Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Table of Contents Part A: Critical analysis and evaluation of Revenue Management practice in the industry Introduction2 Pricing and distribution systems in the hospitality industry2 Strategies3 Game 1 analysis3 Game 2 analysis4 Conclusion4 Part B: Recent Technological Developments within the Rooms marketplace Biometric Authentication4 Artificial Intelligence5 References6 Appendix7 1
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Part A: Critical analysis and evaluation of Revenue Management practice in the industry Introduction In this report we shall discuss the Moss House hotel’s critical Key performance indicators (KPI’s) and evaluate the strategies implemented by my group, analyse and look at the changes we made in our strategies in game 2 to increase the hotels revenue and also look at our overall strengths and weaknesses by looking at our performance analysis summary. In part B we shall discuss two technological advances which could be innovated and could possibly help in the growth of the hotels revenue and improve the guest experience. i.Pricing and distribution systems in the hospitality industry. According to (Ivanov and Zhechev, 2011) Pricing is one of the most important aspects of room bookings and your hotels positioning and can be based on customer segmentation, their willingness to pay, seasonality, forecast etc. Previous year’s highest market segmentation was business conference with 35%, considering this the Moss house Hotel’s target markets are business travellers, conferences groups and delegates. Market segmentation is important because it helps hotels to identify unique customer demands and to build experience to meet their needs. (Tranter, 2013) The room rate for delegates is £160 for rack rate and £80 will be allocated for bedroom & £80 towards food & beverage, and conference room. The hotels rack rate for double occupancy is £140 and £120 for single occupancy. A room rate can be characterized as the cost of a room set by a hotels front office team for a guest wanting to stay overnight. It is vital that front office teams or the marketing team have a thorough view of their competitors’ rates. Staying up to date on what other competitors offer regarding room types, room rates, guest facilities and offers will allow hotels to make updated, competitive distribution strategies.(Hotel Management, 2019) The main purpose of room rate flexibility is to increase the hotel’s revenue when there are low demand phases and to maximize room revenue when there is a high demand period (Kasavana, 2013). The hotel also decided to give discounts on certain bookings towards the end of target to meet the customers budget and to increase night stays and fill the hotels occupancy. As explained by (Tranter, 2013) Global distribution system is a technology system used for selling of products or in our case rooms across the globe. To be able to purchase room easily these varied hospitality products and services e.g. hotel rooms, spas etc GDS makes it easier to bring the consumer and supplier together, increase revenue, reduce operating costs and increase efficiency ,these can be referred to as channels of distribution, also to share room rates and inventory. Majority of the delegates and conference bookings came through direct hotel packages for delegate and group booking contracts, but a majority of bookings in game 2 came through different Online Travel Agencies (OTA’s) too. ii.Strategies 2
The Hotels Front office has executed a few strategies whilst taking different reservations. Having a flexible rate corresponding to the hotel’s occupancy based on customers budget, to increase the hotel’s occupancy was the first strategy. The second strategy was negotiating a more advantageous rate by giving discounts for groups and hotels target markets (business or corporate guests). The third strategy was to be able to occupy the weekdays reservations by target markets because it is a working day for them and they would be receptive to the rate, hence the front office team has decided to give them a higher price. The fourth strategy was creating price strategies to attract groups (business guests) because it functioned better on groups than transients on the weekdays. World Travel and Tourism Council (WTCC) states that, hospitality is the fastest developing industry at present (Best hospitality degrees, 2017). Strategic management may be characterized as the process of evolving, applying, and assessing strategies that would help a hotel to achieve its goals (Tranter, 2013) for us it being our hotels room revenues and occupancy. Based on previous occupancy forecast, customers' demands and accordingly set our room rates and strategy. Although overbooking can help decrease the amount of vacant rooms it can be costly, not just by bearing costs of booking out but also loosing good loyal customers in the process affecting the good will and future business.(StayNTouch, 2019)So, one of our strategy was also not taking overbooking which actually didn’t work in our favour because towards the end of game 1 we had a lot of cancellations hence decreasing our occupancy to 57.1% (Refer to game 1 analysis) and as we had approached our target week it was hard to sell any of those rooms. Cancellation policy is the other strategy we implemented in game 2, not having a cancellation policy in place for game 1 had an adverse effect on our RevPAR, as a few delegate bookings cancelled a few of their bookings due to which the hotel lost a total revenue of 800£. A room which was unable to be sold due to a cancellation particularly closed to the check-in date is something that the hotel cannot afford, particularly during peak season. This is very important as it can directly impact revenues. (Mirai.com, 2019)Hence in game 2 the hotel implemented a cancellation policy of cancelling a week before or 90% of the rate would be charged. iii.Game 1 analysis (refer to game 1 in appendix) In Game 1 The Moss house hotel achieved an occupancy % of 57.1% being lower than average of last year’s overall occupancy which was 75%mainly due to cancellations and pricing strategy being too high and wasn’t in the budget of the customers so being able to fill our rooms was an issue. The highest occupancy we had was 84% and the least being Monday with 40%. If overbooking was considered as a strategy in game one we would minimise our loss of room and therefore increase the occupancy, Modifying our room rates towards the approach of the target week so as to be in budget of the customers and groups would benefit the hotel too, as we couldn’t accept guests because of our prices being too high. Cancellation policy should have been implemented hence saving the hotel some loss and having enough time to be able to resell the rooms. We had to then lower the rates to sell the rooms which meant lower RevPAR. On the brighter side we had good other revenue income from f&b/conference being £6960 we did have a small amount of commission fee which was £1465 because we had decided to take the least amount of booking through agencies to avoid commission fee. What could be done better? Pricing strategy, Cancellation policy, Considering overbooking. 3
iv.Game 2 analysis Game 2 had a much better total occupancy % with an excellent increase of 78.57%, this was achieved because of the change in pricing strategy the hotel used a flexible pricing strategy so as to meet the guests demands during low demand seasons and then increase prices during a high demand. (Kasavana, 2013). Group discounts were given too in order to attract more business groups. The front office team also negotiated with the customers to be able to move their check dates and thus be able to achieve occupancy on days where it was low favouring the hotel, doing this also meant we needed to give a lower rate for the customer, a similar strategy was used to request group booking to share a twin room. Majority of booking were accepted through OTA’s such as Expedia, Trivago, Hotels.com, which was accepted this time regardless of the commission as we wanted to achieve a higher occupancy and revenue this time. Which was achieved the revenue being £60890, almost £20000 more than game 1 and increase in ADR being £110.71,RevPar of £86.99 and a yield of 62.13% all showing an excellent increase from game 1 achieved by adjustments to strategies and key decisions like accepting more of OTA’s, discounts etc. The front office team this time decided to do overbooking as it generates a large influence on hotel revenues and can also increase profitability and help when there is cancellations (Kibin, 2017). The over booking helped because when there was a decrease in the number of group booking the over booking helped to occupy the rooms. What could be done better? Could’ve focused more on other revenues which would help boost the overall revenue more. Conclusion In conclusion the front office team at the moss house hotels had analysed their weakness and mistakes from game one and implemented those strategies in game 2 which showed a favourable revenue and other KPI’s. Part B: Recent Technological Developments within the Rooms marketplace At present as we rely more on internet, it will become more pervasive and essential to every aspect of our business. In the new environment connectivity is key. The consumer really is king and has zero tolerance for error or poor service delivery. – (International journal of tourism research) Hotels have begun innovating new ways through technology to help maximise profitability and increase guest satisfaction. Use of Biometric Authentication to check in and to use as a replacement to a bedroom key. Artificial Intelligence Biometric Authentication Biometrics is one of the top key technology that is constantly expanding and finding its place within many industries. Facial recognition has been top notch by Facebook and Apple has demonstrated that biometrics have demonstrated customer benefits and satisfaction with Touch ID and Face ID. In a hospitality perspective, we're drawing nearer to consistent procedures where customers can authorise a purchase without a need phone or wallet, digital or otherwise. 4
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
The idea of biometric confirmation takes into account reliable and consistent customers transactions that empower customers to leave directly after a meal with the certainty that their bill was paid naturally without the requirement for waitstaff or pay terminal connection. (Ebscohost,2019)So if it were possible to use biometrics as a check-in method and also a key it would be more time efficient and a unique technological advance for customer giving a competitor advantage for the hotel. Artificial Intelligence Artificial intelligence or individual aides has become a typical news nowadays, as it will profit visitor to look into the lodging and help improve their stay understanding. The starting of AI will have the option to meet visitor's desire by reacting to their needs in a quicker pace (Technology4hotels, 2017). It will likewise build staff productivity since AI will be partaking in the front work area occupation to go about as the central matter of contact all through the inn (Appendix 3). This will prompt a productive business as hoteliers will have the option to spare expense to put resources into the AI innovation as opposed to procuring an extra worker. Other than that, AI will profit visitor by having customized encounters, for example, helping the inn to gather information on proposals and spots to visit (Technology4hotels, 2017). Not just that, AI can screen visitor fulfilment and input after they registration and during their remain. Visitor will get the opportunity to leave inputs in regards to their staying experience while AI will have the option to break down them through positive and negative feedbacks. If the AI receives negative feedback from the guest, then it will be automatically escalated to a staff member for action (Technology4hotels, 2017). 5
References Tranter, K. (2013).Introduction to Revenue Management for the Hospitality Industry: Pearson New International Edition. Pearson. Hotel Management. (2019).Establishing a thorough distribution strategy, a must for hotels. [online] Available at:https://www.hotelmanagement.net/tech/establishing-a-thorough-distribution- strategy-a-must-for-hotels[Accessed Dec. 2019]. Besthospitalitydegrees.com. (2017). Is the Hotel Industry Growing? [online] Available at:http://www.besthospitalitydegrees.com/faq/is-the-hotel-industry-growing/[Accessed Dec. 2019] StayNTouch. (2019).The Strategy of Overbooking Your Hotel - StayNTouch. [online] Available at: https://www.stayntouch.com/blog/overbooking-your-hotel/[Accessed Nov. 2019]. Ebscohost, (2019). [online] Available at: http://web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail? vid=4&sid=5c406066-69be-43f8-9981-dbff3d5230a6%40sdc-v- sessmgr03&bdata=JkF1dGhUeXBlPXNoaWImc2l0ZT1laG9zdC1saXZl#db=hjh&AN=17074037 [Accessed Dec. 2019]. Kasavana, M. (2013). Managing front office operations. 9th ed. Michigan: Educational Institute, p.195. Mirai.com. (2019).Cancellations shooting up: implications, costs and how to reduce them |. [online] Available at: https://www.mirai.com/blog/cancellations-shooting-up-implications-costs-and-how-to- reduce-them/ [Accessed Dec. 2019]. Kibin.com. (2017). The Advantage and Disadvantage of Overbooking | Kibin. [online] Available at:https://www.kibin.com/essay-examples/the-advantage-and-disadvantage-of-overbooking- TJbVvUTD[Accessed November. 2019.] Appendix HOTEL WEEKLY PERFORMANCE SUMMARY SHEET– REQUIRED TO BE SUMBITTED WITH THE ASSIGNMENT (ENSURE ALL DETAILS ARE COMPLETED) REVENUE MANAGEMENT GAME NUMBER___1___Semester ___1___Date game played ________________ Group members’ full namesYen-Na, Chen, Aliston Fernandes, Filomena Domingos, Lynnes Brooks___________ SunMonTuesWedThursFriSatTotal (d) Rooms Sold47407084475557400 6
Room Occupancy % 47%40%70%84%47%55%57%57.1% Total number of guests 9267971216290102631 Number of overbooked rooms -------- Overbooking penalty (£150 per room per night) -------- Rooms Revenue (a) (from Reservations Details sheet)£42,365 Other Revenue (b) (F&B + Conference room hire etc.)£6,960 Total Revenue (a+b)£49,325 Commissions paid (e) (from Reservations Details sheet)£1,465 Average Room Rate (a/d) Total rooms revenue /total number of rooms occupied£105.91 RevPar Total rooms revenue/total number of rooms available in the hotel£60.52 Rooms Sales Efficiency (Yield) – see description below Actual Revenue/Maximum Potential Revenue 43.23% HOTEL WEEKLY PERFORMANCE SUMMARY SHEET– REQUIRED TO BE SUMBITTED WITH THE ASSIGNMENT (ENSURE ALL DETAILS ARE COMPLETED) REVENUE MANAGEMENT GAME NUMBER__2____Semester ___1___Date game played ________________ Group members’ full namesYen-Na, Chen, Aliston Fernandes, Filomena Domingos, Lynnesa Brooks SunMonTuesWedThursFriSatTotal (d) Rooms Sold79498088948872550 Room Occupancy % 79%49%80%88%94%88%72%78.57% 7
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Total number of guests 13071123131141126116838 Number of overbooked rooms -------- Overbooking penalty (£150 per room per night) -------- Rooms Revenue (a) (from Reservations Details sheet)£60,890 Other Revenue (b) (F&B + Conference room hire etc.)£1,371.2 Total Revenue (a+b)£62,261.2 Commissions paid (e) (from Reservations Details sheet)£1,823.12 Average Room Rate (a/d) Total rooms revenue /total number of rooms occupied£110.71 RevPar Total rooms revenue/total number of rooms available in the hotel£86.99 Rooms Sales Efficiency (Yield) – see description below Actual Revenue/Maximum Potential Revenue 62.13% 8