SEO Expert for Desklib

Get expert SEO advice for Desklib, an online library for study material with solved assignments, essays, and dissertations. Find the best title, meta title, meta description, and slug for SEO optimization.

Task 2: Case Study
Instructions
 Read the case study below carefully.
 In small groups, discuss the questions that follow which relate to the
case study.
 Write down your answers in the space provided.
Case Study
At the school entrance there is a small step that often trips up visitors
because it is difficult to see. Ideally, this risk would be eliminated by
removing the step altogether, but that would mean lowering the floor of
the building, which is neither practical nor cost efficient.
We could reduce/isolate the risk by getting students to come through via
the fire stairs at the rear of the building, but that contravenes the Code of
Practice. Our next option would be to modify the step by painting it with
bright yellow paint and putting a sign on the door: “Be careful of the small
step.” The last resort would be providing every person entering the door
with a walking stick and kneepads so that if they were to fall, the
protective clothing would cushion their landing.
After reviewing the above strategies, it was decided that making the step
more visible to visitors with signage and bright paint is most suited to
current financial constraints and practicalities.
1. Identify all the control processes considered in the case study.
Ans : Control process is all about collection of required information about a
given system, group of people(French and Strachan 2015). It is mainly needed
for making certain number of decision at each of the given step. Management
of this school can easily set up control system which comes up with four major
steps.
Establishing standard for calculating the standard: Within this school,
the strategic plan is needed by management for defining its aims (Richards et

al. 2015). It is inclusive of certain standard that is performance when it is
compared with the activities in the school.
Measuring the performance: This school can easily prepare some formal
reports for measuring the performance which is viewed by managers on
regular basis (Davis, Frolova and Callahan 2016). The measurement is totally
related to certain number of standards in the very beginning stage of the
control method.
Comparing with Standard: This particular stage helps in comparing certain
number of activities which is based on performance standards (Prinz 2018).
Management of this school can easily get reports by understanding the needs
in the new staircase design.
Taking proper action: There are some instances where the performance can
easily deviate from the given standard (Correa‐Velez, Barnet and Gifford
2015). Management of this school can easily understand the necessary
changes along with applying them. In the present scenario, productivity and
quality are considered to be an important factor for new design of the school
building.
Fig 1: Steps in Control Process

Source: (Pekarek et al. 2017)
2. Why was lowering the floor rejected?
Ans : The following case study highlights about school entrance which
comes up with small steps often can trip advisor. It has been done
because it is every much difficult for the viewers to look into each and
every step (Bailey et al. 2015). There is only one possible solution that is
removing the steps of the building for reducing the involved risk. It will
ultimately result into lowering the floor of the school building which is
neither practical or cost efficient in nature.
3. What Code of Practice was considered to be contravened?

Ans : This particular school can easily reduce the involved risk by addressing the student to come
to the fair stairs. The students are merely invited at the rear of this school building which conflicts
with the code of Practices (Hanley, and O'Rourke 2016). This violet the codes of practices as fire
stairs are used at time of any emergency. The fire stairs are mainly used for managing the school
which highlights the safety of the student of this school.
Task 3: Group Discussion
1. Discuss Equal Employment Opportunities in Australia in a group of 2-3 and write
down your findings
Australian Institute of director’s focus on recognizing the values and strong support for the
principles of equal employment in Australia. The institutes expect to treat each other with
respect along with dignity (French and Strachan 2015). The institute focus on promoting certain
principles related to advantage in current employment practices. It merely highlights the fact
that people are selected as they are best for the job. The institutes focus on review and
development of practices which is required for equal opportunity within any organization
(Correa Velez, Barnet and Gifford 2015). It focuses on gaining potential within the present‐
employees with respect to various aspects like transfer, training and lastly training of
employees. The institutes assure the fact that recruitment and promotion of the employees will
be done with respect to sex, race and sexual preferences. The board focus on recruit diverse
range of people which comes up range of talents that helps in achieving the goals (Richards et al.
2015). The board totally follows Workplace Gender Equality Act 2012. This particular act aims to
provide employees and members of Australian Institute for understanding the report on Human
Resources. Diversity in workplace focus on employees which come with wide range of platform.
It is inclusive of employees with varying gender, work experiences and lastly education
background.

2. Discuss and describe in your own words the Fair Work Act 2009 and Fair
Work Regulations 2009 in Australia.
Task 1: Case Study
Instructions to students
1. Read the following statement carefully.
Ans: Fair Work Act 2009 can be considered to be a piece of legislation which is required for
having understanding with respect to Australian Workplace. It considered to be foundation of
various standard and practices needed for employment (Davis, Frolova and Callahan 2016). It is
required by employer of different industry and business sizes which needs to be familiar with.
There are certain number of rules and regulation which are outlined in this Fair Work Act. It also
known as national Workplace system of relation. This particular ACT is needed for providing a
balance for productivity in workplace. It aims to promote prosperity in national economy and
social inclusive in Australia (Prinz 2018). The board helps in having proper kind of understanding
with respect to present ACT like
 Giving different terms and condition which is needed for employment.
 Giving certain number of roles and responsibility which is needed by employees and
organization.
 It can provide compliance with the present enforcement of this Act.
 It aims to provide proper administration by using Fair Work Commission.

2. Form a group of 3-4 people.
3. You and your team members are required to discuss and negotiate with
your team members which six survivors should be sentenced to death
from the Life Boat.
4. Provide your answers in the space provided and be prepared to present
and justify the reasons for your choices.
5. All team members must participate.
The Lifeboat Game
You are part of a sea expedition to Antarctica but the ship experienced an
engine explosion of unknown origin which has killed the captain and most
of the crew.
Naturally, you contact the Coast Guard immediately and also organize all
the ship's passengers to monitor their progress.
Unfortunately, your luck isn't getting any better. The ship is sinking, and
there is virtually no chance that the Coast Guard will reach you before it
vanishes under the waves.
Trying to swim or tread water is out of the question because of the
freezing water.
A small lifeboat has been located on the ship which, at best, can hold six
people.
Land is in sight, but it will take several hours of rowing on the rough
waters to reach it.
You and the passengers have to decide who should use the lifeboat.
The survivors are as follows:
1) "Jerry" Takeyama, 37, Oriental, Japanese citizenship. Jerry works in the
marketing division of a Japanese computer company, and was travelling to
Antarctica to help set up a new modern computer. He has a wife and three
children back home in Kyoto.

2) Ivan Primakov, 22, Russian citizenship with an Australian work visa.
Ivan is a recent Russian emigrant and the only surviving crew member. He
is the youngest and most physically fit of the survivors. He has no spouse
or offspring.
3) Dr. Caroline Miller, 41, Caucasian, Australian. Dr. Miller is a university physicist who has been
working at a remote research station in Antarctica studying radiation emitted over the frozen
continent. Several nights ago at dinner, she announced that her research has accidentally led to
what she believes will be the first working Unified Field Theory. She has had a stable 10-year
partnership with another woman. She has no children.
4) Dr. Thomas Johnson, 57, African - Australian. Dr. Johnson is an
oncologist who works in Melbourne doing research on children's cancer,
most recently at Melbourne’s University Hospital. He has been married for
two years to his wife Andrea, also a doctor.
5) Helen Johnson, 23, Australian. Helen has worked as a nurse. Her work
was going to involve vaccinating of crew and transferable of medicine at
the Antarctic Base. She just found out that she is two months' pregnant to
her boyfriend living in Tasmania.
6) Gooda Bega, 39, Australian aborigine. Mr. Bega is a junior local
parliamentarian representing a local Victoria Aboriginal community. His
interest was to visit and see Antarctica and study Australia’s interest in
the region. Gooda worked as a social worker in different parts of Australia
before becoming part of the parliament. He represents the environmental
concern of his community. He has a wife and two children back at home in
Melbourne.
7) Cheryl Carmen. 78, Canadian, Mrs. Carmen is a scientist with over 40
years of experience in the field environmental sciences and conservation.
This is her last trip to Antarctica, after this she wants to go back to
Canada and concentrate on writing her biography. She is a widow and has
three children and five grandchildren.
8) Rajish Patel. 30, Indian-Australian. Mr. Patel has just finished his studies
in Meteorology in Tasmania and this was his first trip to Antarctica. This
was a great opportunity to explore this continent and really put his
knowledge to work. He was looking forward to this trip for two years. He

has a girlfriend back in Tasmania and is ready to get married within six
weeks.
9)Tamara Dias, 35, American. Ms. Dias is a journalist working for Times
magazine. This is her second trip to Antarctica as part of a three-year
scientific assignment dealing with the effect of isolation in remote areas of
the world. Tamara is a single and independent woman. She is interested
in developing her professional profile and knowledge.
10) Peter Baron, 40, Australian. Peter works as a builder in Sydney and he
was just selected because of his professional skills and experience, among
20 candidates, to work in building the new extension of the living quarters
at the station. His contract was done for two years’ stationary in
Antarctica. He lives in Sydney and is married with two children.
11) Susan Sangster. A 55-year-old, wheelchair bound, divorcee with three grown up children. Her
charity and fundraising work led to her securing a position on the expedition. Her powerful family
connections include the Kennedy and Rockefeller families; it is rumored she used her connections to
apply pressure on the committee for her inclusion.
12) Mohammed El- Tadros, 29 years old. Photographer, he has won
several awards for his remote location photography. He also
photographed the Arab spring uprising in Egypt and Libya. He is rumored
to be related to the Bin Laden family and has connections in the tribal
regions of Yemen.
a) Nominate 6 people to be kicked off the Life Boat.
Person Reason Why
1. Ivan Primakov
He is a Russian citizen who has Australian
Work Visa. He can be kicked off as he has
no spouse or offspring. There are many
people on the boat who needs to survive
for supporting their family members.
2. Dr. Caroline Miller
This particular person is involved in
studying radiation and its patterns. She
can be kicked off as she has not children.

3. Mohammed El-Tadros
This particular person has own certain
number of awards in Egypt. He is being
rumoured to have relationship with Bin
laden family. Bin laden is considered to
be biggest terrorist of the world.
4. Susan Sangster
She has three grown up children who can
manage themselves without her. It has
been rumoured that she tends to apply
pressure on the present committee
inclusive of her position.
5. Tamara Dias
She is a working journalist for the
magazine named Time. She can be kicked
off from this boat as she is single and
independent woman.
6. Cheryl Carmen
She can be kicked off from this boat as
she is 78 years old and has lived her life.
She is widow and has three children and
grandchildren. Her children can easily
manage themselves as they are enough
matured.
Task 2: Diversity Presentation
Instructions to students
1. To demonstrate clear understanding of the issues surrounding
workplace Diversity and appropriate responses to it, prepare and
present a presentation based on your previous place of
employment. If you have never worked before you can use your
place of study, e.g.: An Australian University
2. You must wear business attire and act professionally when
presenting.
3. This Assessment is to be completed individually.
4. Prepare at least one slide addressing the questions below. Answer
with bullet points. Maximum three sentences per bullet point.
5. Load on your USB and bring to class. Make sure the teacher has a
softcopy of your presentation.

Questions
a) Identify three Types of Diversity in your Workplace / University. Then
clearly explain to the class how this diversity existed in your Workplace /
University.
1.
2.
3.
b) Discuss how these differences have impacted on your Workplace. E.g.: Ramps installed for
wheelchair access.

c) How did you modify your behaviour in order to accommodate this type of diversity?
Give at least two examples of your own or your colleagues behaviour.

References
Bailey, J., Price, R., Pyman, A. and Parker, J., 2015. Union power in retail: Contrasting cases in
Australia and New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Employment Relations, 40(1), p.1.
Correa‐Velez, I., Barnett, A.G. and Gifford, S., 2015. Working for a better life: Longitudinal evidence
on the predictors of employment among recently arrived refugee migrant men living in
Australia. International Migration, 53(2), pp.321-337.
Davis, P.J., Frolova, Y. and Callahan, W., 2016. Workplace diversity management in Australia: what
do managers think and what are organisations doing?. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An
International Journal, 35(2), pp.81-98.
French, E. and Strachan, G., 2015. Women at work! Evaluating equal employment policies and
outcomes in construction. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 34(3), pp.227-
243.
Hanley, G.M. and O'Rourke, A., 2016. The race without a finishing line: legislative means for
confronting bullying in the A ustralian workplace. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 54(3),
pp.352-368.
Pekarek, A., Landau, I., Gahan, P., Forsyth, A. and Howe, J., 2017. Old game, new rules? The
dynamics of enterprise bargaining under the Fair Work Act. Journal of Industrial Relations, 59(1),
pp.44-64.
Prinz, C., 2018. Transforming disability welfare policies: towards work and equal opportunities.
Routledge.
Richards, Z., Thomas, S.L., Randle, M. and Pettigrew, S., 2015. Corporate Social Responsibility
programs of Big Food in Australia: a content analysis of industry documents. Australian and New
Zealand journal of public health, 39(6), pp.550-556.