This document provides information on taxation theory, practice, and law. It discusses the tax liability of individuals and companies, the consequences of GST arrangements, and the calculation of net payable tax. It also includes case studies and references for further reading.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Taxation Theory Practice & Law
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Table of Contents QUESTION 1...................................................................................................................................1 Pablo have to pay Australian tax on any of the salary or not......................................................1 QUESTION 2...................................................................................................................................1 Explanation of the respective outcomes reached by the court on the case of Californian Copper Syndicate Ltd V Harris................................................................................................................1 QUESTON 3....................................................................................................................................2 GST consequences of the arrangement for the companies..........................................................2 QUESTION 4...................................................................................................................................3 Calculation of the net payable tax by All Sports Ltd for the year ending 30th June 2019..........3 REFENRECES................................................................................................................................4
QUESTION 1 Pablo have to pay Australian tax on any of the salary or not Taxation could be defined as the liability of individuals and companies which states that all of them are required to make payment of accurate amount of tax on the income which is generated during the year. Pablo worked in an Australian company for 1 month and received salary of 120000 dollars. The amount was transferred in the Portuguese bank account. The salary which is generated in Australia will be taxable in the country. As Pablo is a non-resident so the tax which will be required to be paid by him will be paid at the non-resident withholding rates for the income received. The tax rate at which non residents pay tax in Australia is 32.5%. It is the minimum rate at which non residents are paying tax in Australia(Gavrilova and Makarov, 2016). The tax which will be paid by Pablo on the income which is generated by Pablo in Australia. It is 32.5% and the calculation of it is as follows: Salary generated by Pablo in Australia =120000 The taxation rate at which amount will be taxable in Australia =37.5% So, the tax will be = 120000 * 37.5% = 45000 The tax which will be paid by Pablo on the salary which is generated in Australia will be 45000 as it is calculated at the rate of non-residents in Australia. If this tax will not be paid by Pablo then it may result in legal actions against him. Apart from this, the salary which will be transferred in the Portuguese Bank Account will be provided after making all the appropriate adjustments for taxation(Kraal, 2016). If the tax will not be deducted then the salary which will be received in bank will be (120000 - 45000) 75000. On the other hand, if the salary is received after deduction of the tax then the amount of tax will be (120000 / 62.5 * 100 = 192000) (192000 - 120000) 72000. It is the amount which will be paid by Pablo on the salary which is generated in Australia but received in Portugal(Sharkey and Murray, 2016). QUESTION 2 Explanation of the respective outcomes reached by the court on the case of Californian Copper Syndicate Ltd V Harris The respective outcome on the case of Californian Copper is concretion of Lord Young. Young concurred that determination of commissioners is right. According to Lord, the case of 1
the enterprise which is selling its property for higher price than the amount which is paid by it for the same and reflecting the price as the part of the capital of it. It is the main liability of all the entities as well as the people to make sure that they are paying the accurate tax on their income so that the possibility of legal action could be ignored.If the rules and regulations will not be complied by the entities then it will result in inappropriate taxation which will leave negative impact upon the functionality of business. Apart from this, it is not the case of the entity which is changing the investment of the capital to the pecuniary advantage. The lord was satisfied with the appellant company which was formed for the purpose of acquiring certain mineral fields or workings. The property was bought for 24000 pounds and the share capital was only less than 6000 pounds. It was analysed from the case that the entity was incorporated in year 1901 in the month of February. It was also the respective outcome that profit which was generated by the company by selling the property was its profit not the realised profit so it will not be taxable. When seller gets the bargained price then the profit is known as realised profit so in case of Californian Copper Syndicate the profit is realised as the seller gets the price which was bargained(Kraal, 2019). QUESTON 3 GST consequences of the arrangement for the companies GST (Goods and Service Tax) is a type of value added tax which is levied on the goods and services that are sold for domestic consumptions. It is paid by buyer but it is remitted to the legal authorities of the country by the entities that are collecting it from the consumers. Surfs Up PL which is a retailer of surfing and water sports equipment and it buys all its goods from Billapong PL which is a large manufacturer of the same. Surfs Up bought 370 surfboards from the producer of them and then returned 14 of them as they were faulty. The consequences related to GST which may take place for both the companies are listed below: All the GST consequences for Billapong P/L are as follows: When the good swill be sold by Billapong P / L in the October Month then the organisation has sold the goods to another organisation which is Surfs Up P / L in the October month and it will include the GST in the liability. It will be for the month of October and it will be required to be paid thereon. 2
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
When the good will be returned by the Surfs Up P / L in the December Month then in this month all the returned surfboards the organisation issued credit note to the Billapong. When the organisation will receive the credit note then the value of GST liability will be reduced for such types of notes from the whole amount payable for the same. All the consequences for GST for Surf Up P / L are as follows: When SURF Up P / L will purchase the goods from Billapong in the October month then it booked the input tax credit on 370 surfboards that are purchased by t and it adjusted the same for the GST liability(Krever, 2020). When the Surf Up P / L will return the faulty surfboards to Billapong then the adjustments that are made for purchasing them will be removed from the output GST liability. QUESTION 4 Calculation of the net payable tax by All Sports Ltd for the year ending 30thJune 2019 Taxation is one of the main liabilities of all the individuals as well as companies and if they will not be paying the accurate amount of tax to the government then it may result in issues for business. It is very important to make payment of tax on the decided rate of government so that the taxation liability could be fulfilled properly. Melbourne Awesome Ltd is selling wide range of cycles and receiving income from different sources(Mikler, Elbra and Murphy- Gregory, 2019). The income on which tax will be required to be paid by it is as follows along with the total tax which will be paid by it: Income from trading = 80000 Franked distribution from public companies = 28000 Unranked distribution from private companies = 25000 Rental income = 5500 Total deductions = 55000 ParticularsAmount Income from trading80000 Franked distribution from public companies28000 Unrankeddistributionfromprivate companies 25000 3
Rental income5500 Franking credits for franked distribution12000 Total income150500 Less franking credits12000 Taxable income138500 Tax @ 30%41550 Net income after tax96950 From the above calculations it has been determined that total tax which will be required to be paid by All Sports Ltd will be around 41550. The after tax income for the organisation will be 96950. If the entity will not pay the appropriate tax then it may result in legal actions against the company. 4
REFENRECES Books and Journals: Gavrilova, I. A. and Makarov, A. D., 2016. Regional economy and taxation: Theory, practice and practical challenges.Экономика и предпринимательство. (8). pp.815-818. Kraal, D., 2016. Australia’s petroleum resource rent tax: Paul Keating, Peter Walsh and other game changers.Griffith Law Review. 25(4). pp.492-524. Kraal, D., 2019. Petroleum industry tax incentives and energy policy implications: A comparison between Australia, Malaysia, Indonesia and Papua New Guinea.Energy Policy. 126. pp.212-222. Krever, R., 2020. A Tax Policy Legacy: Tim Edgar's Contributions to Tax Scholarship and Tax Legislation.Canadian Tax Journal/Revue fiscale Canadienne. 68(2). pp.517-537. Mikler, J., Elbra, A. and Murphy-Gregory, H., 2019. Defending harmful tax practices: mining companies’ responses to the Australian Senate Inquiry into tax avoidance.Australian Journal of Political Science. 54(2). pp.238-254. Sharkey, N. and Murray, I., 2016. Reinventing administrative leadership in Australian taxation: beware the fine balance of social psychological and rule of law principles.Austl. Tax F.. 31. p.63. 5