Taxation Law and Its Application: Detailed Response on Residency Tax Obligations and Income Tax Form Employment

This article discusses taxation law and its application in Australia, including residency tax obligations and income tax from employment. It also covers negative gearing and proposed reforms on negative gearing by the Australian Labor party.

TAXATION LAW
TAXATION LAW AND ITS APPLICATION
Course:
Professor’s Name
Institution
City
Date

TAXATION LAW
Question 1
Smith Sckenker,
Webley Consultancy Ltd,
Queen Street 4562, 5Th September
Elwood Blues,
Unit 52,246 Queen Street,
Brisbane, QLD, 4000.
RE: DETAILED RESPONE ON RESIDENCY TAX OLIGATIONS.
Dear Elwood,
This letter is written to you to respond on Income Tax Obligations involving residency in
Australia even though this is not your native home. The most general way of determining
whether a person is an Australian, is by considering the persons facts and circumstances in
relation to the Common Law and Statutory test carried out to determine ones residency. One is
considered an Australian Resident if the person ‘Resides’ in Australia according to the definition
of the word itself meaning “dwell permanently for a considerable time” etc. This is mainly done
by carrying out a test known as ‘Resident Test’. In the tax ruling TR98/17 Income Tax, it clearly
outlines individuals residing in Australia although they are not natives Woellner (2010.Pg 5).
One of the scenarios is that of persons entering Australia with Pre-Arranged employment
contracts and this which happens to be you in this case. The following factors are considered
when carrying the residency test.

TAXATION LAW
One of the factors is the purpose of presence in Australia. What I mean by this is, the way you
have planned out your life determines your residency thus binding you to pay income tax as an
Australian Resident. The fact that you came to Australia, bought a home and moved in
immediately, clearly show that your intention is to stay in Australia permanently with your
family. Thus being considered as a resident for tax purposes Pinto (Pg. 1762).
The second factor is the registration of utility bills i.e. Telephone and electricity in your name
and adding of the new kitchen to the home at a cost of $20,000. These actions of buying a home,
furnishing the house with a new kitchen, registering for utility bills, clearly shows that you and
family treat Australia as your home. This fact alone changes your status in the country and your
tax purpose changes to that of an Australian resident Lanis (2012.Pg.98).
The third one is the Social Living arrangements. I am referring to you joining a local gym,
becoming a member and raising up to become the Local Chess club President. More so you’re
children settling in well in a local school and your wife securing a part-time. This places you
more as an Australian resident required to pay income tax.
The fourth one is the fact that you and your family have been in Australia for more than half of
the financial year period, shows your intention to reside in Australia and thus being considered as
a resident. Moreover your wife having secured a part time job as a sales manager and enjoying
her job show the intention of residing in Australia.

TAXATION LAW
However I advise Mr. Elwood to seek waiver on double taxation from the income received from
his house in America. Its stated in Tax Ruling 98/7 subsection 29 that waiver is allowed relating
to double taxation and a small percentage going to the country of residency.
Yours Sincere,
Smith Schenker
Question 2;
Jake being an Australian resident has an obligation to pay taxes informed of income tax form
employment or any other income generating activity.
Item No.1
Jake received an income of $86,000 in the that year of income 2017/2018 this amount is to be
taxed under the individual tax bracket as outlined in the ATO whereby each income is classified
under respective tax brackets. More so there is a tax at source withheld as Pay As You Go by the
company declared and paid tax withheld of $19, 820, the company withholds this on behalf of
the tax man as required by the law.
Item No.2
The Australian Tax office allows companies at some point to stand as their agents especially on
issues relating to withholding or charge of tax at source especially for allowances and other form
of income benefits. The same regulations have decided what is to be allowed and what not to be
allowed and at times up to what range is to be allowed. Car allowance given to Jake is calculated
as follows;
= $ 5000 * 0.75 = $ 3750 and the rest $1500 is withheld hence just need to allow this amount of
$3750.

TAXATION LAW
Item No. 3
Ideally it is said two wrongs do not make a right hence though there exist no details of Jake at the
bank especially Jake tax no, Jake has dire obligation to declare and pay tax for the interest he has
earned from the bank of $100.This is likewise expected to on the bank side for purposes of
accounting for deductions they do at their end inclusive of other facilitating charges
Item No.4
ATO as a tax man authority requires and expects that all taxes are paid and all dividends paid in
terms of cash or cheque issuance and re-investing are declared to the authority. In the case of re-
investing the authority requires that the dividend first is declared, and then the shareholder has
the option to re-invest or opt not to do so. In the case of Jake the $35,000 dividend earned and
declared is to be re-invested thus we must first calculate the tax on it first and maintain records of
the market shares. These shared upon re-investment will facilitate calculations in order to claim
capital gain tax or the loss in future if there is any reason to sell of the shares. However the
employer is expected to withhold 15% of the dividend payoff. In this case there was a
withholding tax of = 3,500 * 0.15 = $ 525.
Item No.5
The fact that Jake purchased shares and sold the same shares off there exist an aspect of gain or
loss on disposal hence a need for calculating the capital gain or loss on disposal. It is mostly
calculated as follow;
Purchase Consideration of the share =$ 22 * 1,000 = 22000, this means that the total cost of this
share is 22000, the brokerage part stands as part of capital incidental cost.

TAXATION LAW
Jake then decides to sell these shares at $24 per share but only half of the number of shares thus
the need to likewise calculate the cost of 500,hence=500*22=10000,therefore the 500 shares sold
will fetch sales residual of=500*24=12000,
Thus allowing Jake to calculate his capital gain/loss as
= (24*500)-(22*500) =2*500=1000, this is capital gain that is required by the law to be included
in the income tax part as part of revenue.
Item No. 6
Jakes cricket bats disposal as deemed to be a disposal that is similarly to other assets hence there
exist the possibility of loss or gain resulting from the disposal an aspect that is deemed to be
either a capital gain or loss which has its relevant tax called Capital Gain Tax, therefore these
crickets capital gain or loss is calculated as;
Capital Gain= Sales Proceeds Less Cost
Crickets Sales Proceeds $900
-
Cost of cricket bats = $2600
Capital Loss/Gain= ($ 1500), this indeed is a loss
The selling of the cricket bats by Jake results in a loss on disposal thus this loss needs to be
netted off from taxes in that financial year or if he has any tax due that we are not aware of.
Item No. 7
Despite the fact that there exist no logbook or any paperwork showing ownership of the vehicle,
Jake is still expected and allowed to claim portion of the expenses he incurred for work purposes.

TAXATION LAW
It is therefore certain that most of the part that of the expense incurred was for work purposes
except 5% that is for private purpose hence we calculate that portion as;
Personal part=5% * 6200 = $ 310
Hence the balance from 6200 will be what Jake will have to claim for the purpose of work thus;
= $ 6200 - $ 310 = $ 5890 is what is to be claimed for tax allowance purpose.
Item 8
Even though Jake does not have the receipts of call he made its required within the law that one
declared these costs rather than declining to declare the cost. He should claim the deduction but
only limited to the percentage of work related calls he made in that financial year. Thus = $1,400
* 60% = $ 840 the figure which Jake is supposes to claim.
Item No. 9
Australian Tax Office recognizes all consultancy expenses that are deemed work related hence
Jake is lawfully allowed to claim this $400 tax agency fee that was incurred for the purpose of
his books of account on matters relating tax.
Item No.10
Jake gross income of 86000 is less than the threshold for medical levy surcharge for singles since
we are told he does not have any health cover. But he qualifies for a medical levy contribution of
2% of his gross $86000 which is added to the tax he will be paying.

TAXATION LAW
Jake Income for Tax
For FY Ending June 2018
$ $
Gross Salary 86000
Income from bank interest earned 100
Unfranked Dividend Paid To Jake 3500
Gain resulting from sales of shares 1000
Gross Income 90,600
Deduction Expenses Made;
Car/Motor vehicle expense 3750
Private Car Expense/Depreciation 5890
Telephone Expenses 840
Agency fee on taxes 400
Total Deduction (10880)
Jake Net Taxable Income 79,720

TAXATION LAW
Negative gearing is a form of financial leverage that is mostly used when one is investing in
property. Negative gearing involves borrowing cash to invest in an income generating asset for
example rental property. The asset bought is unable to generate sufficient income to cover the
loan payments, maintenance costs, interest and depreciation cost in the short term. Eventually the
asset is able to generate income to cover all these cost Blunden (2016.Pg.347). The investor is
able to benefit from these losses. He or She is able to offset the losses against other income
generating sources. This certainly show that the investor will be earning less income, meaning he
or she will have to pay less taxes at the end of the financial year.
With the federal elections just around the corner the Australian Labor party has proposed some
reforms on negative gearing. A limit has been proposed by the party to limit negative gearing to
new housing as of 1st July 2017. This is aimed at leveling the playing field for first time
homeowners competing with investors and improve housing affordability Jericho (2017.Pg.2).
However any property owned before 1st July 2017 is fully immune against these changes.

TAXATION LAW
References;
Atkinson, A.B., Piketty, T. and Saez, E., 2011. Top incomes in the long run of history. Journal of
economic literature, 49(1), pp.3-71.
Balachandran, B., Krishnamurti, C., Theobald, M. and Vidanapathirana, B., 2012. Dividend
reductions, the timing of dividend payments and information content. Journal of Corporate
Finance, 18(5), pp.1232-1247.
Blunden, H., 2016. Discourses around negative gearing of investment properties in Australia.
Housing Studies, 31(3), pp.340-357.
Burman, L.E., 2010. The labyrinth of capital gains tax policy: A guide for the perplexed.
Brookings Institution Press.
Coulton, J.J. and Ruddock, C., 2011. Corporate payout policy in Australia and a test of the life‐
cycle theory. Accounting & Finance, 51(2), pp.381-407.
Feld, L., Ruf, M., Schreiber, U., Todtenhaupt, M. and Voget, J., 2016. Taxing away M&A: The
effect of corporate capital gains taxes on acquisition activity.
Hopkins, B.R., 2011. The law of tax-exempt organizations (Vol. 5). John Wiley & Sons.
Jericho, G., 2017. The latest tax data proves it: negative gearing benefits the rich the most'. The
Guardian, 13.
Lanis, R. and Richardson, G., 2012. Corporate social responsibility and tax aggressiveness: An
empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 31(1), pp.86-108.
Pinto, D., 2011. State taxes. In Australian Taxation Law (pp. 1763-1762). CCH Australia
Limited.

TAXATION LAW
Taylor, G. and Richardson, G., 2014. Incentives for corporate tax planning and reporting:
Empirical evidence from Australia. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 10(1),
pp.1-15.
Woellner, R.H., 2010. Australian taxation law. CCH Australia.