ProductsLogo
LogoStudy Documents
LogoAI Grader
LogoAI Answer
LogoAI Code Checker
LogoPlagiarism Checker
LogoAI Paraphraser
LogoAI Quiz
LogoAI Detector
PricingBlogAbout Us
logo

Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages: Curriculum and Resources

Verified

Added on  2023/06/04

|8
|2302
|216
AI Summary
This article discusses the curricula and resources used for teaching English to non-English speaking learners. It covers the different modules of the 10362NAT Certificate I of the Spoken and Writing English and the CSWE I curriculum. It also emphasizes the importance of authentic texts, modern technologies, and feedback systems for effective learning.

Contribute Materials

Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your documents today.
Document Page
Running head: TEACHING ENGLISH TO SPEAKERS OF OTHER LANGUAGES
Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages
The Name of the Student:
The Name of the University:
Author Note:

Secure Best Marks with AI Grader

Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Document Page
1TEACHING ENGLISH TO SPEAKERS OF OTHER LANGUAGES
The Different Curricula
The curriculum in 10362NAT Certificate I of the Spoken and Writing English has
been purposefully planned and developed in order to teach English to the non-English
speaking learners. The curriculum is divided into seven modules, one of them is compulsory,
and the other six are elective modules include one written and one spoken text modules. The
purpose of Module A, which is the compulsory module, is to teach the students learning
strategies of basic level. While twenty hours’ time has been allocated for the teaching of
Module A, eighty hours have been allocated for the rest of the modules. The spoken text
elective has six modules namely Modules B, C, D, E, F, and G. Each of these six modules
consists different learning topics, and the speaking section focuses on the listening as well as
speaking skills of the students. The written text elective, on the other hand, has five modules,
namely Modules H, I, J, K, and L. These five modules have cover different learning areas,
and the writing section puts focus on the reading and writing abilities of the students. The
numeracy elective has two modules – Module M and Module N. Each of these two modules
is based on three separate features. While Module B is focused on improving the productive
skills of the students by making them participate in small interactive sessions, Module C
concentrates on enhancing the receptive skills of the learners through small conversations.
The written elective modules are also focused on improving the productive and receptive
skills of the learners. Therefore, it can be said that obtaining the Certificate I in Spoken and
Written English requires the students to succeed in the completion of these seven modules.
The CSWE I curriculum is focused on addressing the general requirements of the
learners. The purpose of the modules of this curriculum is to focus on four basic skills of
learners, such as listening, speaking, reading, and writing. The modules have been set in way
that they attract the interests of the learners and focus to improve a specific skill of the
Document Page
2TEACHING ENGLISH TO SPEAKERS OF OTHER LANGUAGES
learners. As opined by De Silva and Hood (2009), the diverse objectives of the curriculum
should align with the basic needs of the students. Nonetheless, the diverse curriculum of these
modules may not always with all the needs of the students, as each person is unique in his
own way and also the students have different backgrounds of education and language.
Furthermore, these modules of English learning curriculum are designed to cover an
extensive range of knowledge and topics, such as community, health, education, transport,
and law, that the students, who are willing to stay and settle in Australia, must procure. The
usefulness of these topics is that they help the learners to increase their English vocabulary
and make it easier for them to take part in conversations with English speaking persons.
Nevertheless, the teachers need to verify that the chosen topics are in accordance with the
skills of the learners that need to be developed and improved. In addition to this, the teachers
should also be provided with the options to allocate further tools based on their individual
requirements of their own distinct teaching areas (Ansary & Babaii, 2002). However, this
process does not clarify whether the topics chose by the teachers would interest the students
and match their specific needs. Therefore, the teachers should discuss with the students about
their interests and needs before selecting the topics. According to De Silva and Hood (2009),
the teachers must select the areas, which they would cover in their teaching, according to the
needs and interests of the students.
On this context, it should be mentioned that each student is unique, and therefore has
different set of skills and needs. Thereafter, it is possible that the topics of the curriculum do
not cover all the needs of each student. As observed by Kumaravadivelu (2006), the
communication between the learners and teachers are crucial. The researcher further pointed
out that, in order to address the needs of the students, the teachers could suggest various
learning activities that make the students attentive and motivated. As these students have less
confidence and are detached from learning process, it is required from the teachers to
Document Page
3TEACHING ENGLISH TO SPEAKERS OF OTHER LANGUAGES
innovate learning activities like different games and role-plays could attract the students and
engage them into interactions (Kumaravadivelu, 2006).
While some learners of this program have completed college courses, some may just
have graduated from high school. Therefore, this program has the possibility of not being
able to cover these mixed abilities and needs of the students, as a consequence, this turns into
a challenge for the teachers. In order to avoid this challenging situation, it can be suggested
that the teachers should keep this mixed requirements in mind while selecting the topics and
designing the learning activities, and keep them simple and easy for the understanding of
every student. The teachers also need to help and support the students to complete these
activities. On this context, De Silva and Feez (2012) suggest that scaffolding should be
provided to the students, who need it, for the betterment of their learning experience and
outcome. In order to avoid the demotivation of the students due to their self-doubt, the
teachers are recommended to always encourage and motivate the students to try, and make
them less worried about their mistakes (Marr, Helme & Tout, 2003).
The numeracy level of the learners in the same group could be different. Therefore,
the teachers should be aware of what the students are learning in the math. As the informal
numeracy differs with the formal class (Baker & Rhodes, 2007), the teachers must
acknowledge the experiences of the students.
Various Resources and Texts
Developing and selecting the resources and texts for teaching is a crucial process. As
identified by Thornbury (1999), E-factors and A-factors are the pedagogical principles, which
the teachers of foreign languages must consider while evaluating the resources and texts
before as well as after the teaching. The E-factors include efficacy, economy, and easiness,
and the A-factors are interests, age, expectations, and the size of group.

Paraphrase This Document

Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Document Page
4TEACHING ENGLISH TO SPEAKERS OF OTHER LANGUAGES
The purpose of the AEMP is to go beyond developing reading, speaking, writing, and
numerical capabilities. According to Black and Yasukawa (2010), a new strategy must be
developed, which the teachers could consider as social capital, as it is significant for the non-
English speaking learners. Thereafter, the teachers must put emphasis on the students’ ways
of expressing themselves, interacting, and the level of trust among them. On this context, the
activity of role-playing could be helpful for the students. An addition that I can make to the
Module G that is about understanding and recognising the Australian money through a role-
playing activity between a bank employee and a customer on how to deposit money. This
would benefit the students as they could employ this in real life to interact with each other.
It is necessary to use authentic texts, as it could benefit the students in terms of using
the newly learned language in real life, being exposed to different cultures, and enhancing
their learnings (Tomlinson, 2013). Various authentic texts, such as printed and audio-visual
materials, can be utilised in classrooms. On this context, I can recommend a change in
Module E that focuses on the recognition of general visual symbols by bringing the common
traffic signs in the classroom. By bringing these traffic signs, which the students see everyday
in the streets of this country, the students could be taught to recognise the traffic signals and
understand the rules. It is important to mention that in the use of the authentic materials, it is
evident that hiding sexism is not always possible. Therefore, as there are nine female students
in this class, the teachers need to be conscious while using the authentic materials (Gary,
2002).
Using the modern technologies could benefit the students, and therefore, there is a
demand for technological use in the classroom. It provides the students the opportunity to
access the study materials and activities whenever they want, and communicate with persons
living in distant places, as they are exposed to languages from multimodal representation
(Tomlinson, 2013). Therefore, to make an inclusion in the Module A, which is related to
Document Page
5TEACHING ENGLISH TO SPEAKERS OF OTHER LANGUAGES
reading and understanding time, I can prepare a video using clocks to demonstrate the
students how to understand the time. The global texts could also be favourable for the
learnings of the students (Tomlinson, 2012). A successful teacher always considers the needs
and preferences of the students to ensure the best possible learning experience and outcome
for them (Feez, 1998). As some students could be looking for employment, I would design
reading text that has instructions on how to talk in the workplace.
As the teachers keep engaged in everyday management of the classrooms, the rate of
submission of the assignments is also crucial (Feez, 1998). In cases where the learning
outcomes do not meet the expectations of the students or the materials become too easy for
them, the teachers are required to make change and adapt to new materials according to the
levels of needs of the students. Interview, questionnaires, and surveys are significant in the
process of learning (Huhta et al., 2013). Therefore, I would suggest maintaining a regular
feedback system from the students on the difficulty level that they face and interest that they
feel to do the activities. This would inform whether the activities were sufficient for the
students’ needs and interest.
Document Page
6TEACHING ENGLISH TO SPEAKERS OF OTHER LANGUAGES
References
Baker, D., & Rhodes, V. (2007). Making use of learners’ funds of knowledge for mathematics
and numeracy: Improving teaching and learning of mathematics and numeracy in
adult education. Research Report, Maths4Life Project.
Black, S., & Yasukawa, K. (2010). Time for national renewal: Australian adult literacy and
numeracy as ‘foundation skills’. Literacy and Numeracy Studies, 18, 43-57.
De Silva, J. H., & Feez, S. (2012). Text-based literacy education: Programming and
methodology. Putney, NSW: Phoenix Education.
De Silva, J. H., & Hood, S. (2009). English for community membership: Planning for actual
and potential needs. In Belcher, D. (Ed.), English for specific purposes in theory and
practice (pp. 244-263). Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
Feez, S. (1998). Text-based Syllabus design. Sydney: National Centre for English Language
Teaching and Research, Sydney, NSW.
Gray, J. (2002). The global coursebook in English Language Teaching. In D. Block & C.
Cameron (Eds.), Globalization and language teaching (pp. 151-67). London & New
York: Roultedge.
Huhta, M., Vogt, K., Johnson, E., & Tulkki, H. (2013). Needs analysis and the CEF
professional profits in ESP. In D. R. Hall (Eds.), Needs analysis for language course
design: A holistic approach to ESP (pp. 9-32). Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge.
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). TESOL Methods: Changing tracks, challenging trends. TESOL
Quarterly, 40, 59-81.
Marr, B. et al. (2003). Re-thinking assessment: Strategies for holistic adult numeracy
assessment. Melbourne: Language Australia. Section 1, Initial assessment.

Secure Best Marks with AI Grader

Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Document Page
7TEACHING ENGLISH TO SPEAKERS OF OTHER LANGUAGES
Thornbury, S. (1999). How to teach grammar. Harlow: Longman.
Tomlinson, B. (2013). Materials development. In A. Burns & J. Richards (Eds.), The
Cambridge guide to pedagogy and practice in second language teaching (pp. 269-
278). New York: Cambridge University Press.
1 out of 8
[object Object]

Your All-in-One AI-Powered Toolkit for Academic Success.

Available 24*7 on WhatsApp / Email

[object Object]