Case Study: The Cultural Impact of Digital Tech on Children
VerifiedAdded on 2023/06/11
|8
|2268
|459
Case Study
AI Summary
This case study explores the impact of digital technologies on children aged 8-18, addressing the question of whether restrictions on technology use are justifiable. It examines how digital technologies, including mobile phones, social media, and video games, have transformed youth culture. The s...

The Use of Technology: A Case Study of Children
The Use of Technology: A Case Study of Children
By (name)
Student Number
Faculty
Professor (tutor)
Name of school (university)
Australia
Date
The Use of Technology: A Case Study of Children
By (name)
Student Number
Faculty
Professor (tutor)
Name of school (university)
Australia
Date
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser

The Use of Technology: A Case Study of Children
Introduction
For quite some time, the question as to whether to expose children and young people to the
usage of digital technologies has raised several concerns. However, there has almost been
none to give a precise answer for the same question and come up with a sufficient evidence to
support their arguments. While many of the scholars and researchers have been giving a
somewhat dangling evidence on why they have opted to proposition or opposition, some have
tried to come up with good explanations as to why they stand for their option. Children are
one of the most vulnerable creatures because they can easily be lured or influenced. That is
evident from the prevailing of adverts directed to children. They tend to be more successful
than those directed to the adults. As a result, therefore, that is an implication that the use of
both media and digital technologies may have adverse effects to children if they are not
controlled because children are more receptive than the adults.
However, other schools of thought argue that exposure of children to the use of digital
technologies is beneficial in that the children grow with modern technology in them. As a
Result, they are able to become innovators and inventors in the nearby future. They also
argue that modern technology helped children grow with an open mind and are able to think
for themselves and provide solutions for the problems facing the world. This paper is focused
on answering the question as to whether children should have restrictions on the use of
technology. It is meant to show how the use of digital technologies has changed the culture of
children.
Is technology restriction justifiable? Why?
The best answer to this question can be arrived at by looking at a specific age group to
determine what it means for children and young people. For the purpose of this study, the age
group regarded as being children is the young people from the age of 8 years to 18 years and
Introduction
For quite some time, the question as to whether to expose children and young people to the
usage of digital technologies has raised several concerns. However, there has almost been
none to give a precise answer for the same question and come up with a sufficient evidence to
support their arguments. While many of the scholars and researchers have been giving a
somewhat dangling evidence on why they have opted to proposition or opposition, some have
tried to come up with good explanations as to why they stand for their option. Children are
one of the most vulnerable creatures because they can easily be lured or influenced. That is
evident from the prevailing of adverts directed to children. They tend to be more successful
than those directed to the adults. As a result, therefore, that is an implication that the use of
both media and digital technologies may have adverse effects to children if they are not
controlled because children are more receptive than the adults.
However, other schools of thought argue that exposure of children to the use of digital
technologies is beneficial in that the children grow with modern technology in them. As a
Result, they are able to become innovators and inventors in the nearby future. They also
argue that modern technology helped children grow with an open mind and are able to think
for themselves and provide solutions for the problems facing the world. This paper is focused
on answering the question as to whether children should have restrictions on the use of
technology. It is meant to show how the use of digital technologies has changed the culture of
children.
Is technology restriction justifiable? Why?
The best answer to this question can be arrived at by looking at a specific age group to
determine what it means for children and young people. For the purpose of this study, the age
group regarded as being children is the young people from the age of 8 years to 18 years and

The Use of Technology: A Case Study of Children
data will be acquired from previous relevant researchers. Ask why this group was found
relevant? Children within this age are now beginning to realize and know things. Within this
age, less is known to them and thus they are absorbing a lot of content (Cappa, 2014).
Children within this age are the ones that are prone to influence since it’s a time they are
beginning to get to know how things work. They are easy to influence and technology may
easily have impacts on them. Contrary to the adult or more aged population, they are
constantly absorbing information on a daily basis thereby proving to be more prone to change
and influence than any other population segment (Rudžionis, 2013). Another imperative
consideration to make is what type of technology the study will choose. In the modern day
world, there are several technology outlets ranging from mobile phones, computers, social
media, mainstream media among others. The study has opted to explore technology in terms
of use of mobile phones, consumption of mainstream media content, the use of social media
and virtual connectivity as well as the use of computers and its related provisions such as
video gaming among others.
In giving a convincing answer as to whether these children should have restrictions placed
upon them for the use of these technologies, it is wise to look at what the possible impacts of
the technology used to these children might be. For instance, it has been argued that
technology used by these children has led to reduced activity of children. Children are
spending most of their time in digital technologies leaving very little time for concentration in
other chores. These children are sitting glued to TV programs for long hours to an extent that
they have forgotten that there are other duties that can be taken. This aspect has made our
young people very lazy as they are not ready to do anything else other than sitting and
watching TV programs (Anderson, 2016). This fact has an impact on general productivity
since the next generation is at risk of reduced performance due to a negative attitude towards
work. These children have been hard to convince that that consumption of digital
data will be acquired from previous relevant researchers. Ask why this group was found
relevant? Children within this age are now beginning to realize and know things. Within this
age, less is known to them and thus they are absorbing a lot of content (Cappa, 2014).
Children within this age are the ones that are prone to influence since it’s a time they are
beginning to get to know how things work. They are easy to influence and technology may
easily have impacts on them. Contrary to the adult or more aged population, they are
constantly absorbing information on a daily basis thereby proving to be more prone to change
and influence than any other population segment (Rudžionis, 2013). Another imperative
consideration to make is what type of technology the study will choose. In the modern day
world, there are several technology outlets ranging from mobile phones, computers, social
media, mainstream media among others. The study has opted to explore technology in terms
of use of mobile phones, consumption of mainstream media content, the use of social media
and virtual connectivity as well as the use of computers and its related provisions such as
video gaming among others.
In giving a convincing answer as to whether these children should have restrictions placed
upon them for the use of these technologies, it is wise to look at what the possible impacts of
the technology used to these children might be. For instance, it has been argued that
technology used by these children has led to reduced activity of children. Children are
spending most of their time in digital technologies leaving very little time for concentration in
other chores. These children are sitting glued to TV programs for long hours to an extent that
they have forgotten that there are other duties that can be taken. This aspect has made our
young people very lazy as they are not ready to do anything else other than sitting and
watching TV programs (Anderson, 2016). This fact has an impact on general productivity
since the next generation is at risk of reduced performance due to a negative attitude towards
work. These children have been hard to convince that that consumption of digital
⊘ This is a preview!⊘
Do you want full access?
Subscribe today to unlock all pages.

Trusted by 1+ million students worldwide

The Use of Technology: A Case Study of Children
technologies alone without consolidation with other ordinary duties may not be helpful.
While their guardians have tried to take all corrective measures, they have proven almost
unhelpful since the use of modern digital technologies is quite addictive. Spending most of
their time consuming media content means that they also have little or no time to live with
their patents and get instilled into them good behaviors and ways of living (Serpell, 2016).
These children grow up to be antisocial and focused on their own issues ignoring the
presence of the rest of the population. That implies that children baked by the use of
technology outlets grow to be less useful in the contemporary world because of the behaviors
borrowed from the content they consume.
Exposure of these children to modern digital technologies has also brought about behavior
change towards immorality. Some media houses have poor program line up where adult
programs are run even during the day. Consumption of these adult programs by children has
been held responsible for the bad behaviors being exhibited by most of the children.
According to a research that was carried out by (Diebolt, 2014) concerning the nature of
children behavior and consumption of media content, it was found that the behavior of
children has changed over a period of time. Children, as a result of being exposed to adult
programs, have begun exhibiting behaviors of sexual immorality, something that has
negatively affected the society (Becker, 2015). Some few years ago when technology had not
percolated many parts of the world, children could grow with moral values but in the current
society, these morals have been corrupted.
The use of social media and virtual connectivity has also proved to have adverse effects on
children. Children have grown up to be less productive people because of using most of the
time spend chatting and getting new friends. These children have believed in virtual rather
than physical and factual ties (Aylward, 2016). They have opted for making online friends as
opposed to real physical friends who can be talked to and consulted in several matters. That
technologies alone without consolidation with other ordinary duties may not be helpful.
While their guardians have tried to take all corrective measures, they have proven almost
unhelpful since the use of modern digital technologies is quite addictive. Spending most of
their time consuming media content means that they also have little or no time to live with
their patents and get instilled into them good behaviors and ways of living (Serpell, 2016).
These children grow up to be antisocial and focused on their own issues ignoring the
presence of the rest of the population. That implies that children baked by the use of
technology outlets grow to be less useful in the contemporary world because of the behaviors
borrowed from the content they consume.
Exposure of these children to modern digital technologies has also brought about behavior
change towards immorality. Some media houses have poor program line up where adult
programs are run even during the day. Consumption of these adult programs by children has
been held responsible for the bad behaviors being exhibited by most of the children.
According to a research that was carried out by (Diebolt, 2014) concerning the nature of
children behavior and consumption of media content, it was found that the behavior of
children has changed over a period of time. Children, as a result of being exposed to adult
programs, have begun exhibiting behaviors of sexual immorality, something that has
negatively affected the society (Becker, 2015). Some few years ago when technology had not
percolated many parts of the world, children could grow with moral values but in the current
society, these morals have been corrupted.
The use of social media and virtual connectivity has also proved to have adverse effects on
children. Children have grown up to be less productive people because of using most of the
time spend chatting and getting new friends. These children have believed in virtual rather
than physical and factual ties (Aylward, 2016). They have opted for making online friends as
opposed to real physical friends who can be talked to and consulted in several matters. That
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser

The Use of Technology: A Case Study of Children
has made these children less friendly to people around them, even their parents. Spending a
lot of time on social media has brought about less concentration in studies. Children who
were expected to maneuver in academics and probably become useful people later in their
lives have had their dreams killed by their social media use (Campbell, 2016). Instead of
setting enough time for studies at home, they opt for social media until they can no longer
excel in academics (Copley, 2016). Even in the class, they are not attentive to what they are
being taught but are just there waiting for studying time to come to an end so that they can go
back home and get to social media. The same applies to video gaming where they have
nothing else in mind other than playing games.
The main significant thing that has led to behavior change for these children is that most of
the digital platforms have content that is not legislated. Digital platforms have content that
can be retrieved any time of the day including sexual arousing programs such as porn,
something that has negatively influenced their behavior (Gonczol, 2016). It is due to this
reason, therefore, that having restrictions placed upon these children for technology use is
justifiable. It has been evident that the use of technology by these children has a lot of
adverse effects that threaten the usefulness of these children in future. Restrictions, such as
supervision on which content is consumed are justifiable (Windschitl, 2017). Children should
be allowed to majorly consume content from the mainstream media because in most of the
times the content producers are professionals who adhere to certain stipulated codes of ethics
and thus accountable for what they display. Social media, as opposed to mainstream media,
has amateur content producers who distribute any content without regarding audience
segmentation or applying age restrictions (Crough, 2014). Media outlets should be stopped
from showing adult programs during the day. Again, these children should be limited in terms
of what technological outlets they are using. These should be narrowed down to only those
that are not harmful to them.
has made these children less friendly to people around them, even their parents. Spending a
lot of time on social media has brought about less concentration in studies. Children who
were expected to maneuver in academics and probably become useful people later in their
lives have had their dreams killed by their social media use (Campbell, 2016). Instead of
setting enough time for studies at home, they opt for social media until they can no longer
excel in academics (Copley, 2016). Even in the class, they are not attentive to what they are
being taught but are just there waiting for studying time to come to an end so that they can go
back home and get to social media. The same applies to video gaming where they have
nothing else in mind other than playing games.
The main significant thing that has led to behavior change for these children is that most of
the digital platforms have content that is not legislated. Digital platforms have content that
can be retrieved any time of the day including sexual arousing programs such as porn,
something that has negatively influenced their behavior (Gonczol, 2016). It is due to this
reason, therefore, that having restrictions placed upon these children for technology use is
justifiable. It has been evident that the use of technology by these children has a lot of
adverse effects that threaten the usefulness of these children in future. Restrictions, such as
supervision on which content is consumed are justifiable (Windschitl, 2017). Children should
be allowed to majorly consume content from the mainstream media because in most of the
times the content producers are professionals who adhere to certain stipulated codes of ethics
and thus accountable for what they display. Social media, as opposed to mainstream media,
has amateur content producers who distribute any content without regarding audience
segmentation or applying age restrictions (Crough, 2014). Media outlets should be stopped
from showing adult programs during the day. Again, these children should be limited in terms
of what technological outlets they are using. These should be narrowed down to only those
that are not harmful to them.

The Use of Technology: A Case Study of Children
Conclusion
It is indisputable fact that the use of technology for children has proven to have very adverse
effects. They are turning out to be unproductive people. The hopes that the world is going to
have useful people tomorrow is slowly escaping as children continue being exposed to the
use of technology. They have spent a lot of time engaging in unhelpful activities and
consuming unregulated content that has negatively affected them. They have become
immoral and are not embracing what used to be regarded as a code of conduct and societal
ethics due to the diverse content they are consuming on daily basis. It, therefore, becomes
imperative to put restrictions on the use of technology for these children because if what’s
happening persists, there is a threat that there will be none to rely on in the nearby future.
Conclusion
It is indisputable fact that the use of technology for children has proven to have very adverse
effects. They are turning out to be unproductive people. The hopes that the world is going to
have useful people tomorrow is slowly escaping as children continue being exposed to the
use of technology. They have spent a lot of time engaging in unhelpful activities and
consuming unregulated content that has negatively affected them. They have become
immoral and are not embracing what used to be regarded as a code of conduct and societal
ethics due to the diverse content they are consuming on daily basis. It, therefore, becomes
imperative to put restrictions on the use of technology for these children because if what’s
happening persists, there is a threat that there will be none to rely on in the nearby future.
⊘ This is a preview!⊘
Do you want full access?
Subscribe today to unlock all pages.

Trusted by 1+ million students worldwide

The Use of Technology: A Case Study of Children
References
Anderson, T., 2016. Tweens and their in-betweens: giving voice to young people when
exploring emerging information practices associated with smart devices. An
international electronic journal, 45(76), pp. 43-52.
Aylward, D., 2016. The information and support needs of primary caregivers of premature
and/or medically complex infants upon discharge from the neonatal intensive care
unit. The University of Ottawa, 6(7), pp. 30-41.
Becker, H., 2015. Who's wired and who's not: Children's access to and use of computer
technology. The future of children, 32(6), pp. 44-56.
Campbell, P., 2016. A review of evidence on practices for teaching young children to use
assistive technology devices. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 3(5), pp.
32-54.
Cappa, P., 2014. Development of a Computerized Equipment Management Program at
Children's Hospital. Journal of Clinical Engineering–November/December, 56(7), pp.
67-82.
Copley, J., 2016. Barriers to the use of assistive technology for children with multiple
disabilities. Occupational Therapy International, 7(7), pp. 54-76.
Crough, G., 2014. Visible and Invisible: Aboriginal people in the economy of Northern
Australia. The Australian National University, North Australia Research Unit, 4(76),
pp. 54-71.
Diebold, C., 2014. Did gender-bias matter in the quantity-quality trade-off in 19th century
France. Lund Papers in Economic History, 6(7), pp. 67-74.
References
Anderson, T., 2016. Tweens and their in-betweens: giving voice to young people when
exploring emerging information practices associated with smart devices. An
international electronic journal, 45(76), pp. 43-52.
Aylward, D., 2016. The information and support needs of primary caregivers of premature
and/or medically complex infants upon discharge from the neonatal intensive care
unit. The University of Ottawa, 6(7), pp. 30-41.
Becker, H., 2015. Who's wired and who's not: Children's access to and use of computer
technology. The future of children, 32(6), pp. 44-56.
Campbell, P., 2016. A review of evidence on practices for teaching young children to use
assistive technology devices. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 3(5), pp.
32-54.
Cappa, P., 2014. Development of a Computerized Equipment Management Program at
Children's Hospital. Journal of Clinical Engineering–November/December, 56(7), pp.
67-82.
Copley, J., 2016. Barriers to the use of assistive technology for children with multiple
disabilities. Occupational Therapy International, 7(7), pp. 54-76.
Crough, G., 2014. Visible and Invisible: Aboriginal people in the economy of Northern
Australia. The Australian National University, North Australia Research Unit, 4(76),
pp. 54-71.
Diebold, C., 2014. Did gender-bias matter in the quantity-quality trade-off in 19th century
France. Lund Papers in Economic History, 6(7), pp. 67-74.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser

The Use of Technology: A Case Study of Children
Gonczol, K., 2016. Civil Rights in Hungary at the End of the Twentieth Century-1217
Recommendations in 2000-Report of the Parliamentary Commissioner for Civil
Rights. Budapestinensis Rolando Eotvos Nominatae, 45(7), pp. 45-56.
Rudžionis, V., 2013. Assistive tools for the motor-handicapped people using speech
technologies: Lithuanian case. In International Conference on Business Information
Systems, 68(8), pp. 55-73.
Serpell, R., 2016. Services for disabled children are relatively scarce in Third World
countries. Recently a debate has emerged regardıng the best strategy for their
expansion. The approach advocated by the World Health Organization, 5(76), pp. 59-
63.
Windschitl, M., 2017. Tracing teachers’ use of technology in a laptop computer school: The
interplay of teacher beliefs, social dynamics, and institutional culture. American
educational research journal, 56(7), pp. 42-61.
Gonczol, K., 2016. Civil Rights in Hungary at the End of the Twentieth Century-1217
Recommendations in 2000-Report of the Parliamentary Commissioner for Civil
Rights. Budapestinensis Rolando Eotvos Nominatae, 45(7), pp. 45-56.
Rudžionis, V., 2013. Assistive tools for the motor-handicapped people using speech
technologies: Lithuanian case. In International Conference on Business Information
Systems, 68(8), pp. 55-73.
Serpell, R., 2016. Services for disabled children are relatively scarce in Third World
countries. Recently a debate has emerged regardıng the best strategy for their
expansion. The approach advocated by the World Health Organization, 5(76), pp. 59-
63.
Windschitl, M., 2017. Tracing teachers’ use of technology in a laptop computer school: The
interplay of teacher beliefs, social dynamics, and institutional culture. American
educational research journal, 56(7), pp. 42-61.
1 out of 8
Related Documents

Your All-in-One AI-Powered Toolkit for Academic Success.
+13062052269
info@desklib.com
Available 24*7 on WhatsApp / Email
Unlock your academic potential
© 2024 | Zucol Services PVT LTD | All rights reserved.