University Psychology Report: Philosophy Article Summary

This report summarizes an article comparing assertive community treatment (ACT) and clubhouse models for supported employment services. The study, conducted by Macias et al. (2006), aimed to assess the effectiveness of these programs in achieving employment benchmarks for individuals with serious mental illness. The article discusses the methodologies used, including the comparison of employment rates, work hours, and earnings. The findings indicate that while ACT programs may initially engage more individuals, clubhouse programs are more effective in employee retention. The report emphasizes the need for further research on the quality of ACT services and their impact on employment outcomes. The article's qualitative approach and focus on variables like age, psychiatric symptoms, physical health issues, and substance use are also highlighted. The report concludes by referencing the study's findings on the varying strengths of each model in supporting employment for individuals with mental health challenges, which are important considerations for future research and practice.

Running head: PHILOSOPHY – ARTICLE SUMMARY
PHILOSOPHY – ARTICLE SUMMARY
Name of the Student
Name of the University
Author Note

1PHILOSOPHY – ARTICLE SUMMARY
Macias et al. (2006) in the article entitled “Supported employment outcomes of a
randomized controlled trial of ACT and clubhouse models” attempt a discussion on the matters
that are related to the comparison of the assertive community treatment or the ACT to a
clubhouse that is eligible for the delivery of the various supported services with regards to the
employment within the organization. The concerned study aimed at the assertion of the fact as to
whether the clubhouse programs and the assertive community treatment would attain the several
benchmarks that have been set for the measurement of the performance within the teams that are
specialized for the supporting the employment (Macias et al., 2006). The article also aims at the
discussion on the effectivity of the concerned multipurpose services. The article is majorly based
on the earlier research that had been conducted within the given field.
The hypotheses that were formulated by the authors were known to have been stating that
the assertive community treatment might have a higher engagement of the service that is
maintained within the organization as well as have higher rates of retention as compared to the
clubhouse. The hypotheses further stated that the people with disabilities would face better
employment scope and retention within the company with the implementation of the assertive
community treatment (Macias et al., 2006). The article was composed with a qualitative
approach. The data was collected from the various experiments that were conducted. The major
variables that were considered for the completion of the study are the age of the participants, the
severity of the psychiatric symptoms, the severity of the problems faced by the concerned people
due to the physical health of the person and the active use of the substances (Macias et al., 2006).
The findings of the study discuss the fact that the majority of the people aim to reach out
to the various assertive community treatment groups might be provided with the supportive
employment on the basis of the urgency of their need for the intensive care unit within the

2PHILOSOPHY – ARTICLE SUMMARY
concerned area. The findings of the article further state that the concerned assertive community
treatment programs aimed at the engagement of the concerned people on the services of the
program. On the other hand, the clubhouse program is known to be more efficient in the
retention of the employees (Macias et al., 2006). The further researches should be conducted on
the relationship between the quality of the assertive community treatment meted out to the
patients and the better employment results for the participants.

3PHILOSOPHY – ARTICLE SUMMARY
References
Macias, C., Rodican, C. F., Hargreaves, W. A., Jones, D. R., Barreira, P. J., & Wang, Q. (2006).
Supported employment outcomes of a randomized controlled trial of ACT and clubhouse
models. Psychiatric Services, 57(10), 1406-1415.