Ask a question from expert
Study on Paralegal Studies Document
8 Pages811 Words547 Views
Added on 2020-04-13
Study on Paralegal Studies Document
Added on 2020-04-13
BookmarkShareRelated Documents
Running Head: PARALEGAL STUDIESParalegal StudiesName of the Student:Name of the University:Author Note
1PARALEGAL STUDIESSection One - Lane v. Wallace 579 F.2d 1200 (1978)1.Name of the prevailing parties in the trial court proceeding.Mary Kathleen LANE, Ross E. Lane, her husband vs W. S. WALLACE, M. D., Dan B.Holton, M. D., and W. W. Wersich, M. D.2.The trial court and the appellate courtTrial court -United States District Court for the District of Colorado Appellate Court - United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.3.Kind of case it isThe case in consideration is a suit of medical malpractice in violation of the Federal law.4.Summary of the facts of the caseIt can be stated that the plaintiffs of the case sued three doctors for negligence andmedical malpractice. The plaintiffs claimed that the doctors had been negligent in treating theplaintiffs. 5.Issues on appealIt can be stated that the trial court judges had given a verdict against the three doctors,defendants in this case. The plaintiffs had not been satisfied with the judgment given by theTrial Court Judge and had claimed that the trial court judge was involved in misconduct
2PARALEGAL STUDIES6.Whowrotetheopinion?Judge Breitenstein7.Docket Number 76-21728.Date when the court issued the decision and the rule followed by the courtThe appellate court gave the decision on 5th July 1978 and held that the trial courtwas right in giving its verdict that the patients’ call to continue to have two medicalexperts was not justified. The appellate court also denied the plaintiffs’ claim of accusingthe judge of the trial court of misconduct.9. Provide the text of Headnote [6] as well as the name of the author referenced in the portion of the text which is summarized by that headnote.170Ak1969k.Judge'sremarksandconduct:Ajudgeshouldnottalktoomuch.10.Provide the name of the attorney or attorneys who represented the appellantsJack Dalton, Dodge City, Kan had represented the plaintiffs-appellants. Theattorneys Dale S. Carpenter, III, Denver, Colo had represented the defendants in this case.Section two: Parker v. State of Oklahoma, 556 P.2d 1298 (Okla. Crim. App. 1976)A.How many citation references does the case provide?The aforementioned case provides thirty three citation references.B.Has a Maryland case cited the Parker case?The Maryland case has cited the Parker case,Hudsonv.State,409A.2d692,712(Md.1979)
End of preview
Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.