System Thinking in Anakle Organization

This article explores the implementation of system thinking in Anakle organization and its impact on strategic thinking and organizational goals. It discusses various approaches to strategic thinking, such as vision alignment, asking questions, giving thoughts to situations, planning, and implementation of diagrams. The article also highlights the importance of system thinking in understanding complex scenarios and achieving organizational success. The complexity perspective and complex adaptive systems are also discussed in relation to strategic thinking. Overall, the article provides insights into how system thinking can drive organizational growth and competitiveness.

SYSTEM THINKING 1
System Thinking
By (Name)
Name of the Course
Title of the Instructor
Institutional Affiliation
City and Date
The final date of Submission

SYSTEM THINKING 2
System thinking in Anakle organization
System thinking is one of the essential parameters that aim towards understanding a
particular type of phenomena as a whole formed through an adequate and reliable interaction of
various parts. Moreover, a wide range of changing ideas that are associated with strategic
thinking have been experienced within anakle organization under various conditions in relation
to the operations that are being carried by the whole organization. In this modern century, system
thinking has been able to help a wide range of organizations to evaluate their experiences and be
able to come up with a reasonable set of recommendations that are able to make them analyze
some of the future objectives and goals that they need to accomplish within a particular time
frame. This further offer an appropriate guidance on the correct path that should be followed
when conducting a wide range of strategic thinking scenarios (Ferrero and Sison 2014). Through
this, the management team is also capable of analyzing their performances to a certain level thus
making it much easier to come up with a set of new objectives that are more reliable (Acedo et
al. 2016). At the same time, system thinking exists within the boundaries of the whole
organization through a series of events most so the ones that are being implemented by the top
management officials who are known to be playing on of the most essential roles to ensure that
the organization is capable of attaining a wide range of goals and objectives within the stipulated
time frame (Anessi-Pessina et al. 2016). In order to ensure that the implementation of strategic
thinking within the organization is appropriate addressed among various personalities both at the
internal or external parts of the organization, the entire organization has been working hard to
ensure that various aspects of ethical considerations are adequately implemented thereby coming
up with one of the most reasonable boundaries regarding what should be don together with what
should be avoided in order to attain a certain level of success thus providing an easy time for the

SYSTEM THINKING 3
whole organization to scale up to greater heights and even offer stiff competition at the market
platform. At the same time, there are a wide range of approaches to strategic thinking that the
organization has been looking forward to implement according to the required rules and
regulations. These approaches tend to form one of the strongest pillars of the whole organization
when it comes to the implementation of new ideas that are capable of coming up with positive
changes thus ensuring a smooth operation within the organization’s boundaries. Basically,
approaches to strategic thinking generally involve a step by step move that the organization
implements in order to adequately address various aspects of future goals and objectives.
Approaches to strategic thinking
There are various approaches that are known to be strongly related to strategic thinking
within the organization. Strategic thinking is one of the essential skills that matters where it
involves an adequate alignment of various visions that are related to a particular set of goals
belonging to a given company. The following are some of the major approaches to strategic
thinking;
 Vision Alignment-On major essential approaches to strategic thinking that Anakle
organization has been able to bring on board is the implementation of adequate alignment
of it vision. The organization has been working hard to ensure that it clearly presents
what is required thus making it much easier for the top management officials to come up
with a vivid description of quite a number of details that are related to the whole
organization. Due to this, they have been able to adequate evaluate about various issues
that it will take in order to reach at the required point together with hoe it will feel.
Through vision alignment as a major approach to strategic thinking, Anakle organization

SYSTEM THINKING 4
has been able to fully connect to the inner source of inspiration thus making it much
easier for the whole organization to come up with new vision that are more reasonable.
 Asking questions- Asking of various questions that are related to different encounters is
another major approach that is related to strategic thinking. After ensuring that all the
visions are goals are adequately connected within the organization boundaries, there is
the need to start working on a wide variety of relevant questions thus enabling the top
management officials to clearly evaluate some of the required conditions in order to get
to various levels. Through this, the entire organization is capable of maintaining various
aspects of system thinking that is required (Bluhm et al. 2011).
 Giving some thoughts to various situations- To ensure that strategic thinking is
adequately implemented, Anakle organization has been able to provide some thoughts to
various situations through the use of three different approaches that are known to be
related to this category (Furrer, Thomas and Goussevskaia 2017). Firstly, they have been
able to use analytical approach to give thoughts to various situations thus providing on of
the easiest time to various personalities to write down various answers that are related to
different questions that were asked at the initial step (Zhu and Zhu 2016). This approach
has been able to adequately serve various groups of thinkers together with the ones who
need clarity pertaining various scenarios within the organization. On the other hand, the
second approach is known to be collaborative approach (Bechtel and Jayaram 2016). It
normally involves various personalities who are more socially minded and are capable of
working hard towards various situations that are known to require brain storming thereby
bringing on board a wide variety of meetings thus getting other parties to be fully

SYSTEM THINKING 5
involved in setting up a wide range of matters that are attached to strategy within the
entire organization.
 Plan- this is another approach to strategic thinking. Coming up with an appropriate plan
is a clear indication that there will be the need to identify various types of action items
that will ensure that the whole organization is capable of reaching various goals within
the stipulated time frame. On the other hand, through adequate and reliable planning, the
entire organization will be able to see the clarity and focus that it has been able to gain
right from the first step thus making it much easier to put it into practical course of action
in relation to all the operations being done within the organization.
 Implementation of diagram- This appears to be one of the most essential steps when it
comes to the approaches of strategic thinking. The use of diagrams normally involves
thinking without the use of words through the implementation of various parameters like
drawing pictures, brainstorming and even diagramming. Normally, a strategy is a plan of
action or even policy that is normally designed with an intention of achieving a major
aim that is related to various goals and objectives of a given organization (Burgess and
Shaw 2010).
System thinking
System thinking critically aims towards understanding phenomena as a whole formed by the
interaction of various parameters. Moreover, it is an approach to integration that strongly
relies on the belief that the essential parts of a given system will be able to act differently
when they are isolated from the entire environment of the whole system. Consistent with
various system parameters, system thinking fully concerns a reliable understanding of a
particular system by adequately analyzing various linkage conditions together with the

SYSTEM THINKING 6
interactions that are known to be taking place between different elements that are known to
be comprising of the entire system. Moreover, as far as the implementation of system
thinking is concerned, it encourages the entire organization to adequately explore some of the
interrelationships, perspectives together with various types of boundaries. Moreover, it is one
of the most essential parameters when it comes to addressing complex scenarios most so the
ones that cannot always be handled by one personality (Zhang, Rousseau and Glänzel 2016).
During various times when the entire organization tends to come across various situations
most so the ones that is messy, the implementation of system thinking has been able to make
it to understand the entire situation in a systematic manner. Furthermore, it has enabled
Anakle organization to be able to see the big picture from which it is capable of adequately
identifying a wide range of leverages that can be addressed with an intention of fully
supporting some of the essential changes taking place within the organization. On the other
hand, it has been able to make the top management officials to see the connectivity that
normally exists between various elements in the entire situation in order to fully support quite
a number of joined up actions that are likely to be implemented within the boundaries of the
whole organization (Ika 2016). At the same time, there is the need to pay attention to quite a
number of parameters together with how they relate with one another in order to come up
with some of the best outcomes that are related to system thinking thus ensuring that various
loopholes are adequately addressed within the stipulated time frame. Through system
thinking techniques, Anakle organization has been able to highlight some of the areas where
loopholes are likely to exists as far as various operations involving the organization are
concerned, this is a scenario that has led to the emergence of a wide range of
recommendations geared towards driving the whole organization in the correct path when it

SYSTEM THINKING 7
comes to the achievement of various goals within the stipulated time frame. To ensure that
that system thinking of implemented according to what is required, various rules and
regulations should be strictly adhered to without making any assumptions. This aims towards
ensuring that any negative effects that are likely to come on board are eliminated at an early
stage thus providing on of the best opportunities for the whole organization to move forward
efficiently and be able to offer competitive environmental conditions within the market
platform (Valero et al. 2016).
Complexity perspective
As far as the complexity perspective is concerned, there are quite a number of ways that an
organization can implement in order to think about strategy. One of the best ways of thinking
about a particular set of strategies is to sound strategic (Majid 2016). Strategic thinkers are
personalities who are known to have the capability of prioritizing a series of various thoughts
that are related to the whole organization. In order to think about a strategy, there is the need
to adequately structure verbal together with various forms of written communication in a way
that is capable of making various audiences to be able to adequately focus on most of their
core messages (Esserman et al. 2016). On the other hand, another way of thinking about
strategy is to adequately observe and seek various trends. This will help in the analysis of
various situations and be able to evaluate some of the trends that are required by the whole
organization in order to attain a specific set of goals and objectives (Kotseva et al. 2016).
Moreover, seeking of various trends also enables the organization to be aware of what is

SYSTEM THINKING 8
taking place thus coming on board with a wide range of thoughts about various strategies that
can be best implemented to within the boundaries of the whole organization in order to make
sure that appropriate and reliable outcomes are achieved without any delays being
encountered. On the other hand, thinking about a strategy will involve having a reliable
vision for the entire organization (Harzing and Van Der Wal 2009). This normally acts as the
basis for all forms of strategic thinking by enabling the organization to critically evaluate the
required path where it should be carrying out various operations. At the same time new ways
of thinking about a particular strategy fully involves having a set of focused goals together
with milestones (Perez-Harguindeguy et al. 2016). The creation of small milestones and
goals that appears to be very focused and specific will be capable of playing on of the most
fundamental roles of thinking about a strategy that is likely to lead towards the development
of the whole organization. When thinking about a strategy, there is the need to learn how to
work efficiently and effectively since this the only strategy that will take full charge when it
comes to building the right team and even going as far as implementing the right system
through an adequate and reliable documentation (Ronda‐Pupo and Katz 2016). When the
entire business is capable of running at its optimal level, it will make it much easier for the
top management officials to see various positive results that are associated with leverage.
Adequate implementation of new ways of thinking about a strategy is the only thing that an
organization can use to think about new issues and situations that can be able to take the
entire organization to the next level. It should also involve relevant personalities who are
aware of the exact things that should be done in order to ensure that the strategies are
implemented in an adequate manner without any complication being encountered (Gomes,
Barnes and Mahmood, 2016).

SYSTEM THINKING 9
Complex adaptive systems
Complex adaptive systems that are attached to system thinking involves an environment in
which a perfect understanding in which all the individual parts does not automatically a
reasonable understanding of the behavior attached to the entire system. Complex adaptive
system’s approach to strategic thinking brings on board a set of organizational learning
methods while at the same time it strongly focuses on mindfulness, mission together with
objectives. Strategic planning appears to be one of the most requested consulting services
that an organization requires in order to evaluate various scenarios in a more reasonable
manner. System thinking together with complex adaptive system theories is known to have
the capabilities of sharing a number of components with the major ones being self-
organization together with various hierarchies attached to a wide range of interacting
systems. On the other hand, modeling complexity theory is one of the most fundamental
theories that were able to emerge as a result of systems theory. Moreover, it fully focuses on
various aspects of interactions together with a wide range of accompanying feedback loops
that are capable of constantly changing various systems. Some of the major application areas
that is associated with modeling complexity within Anakle organization majorly includes
understanding of how the entire organization is capable of adapting to a wide range of
environments together with how it is capable of coping up with several other conditions that
are related to uncertainty (Greenwood 2016). On the other hand, modeling complexity has
been able to bring out a clear understanding of what is required when dealing with systems
thinking in order to understand a particular set of phenomena thus ensuring that strategic
thinking is appropriately used to come up with some of the most reasonable decisions
through the implementation of complex models that are capable of analyzing various

SYSTEM THINKING 10
parameters to come up with the required outcomes (Tüselmann, Sinkovics and Pishchulov
2016).
The practice perspective
The practice perspective in system thinking involves the use of various practical
perspectives to illustrate what is taking place within the whole organization thus making it
much easier to encounter a wide range of these situations and be able to interact with them
under various conditions (Smith et al. 2016). Anakle organization has been on the fore front
to implement a wide range of practical perspectives during various situations related to
system thinking (Yancy et al. 2016). Through the practice perspective, the top management
team has been able to come up with a wide range of strategies geared towards solving various
tricky situations that might hinder the development of the entire organization (Macdonald
and Kam 2017). On the other hand, the practice perspective transforms various ideas into
practice thus making them to be linked with what is taking place in the surrounding
environment within the organization, this adequately helps to come up with a wide range of
adequate and reliable strategies that can be easily understood by both the employees and
employers of the entire organization in order to take the organization to the nest level that is
required (Moon et al. 2016).
Conclusion
It is clear beyond any reasonable doubt that system thinking is one of the most fundamental
parameters when it comes to the development of any given organization. Moreover, it involves
an adequate and reliable implementation of strategic thinking under various perspectives in order
to ensure that the entire organization is capable of attaining all the future goals and objectives

SYSTEM THINKING 11
without encountering any barrier related situation. System thinking also plays an essential role in
highlighting a wide range of loopholes that might be existing within an organization thus coming
up with an adequate set of recommendations that will be geared towards coming up with a
relevant combination of solutions for the entire organization to operate smoothly without any
difficulties being experienced during operation periods (Maflahi and Thelwall 2016). In order to
ensure that appropriate system thinking is brought onboard within an organization, there is the
need to ensure that a wide range of ethical considerations are appropriately implemented in all
sectors to ensure that the critical evaluation of appropriate strategic thinking techniques are
utilized in a required manner according to all the rules and regulations of that organization. At
the same time, system thinking is also capable of working hand in hand with problem solving
techniques that are attached to a particular organization thus making sure that all the goals and
objectives remain relevant at all times.
Recommendations
In order to make sure that various aspects of system thinking are implemented within an
organization, the top management officials of that organization need to work hand in hand with
all the employees by fully engaging them in various meetings for them to be aware of what is
required in order to come up with a more positive form of system thinking with the capability of
bringing on board a wide range of solutions. Moreover, ethical considerations should also be
implemented when dealing with system thinking, this aims towards creating one of the most
reasonable boundaries regarding what should be done together with what should always be
avoided in order to come up with some of the best solutions. Appropriate rules and regulations
should also be adhered to in order to ensure that system thinking is appropriately addressed
without any complications coming on board thus ensuring that there is a smooth flow of various

SYSTEM THINKING 12
operations. There is also the need to ensure that the goals and objectives of an organization are
capable of linking together in relation to what the entire organization is doing thus making it
much easier to use system thinking.

SYSTEM THINKING 13
References
Acedo, F., Barroso, C., Casanueva, C. and Galán, J. (2016). Co‐authorship in management and
organizational studies: An empirical and network analysis. Journal of Management Studies,
43(5), pp.957-983.
Anessi-Pessina, E., Barbera, C., Sicilia, M. and Steccolini, I. (2016). Public sector budgeting: a
European review of accounting and public management journals. Accounting, Auditing &
Accountability Journal, 29(3), pp.491-519.
Bechtel, C. and Jayaram, J. (2016). Supply chain management: a strategic perspective. The
international journal of logistics management, 8(1), pp.15-34.
Bluhm, D., Harman, W., Lee, T. and Mitchell, T. (2011). Qualitative research in management: A
decade of progress. Journal of Management Studies, 48(8), pp.1866-1891.
Burgess, T. and Shaw, N. (2010). Editorial board membership of management and business
journals: a social network analysis study of the Financial Times 40. British Journal of
Management, 21(3), pp.627-648.
Esserman, L., Hylton, N., Yassa, L., Barclay, J., Frankel, S. and Sickles, E. (2016). Utility of
magnetic resonance imaging in the management of breast cancer: evidence for improved
preoperative staging. Journal of clinical oncology, 17(1), pp.110-110.
Ferrero, I. and Sison, A. (2014). A quantitative analysis of authors, schools and themes in virtue
ethics articles in business ethics and management journals (1980–2011). Business Ethics: A
European Review, 23(4), pp.375-400.

SYSTEM THINKING 14
Furrer, O., Thomas, H. and Goussevskaia, A. (2017). The structure and evolution of the strategic
management field: A content analysis of 26 years of strategic management research.
International Journal of Management Reviews, 10(1), pp.1-23.
Gomes, E., Barnes, B. and Mahmood, T. (2016). A 22 year review of strategic alliance research
in the leading management journals. International business review, 25(1), pp.15-27.
Greenwood, M. (2016). Approving or improving research ethics in management journals.
Journal of Business Ethics, 137(3), pp.507-520.
Harzing, A. and Van Der Wal, R. (2009). A Google Scholar h‐index for journals: An alternative
metric to measure journal impact in economics and business. Journal of the American Society for
Information Science and technology, 60(1), pp.41-46.
Ika, L. (2016) Project success as a topic in project management journals. Project Management
Journal, 40(4), pp.6-19.
Kotseva, K., Wood, D., De Bacquer, D., De Backer, G., Rydén, L., Jennings, C., Gyberg, V.,
Amouyel, P., Bruthans, J., Castro Conde, A. and Cífková, R. (2016). EUROASPIRE IV: A
European Society of Cardiology survey on the lifestyle, risk factor and therapeutic management
of coronary patients from 24 European countries. European journal of preventive cardiology,
23(6), pp.636-648.
Macdonald, S. and Kam, J. (2017). Ring a ring o’roses: Quality journals and gamesmanship in
management studies. Journal of Management Studies, 44(4), pp.640-655.

SYSTEM THINKING 15
Maflahi, N. and Thelwall, M. (2016). When are readership counts as useful as citation counts? S
copus versus M endeley for LIS journals. Journal of the Association for Information Science and
Technology, 67(1), pp.191-199.
Majid, F. (2016). The use of reflective journals in outcome-based education during the teaching
practicum. Malaysian Journal of ELT Research, 4(1), p.11.
Moon, K., Brewer, T., Januchowski-Hartley, S., Adams, V. and Blackman, D. (2016). A
guideline to improve qualitative social science publishing in ecology and conservation journals.
Ecology and Society, 21(3).
Perez-Harguindeguy, N., Diaz, S., Garnier, E., Lavorel, S., Poorter, H., Jaureguiberry, P., Bret-
Harte, M.S., Cornwell, W., Craine, J., Gurvich, D. and Urcelay, C. (2016). Corrigendum to: new
handbook for standardised measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Australian Journal
of botany, 64(8), pp.715-716.
Ronda‐Pupo, G. and Katz, J.S. (2016). The power–law relationship between citation‐based
performance and collaboration in articles in management journals: A scale‐independent
approach. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(10), pp.2565-
2572.
Smith, T., Staats, P.S., Deer, T., Stearns, L., Rauck, R., Boortz-Marx, R.L., Buchser, E., Català,
E., Bryce, D.A., Coyne, P.J. and Pool, G. (2016). Randomized clinical trial of an implantable
drug delivery system compared with comprehensive medical management for refractory cancer
pain: impact on pain, drug-related toxicity, and survival. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 20(19),
pp.4040-4049.

SYSTEM THINKING 16
Tüselmann, H., Sinkovics, R. and Pishchulov, G. (2016). Revisiting the standing of international
business journals in the competitive landscape. Journal of World Business, 51(4), pp.487-498.
Valero, V., Holmes, F., Walters, R., Theriault, R.L., Esparza, L., Fraschini, G., Fonseca, G.A.,
Bellet, R.E., Buzdar, A.U. and Hortobagyi, G. (2016). Phase II trial of docetaxel: a new, highly
effective antineoplastic agent in the management of patients with anthracycline-resistant
metastatic breast cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 13(12), pp.2886-2894.
Yancy, C., Jessup, M., Bozkurt, B., Butler, J., Casey, D., Colvin, M., Drazner, M.H., Filippatos,
G., Fonarow, G.C., Givertz, M.M. and Hollenberg, S. (2016). 2016 ACC/AHA/HFSA focused
update on new pharmacological therapy for heart failure: an update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA
guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of
Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the
Heart Failure Society of America. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 68(13),
pp.1476-1488.
Zhang, L., Rousseau, R. and Glänzel, W. (2016). Diversity of references as an indicator of the
interdisciplinarity of journals: Taking similarity between subject fields into account. Journal of
the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(5), pp.1257-1265.
Zhu, H. and Zhu, Q. (2016). Mergers and acquisitions by Chinese firms: A review and
comparison with other mergers and acquisitions research in the leading journals. Asia Pacific
Journal of Management, 33(4), pp.1107-1149.