Systems Thinking for Inventory Management: A Case Study of Woolworths
Verified
Added on  2022/11/27
|5
|1053
|485
AI Summary
This article explores the application of systems thinking in inventory management using a case study of Woolworths, a popular retail chain in Australia. It discusses the issues faced by Woolworths, the rationale for using systems thinking, and proposes a solution to improve inventory management.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head:SYSTEMS THINKING SYSTEMS THINKING Name of the Student: Name of the University: Author Note:
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
1SYSTEMS THINKING Background Woolworths is a popular retail chain in the country of Australia that has been facing significant issues in the recent times regarding their inventory management. It has been reported that the retail chain has been storing products with low demands in high amounts, and high demands in low amounts, thereby not being able to meet the market needs. This has significantly impacted the business as customers seek other retail stores to buy what they need, and they can even avail them at cheaper prices (Feigin, 2016). Rationale Systems thinking is a method of complex problem solving in management. This can be used in this context because the problem does not have one single perspective. It has affected the customers, the internal stakeholders and the employees of the organization in various ways. This is why it has to be analyzed from each perspective to arrive at a root definition, which would help in making a more accurate solution to the problem. Applying the CATWOE model Customers: The problem that customers have faced in this is that they have not been able to find products that they commonly need, and when they have, they have found the price to be higher than usual due to shortage of that product (Mayoza et al., 2018). Actors: Actors refer to the various stakeholders. In this case, the suppliers have suffered a loss from the uneven consignment of goods that they receive from the organization. There has been no constant flow in the supply chain. Shareholders have suffered losses since customers are seeking other retails, and the price of Woolworths stock has eventually gone down (Trongtortam et al., 2018).
2SYSTEMS THINKING Transformation process: The retail change keeps a track of the goods outflow, counts the number of each good in the inventory and accordingly orders for the materials from the suppliers (Indahati, Fitriani & Munajat, 2017). Worldview: Gradually, this poor inventory management has been leading to a disrupted market dynamics. There are specific needs in the market, which the company has not been able to address, which has led to customers not finding their required materials, and the prices of common goods have gone up, making them shift to other retail chains (Mahalepa & Goede, 2018). Owners: The decision makers have to do something in this regard since the organization might soon collapse. The stock and profitability have already gone down due to customers switching to other chains, and in this way, the organization would not be able to sustain itself (Trongtortam et al., 2018). Environmental constraint: There is no specific environmental constraint that could be identified in this issue. It is an internal fault of the management as they cannot manage the inventory properly. Root definition Woolworths Australia have been facing a severe issue with inventory management, storing products with low demands in high amounts, and high demands in low amounts. This has made the customers unable to find the common products they look for and if they do, it is at a higher price. As a result, they have been shifting to other retails, impacting the stock prices of the organization. Suppliers have suffered from uneven consignment of goods. It is not aligned with the market dynamics and if this continues, the organization would not be able to sustain itself.
3SYSTEMS THINKING Solution It is therefore recommended that inventory management is done according to the percentage of demand of each product. For example, according to the percentage of a product’s demand in the inventory, it should be assigned a number which has to be present in the inventory at all times. If a product has 5% demand amongst all of the other products and the number of people visiting the store everyday is 300, at least 15 of such products have to be present in the inventory at all times everyday, apart from those that are present inside the store. Whenever this number goes down in the inventory any day, suppliers should be informed immediately. Employees should be assigned to keep a check on the numbers of each category of products.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
4SYSTEMS THINKING REFERENCES Feigin, L. M. (2016).The effects of protests and boycotts on a brand and its reputation: a case study on Woolworths and boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS)(Doctoral dissertation, The IIE). Indahati, P., Fitriani, R. N., & Munajat, Q. (2017). Knowledge Management System Features Analysis Using Soft System Methodology: A Case Study of an Agency in the Ministry of Religious Affairs in Indonesia.Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences,12(12), 3277-3280. Mahalepa,T.,&Goede,R.(2018,January).INDUSTRYNEEDSFORDATA WAREHOUSINGSTUDENTS:USINGSSMASHERMENEUTICDATA ANALYSIS TOOL FOR INTERPRETIVE INTERVIEW DATA. InProceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the ISSS-2017 Vienna, Austria(Vol. 2017, No. 1). Mayoza,L.,Agus,A.,Lili,W.,&Rizal,A.(2018).ANALYTICALBUSINESS DEVELOPMENTONNEONTETRA(PARACHEIRODONINNESI) ORNAMENTAL FISH CULTIVATION.GSJ,6(7), 938. Trongtortam, S., Francis, H., Taylor, M., Sudirman, S., & Symons, A. (2018, September). Development of a Preliminary Model Guide for Using Mobile Learning Technology inResource–LimitedPrimarySchoolsinThailand.In201811thInternational Conference on Developments in eSystems Engineering (DeSE)(pp. 83-88). IEEE.