Characteristics of Team Dynamics: Understanding DiSC Profiles and Maximizing Team Effectiveness
VerifiedAdded on 2023/04/25
|18
|1086
|104
Presentation
AI Summary
In this ppt slide we will discuss about characteristics of team dynamics and below are the summaries point:-
The DiSC personality test is introduced as a tool for understanding team dynamics and individual traits.
The strengths of team members are identified based on their DiSC profiles, with a majority having an "I" style.
Challenges the team may face include clashing personalities, differing work styles, and the need for role clarification.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
CHARACTERISTICS OF
TEAM DYNAMICS
Name of the students:
Name of the Institution:
Roll No:
Date of Submission:
TEAM DYNAMICS
Name of the students:
Name of the Institution:
Roll No:
Date of Submission:
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
CONTENTS
Title
1. Introduction
2. Strengths of Team Members
3. Challenges Team May Encounter
4. Steps to Maximize Effectiveness of the
Team
5. Conclusion
6. References
Page No
1,2
3,4,5, 6
7,8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14
15
16
Title
1. Introduction
2. Strengths of Team Members
3. Challenges Team May Encounter
4. Steps to Maximize Effectiveness of the
Team
5. Conclusion
6. References
Page No
1,2
3,4,5, 6
7,8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14
15
16
INTRODUCTION
DiSC- Personality test
Generally used for managers
Created by Walter Vernon
Clarke
Based on the work of Dr
William Moulton Marston, who
was an industrial psychologist
and a lawyer (Koffel, Kramer,
Arbisi, Erbes, Kaler and
Polusny, 2016) .
Created in 1965.
DiSC- Personality test
Generally used for managers
Created by Walter Vernon
Clarke
Based on the work of Dr
William Moulton Marston, who
was an industrial psychologist
and a lawyer (Koffel, Kramer,
Arbisi, Erbes, Kaler and
Polusny, 2016) .
Created in 1965.
INTRODUCTION
DIMENSIONS OF DISC D- Dominance, Direct,
Decisive, lead not follow,
high self-confidence,
risk-takers and problem-
solvers(Koffel,
Kramer, Arbisi, Erbes,
Kaler
and Polusny, 2016).
I- Influence, enthusiastic,
optimistic, talkative,
persuasive, impulsive
and emotional.
S- Steady, stable,
predictable, even-
tempered, sympathetic
and generous.
C- Conscientiousness,
accurate, precise, detail-
oriented, analytical and
systematic thinkers
(Crowe, 2015).
DIMENSIONS OF DISC D- Dominance, Direct,
Decisive, lead not follow,
high self-confidence,
risk-takers and problem-
solvers(Koffel,
Kramer, Arbisi, Erbes,
Kaler
and Polusny, 2016).
I- Influence, enthusiastic,
optimistic, talkative,
persuasive, impulsive
and emotional.
S- Steady, stable,
predictable, even-
tempered, sympathetic
and generous.
C- Conscientiousness,
accurate, precise, detail-
oriented, analytical and
systematic thinkers
(Crowe, 2015).
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
STRENGHTS OF TEAM MEMBERS
2 team members- iD style
1 team member- I style
1 team member- C style
1 team member- SC style
1 team member- iS style
2 team members- iD style
1 team member- I style
1 team member- C style
1 team member- SC style
1 team member- iS style
STRENGHTS OF
TEAM MEMBERS
Majority have I style.
Participative managers and
instinctive communicators.
Work together as a whole.
Give encouragement to one
another (Crowe, 2015).
Positive attitudes would
ensure that work would get
done.
TEAM MEMBERS
Majority have I style.
Participative managers and
instinctive communicators.
Work together as a whole.
Give encouragement to one
another (Crowe, 2015).
Positive attitudes would
ensure that work would get
done.
STRENGHTS OF
TEAM MEMBERS
2 members in the team have
the S trait.
Stable and Predictable
Good at Multi-tasking
Ensure all team members
complete tasks they have
been assigned (Hancock,
2016).
TEAM MEMBERS
2 members in the team have
the S trait.
Stable and Predictable
Good at Multi-tasking
Ensure all team members
complete tasks they have
been assigned (Hancock,
2016).
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
STRENGHTS OF
TEAM MEMBERS
Other Dominant personality- C
Type
Analytical, Precise and detail-
oriented
Research would be done
accurately
Very even-tempered
(Poulopoulos,
Vassilakis, Antoniou, Lepouras
, Theodoropoulos and Wallace,
2018).
TEAM MEMBERS
Other Dominant personality- C
Type
Analytical, Precise and detail-
oriented
Research would be done
accurately
Very even-tempered
(Poulopoulos,
Vassilakis, Antoniou, Lepouras
, Theodoropoulos and Wallace,
2018).
CHALLENGES
TEAM MAY FACE
Medley of opposing
personalities
Team might not get along.
In a practical setting, under
intense pressure, team might
start to disintegrate
(Hancock, 2016).
TEAM MAY FACE
Medley of opposing
personalities
Team might not get along.
In a practical setting, under
intense pressure, team might
start to disintegrate
(Hancock, 2016).
CHALLENGES
TEAM MAY FACE
Some members- detail-
oriented, others are not.
Many members-like
unpredictability, while other
members would not (Kim and
Yang, 2016).
Create tensions in the team.
Opposing and clashing
personalities would be the
main challenge.
TEAM MAY FACE
Some members- detail-
oriented, others are not.
Many members-like
unpredictability, while other
members would not (Kim and
Yang, 2016).
Create tensions in the team.
Opposing and clashing
personalities would be the
main challenge.
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
CHALLENGES
TEAM MAY FACE
Figuring out the role in the
team according to the style.
Efficient understanding of the
types and individual is
required.
Time-consuming and
challenging
(Poulopoulos, Vassilakis, Anto
niou, Lepouras, Theodoropoul
os and Wallace, 2018).
TEAM MAY FACE
Figuring out the role in the
team according to the style.
Efficient understanding of the
types and individual is
required.
Time-consuming and
challenging
(Poulopoulos, Vassilakis, Anto
niou, Lepouras, Theodoropoul
os and Wallace, 2018).
CHALLENGES TEAM MAY FACE
Final challenge-
domination of a
personality type.
Potential grudges
could result from
lack of conflict
resolution (Kim and
Yang, 2016).
Morale of the team
would be reduced to
a large extent.
Final challenge-
domination of a
personality type.
Potential grudges
could result from
lack of conflict
resolution (Kim and
Yang, 2016).
Morale of the team
would be reduced to
a large extent.
STEPS TO MAXIMIZE
EFFECTIVENESS OF
TEAM
First step- iD is leader.
D type personality- would
not do well in non-
leadership roles, since
dominant leader
(Davenport, 2018).
EFFECTIVENESS OF
TEAM
First step- iD is leader.
D type personality- would
not do well in non-
leadership roles, since
dominant leader
(Davenport, 2018).
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
STEPS TO MAXIMIZE
EFFECTIVENESS OF TEAM
C Personality should be away from the
humdrum and noise.
In charge of fact-checking and research.
Should be made to be in the brainstorming
and creative session (Chen, Tsai and Chen,
2016).
EFFECTIVENESS OF TEAM
C Personality should be away from the
humdrum and noise.
In charge of fact-checking and research.
Should be made to be in the brainstorming
and creative session (Chen, Tsai and Chen,
2016).
STEPS TO MAXIMIZE
EFFECTIVENESS OF TEAM
S personality-
conflicts are
resolved
Team is able to
function smoothly.
Promoting harmony.
Building team
morale in the team
to get the team to
succeed
(Denphaisarn,
2014).
EFFECTIVENESS OF TEAM
S personality-
conflicts are
resolved
Team is able to
function smoothly.
Promoting harmony.
Building team
morale in the team
to get the team to
succeed
(Denphaisarn,
2014).
STEPS TO MAXIMIZE
EFFECTIVENESS OF TEAM
Each member should
have a role that is
according to their
personalities.
This would ensure
that the individuals
would be happy with
their jobs, which also
means they'll be
good at their jobs
(Davenport, 2018).
Ensures minimum
conflict.
EFFECTIVENESS OF TEAM
Each member should
have a role that is
according to their
personalities.
This would ensure
that the individuals
would be happy with
their jobs, which also
means they'll be
good at their jobs
(Davenport, 2018).
Ensures minimum
conflict.
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
CONCLUSION
Majority of the group- I traits
2 members each- C and S traits.
Balance out negative aspects of
each trait.
If not managed properly-harmful
to the team.
Majority of the group- I traits
2 members each- C and S traits.
Balance out negative aspects of
each trait.
If not managed properly-harmful
to the team.
REFERENCES
Chen, T.Y., Tsai, M.C. and Chen, Y.M., 2016. A user’s personality prediction
approach by mining network interaction behaviors on Facebook. Online
Information Review, 40(7), pp.913-937.
Crowe, C., 2015. Using personality profiles for team management. In
Practice, 37(2), p.99.
Davenport, L., 2018. Home Sales Success and Personality Types: Is There a
Connection?. Journal of Real Estate Practice and Education, 21(1), pp.29-57.
Denphaisarn, N., 2014. A new framework for e-learning using learning style and
personality. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research, 13(1),
pp.145-159.
Hancock, D., 2016. To test or not to test: Assessing personality traits. Practice
Management, 26(5), pp.23-25.
Kim, S. and Yang, S., 2016. Childcare teachers' job satisfaction: Effects of
personality, conflict-handling, and organizational characteristics. Social Behavior
and Personality: an international journal, 44(2), pp.177-184.
Koffel, E., Kramer, M.D., Arbisi, P.A., Erbes, C.R., Kaler, M. and Polusny, M.A.,
2016. Personality traits and combat exposure as predictors of psychopathology
over time. Psychological medicine, 46(1), pp.209-220.
Poulopoulos, V., Vassilakis, C., Antoniou, A., Lepouras, G., Theodoropoulos, A. and
Wallace, M., 2018. The Personality of the Influencers, the Characteristics of
Qualitative Discussions and Their Analysis for Recommendations to Cultural
Institutions. Heritage, 1(2), pp.239-253.
Chen, T.Y., Tsai, M.C. and Chen, Y.M., 2016. A user’s personality prediction
approach by mining network interaction behaviors on Facebook. Online
Information Review, 40(7), pp.913-937.
Crowe, C., 2015. Using personality profiles for team management. In
Practice, 37(2), p.99.
Davenport, L., 2018. Home Sales Success and Personality Types: Is There a
Connection?. Journal of Real Estate Practice and Education, 21(1), pp.29-57.
Denphaisarn, N., 2014. A new framework for e-learning using learning style and
personality. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research, 13(1),
pp.145-159.
Hancock, D., 2016. To test or not to test: Assessing personality traits. Practice
Management, 26(5), pp.23-25.
Kim, S. and Yang, S., 2016. Childcare teachers' job satisfaction: Effects of
personality, conflict-handling, and organizational characteristics. Social Behavior
and Personality: an international journal, 44(2), pp.177-184.
Koffel, E., Kramer, M.D., Arbisi, P.A., Erbes, C.R., Kaler, M. and Polusny, M.A.,
2016. Personality traits and combat exposure as predictors of psychopathology
over time. Psychological medicine, 46(1), pp.209-220.
Poulopoulos, V., Vassilakis, C., Antoniou, A., Lepouras, G., Theodoropoulos, A. and
Wallace, M., 2018. The Personality of the Influencers, the Characteristics of
Qualitative Discussions and Their Analysis for Recommendations to Cultural
Institutions. Heritage, 1(2), pp.239-253.
1 out of 18
Your All-in-One AI-Powered Toolkit for Academic Success.
+13062052269
info@desklib.com
Available 24*7 on WhatsApp / Email
Unlock your academic potential
© 2024 | Zucol Services PVT LTD | All rights reserved.