This document provides information on taxation theory, practice, and law. It includes a calculation of net income for a partnership, advice on FBT consequences for an employer, and references for further reading.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head: TAXATION THEORY, PRACTICE AND LAW Taxation theory, Practice and Law Name of the Student: Name of the University: Authors Note:
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
TAXATION THEORY, PRACTICE AND LAW 1 Table of Contents Question 1: Determining the net income for the partnership for the year ended 30 June 2017.2 Question 2: Advising John’s employer on the FBT consequences............................................4 References and Bibliography:....................................................................................................6
TAXATION THEORY, PRACTICE AND LAW 2 Question 1: Determining the net income for the partnership for the year ended 30 June 2017 ParticularsAmount Total sales$1,83,885.0 Total purchases$1,59,323.0 Gross profit$24,562.0 Expenses Car expenses$2,364.0 Electricity bill$1,176.0 Council rates$310.2 Business insurance$1,250.0 Mobile bills$633.6 Union fees$284.0 Account charges ( ANZ Bank)$595.0 Repair expenses$1,490.0 Interest$5,500.0 Depreciation$2,068.9 Total expenses$15,671.7 Earnings before tax$8,890.3 Tax$2,444.8 Income After tax$6,445.5 The above table states the overall net income, which has been generated by the partnership organization during the fiscal year of 2017. The tax calculation has been conducted, as per the ATO rules. The ruling of LCR 2018/D7 Base rate entities and base rate entity passive income is mainly used in deriving the tax rate of the organization to 27.5% (Ato.gov.au 2019). The organization falls under the Small Business Entity Company tax rate group, which is why the overall 27.5% tax rate is used for calculating the tax amount. ParticularsAmountDepreciation value Restaurant freezer $ 1,480.0$192.4 Restaurant refrigeration $ 3,580.0$465.4 Shop fittings structure $ 2,965.0$385.5 Kitchen electrical appliances$$98.0
TAXATION THEORY, PRACTICE AND LAW 3 754.0 Car – Van $ 1,395.0$69.8 Car - SUV $ 6,210.0$310.5 New restaurant freezer $ 3,000.0$547.4 Total Depreciation$2,068.9 The above table relatively derives the overall depreciation value of the organization for the fiscal year of 2017. This calculation is relatively conducted on the basis of ATO rules and regulations, where the depreciation value is calculated separately for each of the organization. Restaurant freezer, Restaurant refrigeration, Shop fittings structure, kitchen electrical appliances, Car – Van, and Car - SUV has been purchased before during 1992. The regulations of ATO directly indicate that the depreciation of assets held before July 1, 2001 can use accelerated depreciation method for calculating the depreciation amount for their assets (Ato.gov.au 2019). Therefore, the depreciation of the above mentioned as a relatively calculated on the basis of accelerated depreciation method. Moreover, the depreciation for new restaurant freezer is calculated on the current depreciation module. ParticularsUseExpenseAmount Van90%1260$1,134.0 SUV60%2050$1,230.0 Car expense$2,364.0 ParticularsUseExpenseAmount Mobile bills90%$704.0$633.6 Electricity bill80%$1,470.0$1,176.0 Council rates60%$517.0$310.2 The above two tables directly indicates over all expenses that is incurred by the organization during the fiscal year of 2017. The evaluation is relatively conducted on the
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
TAXATION THEORY, PRACTICE AND LAW 4 basis of usage of the assets for business purposes, where there is no inclusion conducted for personal use that has been conducted by the business owners. According to the rules of ATO, home and business expenses are relatively different in nature, as expenses conducted on personal measures are not used in business expenses and cannot be linked with the taxes (Ato.gov.au 2019). Question 2: Advising John’s employer on the FBT consequences FBT (Rent for the apartment)Amount FBT consequence (Private school)$ 15,000.00 Rent ('Market Value)$800.00 Employee (Payment of rent)$100.00 FBT (Rent per week)$700.00 FBT consequences (Annualized Rent)$ 36,400.00 Total FBT consequence for John’s employer$ 51,400.00 The above table directly indicates about two different Fringe benefit tax consequences that need to be faced by John’s employer, which are annualized rent and annualized private school expenses. Chapter 10-Housing arrangement, Section-10.5 Taxable value of a housing fringe benefit provided in Australia is used for calculating the FBT consequence for John’s employer (Ato.gov.au 2019). The section directory indicates that the overall expense that is paid by the employer is relatively considered under the fringe benefit tax, as it was discussed in the payment package. From the weekly rent of $800, $700 is paid by the employer, which is calculated as fringe benefit tax. On the other hand, the $100 is not paid by the employer, whichisnotconsideredundertheFBTconsequenceoftheorganization.TheFBT consequence for the annual rent is at $36,400. Moreover, the FBT consequence of child’s school fees at a private school is also evaluated, where the employer has to pay the fringe benefit tax for the employees Child’s School fees. Under Section 65A of the FBTAA, the employer is only liable for deductions
TAXATION THEORY, PRACTICE AND LAW 5 when the education of children employee is conducted overseas (Ato.gov.au 2019). There is no evidence whether the employee is in overseas, which is the main reasons why there is no reduction calculated for the employer. Thus, overall FBT consequence for the employer is mainly calculated at $15,000 for the fiscal year, which comprises of the school fees payment. Hence, the total FBT consequence for John’s employer is mainly at the levels of $51,400.