic ideas and opinions. It involves
interaction of parts and making sure to develop the system as well as identify the previous
impacts. According to Bouhali et al. (2015), the systems thinking is considered as an effective
way for managing deeper analysis of the roots of systems and understand its conceptualization.
The systems thinking has not only facilitated the education of individuals, but also has been
considered as a major integrated composition of components needed to combine together and
make the system function properly too. The systems thinking evolves the entire way of
understanding the concepts of systems and how the conceptual frameworks associated with it can
be beneficial for promoting flexibility, versatility and adaptability (Therivel and Paridario 2013).
Thus, the systems thinking basically means thinking about the systems, identifying and
evaluation of various aspects of systems thinking, acknowledging the systems and finally
conduct researches to gain- detailed in-sight about the systems. Based on several discussions
made by Mingers (2014), it helps in assessing the dynamic complexity consisting of the
behaviors associated with the interaction of system agents over time and at the same time,
manages recognition of judgments and balances to interact with the systems in the environment
(Oliver 2015). As I have worked with the Government as an Administrative officer, it is
important to understand the systems thinking properly and how it can help in simplifying the
complex behaviors and complexity level, furthermore gain various skills to improve the ability to
understand the system and predict the behaviors at early stages. Thus, the interaction of parts has
assisted in development, systematic thinking as well as combined the skills together as a system

3STRATEGIC PRACTICE
to improve the strategic practice management. From the response provided by Morton, Wilson
and Cooke (2016), the entire systems thinking includes various aspects of leadership, changes
within organization and its ability to adapt to different situations for fostering organizational
development, growth and competitive advantage in business for Brugal & Cia, Dominica
(Morton, Wilson and Cooke 2016). By working as an Administrative Officer, it is my duty not
only to carry out the roles and responsibilities properly but also assist in following the legal laws,
rules and regulations for remaining socially responsible and contribute to the economic growth
too, whatever the industry may be where I will be working for.
Approaches to Strategic Thinking
Brugal & Cia is a popular and established rum manufacturing and production company in
Dominica that specializes in the production of good quality alcoholic items. The organization
operates within the distilled beverages company and the major products of the company are rum,
liqueur, alcopop, etc. According to Oliver (2015), the concept of strategic management considers
various important aspects by addressing the nature and characteristics of strategic thinking. This
will not only enable the company named Brugal & Cia to analyze the different types of strengths,
weaknesses, opportunities and threats associated with the actions to be undertaken (brugal-
rum.com 2017). The strategic thinking also enables analyzing the company structure and its
functions through strategic planning considering the mission and vision of the organization.
Therivel and Paridario (2013) stated that the strategic thinking not only helps in dealing with the
challenges, but also will utilize the results obtained from analysis to evaluate the issues and
appropriate actions that can be undertaken for resolving the issues (MARIETTO and NASSIF
2013). The strategic thinking is essential for dealing with situations that are unpredictable and

4STRATEGIC PRACTICE
this also proves the worth and capability of the manager of the organization to think strategically
and ensure that the physical and psychological pressure to own self and the employees are
overcome with ease and effectiveness. Based on the statement by Di Caprio and Santos-Arteaga
(2013), one of the most important benefits of strategic thinking is that it allows the company to
gain a competitive edge over its competitors by strengthening the activities that create value to
the customers. The strategic thinking will also help in evaluating the rules of the market and
manage accountability so that each and every one working at Brugal & Cia, Dominica carry out
their roles and responsibilities properly (Arvidsson, Holmström and Lyytinen 2014).
According to various researchers, the strategic thinking is considered as an integrated
view of the business in mind; furthermore enable planning based on the learning approaches. The
strategic thinking will facilitate the development of effective strategies through proper planning
and implementation of results. The main approaches to strategic thinking are as follows:
According to Systematic approach, the strategic thinking is based on systematic attitudes
and behaviors, which can create a complete system of values and determine the relationship
between the various components with effectiveness. Di Caprio and Santos-Arteaga (2013)
presented views regarding the strategies formed are based on holistic and integrated attitudes and
behaviors, though the activities undertaken are different. The optimization is only possible when
a systematic approach is followed and the maximization of the section may also lead to loss of
important information and data required to manage the sections appropriately.
Focusing on the goals and objectives has facilitated the strategic thinking, which has
helped in managing a proper orientation and focus on various aspects including the organization,

5STRATEGIC PRACTICE
its employees and the various resources required to manage them and bring out their maximum
potential.
Intellectual opportunism is another approach to strategic thinking that can identify the
scopes and opportunities and gain the advantage of important principles in strategic thinking.
The new issues and experiences, both are obtained, which facilitates critical thinking as well as
enhances the potential the organization to adopt new strategies for newer opportunities (Abu-
Rahma and Jaleel 2017). The strategic thinking is also not important for developing and
implementing useful strategies, but it also has benefited Brugal & Cia to gain the ideas, views
and opinions of others to respond to changes and implement the strategies effectively.
The strategic thinking enables connecting the past, present and future to understand the
past situations, the present and then make way for new changes to come and bring positive
outcomes in the future.
In respect of the statement provided by Hahn (2013), Hypothesizing is another important
aspect of systems thinking that creates a link between the creative and analytical features of
strategic thinking, which facilitates the integration of systematic thinking through hypothesizing
or creativity and hypothesis testing. The analytical methods are used for conducting the
hypothesis testing, which improves the strategic planning and ensure that the strategies are
implemented properly for successful accomplishment of the business goals and objectives for the
rum production company in Dominica.

6STRATEGIC PRACTICE
Systems Thinking
The systems thinking is a major concept of the learning organization that manages
various disciplines, policies, principles, rules and regulations for enhancing the body of
knowledge and use various tools and techniques that have been used for the past few years. Stroh
(2015) discussed the fact that it is a kind of conceptual framework that enhances the knowledge
ability and ensures that sufficient skills and expertise are obtained to become successful in the
future. From farm to bottle, every drop of the liquid is distilled properly and filtered to produce
the best quality and somewhat different kind of refreshingly dry rum (Bailey et al. 2018). This
effective manufacturing and production processes require systems thinking as well as proper
knowledge to ensure that the filtering, manufacturing process and production are done properly.
Passion, dedicated and hard work are the major components considered as values managed by
the organization and thus the Brugal family has carried out the tradition and managed the culture
to craft the best quality rum. The strategic systems and thinking are essential for the Brugal
family to communicate the passion of the brand to the customers and maintain a consistent
culture all around the world, as stated by Amran, Lee and Devi (2014). The special craft that has
been passed through generations have discovered the best qualities that make Brugal & Cia
exceptional in terms of quality rum making. The systems’ thinking has enabled the company to
hand the family recipe from one generation to generation, which is considered as an important
tools that has been used till now. The rum is distilled multiple times, which helps in bringing out
the cleanest and purest spirit of the rum and meet the clients’ needs and requirements too. The
systems thinking is the major components of the learning organization which also includes
personal mastery, mental models, development of a shared vision, management of team learning
and systems thinking (Kerzner 2018).

7STRATEGIC PRACTICE
The personal mastery enables clarification of the personal vision and prioritizing on the
development of authority and power, furthermore remain patient and see the reality based on
objectivity. It enhances the organizational commitment and influences the learning capacity too.
According to Crawford et al. (2013), the mental model are associated with the management of
assumptions and is closely related to the enhancement of organizational learning, furthermore
influences the company’s ability to respond to changes and ensure successful business
functioning too. The development of shared vision has created convenience for Brugal & Cia to
create opportunities for people to learn, excel and understand their roles and responsibilities
properly (Crawford et al. 2013). This has also enhanced the skills f leaders and allowed them to
handle crisis situations through working in coordination, as a team and by pursuing an inspiring
goal. The team learning has facilitated the way of thinking and managed communication by
allowing the group members to discover insights and share their individual views and opinions.
The systems thinking is the final concept of learning organization concept that combines all the
other elements and has managed good team dynamics and team working to bring out the best
potential of the workforce and the organization as a whole (Brocaset al. 2014).
With the help of systems thinking, the organization has managed to function at the
simplest level considering the fact that positive relationships are established between the various
components of the system, which improves the ability to build blocks and understand systems
thinking. The major blocks for building the understanding for systems thinking are as follows:
System- The systems have considered the various sets of people, rules, regulations, laws,
machineries and equipments used along with the various processes that are interconnected to
form an effective process (Bouhali et al. 2015).

8STRATEGIC PRACTICE
Variable- The variable defines a particular portion of the system that helps in preparing for the
next step, furthermore manage the identifiable and measurable a aspects of the system that
change from time to time.
Casual loop diagram- The variables when put together in a logical sequence, has assisted n
explaining things the right way and evaluate the consequences to solve a issue before any further
issues arise during the time being.
Delays- The cause and effect of the problem is identified and the separation by time is known as
the delays. The systems thinking have helped in finding the link between the existing solution
and the present problem (Haines 2016).
To manage systems thinking, it is very much important to respect the data and
information and explanation to a particular problem faced within the organization. Based on the
responses of Stroh (2015), to evaluate a problem, the individuals working there have developed
an effective hypothesis to identify the cause of such behaviors and then focus on the quantitative
evidence to determine whether the theory had been successful or not. Another important thing to
be considered is the events that are the major patterns of the systems thinking. The patterns are
created based on the structures and thus exponential growth, development and cyclical
behaviors’ management helped in looking at the organizational system (Mingers 2014). The
structures are identified and implemented with necessary changes and then the testing of
hypothesis has been managed with the utilization of simple simulation model, It has also allowed
Brugal & Cia in Dominica to deliver services at a faster rate and within the perfect time. Young
and Leveson (2013) stated that the systems thinking has been ultimately the ways of providing
help and support to people, i.e., the individuals working at the organization. It is used to make

9STRATEGIC PRACTICE
the world a better place to live for the people and at the same time, developed a clear set of goals
objectives (Young and Leveson 2013). The advancement of technologies improved the
workforce efficiency through the implementation of new and advanced technological equipments
and machineries, which enhanced the production level too.
Complexity Perspective: New Ways of Thinking about Strategy?
The new ways of thinking about strategy means deriving the best outcomes by applying
the systems thinking to the personal and professional activities at the organization. One of the
major benefits is the optimization where the individuals working at the company have gained a
deeper understanding of the dynamics within the system as well as facilitated the systems
thinking by integrating the various components of the system with the business processes. The
ability to solve problems has become easier while the new and exciting opportunities that have
emerged has created place for innovation (Stroh 2015). Creativity and development of own self
and the organization too. The systems thinking has created new ways of thinking about the
strategies that were needed to be implemented within the organization and even developed a
trans-disciplinary understanding of the micro and macro environment factors associated with the
systems management. This has unlocked the power of creativity and innovation and in case of
any failure, rather than blaming the entire system, new issues tend to emerge. These were
handled properly to pass through the various stages of systems thinking about the strategies and
strengthened the foothold of the company within the distilled beverages industry in Dominica.
The raw materials and resources are mainly obtained from the nature, manufactured into goods
that are usable and are then disposed back into the places from where the resources were
previously extracted (Mittal 2013). This created more value and made sure to remain socially

10STRATEGIC PRACTICE
responsible to create a positive impact on the environment as well. Learning from failure is part
of the systems’ new ways to think about strategies and with the use of new tools to integrate into
the daily practices, the creativity and innovation ideas have emerged and enabled dynamic
divergent and systematic thinking while working at Brugal & Cia, Dominica (brugal-rum.com
2018).
The Soft Systems methodology is one of the major processes of modeling that solves
various business issues and manages changes to improve the accountability, flexibility and
effectiveness of the organization. It is a new way of thinking about the strategy with the
management of various approaches followed step by step. As stated by Highsmith (2013), it is
important to enter the situation at first considering the issues that might have been experienced;
then provided explanation about the situation to problem and formulate the root definitions of
various systems required for fulfilling a particular purpose (Highsmith 2013). The conceptual
models of the systems are developed and then the models are compared with real world
situations. Due to this, the changes that are needed to be done have been exposed, based on
which, the feasibility analysis was conducted and further actions were undertaken to improve the
problematic situation too.
Complex Adaptive Systems: Modeling Complexity
According to Mittal (2013), the complex adaptive system enabled proper understanding
of the various portions and part of the system responsible for understanding the behaviors of the
system perfectly. The complex adaptive systems are associated with the non-linear dynamic
systems that are derived from natural and social sciences for maintaining transition across phases
and managing positive behaviors too. It is different from multiple agent system and thus has been

11STRATEGIC PRACTICE
considered as an effective system that can remain adaptive to different situations and
circumstances (Therivel and Paridario 2013). The complex adaptive systems are classified based
on a high level of adaptive ability, which provides flexibility during the occurrence of
perturbation. Few other major features of the complex adaptive system include simplifying the
modeling process through promoting communication among the team members and enabling
cooperation and production of desired output with much ease and effectiveness (Mittal 2013).
Fostering the communication and cooperation between the employees has been possible, which
ensured adapting to different situations and making sure to improve the non-linear interactions
too.
Kerzner (2018) believed that the complex dynamic adaptive systems basically represent
the difficulty or inability to predict changes or manage changes to adapt to a certain environment
or condition. At Brugal & Cia, there were situations when the company failed to compete with
other rum manufacturing and production companies in Dominica. In such cases, the company
was unable to adapt to changes, which further created complexities and deteriorated the business
functioning (Brocas et al. 2014). It was important to adapt a new style of leadership and manage
changes that could be vital for bringing out the best potential of employees and improve the
organizational effectiveness too.
The Practice Perspective
The strategy as practice perspective includes various principles for conducting researches
and manages detailed conversation analytical studies. This has enabled Brugal to determine the
external and internal environment factors, furthermore assessed the market conditions and what
the customers actually wanted. Based on the discussion made by Haines (2016) on behalf of the

12STRATEGIC PRACTICE
strategic practice, with the support and help provided with well known as skilled strategists, there
was foundation for strategic direction, which favored the company through persuasion, diversity
management and adapting to the culture and changing behaviors of customers to ensure higher
level of customer satisfaction (Arvidsson, Holmström and Lyytinen 2014). While the strategic
management solely focused on the ability to gain competitive advantage over the competitors,
the strategy as a practice perspective helped in using various tools required to study the micro as
well as macro behaviors and manage close interactions through successful strategic management
practices. One example could be where the managers interacted with the employees visually by
using various visual tools and techniques during workshops (Bailey et al. 2018). Placing strategy
into practice also considers renovating the company structure and enhancing the ability to adapt
to changes and sustain a good position within the business environment. With the consideration
of strategy as a practice, the micro, meso and macro levels’ functions have improved and the
managers have successful managed their roles and responsibilities. At the micro level, the
managers supervised the employees working at Brugal and interacted with them often to keep
them encouraged (Di Caprio and Santos-Arteaga 2013). This was based on the assessment of
actual situations and by adhering to the external management and safety procedures too. At the
meso level, the managers used their leadership skills to manage functions for cooperation,
furthermore shift between the leadership functions and systems thinking. According to
Highsmith (2013), it has helped in handling emergency situations and improve the level of safety
and comfort at the company too (brugal-rum.com 2018). The macro level experimented the
leadership capabilities and functions by accumulating knowledge, sharing responsibilities and
through exchange and updating of information required to undertake a collective action at Brugal
&Cia, Dominica.

13STRATEGIC PRACTICE
References
Abu-Rahma, A. and Jaleel, B., 2017. Influence of managers’ time orientation on strategic
practices in the UAE: The moderating role of environmental uncertainty. International Journal
of Emerging Markets, 12(2), pp.219-237.
Amran, A., Lee, S.P. and Devi, S.S., 2014. The influence of governance structure and strategic
corporate social responsibility toward sustainability reporting quality. Business Strategy and the
Environment, 23(4), pp.217-235.
Arvidsson, V., Holmström, J. and Lyytinen, K., 2014. Information systems use as strategy
practice: A multi-dimensional view of strategic information system implementation and use. The
Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 23(1), pp.45-61.
Bailey, C., Mankin, D., Kelliher, C. and Garavan, T., 2018. Strategic human resource
management. Oxford University Press.
Bouhali, R., Mekdad, Y., Lebsir, H. and Ferkha, L., 2015. Leader roles for innovation: Strategic
thinking and planning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 181, pp.72-78.
Brocas, I., Carrillo, J.D., Wang, S.W. and Camerer, C.F., 2014. Imperfect choice or imperfect
attention? Understanding strategic thinking in private information games. Review of Economic
Studies, 81(3), pp.944-970.
brugal-rum.com. (2018). Premium Rum from the Dominican Republic | Brugal Rum. [online]
Available at: https://www.brugal-rum.com/ [Accessed 31 Jul. 2018].
Crawford, V.P., Costa-Gomes, M.A. and Iriberri, N., 2013. Structural models of nonequilibrium
strategic thinking: Theory, evidence, and applications. Journal of Economic Literature, 51(1),
pp.5-62.

14STRATEGIC PRACTICE
Di Caprio, D. and Santos-Arteaga, F.J., 2013. Strategic diffusion of information and preference
manipulation. In Management Theories and Strategic Practices for Decision Making (pp. 40-58).
IGI Global.
Hahn, R., 2013. ISO 26000 and the standardization of strategic management processes for
sustainability and corporate social responsibility. Business Strategy and the Environment, 22(7),
pp.442-455.
Haines, S., 2016. The systems thinking approach to strategic planning and management. CRC
Press.
Highsmith, J.R., 2013. Adaptive software development: a collaborative approach to managing
complex systems. Addison-Wesley.
Kerzner, H., 2018. Project management best practices: Achieving global excellence. John Wiley
& Sons.
MARIETTO, M.L. and NASSIF, V.M.J., 2013. Strategy as practice in the structurationist
perspective: An essay on ontology of strategic practice in organizations. Revista de
Administração FACES Journal, 12(4).
Mingers, J., 2014. Systems thinking, critical realism and philosophy: A confluence of ideas.
Routledge.
Mittal, S., 2013. Emergence in stigmergic and complex adaptive systems: A formal discrete
event systems perspective. Cognitive Systems Research, 21, pp.22-39.
Morton, J., Wilson, A.D. and Cooke, L., 2016. Open strategy initiatives: open, IT-enabled
episodes of strategic practice.
Oliver, D.A.V.I.D., 2015. Identity work as a strategic practice. Cambridge handbook of strategy
as practice, pp.331-344.

15STRATEGIC PRACTICE
Stroh, D.P., 2015. Systems thinking for social change: A practical guide to solving complex
problems, avoiding unintended consequences, and achieving lasting results. Chelsea Green
Publishing.
Therivel, R. and Paridario, M.R., 2013. The practice of strategic environmental assessment.
Routledge.
Young, W. and Leveson, N., 2013, December. Systems thinking for safety and security. In
Proceedings of the 29th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference (pp. 1-8). ACM.