Essay on Sustainability

This essay on sustainability discusses the importance of sustainable development, its goals, and counter arguments. It explains how sustainable practices can impact the environment, economy, and society. The essay also highlights the need to utilize resources in a limit without affecting the needs of upcoming generations.

ESSAY
ON
SUSTAINABILITY

TABLE OF CONTENTS
• INTRODUCTION
• MAIN BODY
• CONCLUSION
• REFERENCES

INTRODUCTION
The term sustainability refers to the completing the
needs of present generation but without comprising
the needs of upcoming generation. The
sustainability is not only related with environment
but also considers the economic development and
the social equity. The adoption of sustainability
practices, it can be large activities or small activities
but it has importance and positive impact in the
long run.
YouTube link: https://youtu.be/LpqpF_EYxFE

IN THE FAVOUR OF SUSTAINABILITY
The sustainable development meets the requirements of the
existing individuals without affecting the needs of
upcoming generations. It can be also said that the
individual's can understand the need for growing the
economy but not all the people can understand that the
negative or unbalanced economy can also impact the
environment and the well being of people's. The
sustainability means to reserve the resources and energy
for the long term instead of utilizing them rapidly in order
to fulfil the short term requirements or aims.

CONTINUE…….
The goal of a sustainable development is to create a framework
which provides the sufficient scientific robust, politically acceptance
and the public intuitive. In order to achieve the goals the companies
used to collaborate and align for execution of the global approaches
to secure a clear, fair and healthy prosperous future. There are
broadly 5 sustainable development goals which includes the people,
planet, prosperity, peace and partnership. The sustainable
development involves the three 3 components which are economic
growth, environmental and social aspect.
You tube link: https://youtu.be/iDdcG40PyEY

THE COUNTER ARGUMENT ON THE
SUSTAINABILITY
The counter argument states that sustainability is a delusory based on the statement “ the aim of
sustainable development is a framework which provides the politically acceptance and public intuitive. In
order to achieve the goals the companies used to collaborate and align for execution of the global
approaches to secure a clear, fair and healthy prosperous future”.
On the basis of this statement, the counter argument determines that the sustainability influence
politics and ideology. This development can help the political party to gain the public support. At most of
the regions the sustainability is presented to the students as a saving of energy and enhance the environment
but basically this considers to be the project which is not at all relevant with the environment.
YouTube link: https://youtu.be/cpJeJYnVlb8

CONTINUE……
“The sustainable development practice are capable of crafting the sustainability of financial economies
around the world. The countries which are on the pace of developing, those countries does not utilize the
fossil fuel and this provides the benefit in order to form the renewable energy which also supports the
economies and depict as the financial stability”.
On the basis of this statement the another counter argument is
that the sustainability is an “expensive development which can not be afford by all the people”. The
sustainability can have negative impact on the business also. In order to go green for the companies it can be
an expensive or costly for the company to green initially. This is not always sufficient to begin the upfront
conversion costs. In context with companies, the sustainability can impact the business as it rises the level of
unemployment and the upfront cost.

CONTINUE….
The sustainability development determines that it is also about “creation of new ideas, innovations and
innovative technologies which does not harm the environment and also provide every individual to take
the nutritious foods doesn't matter where they live. This also offers the individual to grab the opportunities
of high quality education, affordable rates and also the freedom to speak and as a result there will be no
violence”.
Based on this statement the counter argument has been passed, a question arises, “how the
sustainability brings the foundation of higher education and prepare the adults for aspects of life". The
sustainability movement is all about taking up the freedom of an individual. And it is a huge wasteful
expenditure and also waste of the human time and their talent. For example: convincing the college
students to grab this opportunities for gaining the value of real education.

CONTINUE….
The sustainability considers the government forces, the individual
gets pressurise to utilize the energy sources which are based on
fossil fuels rather than renewable and sustainable option then the
cost and the impact on environment, which supplies the basic
necessities, then it will become high in order.
The counter argument has been done based on this
statement that sustainability is also termed as coercive. There is no
compulsion about imparting the politics on students, faculty and
staff. The fossil fuel energy resources also harms the environment.
Thus, in order to maintain the sustainability the high cost is
required.

CONCLUSION
Thus, it is concluded from the essay that the sustainability refers to
the utilisation of resources according to the level as it does not affect
the upcoming generation. The resources should be utilised in a limit
and does not exhaust it. The sustainable development refers to the
development of a products, services or resources which does not
harm the economy, environment and society. The sustainable
development has positive as well as negative impact on the human
beings, resources, financial and businesses.

REFERENCES
• Gente, V. and Pattanaro, G., 2019. The place of eco-innovation in the current sustainability
debate. Waste Management, 88, pp.96-101.
• Figueroa, D., Galicia, L. and Suárez Lastra, M., 2022. Latin American Cattle Ranching
Sustainability Debate: An Approach to Social-Ecological Systems and Spatial-Temporal
Scales. Sustainability, 14(14), p.8924.
YouTube Links
• https://youtu.be/LpqpF_EYxFE
• https://youtu.be/7rL1XB-KVCM
• https://youtu.be/iDdcG40PyEY

THANK YOU